Funny how none of the geniuses here care about climate change anymore

Swan wrote:
Then this was a bogus board from the start for zombies who always follow the script. Something that I was never particularly good at.

31,000 scientists reject global warming and say "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of scientists working in the field of climate science, and publishing papers on the topic: 97% of the climate scientists surveyed believe "global average temperatures have increased" during the past century; and 97% think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures. What is the significance of these statistics?

31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence"

While polls of scientists actively working in the filed of climate science indicate strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor, 31,000 scientists say there is "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause "catastrophic" heating of the atmosphere.

Now don't forget the memo now. Besides I can respond as I choose, something most of you can only dream of as you must tow the commie line verbatim.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Then this was a bogus board from the start for zombies who always follow the script. Something that I was never particularly good at.

31,000 scientists reject global warming and say "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of scientists working in the field of climate science, and publishing papers on the topic: 97% of the climate scientists surveyed believe "global average temperatures have increased" during the past century; and 97% think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures. What is the significance of these statistics?

31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence"

While polls of scientists actively working in the filed of climate science indicate strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor, 31,000 scientists say there is "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause "catastrophic" heating of the atmosphere.

Now don't forget the memo now. Besides I can respond as I choose, something most of you can only dream of as you must tow the commie line verbatim.

Science is not polls. There is no voting bloc in science.

RenaissanceMan wrote:
One of my 50 websites:

http://AZGOPReward.blogspot.com

Another: http://TheGlobalWarmingFraud.wordpress.com

They go hand in hand with http://DemocratInsanity.blogspot.com

http://JohnPJaeger.com

Swan wrote:Actually a free scientist would be free to vote anyway that they choose, or start any poll that they choose.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually a free scientist would be free to vote anyway that they choose, or start any poll that they choose.

I have always wondered how any free scientist can become a plural. I'm guessing that it is through the unmatched power of poor grammar. If you butcher grammar sufficiently, you can even get gravity to permanently increase temperature and make unobserved events of the distant past in uninhabited locations become "what we know."

Now, you have leveraged poor grammar to overcome the traditional limitations of the Pauli Exclusion Principle.

Awesome!

.

RenaissanceMan wrote:
You better make time boy or else I will hunt you down like a dog....

Swan wrote:You really need to take your pills now

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:You really need to take your pills now

Nope. Now that ya done shone me the power of piss-grammar, I don't need no pills or nuth'n. Ima think'n I shood juss ride my bike by a moraine or two and travel time (cause of them's high gravity).

It be like the dark side of the force field, all seductive 'n crap.

Moraines. Who'da thunk?

Swan wrote:Says the blithering idiot ...

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Then this was a bogus board from the start for zombies who always follow the script. Something that I was never particularly good at.

31,000 scientists reject global warming and say "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of scientists working in the field of climate science, and publishing papers on the topic: 97% of the climate scientists surveyed believe "global average temperatures have increased" during the past century; and 97% think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures. What is the significance of these statistics?

31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence"

While polls of scientists actively working in the filed of climate science indicate strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor, 31,000 scientists say there is "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause "catastrophic" heating of the atmosphere.

Now don't forget the memo now. Besides I can respond as I choose, something most of you can only dream of as you must tow the commie line verbatim.

Science is not polls. There is no voting bloc in science.

Actually a free scientist would be free to vote anyway that they choose, or start any poll that they choose. You need these people to live in fear and only quote the party line. The poll is reality versus the communist climate mind game. The 31000 dissenters are free, unlike you

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Says the blithering idiot ...

Ima take'n after youz'all, cuz yore my heeero.

You done gimme the pow'r of piss-grammar. I can know evrythin' now.

I luv the feeling of beein omnissient, and t' think all I needs is piss-grammar.

Hay Sworn, wanna travel wimme thru time 'n verify the grate flood? We can quantum telePorsche ... cuz it's wut we know.

.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Then this was a bogus board from the start for zombies who always follow the script. Something that I was never particularly good at.

