Science!

James_ wrote:
How to tell if I've been drinking alcohol?
The Sun's mass is;
1.989 × 10^30 kg

Mercury;
3.285 × 10^23 kg

Venus';
4.867 × 10^24 kg

Earth;
5.972 × 10^24 kg

Mars;
6.39 × 10^23 kg

And all of these values need to be reconciled with both
g = Gm/r^2 and
v = √Gm/r

How to associate all orbital velocities with mass and science. How can
this get any easier, right?

Mercury = 47.36 km/s
Venus....= 35.02 km/s
Earth.....= 29.8...km/s
Mars......= 24.08 km/s

All we need to know to find a common denominator/value.
To use the inverse square law, 35.02/1.91 = 18.34. Yet the Earth's orbital velocity seems to be about 3/4 that of Venus. 18.34/2 x 3 = 27.51.
This is when questions are asked. The math I used wasn't proportional to the inverse square law. And with science, there is a solution.

I'll try for layman's terms. Venus moves about 1/5th the velocity of Earth.
Orbital distances, Venus 67 million miles and the Earth 93 million miles.
35.02 divided by 29.08 = 1.17.
Why does that matter? In gravitational terms it's 1.38. This shows doing some basic math shows something.

James_ wrote:

James_ wrote:
How to tell if I've been drinking alcohol?
The Sun's mass is;
1.989 × 10^30 kg

Mercury;
3.285 × 10^23 kg

Venus';
4.867 × 10^24 kg

Earth;
5.972 × 10^24 kg

Mars;
6.39 × 10^23 kg

And all of these values need to be reconciled with both
g = Gm/r^2 and
v = √Gm/r

How to associate all orbital velocities with mass and science. How can
this get any easier, right?

Mercury = 47.36 km/s
Venus....= 35.02 km/s
Earth.....= 29.8...km/s
Mars......= 24.08 km/s

All we need to know to find a common denominator/value.
To use the inverse square law, 35.02/1.91 = 18.34. Yet the Earth's orbital velocity seems to be about 3/4 that of Venus. 18.34/2 x 3 = 27.51.
This is when questions are asked. The math I used wasn't proportional to the inverse square law. And with science, there is a solution.

I'll try for layman's terms. Venus moves about 1/5th the velocity of Earth.
Orbital distances, Venus 67 million miles and the Earth 93 million miles.
35.02 divided by 29.08 = 1.17.
Why does that matter? In gravitational terms it's 1.38. This shows doing some basic math shows something.

This is the basis of climate change.

James_ wrote:
What scientists will need to consider is that Newton's theory of gravity is his "General" Theory of Gravity.
Mercury = 47.36 km/s density = 5.43 g/cm³ distance from the Sun = 65.514 million km
Venus....= 35.02 km/s density = 5.24 g/cm³ distance from the Sun = 107.82 million km
Earth.....= 29.8...km/s density = 5.51 g/cm³ distance from the Sun = 150 million km
Mars......= 24.08 km/s density = 3.93 g/cm³ distance from the Sun = 236.24 million km

Both Mercury and Venus should be denser than the Earth. It might be possible to use Mars and Earth as a starting point to show a relationship between density, velocity and distance from the Sun. I was
able to find a relationship between the atmospheric pressures of Venus, Earth and Mars.
One theory I'll be promoting is that when the Earth spins faster that the Sun's gravity (orbital velocity)
has less effect on the Earth because of how that energy is conserved. This gets into ice ages and inter-glacial periods. Scientists haven''t figured out yet why they happen.
With this, I'll also need to calculate the Sun's orbital velocity at each distance. Then I'll have 4 values to reconcile with each other. And with this the density of some planets will change. I know the orbital velocity in Venus' orbit is 1.85 times greater than the Earth. And yet Venus' velocity is only 1.175 times faster than the Earth's. And if I divide 1.85 by 1.175 then Venus might be 1.57 times denser than the Earth. What this suggests is that Venus being closer to the Sun is compressed by the function of the Sun's gravity. That would mean that Venus' density is actually 8.6507 g/cm³. And that would help to explain its magnetosphere and atmosphere as well.

Swan wrote:

Yes James, clearly science needs to listen to you, and they might if you can finish the math as perfectly as you can copy it from Nasa's planetary fact sheet

https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/planet_table_ratio.html

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

Yes James, clearly science needs to listen to you, and they might if you can finish the math as perfectly as you can copy it from Nasa's planetary fact sheet

https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/planet_table_ratio.html

It's not that simple and yet it might be. With gravity, it acts on the mass equally.
And this would be where Venus being denser than the Earth would agree with the math while it disagrees with Newton's g = Gm/r^2.
This is because Newton's gravity does not account for an external force acting on a celestial body. If you notice, the density of the Earth is 1 because it is 1 AU or 1 Astronomical Unit. What I posted is that both Mercury and Venus are denser than the Earth because they're closer to the Sun. NASA's fact sheet says they are less dense so I disagree with NASA.

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

Yes James, clearly science needs to listen to you, and they might if you can finish the math as perfectly as you can copy it from Nasa's planetary fact sheet

https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/planet_table_ratio.html

It's not that simple and yet it might be. With gravity, it acts on the mass equally.
And this would be where Venus being denser than the Earth would agree with the math while it disagrees with Newton's g = Gm/r^2.
This is because Newton's gravity does not account for an external force acting on a celestial body. If you notice, the density of the Earth is 1 because it is 1 AU or 1 Astronomical Unit. What I posted is that both Mercury and Venus are denser than the Earth because they're closer to the Sun. NASA's fact sheet says they are less dense so I disagree with NASA.

How did you measure the densities of Mercury and Venus?

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

Yes James, clearly science needs to listen to you, and they might if you can finish the math as perfectly as you can copy it from Nasa's planetary fact sheet

https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/planet_table_ratio.html

It's not that simple and yet it might be. With gravity, it acts on the mass equally.
And this would be where Venus being denser than the Earth would agree with the math while it disagrees with Newton's g = Gm/r^2.
This is because Newton's gravity does not account for an external force acting on a celestial body. If you notice, the density of the Earth is 1 because it is 1 AU or 1 Astronomical Unit. What I posted is that both Mercury and Venus are denser than the Earth because they're closer to the Sun. NASA's fact sheet says they are less dense so I disagree with NASA.

How did you measure the densities of Mercury and Venus?

I only calculated the density of Venus based on the strength of the Sun's gravitational filed relative to that of the Earth.

Swan wrote:

You calculated nothing, other than perhaps the perfect amount of Vaseline needed to get an online psych degree to stick to latex paint without slipping.

When calculating the density of a planet, look up its mass and radius, the latter of which is the distance from the surface to the center. Because planets are roughly spherical, calculate the volume of a sphere using the radius. Then divide the mass by the volume of the sphere to get the density.