06-09-2019 11:01 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote: Then ________? Where did they come from??? You always fail to do the obvious sane thing and answer the what then. Because you have a losing hand you just never put it on the table. Into the Night wrote: Where did that come from? IBD's refrain, which he refuses to explain is: "thermal radiation from a cooler body being absorbed by a warmer body?" and I've of course done that here: https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/net-thermal-radiation-you-in-a-room-as-a-reference--d10-e2769-s160.php Trying to pull a fast one there ITN or just sloppy? "Heating" implies that a colder body could raise the temperature of a warmer body. Not possible. There is the accepted 2nd LTD which I do follow. Me being the text book guy that I am. heat·ed, heat·ing, heats v.tr. 3. Physics To increase the heat energy of (an object). While the cooler bodies radiance is absorbed by the warmer body it loses more than it gains so the thermal energy drops. So using the world "heating" is vague. I have been clear: Radiance from a cooler body is absorbed by a warmer one. |
06-09-2019 18:57 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21863) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote: I'm not going to type the history of any theory here. It would take too long. Go look them up yourself. tmiddles wrote: I did answer it. I told you where to look, liar. tmiddles wrote: This isn't poker, dumbass. tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote: You, or rather, not yet from you. tmiddles wrote: No, you haven't. tmiddles wrote: Inversion fallacy. tmiddles wrote: That's right. tmiddles wrote: But you say it is. Which is it, dude? tmiddles wrote: You are locked in paradox now. Which is it? tmiddles wrote: You are locked in paradox. You aren't a textbook guy, liar. tmiddles wrote: Not vague at all. You would have known that had you actually read a physics textbook, liar. * You can't heat a warmer object with a cooler one. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
07-09-2019 03:09 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:Where did they come from???Go look them up yourself. Where? According to you no textbook can be trusted. You say "look them up". In what? Where? How? Who? The mystery of mysteries. Into the Night wrote:I told you where to look, liar. Ah and the classic "I posted that before but can't be bothered to quote it" in the long winded indiscriminately quoted ramble. Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:That's right. And in net radiantion the hotter object still has a falling temperature though it does absorb the radiance from the cooler object (giving more than it gets). You know this even if you don't believe it so don't play games: tmiddles wrote:(click to see EXAMPLE 1.13): Into the Night wrote:You would have known that had you actually read a physics textbook, Is there a physics textbook you recommend as being reliable? : D Edited on 07-09-2019 03:10 |
07-09-2019 03:28 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21863) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:Where did they come from???Go look them up yourself. All of your questions have been answered before. Repetition fallacy. Argument of the stone fallacy. * You can't heat a warmer object with a colder one. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
07-09-2019 03:36 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote: Nope. You're batting zero. You haven't answered a single one and you lie every-time you claim there is some post from earlier you can't be bothered to quote. Full of it Fallacy |
07-09-2019 04:01 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14507) |
tmiddles wrote: You're batting zero. Ever since you became desperate for a victory (the telltale sign that preaching your religious convictions is your agenda) and desperately needed Into the Night and I to just be wrong about something ... anything at all ... you have tried to turn this into a competition with all sorts of sports/games metaphors ... of course with you as the umpire/referee/statistician/judge/arbiter/sports commentator. I notice, however, that you haven't been able to get out of the starting gate with the ball in your court. It should have been a slam dunk but you fumbled on the kickoff. Now you're getting points deducted for grabbing the cage when everyone was hoping you'd hit it out of the park. Anyway, at the weigh-in you were too light by one repeatable instance of a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The bout has been postponed until you make weight. tmiddles wrote:You haven't answered a single one and you lie every-time you claim there is some post from earlier you can't be bothered to quote. Your laziness is not his fault. tmiddles wrote:Full of it Fallacy Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
07-09-2019 05:51 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote:you became desperate for a victory You and ITN remain utterly defeated. TKO ! : https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/net-thermal-radiation-you-in-a-room-as-a-reference--d10-e2769-s160.php IBdaMann wrote:your agenda) and desperately needed You always stoop to psycho babble insults. But being dead wrong that's all you got. Still no response from either of you to: Name a credible text book? Look up the 2nd LTD where? Where did you learn about it? How are you not freezing to death right now? |
07-09-2019 08:52 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21863) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:you became desperate for a victory Repetitious questions that have already been answered. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 07-09-2019 08:53 |
07-09-2019 11:23 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:questions that have already been answered. Lies. The king of quoting indiscriminately can't quote what he claims exists. |
07-09-2019 19:02 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14507) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:questions that have already been answered. Meanwhile the king of firebrand preaching can't cite one repeatable instance of what he claims occurs naturally. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
07-09-2019 20:14 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21863) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:questions that have already been answered. Contextomy fallacy. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
07-09-2019 23:24 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote: Right here buddy: net-thermal-radiation-you-in-a-room-as-a-reference Someone in a room isn't repeatable you say? Hmmmm. Full of it Fallacy |
08-09-2019 09:07 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21863) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote: Contextomy fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
08-09-2019 22:40 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote: What? Which of those words is a buzzword? "Room"? And how is the context off? Full context: IBdaMann wrote: So both of those "fallacys" don't apply at all. |
08-09-2019 23:16 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21863) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote: Contextomy fallacy. Redirection fallacy. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
09-09-2019 11:04 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
tmiddles wrote: Unanswered. |
09-09-2019 19:24 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21863) |
tmiddles wrote:tmiddles wrote: Obvious. Contextomy fallacy. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
09-09-2019 22:19 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
tmiddles wrote:tmiddles wrote: Stll ITN can't even clarify his own objections |
09-09-2019 22:25 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21863) |
tmiddles wrote:tmiddles wrote:tmiddles wrote: Already have, dumbass. YALIF. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 09-09-2019 22:26 |
09-09-2019 22:49 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:No you just lie and say you've said things but that you can't be bothered to quote them. |
10-09-2019 02:07 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21863) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:No you just lie and say you've said things but that you can't be bothered to quote them. Lie. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
10-09-2019 02:12 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote: I've proven you lie. Try proving I do. |
10-09-2019 02:52 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21863) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote: Lie. Don't need to. Anyone can go look up your posts and see for themselves. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
Threads | Replies | Last post |
Glacial terminal moraine map | 43 | 16-11-2022 09:52 |
Should climate scientist try to regrow the glacial maximum dropping sea levels | 110 | 31-01-2021 16:44 |
What caused Pleistocene to start around 2 million years ago which had periodic glacial interglacial perio | 32 | 05-02-2019 22:29 |
Greenland's Glacial Melt | 24 | 04-09-2017 19:45 |