31,000 scientists reject global warming and say "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of scientists working in the field of climate science, and publishing papers on the topic: 97% of the climate scientists surveyed believe "global average temperatures have increased" during the past century; and 97% think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures. What is the significance of these statistics?

31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence"

While polls of scientists actively working in the filed of climate science indicate strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor, 31,000 scientists say there is "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause "catastrophic" heating of the atmosphere.

Now don't forget the memo now. Besides I can respond as I choose, something most of you can only dream of as you must tow the commie line verbatim.

Science is not polls. There is no voting bloc in science.

Actually a free scientist would be free to vote anyway that they choose, or start any poll that they choose. You need these people to live in fear and only quote the party line. The poll is reality versus the communist climate mind game. The 31000 dissenters are free, unlike you

Science is not polls. There is no voting bloc in science.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Says the blithering idiot ...

Ima take'n after youz'all, cuz yore my heeero.

You done gimme the pow'r of piss-grammar. I can know evrythin' now.

I luv the feeling of beein omnissient, and t' think all I needs is piss-grammar.

Hay Sworn, wanna travel wimme thru time 'n verify the grate flood? We can quantum telePorsche ... cuz it's wut we know.

.

Says the blithering idiot who denies the last ice age ever happened, and who mocks himself mercilessly on the internet bragging such and who keeps confusing quantum entanglement with quantum teleportation because his small mind needs to stay in the past that was simpler.

Note. An IQ over your 85 will be required for all quantum entangled discussions, so unfortunately you will need to remain in pre K for the time being, on the plus side for you, both construction paper and finger paints will be provided free of costs.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Then this was a bogus board from the start for zombies who always follow the script. Something that I was never particularly good at.

31,000 scientists reject global warming and say "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of scientists working in the field of climate science, and publishing papers on the topic: 97% of the climate scientists surveyed believe "global average temperatures have increased" during the past century; and 97% think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures. What is the significance of these statistics?

31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence"

While polls of scientists actively working in the filed of climate science indicate strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor, 31,000 scientists say there is "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause "catastrophic" heating of the atmosphere.

Now don't forget the memo now. Besides I can respond as I choose, something most of you can only dream of as you must tow the commie line verbatim.

Science is not polls. There is no voting bloc in science.

Actually a free scientist would be free to vote anyway that they choose, or start any poll that they choose. You need these people to live in fear and only quote the party line. The poll is reality versus the communist climate mind game. The 31000 dissenters are free, unlike you

Science is not polls. There is no voting bloc in science.

Swan wrote:
but by verified scientific facts

Swan wrote:
and at least 31,000 scientist have verified that humans are not causing climate change,

Swan wrote:
formerly called global warming which was dropped as a term, because the globe is in fact warming far slower now than it did 20,000 years ago.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Says the blithering idiot ...

Ima take'n after youz'all, cuz yore my heeero.

You done gimme the pow'r of piss-grammar. I can know evrythin' now.

I luv the feeling of beein omnissient, and t' think all I needs is piss-grammar.

Hay Sworn, wanna travel wimme thru time 'n verify the grate flood? We can quantum telePorsche ... cuz it's wut we know.

.

Says the blithering idiot who denies the last ice age ever happened, and who mocks himself mercilessly on the internet bragging such and who keeps confusing quantum entanglement with quantum teleportation because his small mind needs to stay in the past that was simpler.

Note. An IQ over your 85 will be required for all quantum entangled discussions, so unfortunately you will need to remain in pre K for the time being, on the plus side for you, both construction paper and finger paints will be provided free of costs.

You still believe in this religion. I get it. But you have no idea if ice ages ever occurred or not.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Says the blithering idiot ...

Ima take'n after youz'all, cuz yore my heeero.

You done gimme the pow'r of piss-grammar. I can know evrythin' now.

I luv the feeling of beein omnissient, and t' think all I needs is piss-grammar.

Hay Sworn, wanna travel wimme thru time 'n verify the grate flood? We can quantum telePorsche ... cuz it's wut we know.

