Remember me
▼ Content

"Cost effective" MUST be the message

"Cost effective" MUST be the message04-01-2014 22:53
Stating that climate change must be confronted at ANY COST is not going to win the war. So far I have only seen one post by one person on this forum who seems to get that. And it also doesn't help that word is out Al Gore owns the intellectual property (process) for creating a carbon trading system and stands to make billions if cap and trade is ever implemented.

The day we start talking about real solutions with proven cost/ benefit analysis included, based on real scientific/economic data is the day we start winning the hearts and minds of the masses.

Oh, and it cannot be channeled through Washington DC either, since anyone who thinks sending them our money is going to accomplish ANYTHING is delusional
04-01-2014 22:55
Please read post by Brettbyers, the guy who gets it!
Join the debate "Cost effective" MUST be the message:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Oceans absorb almost a third of global CO2 emissions, but at what cost?220-03-2019 04:36
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Could Cost $93 Trillion, Group Says309-03-2019 05:15
Record Australian heat shows soaring cost of climate change126-02-2019 18:16
How effective are the UK strategies to reduce global warming?(please complete survey)12708-02-2018 16:41
Market trends now favor renewable energy as a cost-effective alternative to fossil fuels - Nov 20171902-12-2017 04:19
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?








Don't know

Thanks for supporting
Copyright © 2009-2019 | About | Contact