Atmospheric Chemistry and Astrophysics

James_ wrote:
This is all I have to work with. My camcorder is okay but I like recording videos with my tablet better. I had to buy a computer that's solid state and with a good video card for working with SketchUp.
If I do any charity work helping to design and build power stations for impoverished or off grid living then I'll probably use SketchUp to share work with.
Then everyone will be on the same page so to speak while you'll be sitting at home bored.

p.s., You should get a hobby and read a few books.When I worked at Boeing, during employee indoctrination they stressed the importance of having interests. They told us that the average retiree only collected 18 social security checks. Want to collect more checks? Have interests, be active.

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
This is all I have to work with. My camcorder is okay but I like recording videos with my tablet better. I had to buy a computer that's solid state and with a good video card for working with SketchUp.
If I do any charity work helping to design and build power stations for impoverished or off grid living then I'll probably use SketchUp to share work with.
Then everyone will be on the same page so to speak while you'll be sitting at home bored.

p.s., You should get a hobby and read a few books.When I worked at Boeing, during employee indoctrination they stressed the importance of having interests. They told us that the average retiree only collected 18 social security checks. Want to collect more checks? Have interests, be active.

When I worked a hobby and read at told us the average read at to collected image:
p.s., You should get a few books.When I worked the active.
Attachecks? Have image:
p.s., You should us the average:
p.s., You should get a hobby and retiree interests. They stressed at told us that Boeing interests, be active.
Attachecks. They to collect more checks? Haverage:
p.s., You should us they to collect more checks.When I worked 18 social securination they told get a hobby and read at Boeing interests.

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
This is all I have to work with. My camcorder is okay but I like recording videos with my tablet better. I had to buy a computer that's solid state and with a good video card for working with SketchUp.
If I do any charity work helping to design and build power stations for impoverished or off grid living then I'll probably use SketchUp to share work with.
Then everyone will be on the same page so to speak while you'll be sitting at home bored.

p.s., You should get a hobby and read a few books.When I worked at Boeing, during employee indoctrination they stressed the importance of having interests. They told us that the average retiree only collected 18 social security checks. Want to collect more checks? Have interests, be active.

When I worked a hobby and read at told us the average read at to collected image:
p.s., You should get a few books.When I worked the active.
Attachecks? Have image:
p.s., You should us the average:
p.s., You should get a hobby and retiree interests. They stressed at told us that Boeing interests, be active.
Attachecks. They to collect more checks? Haverage:
p.s., You should us they to collect more checks.When I worked 18 social securination they told get a hobby and read at Boeing interests.

Теперь Я хочу здрузамати или понимать ваших проблема. Я не понимаю что вас сказать.
Ты знаешь изучаете по Английский? Его могла быль помешать. Я буду разговор по Английский если ты говоришь по Английский, да? Да!



I want to heal or understand what to tell your problem. I want to tell talk in English? It could have been problem. I don't understand what to tell you speak English if you.
Do your prevented. I'll you are studying English if you.
Do you.
Do your prevented. I don't understand you speak English, right? Yes! Now you.
Do you know you.
Do you are studying English? It could have been problem. I don't understand what to heal or understand you are studying English, right? Yes! Now you speak English? It
KZNuqhd5Doq[/url]https://youtu.be/rHBxJCq99jA?si=LbKuPKZNuqhd5Doq[/url]

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
This is all I have to work with. My camcorder is okay but I like recording videos with my tablet better. I had to buy a computer that's solid state and with a good video card for working with SketchUp.
If I do any charity work helping to design and build power stations for impoverished or off grid living then I'll probably use SketchUp to share work with.
Then everyone will be on the same page so to speak while you'll be sitting at home bored.

p.s., You should get a hobby and read a few books.When I worked at Boeing, during employee indoctrination they stressed the importance of having interests. They told us that the average retiree only collected 18 social security checks. Want to collect more checks? Have interests, be active.

When I worked a hobby and read at told us the average read at to collected image:
p.s., You should get a few books.When I worked the active.
Attachecks? Have image:
p.s., You should us the average:
p.s., You should get a hobby and retiree interests. They stressed at told us that Boeing interests, be active.
Attachecks. They to collect more checks? Haverage:
p.s., You should us they to collect more checks.When I worked 18 social securination they told get a hobby and read at Boeing interests.