.

Says the blithering idiot who denies the last ice age ever happened, and who mocks himself mercilessly on the internet bragging such and who keeps confusing quantum entanglement with quantum teleportation because his small mind needs to stay in the past that was simpler.

Note. An IQ over your 85 will be required for all quantum entangled discussions, so unfortunately you will need to remain in pre K for the time being, on the plus side for you, both construction paper and finger paints will be provided free of costs.

You still believe in this religion. I get it. But you have no idea if ice ages ever occurred or not.

Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves. I was not there to see this, yet I know that it happened, something that you never will know. On the flip side as I said the government will provide you free finger painting kits

Swan wrote:
LOL I wasn't there when Hawaii was born 800,000 years ago

Swan wrote:
but I know that the temperature was 2,200 degrees.

Swan wrote:
You on the other hand know nothing unless the topic is your meds

Swan wrote:Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves.

Swan wrote: I was not there to see this,

Swan wrote: ... yet I know that it happened,

Swan wrote: ... something that you never will know.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Says the blithering idiot ...

Ima take'n after youz'all, cuz yore my heeero.

You done gimme the pow'r of piss-grammar. I can know evrythin' now.

I luv the feeling of beein omnissient, and t' think all I needs is piss-grammar.

Hay Sworn, wanna travel wimme thru time 'n verify the grate flood? We can quantum telePorsche ... cuz it's wut we know.

.

Says the blithering idiot who denies the last ice age ever happened, and who mocks himself mercilessly on the internet bragging such and who keeps confusing quantum entanglement with quantum teleportation because his small mind needs to stay in the past that was simpler.

Note. An IQ over your 85 will be required for all quantum entangled discussions, so unfortunately you will need to remain in pre K for the time being, on the plus side for you, both construction paper and finger paints will be provided free of costs.

You still believe in this religion. I get it. But you have no idea if ice ages ever occurred or not.

Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves. I was not there to see this, yet I know that it happened, something that you never will know. On the flip side as I said the government will provide you free finger painting kits

Nope. Hawaii didn't just pop out of the ocean.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves.

Too funny! Yet you are certain that the great flood never happened.

Your belief that the earth was entirely covered in water is not believable unless your context is within that of a religious miracle that you happen to accept.

So I have to ask, do you believe in a religious miracle by which the earth was covered with water, or not?

Swan wrote: I was not there to see this,

... probably because the earth was never covered completely by any ocean, but it was in your religion, you say?

Swan wrote: ... yet I know that it happened,

... only because you are employing your piss-grammar to conflate the meanings of "believe" and "know."

That is one mighty superpower you wield! Piss-Grammar power. We can only hope that you use your powers for good, and not for evil.

Swan wrote: ... something that you never will know.

You mean "... something that I never will believe," just as it is nothing that you ever will know.

Piss-Grammar. It's what we know. It's why we can quantumly teleport to the ice-buried moraines of the unobserved distant past.

.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves.

Too funny! Yet you are certain that the great flood never happened.

Your belief that the earth was entirely covered in water is not believable unless your context is within that of a religious miracle that you happen to accept.

So I have to ask, do you believe in a religious miracle by which the earth was covered with water, or not?

Swan wrote: I was not there to see this,

... probably because the earth was never covered completely by any ocean, but it was in your religion, you say?

Swan wrote: ... yet I know that it happened,

... only because you are employing your piss-grammar to conflate the meanings of "believe" and "know."

That is one mighty superpower you wield! Piss-Grammar power. We can only hope that you use your powers for good, and not for evil.

Swan wrote: ... something that you never will know.

You mean "... something that I never will believe," just as it is nothing that you ever will know.

Piss-Grammar. It's what we know. It's why we can quantumly teleport to the ice-buried moraines of the unobserved distant past.

.

I never said that the Earth has not had great floods, because it has. I said that there never was an ark carrying two of every living thing, or that any flood could cover Mount Everest at 29000 plus feet.

No matter you keep on playing with the arky that your mommy goted u fer yet 23'rd birtday, when you still lived in Odd West Virginia.

https://i.ytimg.com/an_webp/nkGiFpJC9LM/mqdefault_6s.webp?du=3000&sqp=CJ6hjJcG&rs=AOn4CLA8JAUKG2jfEmutOH49CufvvSUrZA

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves.

Too funny! Yet you are certain that the great flood never happened.

Your belief that the earth was entirely covered in water is not believable unless your context is within that of a religious miracle that you happen to accept.

So I have to ask, do you believe in a religious miracle by which the earth was covered with water, or not?

Swan wrote: I was not there to see this,

... probably because the earth was never covered completely by any ocean, but it was in your religion, you say?

Swan wrote: ... yet I know that it happened,

... only because you are employing your piss-grammar to conflate the meanings of "believe" and "know."

That is one mighty superpower you wield! Piss-Grammar power. We can only hope that you use your powers for good, and not for evil.

Swan wrote: ... something that you never will know.

You mean "... something that I never will believe," just as it is nothing that you ever will know.

Piss-Grammar. It's what we know. It's why we can quantumly teleport to the ice-buried moraines of the unobserved distant past.

.

I never said that the Earth has not had great floods, because it has. I said that there never was an ark carrying two of every living thing, or that any flood could cover Mount Everest at 29000 plus feet.

No matter you keep on playing with the arky that your mommy goted u fer yet 23'rd birtday, when you still lived in Odd West Virginia.

https://i.ytimg.com/an_webp/nkGiFpJC9LM/mqdefault_6s.webp?du=3000&sqp=CJ6hjJcG&rs=AOn4CLA8JAUKG2jfEmutOH49CufvvSUrZA

You are contradicting yourself again. Did you know that arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational?

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves.

Too funny! Yet you are certain that the great flood never happened.

Your belief that the earth was entirely covered in water is not believable unless your context is within that of a religious miracle that you happen to accept.

So I have to ask, do you believe in a religious miracle by which the earth was covered with water, or not?

Swan wrote: I was not there to see this,

... probably because the earth was never covered completely by any ocean, but it was in your religion, you say?

Swan wrote: ... yet I know that it happened,

... only because you are employing your piss-grammar to conflate the meanings of "believe" and "know."

That is one mighty superpower you wield! Piss-Grammar power. We can only hope that you use your powers for good, and not for evil.

Swan wrote: ... something that you never will know.

You mean "... something that I never will believe," just as it is nothing that you ever will know.

Piss-Grammar. It's what we know. It's why we can quantumly teleport to the ice-buried moraines of the unobserved distant past.

.

I never said that the Earth has not had great floods, because it has. I said that there never was an ark carrying two of every living thing, or that any flood could cover Mount Everest at 29000 plus feet.

No matter you keep on playing with the arky that your mommy goted u fer yet 23'rd birtday, when you still lived in Odd West Virginia.

https://i.ytimg.com/an_webp/nkGiFpJC9LM/mqdefault_6s.webp?du=3000&sqp=CJ6hjJcG&rs=AOn4CLA8JAUKG2jfEmutOH49CufvvSUrZA

You are contradicting yourself again. Did you know that arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational?

I am not arguing, I am giggling at fools.

Why? Well because giggling is a pleasant activity.

So you may continue, please.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves.

Too funny! Yet you are certain that the great flood never happened.

Your belief that the earth was entirely covered in water is not believable unless your context is within that of a religious miracle that you happen to accept.

So I have to ask, do you believe in a religious miracle by which the earth was covered with water, or not?

Swan wrote: I was not there to see this,

... probably because the earth was never covered completely by any ocean, but it was in your religion, you say?

Swan wrote: ... yet I know that it happened,

... only because you are employing your piss-grammar to conflate the meanings of "believe" and "know."

That is one mighty superpower you wield! Piss-Grammar power. We can only hope that you use your powers for good, and not for evil.

Swan wrote: ... something that you never will know.

You mean "... something that I never will believe," just as it is nothing that you ever will know.

Piss-Grammar. It's what we know. It's why we can quantumly teleport to the ice-buried moraines of the unobserved distant past.

.

I never said that the Earth has not had great floods, because it has. I said that there never was an ark carrying two of every living thing, or that any flood could cover Mount Everest at 29000 plus feet.

No matter you keep on playing with the arky that your mommy goted u fer yet 23'rd birtday, when you still lived in Odd West Virginia.

https://i.ytimg.com/an_webp/nkGiFpJC9LM/mqdefault_6s.webp?du=3000&sqp=CJ6hjJcG&rs=AOn4CLA8JAUKG2jfEmutOH49CufvvSUrZA

You are contradicting yourself again. Did you know that arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational?

I am not arguing, I am giggling at fools.

Why? Well because giggling is a pleasant activity.

So you may continue, please.

Irrational. Paradox.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves.

Too funny! Yet you are certain that the great flood never happened.

Your belief that the earth was entirely covered in water is not believable unless your context is within that of a religious miracle that you happen to accept.

So I have to ask, do you believe in a religious miracle by which the earth was covered with water, or not?

Swan wrote: I was not there to see this,

... probably because the earth was never covered completely by any ocean, but it was in your religion, you say?

Swan wrote: ... yet I know that it happened,

... only because you are employing your piss-grammar to conflate the meanings of "believe" and "know."

That is one mighty superpower you wield! Piss-Grammar power. We can only hope that you use your powers for good, and not for evil.

Swan wrote: ... something that you never will know.

You mean "... something that I never will believe," just as it is nothing that you ever will know.

Piss-Grammar. It's what we know. It's why we can quantumly teleport to the ice-buried moraines of the unobserved distant past.

.

I never said that the Earth has not had great floods, because it has. I said that there never was an ark carrying two of every living thing, or that any flood could cover Mount Everest at 29000 plus feet.

No matter you keep on playing with the arky that your mommy goted u fer yet 23'rd birtday, when you still lived in Odd West Virginia.

https://i.ytimg.com/an_webp/nkGiFpJC9LM/mqdefault_6s.webp?du=3000&sqp=CJ6hjJcG&rs=AOn4CLA8JAUKG2jfEmutOH49CufvvSUrZA

You are contradicting yourself again. Did you know that arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational?

I am not arguing, I am giggling at fools.

Why? Well because giggling is a pleasant activity.

So you may continue, please.

Irrational. Paradox.

You consider 2 + 2 = 4 to be an irrational paradox

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves.

Too funny! Yet you are certain that the great flood never happened.

Your belief that the earth was entirely covered in water is not believable unless your context is within that of a religious miracle that you happen to accept.

So I have to ask, do you believe in a religious miracle by which the earth was covered with water, or not?

Swan wrote: I was not there to see this,

... probably because the earth was never covered completely by any ocean, but it was in your religion, you say?

Swan wrote: ... yet I know that it happened,

... only because you are employing your piss-grammar to conflate the meanings of "believe" and "know."

That is one mighty superpower you wield! Piss-Grammar power. We can only hope that you use your powers for good, and not for evil.

Swan wrote: ... something that you never will know.

You mean "... something that I never will believe," just as it is nothing that you ever will know.

Piss-Grammar. It's what we know. It's why we can quantumly teleport to the ice-buried moraines of the unobserved distant past.

.

I never said that the Earth has not had great floods, because it has. I said that there never was an ark carrying two of every living thing, or that any flood could cover Mount Everest at 29000 plus feet.

No matter you keep on playing with the arky that your mommy goted u fer yet 23'rd birtday, when you still lived in Odd West Virginia.

https://i.ytimg.com/an_webp/nkGiFpJC9LM/mqdefault_6s.webp?du=3000&sqp=CJ6hjJcG&rs=AOn4CLA8JAUKG2jfEmutOH49CufvvSUrZA

You are contradicting yourself again. Did you know that arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational?

