What happened to all the CO2 doomsday posts?

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

The reminder is my signature. The sun is a reflection on the 2 yellow glass terrarium barriers.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

The reminder is my signature. The sun is a reflection on the 2 yellow glass terrarium barriers.

So the sun is a reflection not a star. We need more evidence

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

The reminder is my signature. The sun is a reflection on the 2 yellow glass terrarium barriers.

So the sun is a reflection not a star. We need more evidence

Ok, look at the below picture taken of an incandescent light bulb. I made sure to point the camera at the bulb at an indirect angle. When pointing at an indirect angle, it causes a green artifact on the lens. The artifact is the filament burning behind the glass bulb. It is a V shape.



The photograph of the shining light is just detected as a white circle, but the camera can also detect the filament behind the glass, if the angle the picture is taken at is indirect.

That is the same phenomenon as detected here in this picture of the Sun taken at an indirect angle. See the green artifact?



If you zoom in on the artifact of the Sun burning behind the terrarium, you can see double, like 2 overlapping Venn diagrams, which reveals the 2 glass barriers of the terrarium.

This phenomenon is very easy to capture, unlike the double sun phenomenon in my signature which is much more rare, and required a dimming of the sun shine by wildfire smoke.

While I wouldn't disagree that the Sun is a burning star, I do like to point out, that us Earth dwellers do not see the real Sun behind the glass (except as an artifact on a camera lens). We just see its reflection on glass.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

The reminder is my signature. The sun is a reflection on the 2 yellow glass terrarium barriers.

So the sun is a reflection not a star. We need more evidence

Ok, look at the below picture taken of an incandescent light bulb. I made sure to point the camera at the bulb at an indirect angle. When pointing at an indirect angle, it causes a green artifact on the lens. The artifact is the filament burning behind the glass bulb. It is a V shape.



The photograph of the shining light is just detected as a white circle, but the camera can also detect the filament behind the glass, if the angle the picture is taken at is indirect.

That is the same phenomenon as detected here in this picture of the Sun taken at an indirect angle. See the green artifact?



If you zoom in on the artifact of the Sun burning behind the terrarium, you can see double, like 2 overlapping Venn diagrams, which reveals the 2 glass barriers of the terrarium.

This phenomenon is very easy to capture, unlike the double sun phenomenon in my signature which is much more rare, and required a dimming of the sun shine by wildfire smoke.

While I wouldn't disagree that the Sun is a burning star, I do like to point out, that us Earth dwellers do not see the real Sun behind the glass (except as an artifact on a camera lens). We just see its reflection on glass.

Ok, so lets assume that you are right and the sun is a light bulb and not a star, this requires that the sun be screwed into an electrical receptacle that has power. Who made the sun sized bulb? Who screwed it in? and what electrical outlet has 3.8 × 10²⁶ watts per second? Seriously we need more information

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

The reminder is my signature. The sun is a reflection on the 2 yellow glass terrarium barriers.

So the sun is a reflection not a star. We need more evidence

Ok, look at the below picture taken of an incandescent light bulb. I made sure to point the camera at the bulb at an indirect angle. When pointing at an indirect angle, it causes a green artifact on the lens. The artifact is the filament burning behind the glass bulb. It is a V shape.



The photograph of the shining light is just detected as a white circle, but the camera can also detect the filament behind the glass, if the angle the picture is taken at is indirect.

That is the same phenomenon as detected here in this picture of the Sun taken at an indirect angle. See the green artifact?



If you zoom in on the artifact of the Sun burning behind the terrarium, you can see double, like 2 overlapping Venn diagrams, which reveals the 2 glass barriers of the terrarium.

This phenomenon is very easy to capture, unlike the double sun phenomenon in my signature which is much more rare, and required a dimming of the sun shine by wildfire smoke.

While I wouldn't disagree that the Sun is a burning star, I do like to point out, that us Earth dwellers do not see the real Sun behind the glass (except as an artifact on a camera lens). We just see its reflection on glass.