Теперь Я хочу здрузамати или понимать ваших проблема. Я не понимаю что вас сказать.
Ты знаешь изучаете по Английский? Его могла быль помешать. Я буду разговор по Английский если ты говоришь по Английский, да? Да!

p.s., Feliz Navidad, God Jule, if you want to be a Grinch, that's up to you. A little music from Cindy Lou Who (she costarred with Jim Carry);
https://youtu.be/rHBxJCq99jA?si=LbKuPKZNuqhd5Doq

Swan wrote:


Yesterday you claimed to have worked for Boeing
The day before that you had NY Times proof that no one knows how planes stay in the air, and the day before that I called you a loon playing a psychological game with yourself.


So as always

130 Bernoulli approved

Now hand over the missile keys already

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:


Yesterday you claimed to have worked for Boeing
The day before that you had NY Times proof that no one knows how planes stay in the air, and the day before that I called you a loon playing a psychological game with yourself.


So as always

130 Bernoulli approved

Now hand over the missile keys already

You need to explain why Bernoulli matters. I mean fluid dynamics would have to do with piping a liquid from point A to point B. With oil, its pressure will drop between pumping stations. Those stations will use centrifugal pumps and when they take suction on a pipe or tank then it's under vacuum.
Can you explain how Bernoulli's principle affects the work an oil pipeline does?
When I served in the Navy I pumped a lot of water and oil as well as purifying oil.
I could tell you but it'd be like all those times when you said you can post what I can post, you need to understand what you're posting. There's a simple explanation for Bernoulli's principle and I'll give you time to consider it and post it.

p.s., One thing I like is that I've been able to organize and simplify everything I'm working on. And one thing I realized about math, building and science, I can do it my way and enjoy it. That's what happens when a person does original or unrealized work (Bessler's Wheel).

James_ wrote:
Alan, This is an example of a teacher teaching his student(s).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0euyDNGEiZ4 And yet you claim this is how you teach me. And I can't say I went to school in the U.S. Navy for propulsion engineering or that I took off hour training at Boeing.
What you failed to do was explain why pressure and velocity in a fluid/liquid being piped has a relationship. It seems like you copy and pasted your answer and then used a poor attitude to dare me to challenge you. That is not how debates or discussions work. And it does help if you're familiar with math and ratios. With Bernoulli's principle, it can be factored as f(x) = Δy/Δx.
And now you can give the correct answer. The answer might apply to seawater desalination using a reverse osmosis filter as well.

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
Alan, This is an example of a teacher teaching his student(s).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0euyDNGEiZ4 And yet you claim this is how you teach me. And I can't say I went to school in the U.S. Navy for propulsion engineering or that I took off hour training at Boeing.
What you failed to do was explain why pressure and velocity in a fluid/liquid being piped has a relationship. It seems like you copy and pasted your answer and then used a poor attitude to dare me to challenge you. That is not how debates or discussions work. And it does help if you're familiar with math and ratios. With Bernoulli's principle, it can be factored as f(x) = Δy/Δx.
And now you can give the correct answer. The answer might apply to seawater desalination using a reverse osmosis filter as well.

Why do I need to explain anything to a moron that is too dumb to know that air is a fluid?

ROTMFFLMMFAOA

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
Alan, This is an example of a teacher teaching his student(s).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0euyDNGEiZ4 And yet you claim this is how you teach me. And I can't say I went to school in the U.S. Navy for propulsion engineering or that I took off hour training at Boeing.
What you failed to do was explain why pressure and velocity in a fluid/liquid being piped has a relationship. It seems like you copy and pasted your answer and then used a poor attitude to dare me to challenge you. That is not how debates or discussions work. And it does help if you're familiar with math and ratios. With Bernoulli's principle, it can be factored as f(x) = Δy/Δx.
And now you can give the correct answer. The answer might apply to seawater desalination using a reverse osmosis filter as well.

Why do I need to explain anything to a moron that is too dumb to know that air is a fluid?

ROTMFFLMMFAOA

You claim to be teaching me, remember? Maybe you'll ask Scott to ban me?
Oops, we're not at besslerwheel. Why do you expect me to prove myself to you?
You say perpetual motion is impossible in a perpetual motion forum. How does that make any sense?
Alan, you miss the most basic principle between fluid dynamics and pneumatics.
And that is that air and liquids exert force in ALL directions equally. When the velocity of air is increased as it moves over a wing, it is not exerting force in all directions equally. When it's moving OVER a wing it is exerting force perpendicular to the wing, ie., the vacuum it creates.
Then the air UNDER the wing creates a pressure differential. Kind of why planes fly nose up, to account for the downward push when air moving OVER the wing is accelerated. This means that the fuselage also helps to create lift as well. You need to understand the basics before you show how abusive you are because why learn, right?
With Bernoulli's principle, pressure/force is conserved as linear momentum. It might be that it's not possible for you to learn because you've been allowed to be abusive for so many years you don't know anything else. And this prevents explaining how the energy air has at altitude has a parallel with water without it being a fluid as you just claimed.

keepit wrote:
Swan,
James is right. There has been debate about what makes a wing fly. Back in the days of the bi wing planes i was taught the old static and dynamic pressure theory and i just accepted it and believed it. Actually i learned the theory more recently than the bi wing days. They've added a few factors to the old theory.
Personally, i believe and believed that the plane flew because i believed it would fly. It worked for me.

We used to call it flying on a wing and a prayer.

keepit wrote:
Swan,
James is right. There has been debate about what makes a wing fly. Back in the days of the bi wing planes i was taught the old static and dynamic pressure theory and i just accepted it and believed it. Actually i learned the theory more recently than the bi wing days. They've added a few factors to the old theory.
Personally, i believe and believed that the plane flew because i believed it would fly. It worked for me.

We used to call it flying on a wing and a prayer.

James_ wrote:

keepit wrote:
Swan,
James is right. There has been debate about what makes a wing fly. Back in the days of the bi wing planes i was taught the old static and dynamic pressure theory and i just accepted it and believed it. Actually i learned the theory more recently than the bi wing days. They've added a few factors to the old theory.
Personally, i believe and believed that the plane flew because i believed it would fly. It worked for me.

We used to call it flying on a wing and a prayer.

With air at altitude, it will have more protons/neutrons per liter. And with about
KE = 3115.99 joules per mol or 139 joules per liter creates an opposing force.
At sea level, there will be fewer molecules of air so they'll have more velocity/KE.
Why it's warmer at sea level. Scientists don't consider the atmosphere to be denser in the upper troposphere into the tropopause. They forgot about mass escape velocity which is considered 11.2 km/s and air in the atmosphere moves at 0.45 km/s, about 1/20th of mass escape velocity and that altitude is out in space basically. It'll be strange in a way saying that air has so much energy when yet it's hardly noticed unless the wind blows.

Swan wrote:

1. Air itself is not a molecule, but a combination of diatomic and triatomic molecules and Argon.
2. At sea level there are more and not less combinations of molecules, and a correspondingly higher number of subatomic particles as every third grader and you all know quite well.
3. Math at your grade level. If you have three apples, two pears and one orange and you give one apple to Tom, how many grapes does Cindy have?

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

1. Air itself is not a molecule, but a combination of diatomic and triatomic molecules and Argon.
2. At sea level there are more and not less combinations of molecules, and a correspondingly higher number of subatomic particles as every third grader and you all know quite well.
3. Math at your grade level. If you have three apples, two pears and one orange and you give one apple to Tom, how many grapes does Cindy have?

At the moment I am repurposing wood. The dried glue is just stain on the plywood. It's smooth and is ready to be put to a new use. I created a 23º angle in my levers. Some clean up will be necessary but that's okay. I'm hoping to finish it well before Christmas so Saxony, Germany can know that a part of their history has been realized.
With the work I'm getting done and seeing it all come together, I doubt you'll be able to ruin things for me. As you said, you're not on my YouTube channel and a lot of people like the work I'm doing.
With me it won't be surprising if some people will want me to do a live stream to discuss the math and how they can simplify it. You know, why would they need to spend years learning math like I have when I could let them know a good place to start when considering conservation of momentum.

With air, what you've overlooked is at what velocity does the wind create lbs. of force? That shows how compressive air is in the atmosphere. And that increases the energy that air has. Basically air away from the plane will push back against the air the plane itself is moving. This gets into calculus and considering fields and unions like this video shows;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSNf8hiYhBE&t=3s

If you can understand basic math like that Alan then you could consider the underneath of an airplane is pushing air downward. There will be a union where other air will push back. But I doubt you can do this simple math. You'll have to think and you weren't taught to do that in church.

p.s., Merry Christmas!

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

1. Air itself is not a molecule, but a combination of diatomic and triatomic molecules and Argon.
2. At sea level there are more and not less combinations of molecules, and a correspondingly higher number of subatomic particles as every third grader and you all know quite well.
3. Math at your grade level. If you have three apples, two pears and one orange and you give one apple to Tom, how many grapes does Cindy have?

At the moment I am repurposing wood. The dried glue is just stain on the plywood. It's smooth and is ready to be put to a new use. I created a 23º angle in my levers. Some clean up will be necessary but that's okay. I'm hoping to finish it well before Christmas so Saxony, Germany can know that a part of their history has been realized.
With the work I'm getting done and seeing it all come together, I doubt you'll be able to ruin things for me. As you said, you're not on my YouTube channel and a lot of people like the work I'm doing.
With me it won't be surprising if some people will want me to do a live stream to discuss the math and how they can simplify it. You know, why would they need to spend years learning math like I have when I could let them know a good place to start when considering conservation of momentum.

With air, what you've overlooked is at what velocity does the wind create lbs. of force? That shows how compressive air is in the atmosphere. And that increases the energy that air has. Basically air away from the plane will push back against the air the plane itself is moving. This gets into calculus and considering fields and unions like this video shows;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSNf8hiYhBE&t=3s

If you can understand basic math like that Alan then you could consider the underneath of an airplane is pushing air downward. There will be a union where other air will push back. But I doubt you can do this simple math. You'll have to think and you weren't taught to do that in church.

p.s., Merry Christmas!

You go right ahead and invent the Bessler wheel, which by the way was invented by Johan Bessler in 1712, not sure if his family will bother to sue you for copyright or name infringement since the thang dunt wurkz. See if I care because I am inventing toothpaste in response to my last invention which I named corn flakes.

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

1. Air itself is not a molecule, but a combination of diatomic and triatomic molecules and Argon.
2. At sea level there are more and not less combinations of molecules, and a correspondingly higher number of subatomic particles as every third grader and you all know quite well.
3. Math at your grade level. If you have three apples, two pears and one orange and you give one apple to Tom, how many grapes does Cindy have?

At the moment I am repurposing wood. The dried glue is just stain on the plywood. It's smooth and is ready to be put to a new use. I created a 23º angle in my levers. Some clean up will be necessary but that's okay. I'm hoping to finish it well before Christmas so Saxony, Germany can know that a part of their history has been realized.
With the work I'm getting done and seeing it all come together, I doubt you'll be able to ruin things for me. As you said, you're not on my YouTube channel and a lot of people like the work I'm doing.
With me it won't be surprising if some people will want me to do a live stream to discuss the math and how they can simplify it. You know, why would they need to spend years learning math like I have when I could let them know a good place to start when considering conservation of momentum.

With air, what you've overlooked is at what velocity does the wind create lbs. of force? That shows how compressive air is in the atmosphere. And that increases the energy that air has. Basically air away from the plane will push back against the air the plane itself is moving. This gets into calculus and considering fields and unions like this video shows;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSNf8hiYhBE&t=3s

If you can understand basic math like that Alan then you could consider the underneath of an airplane is pushing air downward. There will be a union where other air will push back. But I doubt you can do this simple math. You'll have to think and you weren't taught to do that in church.

p.s., Merry Christmas!

You go right ahead and invent the Bessler wheel, which by the way was invented by Johan Bessler in 1712, not sure if his family will bother to sue you for copyright or name infringement since the thang dunt wurkz. See if I care because I am inventing toothpaste in response to my last invention which I named corn flakes.

I'm also watching a Christmas movie. What are you doing?

James_ wrote:
Alan, have you thought about saying something worth saying?

James_ wrote:
I just thought of something cool I can do once I successfully demonstrate my experiment. It'll help to demonstrate external forces that exert an influence on the Earth's atmosphere.
And I'll probably have a nicely equipped wood shop and some machining equipment (CNC mill as well as a Bridgeport mill as examples) as well to work with. It'll be a strange situation. I'll have my own company Free Energy Systems as well as research in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics to keep me busy.
I think this will open a lot of doors for me. What Americans might not like is that people told me they can't let me have a life here. My brother Paul as well as my other brothers haven't had my problems and none of them have a significant service connected hearing loss. That helps to show how important having good hearing is.

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
I just thought of something cool I can do once I successfully demonstrate my experiment. It'll help to demonstrate external forces that exert an influence on the Earth's atmosphere.
And I'll probably have a nicely equipped wood shop and some machining equipment (CNC mill as well as a Bridgeport mill as examples) as well to work with. It'll be a strange situation. I'll have my own company Free Energy Systems as well as research in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics to keep me busy.
I think this will open a lot of doors for me. What Americans might not like is that people told me they can't let me have a life here. My brother Paul as well as my other brothers haven't had my problems and none of them have a significant service connected hearing loss. That helps to show how important having good hearing is.

The instant that you build a Bessler wheel and call this "my experiment" you are guilty of intellectual property theft and will be demonstrating classic delusions of grandeur.

So go for it Shirley

In the early 18th century, J. E. E. Bessler, known as Orffyreus, constructed several wheels that he claimed could keep turning forever, powered only by gravity. He never revealed the details of his invention, but he conducted demonstrations (with the machine's inner workings covered) that persuaded competent observers that he might have discovered the secret of perpetual motion. Among Bessler's defenders were Gottfried Leibniz, Johann Bernoulli, Professor Willem 's Gravesande of Leiden University (who wrote to Isaac Newton on the subject), and Prince Karl, ruler of the German state of Hesse-Kassel. We review Bessler's work, placing it within the context of the intellectual debates of the time about mechanical conservation laws and the (im)possibility of perpetual motion. We also mention Bessler's long career as a confidence man, the details of which were discussed in popular 19th-century German publications, but have remained unfamiliar to authors in other languages.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3097

The internal design of the machine was always closely guarded by its inventor. Plagued by paranoia and a nasty temper, and with no patent laws to protect him, Bessler never arranged payment terms for the wheel. A bitter man, he took his secret to the grave and drifted into obscurity.
https://besslerwheel.com/

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
I just thought of something cool I can do once I successfully demonstrate my experiment. It'll help to demonstrate external forces that exert an influence on the Earth's atmosphere.
And I'll probably have a nicely equipped wood shop and some machining equipment (CNC mill as well as a Bridgeport mill as examples) as well to work with. It'll be a strange situation. I'll have my own company Free Energy Systems as well as research in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics to keep me busy.
I think this will open a lot of doors for me. What Americans might not like is that people told me they can't let me have a life here. My brother Paul as well as my other brothers haven't had my problems and none of them have a significant service connected hearing loss. That helps to show how important having good hearing is.

The instant that you build a Bessler wheel and call this "my experiment" you are guilty of intellectual property theft and will be demonstrating classic delusions of grandeur.

So go for it Shirley

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
I just thought of something cool I can do once I successfully demonstrate my experiment. It'll help to demonstrate external forces that exert an influence on the Earth's atmosphere.
And I'll probably have a nicely equipped wood shop and some machining equipment (CNC mill as well as a Bridgeport mill as examples) as well to work with. It'll be a strange situation. I'll have my own company Free Energy Systems as well as research in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics to keep me busy.
I think this will open a lot of doors for me. What Americans might not like is that people told me they can't let me have a life here. My brother Paul as well as my other brothers haven't had my problems and none of them have a significant service connected hearing loss. That helps to show how important having good hearing is.

The instant that you build a Bessler wheel and call this "my experiment" you are guilty of intellectual property theft and will be demonstrating classic delusions of grandeur.

So go for it Shirley

Do you have only 2 brain cells that work? You know, one got lost and the other one went looking for it?

Yep, I'm a sinner and won't be going to Heaven when I die. Jesus died on the cross for you because he loves you! and not me. Bessler didn't quantify the energy from gravity that he conserved. Yet that isn't my experiment while it is my observation.
This is what will make Christians look bad. You're supposed to have it better than me when I do actual work. It's in the Bible. Yet you could've chosen to work with me and learn something about gravity but instead, being a Christian (rude and insulting) would let you take credit for my work.
And as history goes, I'll be creating Bessler's legacy more inline with what he was known for in none Engelsk snakk areas, where German and not Norske was spoken.
Where it says access paper, those are links to what Alejandro Jenkins wrote.

In the early 18th century, J. E. E. Bessler, known as Orffyreus, constructed several wheels that he claimed could keep turning forever, powered only by gravity. He never revealed the details of his invention, but he conducted demonstrations (with the machine's inner workings covered) that persuaded competent observers that he might have discovered the secret of perpetual motion. Among Bessler's defenders were Gottfried Leibniz, Johann Bernoulli, Professor Willem 's Gravesande of Leiden University (who wrote to Isaac Newton on the subject), and Prince Karl, ruler of the German state of Hesse-Kassel. We review Bessler's work, placing it within the context of the intellectual debates of the time about mechanical conservation laws and the (im)possibility of perpetual motion. We also mention Bessler's long career as a confidence man, the details of which were discussed in popular 19th-century German publications, but have remained unfamiliar to authors in other languages.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3097

And what do your friends at besslerwheel say?

