Remember me
▼ Content

Satellite Measurements-- Sea Level Rise


Satellite Measurements-- Sea Level Rise13-02-2018 07:50
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
New study confirms that oceans are rising quicker:
http://ktla.com/2018/02/12/sea-level-rise-is-speeding-up-25-years-of-satellite-data-show-study/
13-02-2018 10:33
Into the Night
★★★★★
(7012)
More random numbers.
13-02-2018 10:56
Tim the plumber
★★★★☆
(1284)
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/02/06/1717312115

If you look at the acrtual study they are talking about the graphs show no real acceleration.

Edited on 13-02-2018 10:57
13-02-2018 16:17
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1097)
That projection agrees perfectly with climate models used in the latest International Panel on Climate Change report, which show sea level rise to be between 52 and 98 centimeters by 2100

Somewhere between 52 and 98 is perfection, eh?


Think ITN is right. More random numbers.
13-02-2018 17:31
Tim the plumber
★★★★☆
(1284)
The graphs show a rise of about 1.5mm/yr.

That's 6 inches by 2100 over the 2000 level. Or 5 inches over now.
13-02-2018 22:20
Into the Night
★★★★★
(7012)
It's not possible to measure sea level to this kind of accuracy. There is no valid reference point for it.

The only reference points for a local sea level is a land station (such as a tide station) or the reference beacon located at Boulder, CO for the satellite system.

Both are located on land. Land moves. It rises, it sinks, it moves from side to side, etc.
15-02-2018 00:39
Wake
★★★★★
(3903)
Tim the plumber wrote:
The graphs show a rise of about 1.5mm/yr.

That's 6 inches by 2100 over the 2000 level. Or 5 inches over now.


Remember when I poked into it I discovered that NASA was suddenly claiming that the Earth's mantle was shrinking (with no evidence) so they added "ocean rise" to make up for this shrinking.

In fact the rise of the oceans hadn't changed at all since the civil war unless is has been reducing since that was the end of the little ice age and the time that the Greenland glaciers started shrinking back to their original bases.

After the civil war the oceans were rising 1 mm per year. NASA has since told us that the mantle is shrinking 1 mm per year so IF the 1.5 mm "rise" is accurate it means that in fact the sea levels have slowed their rise as one would expect since all of the low latitude glaciers have gone back pretty much to their original positions.
15-02-2018 01:16
Into the Night
★★★★★
(7012)
Wake wrote:
Tim the plumber wrote:
The graphs show a rise of about 1.5mm/yr.

That's 6 inches by 2100 over the 2000 level. Or 5 inches over now.


Remember when I poked into it I discovered that NASA was suddenly claiming that the Earth's mantle was shrinking (with no evidence) so they added "ocean rise" to make up for this shrinking.

In fact the rise of the oceans hadn't changed at all since the civil war unless is has been reducing since that was the end of the little ice age and the time that the Greenland glaciers started shrinking back to their original bases.

After the civil war the oceans were rising 1 mm per year. NASA has since told us that the mantle is shrinking 1 mm per year so IF the 1.5 mm "rise" is accurate it means that in fact the sea levels have slowed their rise as one would expect since all of the low latitude glaciers have gone back pretty much to their original positions.


Why would the mantle shrink? Does NASA say?


The Parrot Killer
19-11-2018 23:17
Wake
★★★★★
(3903)
Into the Night wrote:
Wake wrote:
Tim the plumber wrote:
The graphs show a rise of about 1.5mm/yr.

That's 6 inches by 2100 over the 2000 level. Or 5 inches over now.


Remember when I poked into it I discovered that NASA was suddenly claiming that the Earth's mantle was shrinking (with no evidence) so they added "ocean rise" to make up for this shrinking.

In fact the rise of the oceans hadn't changed at all since the civil war unless is has been reducing since that was the end of the little ice age and the time that the Greenland glaciers started shrinking back to their original bases.

After the civil war the oceans were rising 1 mm per year. NASA has since told us that the mantle is shrinking 1 mm per year so IF the 1.5 mm "rise" is accurate it means that in fact the sea levels have slowed their rise as one would expect since all of the low latitude glaciers have gone back pretty much to their original positions.


Why would the mantle shrink? Does NASA say?


This is supposedly from a study that showed that the Earth's core is cooling and allowing the mantle to shrink. There is really no way of testing such a thing so this should not have been added to the calculations.
20-11-2018 19:56
Into the Night
★★★★★
(7012)
Wake wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Wake wrote:
Tim the plumber wrote:
The graphs show a rise of about 1.5mm/yr.

That's 6 inches by 2100 over the 2000 level. Or 5 inches over now.


Remember when I poked into it I discovered that NASA was suddenly claiming that the Earth's mantle was shrinking (with no evidence) so they added "ocean rise" to make up for this shrinking.

In fact the rise of the oceans hadn't changed at all since the civil war unless is has been reducing since that was the end of the little ice age and the time that the Greenland glaciers started shrinking back to their original bases.

After the civil war the oceans were rising 1 mm per year. NASA has since told us that the mantle is shrinking 1 mm per year so IF the 1.5 mm "rise" is accurate it means that in fact the sea levels have slowed their rise as one would expect since all of the low latitude glaciers have gone back pretty much to their original positions.


Why would the mantle shrink? Does NASA say?


This is supposedly from a study that showed that the Earth's core is cooling and allowing the mantle to shrink. There is really no way of testing such a thing so this should not have been added to the calculations.


So it's essentially another random number they are using to generate random numbers for data.


The Parrot Killer




Join the debate Satellite Measurements-- Sea Level Rise:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Sharp rise in Arctic temperatures now inevitable – UN214-03-2019 20:27
411.66 PPM: Scientists Alarmed by Early Rise in Atmospheric CO2209-03-2019 16:55
from sea levels to well hydrated trees523-02-2019 05:45
Amy Kloubuchar uses snow to prove there is climate change. Now that's top level Marxism.613-02-2019 23:05
So what if CO2 reaches 450 ppm which is CO2e 600 ppm? It's not like sea will rise.612-02-2019 01:20
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact