What makes IPCC thinks N2, O2, O3 are not as good at capturing and retaining heat than CO2 can?
| What makes IPCC thinks N2, O2, O3 are not as good at capturing and retaining heat than CO2 can?18-04-2019 17:36 | |
| Tai Hai Chen★★★★☆ (1085) |
These have higher specific heat than CO2 so they hold more heat than CO2 does. They capture shortwave radiation which is far more powerful than longwave radiation. That means they capture heat at day and dissipate heat at night. So they should be better at capturing and retaining heat than CO2 can.
Edited on 18-04-2019 17:40 |
| 18-04-2019 19:32 | |
Into the Night ★★★★★(22880) |
Tai Hai Chen wrote: Duplicate thread. Ignored. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 18-04-2019 20:57 | |
IBdaMann ★★★★★(14932) |
Tai Hai Chen wrote: These have higher specific heat than CO2 So they aren't in a dead heat? Who's going to take the heat for this one? Whoever it is, he'd better be pack'n heat. Maybe even the heat will arrive and give everyone the cold shoulder. Tai Hai Chen wrote: so they hold more heat than CO2 does. Tai Hai Chen ... how does one substance "hold" more "heat" than any other? Are there substances that have lower "heat capacities" or lower "heat limits" than others? How does that work? Tai Hai Chen wrote: They capture shortwave radiation which is far more powerful than longwave radiation. Tai Hai Chen ... does wavelength determine power, i.e. energy / time ? I thought it was energy / time that determines power? Am I mistaken? Tai Hai Chen wrote: That means they capture heat at day and dissipate heat at night. How do they know when night time has arrived so that they stop capturing and start dissipating? I thought it was all based on temperature. Tai Hai Chen wrote: So they should be better at capturing and retaining heat than CO2 can.How is "heat" retained, exactly? I thought that thermal radiation pours out of all matter per Stefan-Boltzmann and that no matter can do anything to hinder that in any way. I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist Edited on 18-04-2019 21:00 |
Join the debate What makes IPCC thinks N2, O2, O3 are not as good at capturing and retaining heat than CO2 can?:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| Fossil Fuel Substitution for reduced emission of CO2, mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium.. | 462 | 24-01-2025 00:45 |
| Why exactly is strip mining for coal bad, yet strip mining for Lithium is good | 9 | 23-12-2023 00:11 |
| Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat | 326 | 07-11-2023 19:16 |
| Some can take the heat, and | 2 | 14-10-2023 13:26 |
| All Sides, Beings, Entities No Matter "Evil" Or "Good" Are Receiving Their Final Chan | 0 | 14-07-2023 07:52 |