The internal design of the machine was always closely guarded by its inventor. Plagued by paranoia and a nasty temper, and with no patent laws to protect him, Bessler never arranged payment terms for the wheel. A bitter man, he took his secret to the grave and drifted into obscurity.
https://besslerwheel.com/

Notice the difference? People might find it sad that in 2009 when I had cancer I had posted what led to this design. And even with cancer people who claimed to be considering Bessler's Wheel simply had no work to show yet they were the credible ones, you know, like you're credible.

James_ wrote:
Alan, what you're showing is that you failed to plan while I didn't. I think everyone is familiar with the saying People don't plan to fail but they fail to plan. And you'll be an example of what it means to be a "godly" Christian or to be "saved". The church gave you a crutch to lean on so you could be good for nothing (no reason). It simply offered you an easy life in which you don't have to do anything to be that good.

Swan wrote:

Actually

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
188.66 USD
+188.56 (188,555.00%)all time

Now what was your plan?

Carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) are each important to climate forcing and to the levels of stratospheric ozone (see Chapter 2). In terms of the globally averaged ozone column, additional N2O leads to lower ozone levels, whereas additional CO2 and CH4 lead to higher ozone levels. Ozone depletion to date would have been greater if not for the historical increases in CO2 and CH4.

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

Actually

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
188.66 USD
+188.56 (188,555.00%)all time

Now what was your plan?

And yet you're not showing where you own stock just as you did not show your various computer screens which you use to multitask. People in here know I've worked at things. Doing actual work is not delusional, in Christian terms it would be reaping what I've sown. It won't be surprising if once my work becomes known that people will "flood" this website so they'll see what I've discussed and who I've discussed it with.
An example is that Harvey doesn't know the difference between a crap sack and an ileostomy. he still has all of his original factory equipment so it's understandable that he doesn't know the difference. I might ask for a highly modified procedure to accommodate the diet I'd like to enjoy.
What people will find the most interesting will be discussions about deep sea vents in the seafloor, Einstein's general theory of relativity (light bending) or what the IPCC and NOAA said;

Carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) are each important to climate forcing and to the levels of stratospheric ozone (see Chapter 2). In terms of the globally averaged ozone column, additional N2O leads to lower ozone levels, whereas additional CO2 and CH4 lead to higher ozone levels. Ozone depletion to date would have been greater if not for the historical increases in CO2 and CH4.

When I read that I knew what it meant and that's also posted in here. Some people will find it worth learning about how I started with a basic idea and then developed a more complex understanding. and people will see where you say delusional and they'll also see where there were a lot of discussions over the years.
And you represent what it means to be both a Christian and an American.

p.s., Can you see the 3 crosses in Bessler's drawing and do you what those 3 crosses signifies in Bessler's drawings? What about his Freemason symbol?

James_ wrote:
Do you know what a scary thought is Alan? How many Christians will say you taught me by attacking me. After all, you say I am delusional and then when I work to make it happen Christians will give you credit for motivating me and not my sister for having inspired me. This goes to Christians don't work but are Good For Nothing (no reason).
At the same time I am aware a desalination plant of my design might cost $20 million while a pipeline to Montana will cost about $8 Billion. Then there's the matter of powering the pumps at a much lower cost than what it costs with today's energy which might be fossil fuels.
Yet religious wars have cost the U.S. over $2 Trillion. Kind of shows how misguided religion is. And with irrigating Montana (the U.S. population is expected to grow by about 100 million people over the next 25 years) would show that even Colorado and Utah might be able to be irrigated. And then what I'm pursuing might become a model other countries will use to adapt to climate change.
And what you'll be showing is that Christians want the recognition but aren't willing to do the work to earn the respect they COVET. That's breaking a commandment, Thou Shall Not Covet.

James_ wrote:
Alan, I think you'll get the psychiatric care you need when doctors find out that you've stalked me for 18 years saying I have to marry you. After all, "your tough love" is to make me wanting you to be nice to me. They'll se your abusive behavior for what it is.

James_ wrote:
What will be kind of neat is that I'll probably be the first scientist to map out the tropopause.
While that will seem insignificant, when its altitude or ceiling height changes, this will change the atmospheric pressure below it as well as the stratospheric pressure above it. This is what IMO helps to influence storms and the paths they follow. This might allow for extending weather forecasts out further than 10 days. It's kinda cool that it'll turn out to be important research and it'll help to promote Atmospheric Chemistry and Astrophysics as an extension of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
And for anyone interested, a link to my YouTube channel and my website.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6p2S01II-6I2j46qVXnHXg
https://climate-cycling.com/