I am not arguing, I am giggling at fools.

Why? Well because giggling is a pleasant activity.

So you may continue, please.

Irrational. Paradox.

You consider 2 + 2 = 4 to be an irrational paradox

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Random statement. No argument presented. Trolling.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves.

Too funny! Yet you are certain that the great flood never happened.

Your belief that the earth was entirely covered in water is not believable unless your context is within that of a religious miracle that you happen to accept.

So I have to ask, do you believe in a religious miracle by which the earth was covered with water, or not?

Swan wrote: I was not there to see this,

... probably because the earth was never covered completely by any ocean, but it was in your religion, you say?

Swan wrote: ... yet I know that it happened,

... only because you are employing your piss-grammar to conflate the meanings of "believe" and "know."

That is one mighty superpower you wield! Piss-Grammar power. We can only hope that you use your powers for good, and not for evil.

Swan wrote: ... something that you never will know.

You mean "... something that I never will believe," just as it is nothing that you ever will know.

Piss-Grammar. It's what we know. It's why we can quantumly teleport to the ice-buried moraines of the unobserved distant past.

.

I never said that the Earth has not had great floods, because it has. I said that there never was an ark carrying two of every living thing, or that any flood could cover Mount Everest at 29000 plus feet.

No matter you keep on playing with the arky that your mommy goted u fer yet 23'rd birtday, when you still lived in Odd West Virginia.

https://i.ytimg.com/an_webp/nkGiFpJC9LM/mqdefault_6s.webp?du=3000&sqp=CJ6hjJcG&rs=AOn4CLA8JAUKG2jfEmutOH49CufvvSUrZA

You are contradicting yourself again. Did you know that arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational?

I am not arguing, I am giggling at fools.

Why? Well because giggling is a pleasant activity.

So you may continue, please.

Irrational. Paradox.

You consider 2 + 2 = 4 to be an irrational paradox

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Random statement. No argument presented. Trolling.

You become less than nothing without an argument, but you already are nothing, this is the paradox that you live with every day. Try freedom just once, you will not go back

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually one day there was just ocean and then Hawaii just popped up from beneath the waves.

Too funny! Yet you are certain that the great flood never happened.

Your belief that the earth was entirely covered in water is not believable unless your context is within that of a religious miracle that you happen to accept.

So I have to ask, do you believe in a religious miracle by which the earth was covered with water, or not?

Swan wrote: I was not there to see this,

... probably because the earth was never covered completely by any ocean, but it was in your religion, you say?

Swan wrote: ... yet I know that it happened,

... only because you are employing your piss-grammar to conflate the meanings of "believe" and "know."

That is one mighty superpower you wield! Piss-Grammar power. We can only hope that you use your powers for good, and not for evil.

Swan wrote: ... something that you never will know.

You mean "... something that I never will believe," just as it is nothing that you ever will know.

Piss-Grammar. It's what we know. It's why we can quantumly teleport to the ice-buried moraines of the unobserved distant past.

.

I never said that the Earth has not had great floods, because it has. I said that there never was an ark carrying two of every living thing, or that any flood could cover Mount Everest at 29000 plus feet.

No matter you keep on playing with the arky that your mommy goted u fer yet 23'rd birtday, when you still lived in Odd West Virginia.

https://i.ytimg.com/an_webp/nkGiFpJC9LM/mqdefault_6s.webp?du=3000&sqp=CJ6hjJcG&rs=AOn4CLA8JAUKG2jfEmutOH49CufvvSUrZA

You are contradicting yourself again. Did you know that arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational?

I am not arguing, I am giggling at fools.

Why? Well because giggling is a pleasant activity.

So you may continue, please.

Irrational. Paradox.

You consider 2 + 2 = 4 to be an irrational paradox

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Random statement. No argument presented. Trolling.

You become less than nothing without an argument, but you already are nothing, this is the paradox that you live with every day. Try freedom just once, you will not go back

LIF.