Layers of the Atmosphere as Viewed in Blue

James_ wrote:
With this picture, because it was taken from space the curvature of the Earth needs to be considered. The bluest part of the atmosphere might actually be the ozone layer.
And when it becomes lighter blue, the tropopause. And because of the curvature of the Earth, how Lunar lighting and the Sun allows for the tropopause and the stratosphere to be seen in blue, the stratosphere is actually a "thicker" layer than the tropopause.
Scientists will say that the blue light is not what's filtered out by scattering as solar radiation makes its way into the atmosphere. If that's true then why is the stratosphere bluer than the layers below it?
https://www.rmg.co.uk/stories/topics/why-sky-blue

With the Sun setting and then the sky is red, this I think gets into Atmospheric Chemistry and Astrophysics. If I am right then once it becomes known it'll be like gravity. You know, g Gm/r^2.

I think with me I find this interesting which is why I work at it. While it is a lot of work I think it's something that makes the Earth one of the more interesting planets. It's like Beethoven was a great composer and the Earth's atmosphere might've been a symphony by hm or one of his "contemporaries".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjT--ByyUVM

James_ wrote:
With this picture, because it was taken from space the curvature of the Earth needs to be considered. The bluest part of the atmosphere might actually be the ozone layer.
And when it becomes lighter blue, the tropopause. And because of the curvature of the Earth, how Lunar lighting and the Sun allows for the tropopause and the stratosphere to be seen in blue, the stratosphere is actually a "thicker" layer than the tropopause.
Scientists will say that the blue light is not what's filtered out by scattering as solar radiation makes its way into the atmosphere. If that's true then why is the stratosphere bluer than the layers below it?
https://www.rmg.co.uk/stories/topics/why-sky-blue

With the Sun setting and then the sky is red, this I think gets into Atmospheric Chemistry and Astrophysics. If I am right then once it becomes known it'll be like gravity. You know, g Gm/r^2.

I think with me I find this interesting which is why I work at it. While it is a lot of work I think it's something that makes the Earth one of the more interesting planets. It's like Beethoven was a great composer and the Earth's atmosphere might've been a symphony by hm or one of his "contemporaries".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjT--ByyUVM

James_ wrote:
With this picture, because it was taken from space the curvature of the Earth needs to be considered. The bluest part of the atmosphere might actually be the ozone layer.

IBdaMann wrote:

James_ wrote:
With this picture, because it was taken from space the curvature of the Earth needs to be considered. The bluest part of the atmosphere might actually be the ozone layer.

Do you see any glass?

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

James_ wrote:
With this picture, because it was taken from space the curvature of the Earth needs to be considered. The bluest part of the atmosphere might actually be the ozone layer.

Do you see any glass?

The idiot does not see any glass, they are just a double secret probation agent on the hunt for Alan their dream lover. But keep this quiet because of the double secret probation agents must as said remain secret

IBdaMann wrote:

James_ wrote:
With this picture, because it was taken from space the curvature of the Earth needs to be considered. The bluest part of the atmosphere might actually be the ozone layer.

Do you see any glass?

The ozone layer contains less than 10 parts per million of ozone,

James_ wrote:
When iron from the Copper River in Alaska has a sufficient runoff, it increases the amount of iron in the Alaska Bay. It takes a while for the 2 different types of water to mix when this happens.
With the tropopause, it doesn't like mixing with the troposphere or the stratosphere. The change in color in the image of that part of the Earth's atmosphere is because oxygen (O and O2) are able to be close to the tropopause.
The bluest part might be from the angle the picture is taken from and also that of the Moon's ability to light up the atmosphere.

The ozone layer contains less than 10 parts per million of ozone,

That suggests that ozone wouldn't influence the color of the tropopause or the ozone layer. Why the color of the tropopause and the ozone layer might go from white to bright blue, just the angles of the light source and the camera.
Without glare, how do you see the glass? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC9xQkUtQ98&t=1s

Also, since the tropopause is mostly pure N2 and keeps other gasses out for the most part (why it's mostly pure) it is a barrier. When it stops a cloud from rising, that proves it is a barrier.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-lm&sca_esv=ff6a576cda318133&sca_upv=1&hl=en&sxsrf=AM9HkKnaqcKTl-r2Do4FGPTNrrH1A2odtg:1704388391982&q=anvil+cloud&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjL66bFncSDAxUhroQIHYaPD88Q0pQJegQIEBAB&biw=1918&bih=904&dpr=1#imgrc=6M_AhoScTKrhfM

p.s., It is possible that ozone that is more excited adds more blue. The temperature warms quite a bit in the stratosphere compared to where it meets the tropopause. And then the bluer part of the ozone layer would be where more heat (heat is a flow of energy) is and that would allow for more emissions from both ozone and nitrogen.

James_ wrote:Also, since the tropopause is mostly pure N2

IBdaMann wrote:

James_ wrote:Also, since the tropopause is mostly pure N2

There is nothing in the tropopause. It is a conceptual definition and nothing more.

IBdaMann wrote:
What color is the tropopause when you consider the color filtering effect of the glass around the earth? Is it still in the "blue" range? Does that color have a name? I suggest "tropoglass."

Suggestions? Can someone post a swatch of this color?

Tropospheric ozone chemistry in the Arctic is largely determined by the supply of hydrogen oxide radicals (HO) and nitrogen oxide radicals (NOx), but the processes controlling the abundances of these radicals are poorly understood.
https://www.academia.edu/12675456/The_ARCTAS_aircraft_mission_design_and_execution?email_work_card=thumbnail

James_ wrote: My experiment (CO2 + H2O > CH2O + O2) might help them to understand what processes allows for their observations.

James_ wrote: What I'd be demonstrating is 1 process that does not require solar radiation.

James_ wrote: If it does require solar radiation then is it because solar radiation excites CO2 molecules?

James_ wrote: I think there is a reason why solar radiation won't be necessary.

James_ wrote: I'll save this for another day.

James_ wrote:
And now all I need to do today is find out how many screws I'll need for my build.

James_ wrote: Adding screws to glue will make it more durable and I do consider it an engine.

IBdaMann wrote:

James_ wrote: My experiment (CO2 + H2O > CH2O + O2) might help them to understand what processes allows for their observations.

This is not an experiment. It is a chemical process. Why do you think they need chemical processes to allow them their observations?

James_ wrote: What I'd be demonstrating is 1 process that does not require solar radiation.

Brushing one's teeth comes to mind.

James_ wrote: If it does require solar radiation then is it because solar radiation excites CO2 molecules?

Great news! No solar radiation and no CO2 is required to brush one's teeth.

James_ wrote: I think there is a reason why solar radiation won't be necessary.

Flouride works fine as it is.

James_ wrote: I'll save this for another day.

You'll probably wait until you are going to bed for the night.

James_ wrote:
And now all I need to do today is find out how many screws I'll need for my build.

Tooth enamel doesn't require any screws.

James_ wrote: Adding screws to glue will make it more durable and I do consider it an engine.

Aahhh yes, your V-none engine.

This is not an experiment. It is a chemical process. Why do you think they need chemical processes to allow them their observations?

James_ wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
What color is the tropopause when you consider the color filtering effect of the glass around the earth? Is it still in the "blue" range? Does that color have a name? I suggest "tropoglass."

Suggestions? Can someone post a swatch of this color?

I think it'll shock the world (at least scientists) when they find out that the tropopause is an actual barrier. The question is "What allows for it to be a barrier".
It'll change atmospheric chemistry. Then if the van Allen radiation belts attract the
tropopause, Atmospheric Chemistry and Astrophysics. That's what I'm thinking.

Into the Night wrote: The Van Allen belts are not in the atmosphere.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote: The Van Allen belts are not in the atmosphere.

No, but the Van Allen belt "influences" the tropopause through magnetism, formaldehyde and witty humor.

Scientists who study this phenomenon want to be sure that nothing in their experimental setup is somehow creating the illusion of entanglement, perhaps via some physical mechanism or phenomenon that scientists don't yet know about. In an effort to close a possible loophole in entanglement experiments, a group of researchers used starlight as part of their experiment. The researchers say the results of their work provide further support for this "spooky" phenomenon. [Quantum Entanglement: Love on a Subatomic Scale [url]https://www.space.com/31933-quantum-entanglement-action-at-a-distance.html [/url]]
https://www.space.com/35676-einstein-spooky-action-starlight-quantum-entanglement.html

Into the Night wrote:
Now you're just making random statements again, James.

Magnetism is not thermodynamics. There is no such thing as 'eWeather'. You cannot make heat flow backwards.
The Van Allen belts are not in the atmosphere.

You cannot make heat flow backwards.