Remember me
▼ Content

Satellite Measurements-- Sea Level Rise


Satellite Measurements-- Sea Level Rise13-02-2018 06:50
litesong
★★★★★
(2350)
New study confirms that oceans are rising quicker:
http://ktla.com/2018/02/12/sea-level-rise-is-speeding-up-25-years-of-satellite-data-show-study/
13-02-2018 09:33
Into the Night
★★★★★
(4849)
More random numbers.
13-02-2018 09:56
Tim the plumber
★★★★☆
(1035)
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/02/06/1717312115

If you look at the acrtual study they are talking about the graphs show no real acceleration.

Edited on 13-02-2018 09:57
13-02-2018 15:17
GasGuzzler
★★★☆☆
(915)
That projection agrees perfectly with climate models used in the latest International Panel on Climate Change report, which show sea level rise to be between 52 and 98 centimeters by 2100

Somewhere between 52 and 98 is perfection, eh?


Think ITN is right. More random numbers.
13-02-2018 16:31
Tim the plumber
★★★★☆
(1035)
The graphs show a rise of about 1.5mm/yr.

That's 6 inches by 2100 over the 2000 level. Or 5 inches over now.
13-02-2018 21:20
Into the Night
★★★★★
(4849)
It's not possible to measure sea level to this kind of accuracy. There is no valid reference point for it.

The only reference points for a local sea level is a land station (such as a tide station) or the reference beacon located at Boulder, CO for the satellite system.

Both are located on land. Land moves. It rises, it sinks, it moves from side to side, etc.
13-02-2018 23:08
litesong
★★★★★
(2350)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" bluffed: ... moves .... rises....sinks....side to side...
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" NEVER rises, sinks or moves side to side from being an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner.
14-02-2018 23:39
Wake
★★★★★
(3114)
Tim the plumber wrote:
The graphs show a rise of about 1.5mm/yr.

That's 6 inches by 2100 over the 2000 level. Or 5 inches over now.


Remember when I poked into it I discovered that NASA was suddenly claiming that the Earth's mantle was shrinking (with no evidence) so they added "ocean rise" to make up for this shrinking.

In fact the rise of the oceans hadn't changed at all since the civil war unless is has been reducing since that was the end of the little ice age and the time that the Greenland glaciers started shrinking back to their original bases.

After the civil war the oceans were rising 1 mm per year. NASA has since told us that the mantle is shrinking 1 mm per year so IF the 1.5 mm "rise" is accurate it means that in fact the sea levels have slowed their rise as one would expect since all of the low latitude glaciers have gone back pretty much to their original positions.
15-02-2018 00:16
Into the Night
★★★★★
(4849)
Wake wrote:
Tim the plumber wrote:
The graphs show a rise of about 1.5mm/yr.

That's 6 inches by 2100 over the 2000 level. Or 5 inches over now.


Remember when I poked into it I discovered that NASA was suddenly claiming that the Earth's mantle was shrinking (with no evidence) so they added "ocean rise" to make up for this shrinking.

In fact the rise of the oceans hadn't changed at all since the civil war unless is has been reducing since that was the end of the little ice age and the time that the Greenland glaciers started shrinking back to their original bases.

After the civil war the oceans were rising 1 mm per year. NASA has since told us that the mantle is shrinking 1 mm per year so IF the 1.5 mm "rise" is accurate it means that in fact the sea levels have slowed their rise as one would expect since all of the low latitude glaciers have gone back pretty much to their original positions.


Why would the mantle shrink? Does NASA say?


The Parrot Killer
17-02-2018 07:27
litesong
★★★★★
(2350)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight: bluffed: More random numbers.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" is non-randomly wrong.




Join the debate Satellite Measurements-- Sea Level Rise:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Tanker makes solo voyage through melting Arctic Sea1017-02-2018 07:50
Oklahoma Earthquakes And The Rise In Fracking1021-12-2017 19:30
Arctic Sea Ice Minimum Volumes 1979-2017 in 30 seconds908-12-2017 07:29
New Federal Report, Approved by White House, Predicts 5C Rise by 21007318-11-2017 17:25
Arctic sea ice loss, negative or positive feedback?4608-08-2017 23:21
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2017 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact