Status: | Member | |
Birthdate: | Not Specified | |
Sex: | Not Specified | |
Occupation: | Not Specified | |
Location: | Not Specified | |
[Email] | Interests: | Not Specified |
Extra text: | Not Specified |
Statistics | |
Date joined: | 16. December 2010, 19:12 |
Last Visit: | 8. June 2011, 01:11 |
Number of posts: | 9 ↓ View list |
Posts/day: | 0 |
Number of threads: | 3 ↓ View list |
Number of comments: | 0 |
Last 10 posts: |
10-02-2011: RE: Where should we expect UHI in temperature data 1979-2009? (Climate debate in general) 09-02-2011: RE: Where should we expect UHI in temperature data 1979-2009? (Climate debate in general) 08-02-2011: RE: Where should we expect UHI in temperature data 1979-2009? (Climate debate in general) 16-01-2011: Where should we expect UHI in temperature data 1979-2009? (Climate debate in general) 16-01-2011: Fast recovery of thick Arctic ice (Climate debate in general) 19-12-2010: RE: New ice age (Consequences) 19-12-2010: RE: UAH reveals UrbAn Heat (Climate debate in general) 18-12-2010: RE: UAH reveals UrbAn Heat (Climate debate in general) 16-12-2010: UAH reveals UrbAn Heat (Climate debate in general) |
Last 10 threads (started by Frank Lansner): |
16-01-2011: Where should we expect UHI in temperature data 1979-2009? (Climate debate in general) 16-01-2011: Fast recovery of thick Arctic ice (Climate debate in general) 16-12-2010: UAH reveals UrbAn Heat (Climate debate in general) |