Ok, so lets assume that you are right and the sun is a light bulb and not a star, this requires that the sun be screwed into an electrical receptacle that has power. Who made the sun sized bulb? Who screwed it in? and what electrical outlet has 3.8 × 10²⁶ watts per second? Seriously we need more information

Sheesh, you must want me to spell out my whole thesis!

The northern and southern lights are what I imagine to indicate the power lines connected to the Sun and/or Moon.

The spinning Earth is the power source.

I imagine, in addition to the glass barriers there is a much larger surrounding body spinning the opposite direction of Earth, like a black box or something like that. These opposing spinning bodies are causing the gravitational force holding everybody down to Earth.

(Could you imagine how much wind this would create without the glass barriers serving as a wind shield. Seriously, without those glass barriers everybody on Earth's land would be ripped to shreds.)

This friction which is causing gravity is what is generating power.

I happen to think the Moon is sucking up the power from Earth and feeding it to the Sun. And the Sun is feeding the energy back to Earth.

The stars and satellites don't really seem to feed much of any energy back to Earth, but they must be getting their power from Earth too I imagine.

I like to say Earth is the heart of the Universe.

Look I drew my imaginary childish doodle here.



* Corrections: South Pole spins once counter clockwise, every 23 hours and 56 minutes. Sun orbits once every 365.25 days. Moon orbits once every 27.3 days.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

The reminder is my signature. The sun is a reflection on the 2 yellow glass terrarium barriers.

So the sun is a reflection not a star. We need more evidence

Ok, look at the below picture taken of an incandescent light bulb. I made sure to point the camera at the bulb at an indirect angle. When pointing at an indirect angle, it causes a green artifact on the lens. The artifact is the filament burning behind the glass bulb. It is a V shape.



The photograph of the shining light is just detected as a white circle, but the camera can also detect the filament behind the glass, if the angle the picture is taken at is indirect.

That is the same phenomenon as detected here in this picture of the Sun taken at an indirect angle. See the green artifact?



If you zoom in on the artifact of the Sun burning behind the terrarium, you can see double, like 2 overlapping Venn diagrams, which reveals the 2 glass barriers of the terrarium.

This phenomenon is very easy to capture, unlike the double sun phenomenon in my signature which is much more rare, and required a dimming of the sun shine by wildfire smoke.

While I wouldn't disagree that the Sun is a burning star, I do like to point out, that us Earth dwellers do not see the real Sun behind the glass (except as an artifact on a camera lens). We just see its reflection on glass.

Ok, so lets assume that you are right and the sun is a light bulb and not a star, this requires that the sun be screwed into an electrical receptacle that has power. Who made the sun sized bulb? Who screwed it in? and what electrical outlet has 3.8 × 10²⁶ watts per second? Seriously we need more information

Sheesh, you must want me to spell out my whole thesis!

The northern and southern lights are what I imagine to indicate the power lines connected to the Sun and/or Moon.

The spinning Earth is the power source.

I imagine, in addition to the glass barriers there is a much larger surrounding body spinning the opposite direction of Earth, like a black box or something like that. These opposing spinning bodies are causing the gravitational force holding everybody down to Earth.

(Could you imagine how much wind this would create without the glass barriers serving as a wind shield. Seriously, without those glass barriers everybody on Earth's land would be ripped to shreds.)

This friction which is causing gravity is what is generating power.

I happen to think the Moon is sucking up the power from Earth and feeding it to the Sun. And the Sun is feeding the energy back to Earth.

The stars and satellites don't really seem to feed much of any energy back to Earth, but they must be getting their power from Earth too I imagine.

I like to say Earth is the heart of the Universe.

Look I drew my imaginary childish doodle here.



* Corrections: South Pole spins once counter clockwise, every 23 hours and 56 minutes. Sun orbits once every 365.25 days. Moon orbits once every 27.3 days.

Spongy Iris wrote: Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

The reminder is my signature. The sun is a reflection on the 2 yellow glass terrarium barriers.

So the sun is a reflection not a star. We need more evidence

Ok, look at the below picture taken of an incandescent light bulb. I made sure to point the camera at the bulb at an indirect angle. When pointing at an indirect angle, it causes a green artifact on the lens. The artifact is the filament burning behind the glass bulb. It is a V shape.



The photograph of the shining light is just detected as a white circle, but the camera can also detect the filament behind the glass, if the angle the picture is taken at is indirect.

That is the same phenomenon as detected here in this picture of the Sun taken at an indirect angle. See the green artifact?



If you zoom in on the artifact of the Sun burning behind the terrarium, you can see double, like 2 overlapping Venn diagrams, which reveals the 2 glass barriers of the terrarium.

This phenomenon is very easy to capture, unlike the double sun phenomenon in my signature which is much more rare, and required a dimming of the sun shine by wildfire smoke.

While I wouldn't disagree that the Sun is a burning star, I do like to point out, that us Earth dwellers do not see the real Sun behind the glass (except as an artifact on a camera lens). We just see its reflection on glass.

Ok, so lets assume that you are right and the sun is a light bulb and not a star, this requires that the sun be screwed into an electrical receptacle that has power. Who made the sun sized bulb? Who screwed it in? and what electrical outlet has 3.8 × 10²⁶ watts per second? Seriously we need more information

Sheesh, you must want me to spell out my whole thesis!

The northern and southern lights are what I imagine to indicate the power lines connected to the Sun and/or Moon.

The spinning Earth is the power source.

I imagine, in addition to the glass barriers there is a much larger surrounding body spinning the opposite direction of Earth, like a black box or something like that. These opposing spinning bodies are causing the gravitational force holding everybody down to Earth.

(Could you imagine how much wind this would create without the glass barriers serving as a wind shield. Seriously, without those glass barriers everybody on Earth's land would be ripped to shreds.)

This friction which is causing gravity is what is generating power.

I happen to think the Moon is sucking up the power from Earth and feeding it to the Sun. And the Sun is feeding the energy back to Earth.

The stars and satellites don't really seem to feed much of any energy back to Earth, but they must be getting their power from Earth too I imagine.

I like to say Earth is the heart of the Universe.

Look I drew my imaginary childish doodle here.



* Corrections: South Pole spins once counter clockwise, every 23 hours and 56 minutes. Sun orbits once every 365.25 days. Moon orbits once every 27.3 days.

What is the Earth spinning around if there is no sun?

You seem confused because now you say that the northern lights are power lines connected to the sun, but you also said that there is no sun, just a lightbulb in the sky. So what gives?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

The reminder is my signature. The sun is a reflection on the 2 yellow glass terrarium barriers.

So the sun is a reflection not a star. We need more evidence

Ok, look at the below picture taken of an incandescent light bulb. I made sure to point the camera at the bulb at an indirect angle. When pointing at an indirect angle, it causes a green artifact on the lens. The artifact is the filament burning behind the glass bulb. It is a V shape.



The photograph of the shining light is just detected as a white circle, but the camera can also detect the filament behind the glass, if the angle the picture is taken at is indirect.

That is the same phenomenon as detected here in this picture of the Sun taken at an indirect angle. See the green artifact?



If you zoom in on the artifact of the Sun burning behind the terrarium, you can see double, like 2 overlapping Venn diagrams, which reveals the 2 glass barriers of the terrarium.

This phenomenon is very easy to capture, unlike the double sun phenomenon in my signature which is much more rare, and required a dimming of the sun shine by wildfire smoke.

While I wouldn't disagree that the Sun is a burning star, I do like to point out, that us Earth dwellers do not see the real Sun behind the glass (except as an artifact on a camera lens). We just see its reflection on glass.

Ok, so lets assume that you are right and the sun is a light bulb and not a star, this requires that the sun be screwed into an electrical receptacle that has power. Who made the sun sized bulb? Who screwed it in? and what electrical outlet has 3.8 × 10²⁶ watts per second? Seriously we need more information

Sheesh, you must want me to spell out my whole thesis!

The northern and southern lights are what I imagine to indicate the power lines connected to the Sun and/or Moon.

The spinning Earth is the power source.

I imagine, in addition to the glass barriers there is a much larger surrounding body spinning the opposite direction of Earth, like a black box or something like that. These opposing spinning bodies are causing the gravitational force holding everybody down to Earth.

(Could you imagine how much wind this would create without the glass barriers serving as a wind shield. Seriously, without those glass barriers everybody on Earth's land would be ripped to shreds.)

This friction which is causing gravity is what is generating power.

I happen to think the Moon is sucking up the power from Earth and feeding it to the Sun. And the Sun is feeding the energy back to Earth.

The stars and satellites don't really seem to feed much of any energy back to Earth, but they must be getting their power from Earth too I imagine.

I like to say Earth is the heart of the Universe.

Look I drew my imaginary childish doodle here.



* Corrections: South Pole spins once counter clockwise, every 23 hours and 56 minutes. Sun orbits once every 365.25 days. Moon orbits once every 27.3 days.

What is the Earth spinning around if there is no sun?

You seem confused because now you say that the northern lights are power lines connected to the sun, but you also said that there is no sun, just a lightbulb in the sky. So what gives?

The Earth is spinning on its own axis every 23 hours and 56 minutes in my model, and the generally accepted model, but the Sun is spinning around the Earth every 365.25 days in my model.

I think what they say about the Sun being a fusion reaction generating helium is correct. The charged helium is what gives the sky the pink color.

I'm not sure how everything is wired to conduct electricity, but there appears to be a toroidal energy field emanating from the north and south poles.

I think there may be tubes that celestial objects orbit through.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Where is the glass? How is the glass both completely invisible and yet always visible? I just looked up into the sky ... again ... and there is no glass.

Also, why is the glass not completely shattered, or at least completely covered in completely visible craters?

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

The reminder is my signature. The sun is a reflection on the 2 yellow glass terrarium barriers.

So the sun is a reflection not a star. We need more evidence

Ok, look at the below picture taken of an incandescent light bulb. I made sure to point the camera at the bulb at an indirect angle. When pointing at an indirect angle, it causes a green artifact on the lens. The artifact is the filament burning behind the glass bulb. It is a V shape.



The photograph of the shining light is just detected as a white circle, but the camera can also detect the filament behind the glass, if the angle the picture is taken at is indirect.

That is the same phenomenon as detected here in this picture of the Sun taken at an indirect angle. See the green artifact?



If you zoom in on the artifact of the Sun burning behind the terrarium, you can see double, like 2 overlapping Venn diagrams, which reveals the 2 glass barriers of the terrarium.

This phenomenon is very easy to capture, unlike the double sun phenomenon in my signature which is much more rare, and required a dimming of the sun shine by wildfire smoke.

While I wouldn't disagree that the Sun is a burning star, I do like to point out, that us Earth dwellers do not see the real Sun behind the glass (except as an artifact on a camera lens). We just see its reflection on glass.

Ok, so lets assume that you are right and the sun is a light bulb and not a star, this requires that the sun be screwed into an electrical receptacle that has power. Who made the sun sized bulb? Who screwed it in? and what electrical outlet has 3.8 × 10²⁶ watts per second? Seriously we need more information

Sheesh, you must want me to spell out my whole thesis!

The northern and southern lights are what I imagine to indicate the power lines connected to the Sun and/or Moon.

The spinning Earth is the power source.

I imagine, in addition to the glass barriers there is a much larger surrounding body spinning the opposite direction of Earth, like a black box or something like that. These opposing spinning bodies are causing the gravitational force holding everybody down to Earth.

(Could you imagine how much wind this would create without the glass barriers serving as a wind shield. Seriously, without those glass barriers everybody on Earth's land would be ripped to shreds.)

This friction which is causing gravity is what is generating power.

I happen to think the Moon is sucking up the power from Earth and feeding it to the Sun. And the Sun is feeding the energy back to Earth.

