Wow!

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > Wow! > Page 4

Page 4 of 4

21-03-2021 00:49
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14475)	keepit wrote:ibd, Re: Captain Wang. I can't imagine any responsible adult being friends with the likes of you. This is not the first time you have detailed heavy limitations on your imagination. Also there is no such thing as "the likes" of me since there is no one else like me. Now I have seen a bunch of doorknobs that are very much like you with the same track record of getting things correct but you just won't find anyone like me. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
21-03-2021 02:19
Into the Night★★★★★ (21699)	keepit wrote: A lot of misinterpretations itn, Void argument fallacy. keepit wrote: and i'm using a polite word although i don't know why. Nah. You're just being an imbecile. keepit wrote: He wasn't crazy Never said he was. Pay attention. keepit wrote: and he wasn't stressed. All air traffic controllers are stressed. Stress is part of the job. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
21-03-2021 02:49
James___ ★★★★★ (5513)	Into the Night wrote: keepit wrote: A lot of misinterpretations itn, Void argument fallacy. keepit wrote: and i'm using a polite word although i don't know why. Nah. You're just being an imbecile. keepit wrote: He wasn't crazy Never said he was. Pay attention. keepit wrote: and he wasn't stressed. All air traffic controllers are stressed. Stress is part of the job. Would you like some cheese to go with your whine sir?
21-03-2021 03:11
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14475)	James___ wrote:Most of these guys must have miserable lives. Most? What percentage? What is the domain of people in question? Who comprise the domain of people in question? Am I one of them? Thanks in advance for the info. I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :sigh* Not the "raw data" crap.* - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
21-03-2021 05:05
duncan61 ★★★★★ (2021)	Bring back Ted Striker from flying high

23-03-2021 21:57
S@ve0ur3arth ☆☆☆☆☆ (29)	IBdaMann wrote: keepit wrote: If the money is sent to the lowest earners Money is not "sent.". Money is not "distributed" Money is earned by adding value. If you punish the successful by confiscating the rewards for adding value, everyone will stop adding value. Everyone will instead stop working and simply line up for the free government distribution check ... until the government has no more money to redistribute. I notice that every economic-related idea of yours is an economy killer. . If the vast majority of a society thinks that money is like a big cake that needs to be distributed...well, there you have the recipe for disaster.
24-03-2021 02:08
HarveyH55★★★★★ (5197)	S@ve0ur3arth wrote: IBdaMann wrote: keepit wrote: If the money is sent to the lowest earners Money is not "sent.". Money is not "distributed" Money is earned by adding value. If you punish the successful by confiscating the rewards for adding value, everyone will stop adding value. Everyone will instead stop working and simply line up for the free government distribution check ... until the government has no more money to redistribute. I notice that every economic-related idea of yours is an economy killer. . Money is pretty much useless, if there is nothing to buy. Money is useless, when you can't carry enough, to buy even the simplest things. If the vast majority of a society thinks that money is like a big cake that needs to be distributed...well, there you have the recipe for disaster.
24-03-2021 05:43
James___ ★★★★★ (5513)	HarveyH55 wrote: S@ve0ur3arth wrote: IBdaMann wrote: keepit wrote: If the money is sent to the lowest earners Money is not "sent.". Money is not "distributed" Money is earned by adding value. If you punish the successful by confiscating the rewards for adding value, everyone will stop adding value. Everyone will instead stop working and simply line up for the free government distribution check ... until the government has no more money to redistribute. I notice that every economic-related idea of yours is an economy killer. . Money is pretty much useless, if there is nothing to buy. Money is useless, when you can't carry enough, to buy even the simplest things. If the vast majority of a society thinks that money is like a big cake that needs to be distributed...well, there you have the recipe for disaster. IBDM, you should've given him red eyes. That way he could say that Pre died for a cause and he wasn't it. Just another loser. And for a pic of a naked woman; simply have to be banned for posting a nude picture. IBDM's rules. If he doesn't ban me for this then we need a new politburo. спасебо бок! Её музыка, Спасибо вас. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOgpT5rEKIU Attached image: Edited on 24-03-2021 05:52
24-03-2021 05:58
James___ ★★★★★ (5513)	And IBDM, you did say that I would be banned for posting pictures of naked women. I posted a video of a naked woman (and a picture as well). Your only option is to ban me. I said NO to your authoritarianism. I am wrong and you are right. I have to accept my punishment. I am bad and you are good. Edited on 24-03-2021 06:01
24-03-2021 06:30
HarveyH55★★★★★ (5197)	James___ wrote: And IBDM, you did say that I would be banned for posting pictures of naked women. I posted a video of a naked woman (and a picture as well). Your only option is to ban me. I said NO to your authoritarianism. I am wrong and you are right. I have to accept my punishment. I am bad and you are good. Actually, you are likely mentally ill, and should check into the VA hospital for evaluation and treatment. A couple jolts of E.C.T. should be sufficient. You can't discuss any topic, without turning it into a whiskey-rant, pity-party, or porn. You are desperate for attention, any kind will do. So why not take it to those who can give you the attention you need, and deserve.
24-03-2021 15:12
gfm7175★★★★★ (3314)	HarveyH55 wrote: James___ wrote: And IBDM, you did say that I would be banned for posting pictures of naked women. I posted a video of a naked woman (and a picture as well). Your only option is to ban me. I said NO to your authoritarianism. I am wrong and you are right. I have to accept my punishment. I am bad and you are good. Actually, you are likely mentally ill, and should check into the VA hospital for evaluation and treatment. A couple jolts of E.C.T. should be sufficient. You can't discuss any topic, without turning it into a whiskey-rant, pity-party, or porn. You are desperate for attention, any kind will do. So why not take it to those who can give you the attention you need, and deserve. Bingo.

Page 4 of 4

Join the debate Wow!: