The History of Science

James_ wrote:
With science as with anything else, what's the latest? World War I broke out
shortly after Einstein wrote his 1915 on General Relativity (light bending). The
astronomers pursued their images while World War I was being fought. I think their first attempt failed because the war did not allow them to cross the border.
It seems war and economy go hand in hand and this influenced science away from understanding science itself. It's possible that most science since World War I has been to attain an advantage. Most of what I do with climate change and atmospheric chemistry, that won't come with a paycheck, that'd be Bessler's Wheel (perpetual motion) and woodworking.

It's possible that Einstein also gave people something else to consider besides war. And if they would've said then that gravity affecting light proves it has mass
(E = MC^2 and E = hv), we would not be having this conversation today. This is because this conservation would've happened 100 years ago.
And as everyone in here knows by now, dark matter acts on matter at the gravitational level, why light is matter and has mass.

p.s., I might be seen at Star Trek conventions. Then it might not be an issue discussing the difference between a warp drive and an impulse engine. One scientist has already demonstrated a tractor beam in his laboratory;
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a42676079/scientists-build-working-tractor-beam/

Replicators and transporters up to a point are also the same things. Just a lot on Star Trek that has already been done.

James_ wrote:
With science as with anything else, what's the latest? World War I broke out
shortly after Einstein wrote his 1915 on General Relativity (light bending). The
astronomers pursued their images while World War I was being fought. I think their first attempt failed because the war did not allow them to cross the border.
It seems war and economy go hand in hand and this influenced science away from understanding science itself. It's possible that most science since World War I has been to attain an advantage. Most of what I do with climate change and atmospheric chemistry, that won't come with a paycheck, that'd be Bessler's Wheel (perpetual motion) and woodworking.

It's possible that Einstein also gave people something else to consider besides war. And if they would've said then that gravity affecting light proves it has mass
(E = MC^2 and E = hv), we would not be having this conversation today. This is because this conservation would've happened 100 years ago.
And as everyone in here knows by now, dark matter acts on matter at the gravitational level, why light is matter and has mass.

p.s., I might be seen at Star Trek conventions. Then it might not be an issue discussing the difference between a warp drive and an impulse engine. One scientist has already demonstrated a tractor beam in his laboratory;
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a42676079/scientists-build-working-tractor-beam/

Replicators and transporters up to a point are also the same things. Just a lot on Star Trek that has already been done.

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
With science as with anything else, what's the latest? World War I broke out
shortly after Einstein wrote his 1915 on General Relativity (light bending). The
astronomers pursued their images while World War I was being fought. I think their first attempt failed because the war did not allow them to cross the border.
It seems war and economy go hand in hand and this influenced science away from understanding science itself. It's possible that most science since World War I has been to attain an advantage. Most of what I do with climate change and atmospheric chemistry, that won't come with a paycheck, that'd be Bessler's Wheel (perpetual motion) and woodworking.

It's possible that Einstein also gave people something else to consider besides war. And if they would've said then that gravity affecting light proves it has mass
(E = MC^2 and E = hv), we would not be having this conversation today. This is because this conservation would've happened 100 years ago.
And as everyone in here knows by now, dark matter acts on matter at the gravitational level, why light is matter and has mass.

p.s., I might be seen at Star Trek conventions. Then it might not be an issue discussing the difference between a warp drive and an impulse engine. One scientist has already demonstrated a tractor beam in his laboratory;
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a42676079/scientists-build-working-tractor-beam/

Replicators and transporters up to a point are also the same things. Just a lot on Star Trek that has already been done.

Did they let you out of the hospital, or did you escape?

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
With science as with anything else, what's the latest? World War I broke out
shortly after Einstein wrote his 1915 on General Relativity (light bending). The
astronomers pursued their images while World War I was being fought. I think their first attempt failed because the war did not allow them to cross the border.
It seems war and economy go hand in hand and this influenced science away from understanding science itself. It's possible that most science since World War I has been to attain an advantage. Most of what I do with climate change and atmospheric chemistry, that won't come with a paycheck, that'd be Bessler's Wheel (perpetual motion) and woodworking.