The stars and satellites don't really seem to feed much of any energy back to Earth, but they must be getting their power from Earth too I imagine.

I like to say Earth is the heart of the Universe.

Look I drew my imaginary childish doodle here.



* Corrections: South Pole spins once counter clockwise, every 23 hours and 56 minutes. Sun orbits once every 365.25 days. Moon orbits once every 27.3 days.

What is the Earth spinning around if there is no sun?

You seem confused because now you say that the northern lights are power lines connected to the sun, but you also said that there is no sun, just a lightbulb in the sky. So what gives?

The Earth is spinning on its own axis every 23 hours and 56 minutes in my model, and the generally accepted model, but the Sun is spinning around the Earth every 365.25 days in my model.

I think what they say about the Sun being a fusion reaction generating helium is correct. The charged helium is what gives the sky the pink color.

I'm not sure how everything is wired to conduct electricity, but there appears to be a toroidal energy field emanating from the north and south poles.

I think there may be tubes that celestial objects orbit through.

Nonsense because you said that the northern lights were power lines connecting the Earth to a big lightbulb in the sky that people dumber than you call the sun. Clearly power lines would not allow for spin, so stop making stuff up and get back to being a frustrated analyst with no life

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
I bet that Al Bore is disappointed

Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Please provide more evidence as the above post contains none.

The reminder is my signature. The sun is a reflection on the 2 yellow glass terrarium barriers.

So the sun is a reflection not a star. We need more evidence

Ok, look at the below picture taken of an incandescent light bulb. I made sure to point the camera at the bulb at an indirect angle. When pointing at an indirect angle, it causes a green artifact on the lens. The artifact is the filament burning behind the glass bulb. It is a V shape.



The photograph of the shining light is just detected as a white circle, but the camera can also detect the filament behind the glass, if the angle the picture is taken at is indirect.

That is the same phenomenon as detected here in this picture of the Sun taken at an indirect angle. See the green artifact?



If you zoom in on the artifact of the Sun burning behind the terrarium, you can see double, like 2 overlapping Venn diagrams, which reveals the 2 glass barriers of the terrarium.

This phenomenon is very easy to capture, unlike the double sun phenomenon in my signature which is much more rare, and required a dimming of the sun shine by wildfire smoke.

While I wouldn't disagree that the Sun is a burning star, I do like to point out, that us Earth dwellers do not see the real Sun behind the glass (except as an artifact on a camera lens). We just see its reflection on glass.

Ok, so lets assume that you are right and the sun is a light bulb and not a star, this requires that the sun be screwed into an electrical receptacle that has power. Who made the sun sized bulb? Who screwed it in? and what electrical outlet has 3.8 × 10²⁶ watts per second? Seriously we need more information

Sheesh, you must want me to spell out my whole thesis!

The northern and southern lights are what I imagine to indicate the power lines connected to the Sun and/or Moon.

The spinning Earth is the power source.

I imagine, in addition to the glass barriers there is a much larger surrounding body spinning the opposite direction of Earth, like a black box or something like that. These opposing spinning bodies are causing the gravitational force holding everybody down to Earth.

(Could you imagine how much wind this would create without the glass barriers serving as a wind shield. Seriously, without those glass barriers everybody on Earth's land would be ripped to shreds.)

This friction which is causing gravity is what is generating power.

I happen to think the Moon is sucking up the power from Earth and feeding it to the Sun. And the Sun is feeding the energy back to Earth.

The stars and satellites don't really seem to feed much of any energy back to Earth, but they must be getting their power from Earth too I imagine.

I like to say Earth is the heart of the Universe.

Look I drew my imaginary childish doodle here.



* Corrections: South Pole spins once counter clockwise, every 23 hours and 56 minutes. Sun orbits once every 365.25 days. Moon orbits once every 27.3 days.

What is the Earth spinning around if there is no sun?

You seem confused because now you say that the northern lights are power lines connected to the sun, but you also said that there is no sun, just a lightbulb in the sky. So what gives?

The Earth is spinning on its own axis every 23 hours and 56 minutes in my model, and the generally accepted model, but the Sun is spinning around the Earth every 365.25 days in my model.

I think what they say about the Sun being a fusion reaction generating helium is correct. The charged helium is what gives the sky the pink color.

I'm not sure how everything is wired to conduct electricity, but there appears to be a toroidal energy field emanating from the north and south poles.

I think there may be tubes that celestial objects orbit through.

Nonsense because you said that the northern lights were power lines connecting the Earth to a big lightbulb in the sky that people dumber than you call the sun. Clearly power lines would not allow for spin, so stop making stuff up and get back to being a frustrated analyst with no life

The northern and southern lights are indications of an energetic toroidal field emanating from Earth.

The Earth looks like the power source of a battery, the torus around it looks like the EMR field.

I will leave the complex diagrams of the power flow for the 130 IQ and up folks to explain, whether there are wires, or it's wireless, or both.

I will just say I imagine the basic circuit goes from Earth to Moon to Sun to Earth.

Have you ever seen a cowboy lasso a pig? The rope is above him spinning so he doesn't get tangled in it.

That is not necessarily to suggest you are wrong to say power wires connecting the Earth Sun Moon is nonsense, just to say I can't rule it out yet as impossible.

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Where is the glass? How is the glass both completely invisible and yet always visible? I just looked up into the sky ... again ... and there is no glass.

Also, why is the glass not completely shattered, or at least completely covered in completely visible craters?

There is lots of evidence for the glass barriers, and I have provided 4 points so far in this thread

Double sun
Artifact on lens
Libyan glass
Muted wind force from a spinning Earth

It was shattered in the past, as evidenced by 1000+ tonnes of foreign glass found in the Saharan desert. Are you familiar with the process for creating a dry ice bomb?

It doesn't get shattered by meteorites because those must be launched either from inside the terrarium, or from a small made hole connecting the outside to the inside.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Where is the glass? How is the glass both completely invisible and yet always visible? I just looked up into the sky ... again ... and there is no glass.

Also, why is the glass not completely shattered, or at least completely covered in completely visible craters?

There is lots of evidence for the glass barriers, and I have provided 4 points so far in this thread

Double sun
Artifact on lens
Libyan glass
Muted wind force from a spinning Earth

It was shattered in the past, as evidenced by 1000+ tonnes of foreign glass found in the Saharan desert. Are you familiar with the process for creating a dry ice bomb?

It doesn't get shattered by meteorites because those must be launched either from inside the terrarium, or from a small made hole connecting the outside to the inside.

You are dodging the primary question, and until you answer it, no rational adult can accept your model.

How does all this opaque/dimly translucent glass that completely surrounds the earth remain totally invisible? How are we able to clearly see the sun, moon and stars? If the earth were surrounded by your glass, everything would be as dark as a cave. Answer that.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Where is the glass? How is the glass both completely invisible and yet always visible? I just looked up into the sky ... again ... and there is no glass.

Also, why is the glass not completely shattered, or at least completely covered in completely visible craters?

There is lots of evidence for the glass barriers, and I have provided 4 points so far in this thread

Double sun
Artifact on lens
Libyan glass
Muted wind force from a spinning Earth

It was shattered in the past, as evidenced by 1000+ tonnes of foreign glass found in the Saharan desert. Are you familiar with the process for creating a dry ice bomb?

It doesn't get shattered by meteorites because those must be launched either from inside the terrarium, or from a small made hole connecting the outside to the inside.

You are dodging the primary question, and until you answer it, no rational adult can accept your model.

How does all this opaque/dimly translucent glass that completely surrounds the earth remain totally invisible? How are we able to clearly see the sun, moon and stars? If the earth were surrounded by your glass, everything would be as dark as a cave. Answer that.

The behavioral analyst knows that there is no glass, the fool is just trying to come down to the level of the common man in order to make contact and glorify the hundreds of grand that it wasted on a psych degree.

CIAO

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Where is the glass? How is the glass both completely invisible and yet always visible? I just looked up into the sky ... again ... and there is no glass.

Also, why is the glass not completely shattered, or at least completely covered in completely visible craters?

There is lots of evidence for the glass barriers, and I have provided 4 points so far in this thread

Double sun
Artifact on lens
Libyan glass
Muted wind force from a spinning Earth

It was shattered in the past, as evidenced by 1000+ tonnes of foreign glass found in the Saharan desert. Are you familiar with the process for creating a dry ice bomb?

It doesn't get shattered by meteorites because those must be launched either from inside the terrarium, or from a small made hole connecting the outside to the inside.

You are dodging the primary question, and until you answer it, no rational adult can accept your model.

How does all this opaque/dimly translucent glass that completely surrounds the earth remain totally invisible? How are we able to clearly see the sun, moon and stars? If the earth were surrounded by your glass, everything would be as dark as a cave. Answer that.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Every single post I make contains a reminder that Earth is inside a glass terrarium, which can only hold so much CO2.

Where is the glass? How is the glass both completely invisible and yet always visible? I just looked up into the sky ... again ... and there is no glass.

Also, why is the glass not completely shattered, or at least completely covered in completely visible craters?

There is lots of evidence for the glass barriers, and I have provided 4 points so far in this thread

Double sun
Artifact on lens
Libyan glass
Muted wind force from a spinning Earth

It was shattered in the past, as evidenced by 1000+ tonnes of foreign glass found in the Saharan desert. Are you familiar with the process for creating a dry ice bomb?

It doesn't get shattered by meteorites because those must be launched either from inside the terrarium, or from a small made hole connecting the outside to the inside.

You are dodging the primary question, and until you answer it, no rational adult can accept your model.

How does all this opaque/dimly translucent glass that completely surrounds the earth remain totally invisible? How are we able to clearly see the sun, moon and stars? If the earth were surrounded by your glass, everything would be as dark as a cave. Answer that.

The behavioral analyst knows that there is no glass, the fool is just trying to come down to the level of the common man in order to make contact and glorify the hundreds of grand that it wasted on a psych degree.

CIAO

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

You are actually assuming that gravity is the force behind universal expansion because that is what they told you. As I said, they lied because the truth might destroy humanity's collective soul

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Your theory says that meth use is bad

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Your theory says that meth use is bad

I am somewhat of an expert in dealing with abnormally long withdrawal symptoms.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Your theory says that meth use is bad

I am somewhat of an expert in dealing with abnormally long withdrawal symptoms.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Your theory says that meth use is bad

I am somewhat of an expert in dealing with abnormally long withdrawal symptoms.

Says the connoisseur of fine hot dogs.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Your theory says that meth use is bad

I am somewhat of an expert in dealing with abnormally long withdrawal symptoms.

Says the connoisseur of fine hot dogs.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You must be a vegan. How is that working out for you?

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Your theory says that meth use is bad

I am somewhat of an expert in dealing with abnormally long withdrawal symptoms.

Says the connoisseur of fine hot dogs.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You must be a vegan. How is that working out for you?

I eat real whole food, I do not eat the processed shit that you are addicted to and dying from

Seriously ask your rabbi why sodium nitrite is kosher and healthy. Just let me be there with popcorn

Spongy Iris wrote: While I wouldn't disagree that the Sun is a burning star, I do like to point out, that us Earth dwellers do not see the real Sun behind the glass (except as an artifact on a camera lens). We just see its reflection on glass.

Spongy Iris wrote:I don't believe in universal expansion, but I think they are observing red shift?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Your theory says that meth use is bad

I am somewhat of an expert in dealing with abnormally long withdrawal symptoms.

Says the connoisseur of fine hot dogs.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You must be a vegan. How is that working out for you?

I eat real whole food, I do not eat the processed shit that you are addicted to and dying from

Seriously ask your rabbi why sodium nitrite is kosher and healthy. Just let me be there with popcorn

Show me the evidence that strict food snobs live longer than people who eat quick snacks sometimes.

