covid response

IBdaMann wrote:

gfm7175 wrote:So I have been experiencing hair loss because I refuse to wear a hair net?

You need to be double-netting ... maybe triple-netting in your case.

You are one of society's most vulnerable. You probably qualify for the special government aid program by which they cut out all of your red tape and rush to give top priority to shutting down your business.

.

IBdaMann wrote:
I have finally/recently encountered people I know personally who got COVID-19. All they have to say about it is that they lost their sense of smell for about three days and had bouts of the sniffles (requiring some Kleenex). Otherwise, nothing to write home about.

.

gfm7175 wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
I have finally/recently encountered people I know personally who got COVID-19. All they have to say about it is that they lost their sense of smell for about three days and had bouts of the sniffles (requiring some Kleenex). Otherwise, nothing to write home about.

.

Sounds like your encounters are quite similar to my encounters thus far. Doesn't sound like anything to freak out about to me...

IBdaMann wrote:

gfm7175 wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
I have finally/recently encountered people I know personally who got COVID-19. All they have to say about it is that they lost their sense of smell for about three days and had bouts of the sniffles (requiring some Kleenex). Otherwise, nothing to write home about.

.

Sounds like your encounters are quite similar to my encounters thus far. Doesn't sound like anything to freak out about to me...

COVID-19 sounds like an excellent thing to get as an excuse to get out of going to a baby shower. I assure any and all Democrats and Leftist morons that if they will give me COVID-19 and force me to work from home for two weeks straight, I promise to bitch and moan about how absolutely tantamount to torture the virus is that is most assuredly bringing me to the brink of death for the entire time that I am milking it for all its worth.

Please bring it on.

.

GasGuzzler wrote: Interesting chats with 3 people the last week...

GasGuzzler wrote:All three had loss of taste and smell.

GasGuzzler wrote:All three had someone in their household with positive covid test prior to Jam 20.

ALL 3 TESTED NEGATIVE JANUARY 24TH OR LATER.

GasGuzzler wrote:2 of the 3 had burning sensation in their chest. The other 1 had minor congestion with a cough.

IBdaMann wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote: Interesting chats with 3 people the last week...

Why didn't you speak with the families of the other tens of thousands who dropped dead like flies all around you?

GasGuzzler wrote:All three had loss of taste and smell.

They must have been praying for death to come quickly.

GasGuzzler wrote:All three had someone in their household with positive covid test prior to Jam 20.

ALL 3 TESTED NEGATIVE JANUARY 24TH OR LATER.

How did they hold out for that long?

GasGuzzler wrote:2 of the 3 had burning sensation in their chest. The other 1 had minor congestion with a cough.

Would this be the first time in their lives these people had these symptoms?

If not, did they survive the first bout?


.

GasGuzzler wrote:
Interesting chats with 3 people the last week...

All three had loss of taste and smell.

All three had someone in their household with positive covid test prior to Jam 20.

2 of the 3 had burning sensation in their chest. The other 1 had minor congestion with a cough.

ALL 3 TESTED NEGATIVE JANUARY 24TH OR LATER.

This morning I went to the small town convenience store to grab some coffee and the owner was in their. I had an interesting chat with him. Full disclosure, he is a Biden hater....

He said that covid tests were previously "scanned" (I don't know what scanned actually means) 45 times to pick up on traces of the virus. After rejoining the WHO, tests are now only scanned once, in an effort to reduce the number of cases making Biden look like the old man with the right plan.

Can anyone verify or have any info on this? Web is turning up nothing. Is this even plausible?

Xadoman wrote:
Dr Fauci now recommends to wear two facemask at the same time. I have also heard that in China they already use some kind of butt plugs to detect the virus. Supposedly the efficiency to detect the virus from the bunghole is much higher than from the nose.

Into the Night wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
Interesting chats with 3 people the last week...

All three had loss of taste and smell.

All three had someone in their household with positive covid test prior to Jam 20.

2 of the 3 had burning sensation in their chest. The other 1 had minor congestion with a cough.

ALL 3 TESTED NEGATIVE JANUARY 24TH OR LATER.

This morning I went to the small town convenience store to grab some coffee and the owner was in their. I had an interesting chat with him. Full disclosure, he is a Biden hater....

He said that covid tests were previously "scanned" (I don't know what scanned actually means) 45 times to pick up on traces of the virus. After rejoining the WHO, tests are now only scanned once, in an effort to reduce the number of cases making Biden look like the old man with the right plan.

Can anyone verify or have any info on this? Web is turning up nothing. Is this even plausible?

A covid19 test does not test for infection. It tests for antibodies. It is not a reliable test. It has false positives and false negatives.

Further, State governors have been manufacturing 'data' to justify getting more federal money.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
Interesting chats with 3 people the last week...

All three had loss of taste and smell.

All three had someone in their household with positive covid test prior to Jam 20.

2 of the 3 had burning sensation in their chest. The other 1 had minor congestion with a cough.

ALL 3 TESTED NEGATIVE JANUARY 24TH OR LATER.

This morning I went to the small town convenience store to grab some coffee and the owner was in their. I had an interesting chat with him. Full disclosure, he is a Biden hater....

He said that covid tests were previously "scanned" (I don't know what scanned actually means) 45 times to pick up on traces of the virus. After rejoining the WHO, tests are now only scanned once, in an effort to reduce the number of cases making Biden look like the old man with the right plan.

Can anyone verify or have any info on this? Web is turning up nothing. Is this even plausible?

A covid19 test does not test for infection. It tests for antibodies. It is not a reliable test. It has false positives and false negatives.

Further, State governors have been manufacturing 'data' to justify getting more federal money.

Actually nucleic acid testing detects the genetic material of the virus not antibodies. Antigen testing detects antibodies. Many newly sick people do not have antibodies in enough numbers to show, thus they are sick

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
Interesting chats with 3 people the last week...

All three had loss of taste and smell.

All three had someone in their household with positive covid test prior to Jam 20.

2 of the 3 had burning sensation in their chest. The other 1 had minor congestion with a cough.

ALL 3 TESTED NEGATIVE JANUARY 24TH OR LATER.

This morning I went to the small town convenience store to grab some coffee and the owner was in their. I had an interesting chat with him. Full disclosure, he is a Biden hater....

He said that covid tests were previously "scanned" (I don't know what scanned actually means) 45 times to pick up on traces of the virus. After rejoining the WHO, tests are now only scanned once, in an effort to reduce the number of cases making Biden look like the old man with the right plan.

Can anyone verify or have any info on this? Web is turning up nothing. Is this even plausible?

A covid19 test does not test for infection. It tests for antibodies. It is not a reliable test. It has false positives and false negatives.

Further, State governors have been manufacturing 'data' to justify getting more federal money.

Actually nucleic acid testing detects the genetic material of the virus not antibodies. Antigen testing detects antibodies. Many newly sick people do not have antibodies in enough numbers to show, thus they are sick

There is no valid nucleic acid testing. The RNA of the virus is unknown. All such testing can test for are small sequences of RNA. Sequences considered 'positive' are in common with other viruses and even with RNA produced by healthy cells. This type of testing is rife with false positives.

keepit wrote:
ITN,
Do you actually think Dr. Fauci suggested that testing is a cure?

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
Interesting chats with 3 people the last week...

All three had loss of taste and smell.

All three had someone in their household with positive covid test prior to Jam 20.

2 of the 3 had burning sensation in their chest. The other 1 had minor congestion with a cough.

ALL 3 TESTED NEGATIVE JANUARY 24TH OR LATER.

This morning I went to the small town convenience store to grab some coffee and the owner was in their. I had an interesting chat with him. Full disclosure, he is a Biden hater....

He said that covid tests were previously "scanned" (I don't know what scanned actually means) 45 times to pick up on traces of the virus. After rejoining the WHO, tests are now only scanned once, in an effort to reduce the number of cases making Biden look like the old man with the right plan.

Can anyone verify or have any info on this? Web is turning up nothing. Is this even plausible?

A covid19 test does not test for infection. It tests for antibodies. It is not a reliable test. It has false positives and false negatives.

Further, State governors have been manufacturing 'data' to justify getting more federal money.