It's possible that Einstein also gave people something else to consider besides war. And if they would've said then that gravity affecting light proves it has mass
(E = MC^2 and E = hv), we would not be having this conversation today. This is because this conservation would've happened 100 years ago.
And as everyone in here knows by now, dark matter acts on matter at the gravitational level, why light is matter and has mass.

p.s., I might be seen at Star Trek conventions. Then it might not be an issue discussing the difference between a warp drive and an impulse engine. One scientist has already demonstrated a tractor beam in his laboratory;
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a42676079/scientists-build-working-tractor-beam/

Replicators and transporters up to a point are also the same things. Just a lot on Star Trek that has already been done.

Did they let you out of the hospital, or did you escape?

Are you Don Rickles?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu1Jip-2ioQ&t=88s

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
With science as with anything else, what's the latest? World War I broke out
shortly after Einstein wrote his 1915 on General Relativity (light bending). The
astronomers pursued their images while World War I was being fought. I think their first attempt failed because the war did not allow them to cross the border.
It seems war and economy go hand in hand and this influenced science away from understanding science itself. It's possible that most science since World War I has been to attain an advantage. Most of what I do with climate change and atmospheric chemistry, that won't come with a paycheck, that'd be Bessler's Wheel (perpetual motion) and woodworking.

It's possible that Einstein also gave people something else to consider besides war. And if they would've said then that gravity affecting light proves it has mass
(E = MC^2 and E = hv), we would not be having this conversation today. This is because this conservation would've happened 100 years ago.
And as everyone in here knows by now, dark matter acts on matter at the gravitational level, why light is matter and has mass.

p.s., I might be seen at Star Trek conventions. Then it might not be an issue discussing the difference between a warp drive and an impulse engine. One scientist has already demonstrated a tractor beam in his laboratory;
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a42676079/scientists-build-working-tractor-beam/

Replicators and transporters up to a point are also the same things. Just a lot on Star Trek that has already been done.

Did they let you out of the hospital, or did you escape?

Are you Don Rickles?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu1Jip-2ioQ&t=88s

So you escaped as Don Rickles is quite dead I assure you

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
With science as with anything else, what's the latest? World War I broke out
shortly after Einstein wrote his 1915 on General Relativity (light bending). The
astronomers pursued their images while World War I was being fought. I think their first attempt failed because the war did not allow them to cross the border.
It seems war and economy go hand in hand and this influenced science away from understanding science itself. It's possible that most science since World War I has been to attain an advantage. Most of what I do with climate change and atmospheric chemistry, that won't come with a paycheck, that'd be Bessler's Wheel (perpetual motion) and woodworking.

It's possible that Einstein also gave people something else to consider besides war. And if they would've said then that gravity affecting light proves it has mass
(E = MC^2 and E = hv), we would not be having this conversation today. This is because this conservation would've happened 100 years ago.
And as everyone in here knows by now, dark matter acts on matter at the gravitational level, why light is matter and has mass.

p.s., I might be seen at Star Trek conventions. Then it might not be an issue discussing the difference between a warp drive and an impulse engine. One scientist has already demonstrated a tractor beam in his laboratory;
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a42676079/scientists-build-working-tractor-beam/

Replicators and transporters up to a point are also the same things. Just a lot on Star Trek that has already been done.

Did they let you out of the hospital, or did you escape?

Are you Don Rickles?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu1Jip-2ioQ&t=88s

So you escaped as Don Rickles is quite dead I assure you

If you want to buy this, bid on it; https://www.ebay.com/itm/176343834425

And Alan, if the winning bidder meets the reserve they get all tools, wood and builds. The 9th Commandment will send me to Hell if I bare false witness. You taught me what I did not want to know because you are a Christian Prophet as
you said you are. I'm not a christian and don't believe in Jesus. He's for people who are allowed to have a family and I wasn't. The Bible says multiply and I wasn't allowed to.
And Alan, if you finish it then it becomes your invention. Then the other designs can be patented without working. It's not an invention until it works. And as you told me, have surgery without it which is what I'll be doing, being obedient to Jesus' prophet to show respect for my sister who believed in Jesus.

James_ wrote:
If he wasn't a prophet I would not have learned to build his wheel. And who got banned from forums? The person who did not want to serve a prophet.

James_ wrote:
Harvey, I might finally get the ileostomy I've been wanting.