NEW HIGH TEMPERATURE RECORDS CONTINUE TO OUTPACE LOW
| NEW HIGH TEMPERATURE RECORDS CONTINUE TO OUTPACE LOW18-06-2020 16:23 | |
| DRKTS★★☆☆☆ (305) |
In a world with a stable temperature (i.e., no net long-term warming or cooling trends) the number of new high temperature records should be statistically consistent with new low temperature records when averaged over time. When the average temperature of that world changes the normal distribution shifts so there is an imbalance between the two.  We can test what is happening to Earth by checking the data on new high and low temperature records. Year-to-date: 46,500 new high-temp records 17,000 new low-temp records Last 365 days: 110,000 new daily highs 47,000 new daily lows And it has been that way for for over 40 years  Currently we are running at about 2.5:1 over the 2010s. |
| 18-06-2020 16:46 | |
HarveyH55 ★★★★★(5197) |
Really scraping the bottom of the data barrel... Official temperature record keeping started in 1898. Mostly major cities, at first, more monitoring stations added every year. Over the past 120 years, there have been several upgrades, more accurate equipment, automated readings... For you assertion, the methods and equipment would need to stay the same. Even though we use better equipment and methods, the margin of error. is still the same as the 1898 measurements (least reliable data). A lot of room to play with... |
| 18-06-2020 16:51 | |
IBdaMann ★★★★★(14450) |
DRKTS wrote: In a world of honest people, there would not be gullible morons ignoring huge swaths of data as though they don't exist and then pretending that the only data they recognize is, in fact, reality. Honest people don't deny that there are glaciers forming and/or growing and that the total is not known since nobody tracks that. Honest people don't completely deny evaporation of water so as to claim that the ocean is somehow "acidifying." Ignoring evaporation! You've got be kidding. Honest people don't ignore the equivalent amount of cold records as warm records ... and don't claim to know what is happening over all the ocean as though it somehow doesn't "count." Honest people admit when they are simply preaching their religion. Christians can demonstrate how it's done. Ask a Christian what he thinks about God and he'll tell you that it's his faith. Ask a warmizombie why he believes what he believes and he'll instantly starts to HATE you for doubting "science" and for being a fugging "denier ashsole." Warmizombies are dishonest chitheads.  ... Oh, DRKTS ... I suppose you quite conveniently don't have the raw data for this either, so we cannot scrutize everything that was omitted, yes? I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
| 18-06-2020 23:43 | |
Into the Night ★★★★★(21628) |
DRKTS wrote: Nope. Base rate fallacy. DRKTS wrote: Nope. Base rate fallacy. A temperature reading at any weather station is not the temperature of the Earth. DRKTS wrote: The temperature of the Earth is not a probability. DRKTS wrote: Nope. Base rate fallacy. No weather station is measuring the temperature of the Earth. DRKTS wrote: Lie. Every day at every weather station there is a low and high temperature recorded. DRKTS wrote: Longer. Weather stations have been around in the United States since the 1800's. They've existed elsewhere in the world since the 1700's. They have since then recorded a daily high and low temperature at each station. DRKTS wrote: Argument from randU. Bad math. No argument presented. Denial of mathematics. Base rate fallacies. False authority fallacies. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 19-06-2020 10:17 | |
tmiddles ★★★★★(3979) |
DRKTS wrote:This is a brilliant point DRKTS. I wish we had a rebuttal to work with here. |
| 19-06-2020 17:56 | |
| IBdaMann★★★★★ (14450) |
tmiddles wrote:DRKTS wrote:This is a brilliant point DRKTS. I wish we had a rebuttal to work with here. Help me out here. How does one rebut the lack of any point? DRKTS fabricated some numbers. Anyone can do that. Btw ... why do you think that makes for a great point? . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
| 19-06-2020 22:02 | |
| Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
tmiddles wrote:DRKTS wrote:This is a brilliant point DRKTS. I wish we had a rebuttal to work with here. RQAA. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
Join the debate NEW HIGH TEMPERATURE RECORDS CONTINUE TO OUTPACE LOW:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| Can we trust the satellite and surface-based temperature records? | 1 | 23-04-2024 16:21 |
| Present temperature spike July '23 | 31 | 27-09-2023 00:27 |
| Surface temperature of earth according to Boltzmann law | 56 | 10-05-2023 15:46 |
| Greenhouse gases cool better and cause lower surface temperature of earth than non greenhouse gases | 3 | 10-05-2023 08:27 |
| Low temperature breaks record set over 100 years ago, proving climate change is real | 28 | 01-06-2022 06:03 |