I can probably think of a better conversation starter with a rabbi than kosher hot dogs... not that this isn't a grand conversation.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Your theory says that meth use is bad

I am somewhat of an expert in dealing with abnormally long withdrawal symptoms.

Says the connoisseur of fine hot dogs.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You must be a vegan. How is that working out for you?

I eat real whole food, I do not eat the processed shit that you are addicted to and dying from

Seriously ask your rabbi why sodium nitrite is kosher and healthy. Just let me be there with popcorn

Show me the evidence that strict food snobs live longer than people who eat quick snacks sometimes.

I can probably think of a better conversation starter with a rabbi than kosher hot dogs... not that this isn't a grand conversation.

You are correct, all the data says that smokers who eat sodium nitrite filled hot dogs live longer, so keep on smoking your kosher poison filled shit.

Swan wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Your theory says that meth use is bad

I am somewhat of an expert in dealing with abnormally long withdrawal symptoms.

Says the connoisseur of fine hot dogs.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You must be a vegan. How is that working out for you?

I eat real whole food, I do not eat the processed shit that you are addicted to and dying from

Seriously ask your rabbi why sodium nitrite is kosher and healthy. Just let me be there with popcorn

Show me the evidence that strict food snobs live longer than people who eat quick snacks sometimes.

I can probably think of a better conversation starter with a rabbi than kosher hot dogs... not that this isn't a grand conversation.

You are correct, all the data says that smokers who eat sodium nitrite filled hot dogs live longer, so keep on smoking your kosher poison filled shit.

The hot dog eating clown has just nowhere to go with that.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
What my theory of the Universe does, which the prevailing theory does not, is explain gravity.

The current prevailing theory of the Universe will never be able to explain gravity.

Your theory says that meth use is bad

I am somewhat of an expert in dealing with abnormally long withdrawal symptoms.

Says the connoisseur of fine hot dogs.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

You must be a vegan. How is that working out for you?

I eat real whole food, I do not eat the processed shit that you are addicted to and dying from

Seriously ask your rabbi why sodium nitrite is kosher and healthy. Just let me be there with popcorn

Show me the evidence that strict food snobs live longer than people who eat quick snacks sometimes.

I can probably think of a better conversation starter with a rabbi than kosher hot dogs... not that this isn't a grand conversation.

You are correct, all the data says that smokers who eat sodium nitrite filled hot dogs live longer, so keep on smoking your kosher poison filled shit.

The hot dog eating clown has just nowhere to go with that.

lol, I promote a balanced omnivore diet.

but on the topic of anti psychotic drugs:

AI headline:

"Haloperidol, an antipsychotic medication, has shown to inhibit the replication of Toxoplasma gondii in vitro. Studies have found that haloperidol and the mood stabilizer valproic acid are among the most effective antipsychotic/mood stabilizing in preventing T. gondii growth in vitro. Additionally, haloperidol and valproate have been shown to be effective in preventing T. gondii-induced behavioral and cognitive changes in infected rats."

A science I promote here is anti Toxoplasma Gondii, among other things. And there seems to be a connection with anti psychotic drugs being anti TG

Personally, I think the blue sky color American Spirits do an ok job and I have never tried those drugs mentioned above. I don't promote them. They are just an indicator.

It's an ok treatment IMO, but ultimately my position is nothing can vanquish semen demon, other than pure stem cell retention.

See, all roads lead back to Climate Change.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: While I wouldn't disagree that the Sun is a burning star, I do like to point out, that us Earth dwellers do not see the real Sun behind the glass (except as an artifact on a camera lens). We just see its reflection on glass.

Not possible. As you can see, there is no glass surrounding the earth. Glass is not invisible, and the glass you claim it is, is opaque.

Swan wrote:

I LOVE IT WHEN 6 YEAR OLD GIRLS USE THE WORD SCIENCE

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:I don't believe in universal expansion, but I think they are observing red shift?

Where do you believe that the universe is contracting?