Actually nucleic acid testing detects the genetic material of the virus not antibodies. Antigen testing detects antibodies. Many newly sick people do not have antibodies in enough numbers to show, thus they are sick

There is no valid nucleic acid testing. The RNA of the virus is unknown. All such testing can test for are small sequences of RNA. Sequences considered 'positive' are in common with other viruses and even with RNA produced by healthy cells. This type of testing is rife with false positives.

LOL the RNA and DNA of the virus are identified.

Sheesh do you still play with blocks?

keepit wrote:
ITN,
Do you actually think Dr. Fauci suggested that testing is a cure?

keepit wrote: That may be one of your silliest semantics arguments.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
Interesting chats with 3 people the last week...

All three had loss of taste and smell.

All three had someone in their household with positive covid test prior to Jam 20.

2 of the 3 had burning sensation in their chest. The other 1 had minor congestion with a cough.

ALL 3 TESTED NEGATIVE JANUARY 24TH OR LATER.

This morning I went to the small town convenience store to grab some coffee and the owner was in their. I had an interesting chat with him. Full disclosure, he is a Biden hater....

He said that covid tests were previously "scanned" (I don't know what scanned actually means) 45 times to pick up on traces of the virus. After rejoining the WHO, tests are now only scanned once, in an effort to reduce the number of cases making Biden look like the old man with the right plan.

Can anyone verify or have any info on this? Web is turning up nothing. Is this even plausible?

A covid19 test does not test for infection. It tests for antibodies. It is not a reliable test. It has false positives and false negatives.

Further, State governors have been manufacturing 'data' to justify getting more federal money.

Actually nucleic acid testing detects the genetic material of the virus not antibodies. Antigen testing detects antibodies. Many newly sick people do not have antibodies in enough numbers to show, thus they are sick

There is no valid nucleic acid testing. The RNA of the virus is unknown. All such testing can test for are small sequences of RNA. Sequences considered 'positive' are in common with other viruses and even with RNA produced by healthy cells. This type of testing is rife with false positives.

LOL the RNA and DNA of the virus are identified.

Sheesh do you still play with blocks?

Nope. It is unknown.

HarveyH55 wrote:
President Joey, sign an executive order, banning the use of 'China Virus', this past week. So, of course, I'll be using 'China Virus', instead of covid-19. I simply refuse to comply with dictators. Fairly certain, nobody used 'China Virus' on any official federal documents, except to quote Trump, in a derogatory fashion.

I've been sort of skeptical of the nasal swab testing. It's kind of invasive, for a test given to a lot of people, some frequently. Our nose, is a filter, keeps a lot of crap, from getting into our respiratory tract. Mostly, the swab, is going to collect stuff, that didn't quite make it. Even if the test worked as claimed, it loses any value, because of the timeline, and turn around for results. If you get exposed, you aren't instantly infected, and spreading. Can take a few days. Basically, you could be exposed, while waiting to be tested, your negative result from that day, would no longer be valid. To have any value, you would need to get tested, every time you are near other people.

The testing is even more, than we were told. Not only can they tell if you are infected, but they can identify which strain you got nailed with now. Variants, are very subtle differences in the China Virus. So subtle, that the current vaccines should still work on all 4,000+ variants documented so far.

HarveyH55 wrote:
I takes about 2 weeks, for a flu shot to be fully effective. The China Virus vaccine takes two shots, so figure on two weeks or so, after the second shot (if you can get it). I would expect the scoreboard numbers to show any effect of the vaccines for at least another month. Most of the people getting tested regularly, are the same people in front of the vaccination lines. No need to keep getting a Q-tip shoved against your brain, if you are immune. There should be a huge drop in new cases. The deaths and hospitalizations should change that much. One respiratory infection, will be just as bad as any other. Those that feel safe now, since they got their China Virus vaccine, are still wide open to hundreds of other viruses, that can do the same damage. The masks and other mandates won't change this year, probably not completely go away next year, no cure for death, or stupidity.

keepit wrote:
That may be one of your silliest semantics arguments.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
Interesting chats with 3 people the last week...

All three had loss of taste and smell.

All three had someone in their household with positive covid test prior to Jam 20.

2 of the 3 had burning sensation in their chest. The other 1 had minor congestion with a cough.

ALL 3 TESTED NEGATIVE JANUARY 24TH OR LATER.

This morning I went to the small town convenience store to grab some coffee and the owner was in their. I had an interesting chat with him. Full disclosure, he is a Biden hater....

He said that covid tests were previously "scanned" (I don't know what scanned actually means) 45 times to pick up on traces of the virus. After rejoining the WHO, tests are now only scanned once, in an effort to reduce the number of cases making Biden look like the old man with the right plan.

Can anyone verify or have any info on this? Web is turning up nothing. Is this even plausible?

A covid19 test does not test for infection. It tests for antibodies. It is not a reliable test. It has false positives and false negatives.

Further, State governors have been manufacturing 'data' to justify getting more federal money.

Actually nucleic acid testing detects the genetic material of the virus not antibodies. Antigen testing detects antibodies. Many newly sick people do not have antibodies in enough numbers to show, thus they are sick

There is no valid nucleic acid testing. The RNA of the virus is unknown. All such testing can test for are small sequences of RNA. Sequences considered 'positive' are in common with other viruses and even with RNA produced by healthy cells. This type of testing is rife with false positives.

LOL the RNA and DNA of the virus are identified.

Sheesh do you still play with blocks?

Nope. It is unknown.

LOL covid 19 was discovered in 2012 in a chinese mine when the miners died of pneumonia, it was worked on in the lab for a long time before the war started

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
President Joey, sign an executive order, banning the use of 'China Virus', this past week. So, of course, I'll be using 'China Virus', instead of covid-19. I simply refuse to comply with dictators. Fairly certain, nobody used 'China Virus' on any official federal documents, except to quote Trump, in a derogatory fashion.

I've been sort of skeptical of the nasal swab testing. It's kind of invasive, for a test given to a lot of people, some frequently. Our nose, is a filter, keeps a lot of crap, from getting into our respiratory tract. Mostly, the swab, is going to collect stuff, that didn't quite make it. Even if the test worked as claimed, it loses any value, because of the timeline, and turn around for results. If you get exposed, you aren't instantly infected, and spreading. Can take a few days. Basically, you could be exposed, while waiting to be tested, your negative result from that day, would no longer be valid. To have any value, you would need to get tested, every time you are near other people.

The testing is even more, than we were told. Not only can they tell if you are infected, but they can identify which strain you got nailed with now. Variants, are very subtle differences in the China Virus. So subtle, that the current vaccines should still work on all 4,000+ variants documented so far.

LOL the china virus vaccine is literally killing people while there is no evidence that it is curtailing the virus that is spreading.

50 percent of nurses turned down the china vaccine

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:
Interesting chats with 3 people the last week...

All three had loss of taste and smell.

All three had someone in their household with positive covid test prior to Jam 20.

2 of the 3 had burning sensation in their chest. The other 1 had minor congestion with a cough.

ALL 3 TESTED NEGATIVE JANUARY 24TH OR LATER.

This morning I went to the small town convenience store to grab some coffee and the owner was in their. I had an interesting chat with him. Full disclosure, he is a Biden hater....

He said that covid tests were previously "scanned" (I don't know what scanned actually means) 45 times to pick up on traces of the virus. After rejoining the WHO, tests are now only scanned once, in an effort to reduce the number of cases making Biden look like the old man with the right plan.

Can anyone verify or have any info on this? Web is turning up nothing. Is this even plausible?

A covid19 test does not test for infection. It tests for antibodies. It is not a reliable test. It has false positives and false negatives.

Further, State governors have been manufacturing 'data' to justify getting more federal money.

Actually nucleic acid testing detects the genetic material of the virus not antibodies. Antigen testing detects antibodies. Many newly sick people do not have antibodies in enough numbers to show, thus they are sick

There is no valid nucleic acid testing. The RNA of the virus is unknown. All such testing can test for are small sequences of RNA. Sequences considered 'positive' are in common with other viruses and even with RNA produced by healthy cells. This type of testing is rife with false positives.

LOL the RNA and DNA of the virus are identified.

Sheesh do you still play with blocks?

Nope. It is unknown.

LOL covid 19 was discovered in 2012 in a chinese mine when the miners died of pneumonia, it was worked on in the lab for a long time before the war started

So?