Remember me
▼ Content

Uncertain projections help to reveal the truth about future climate change


Uncertain projections help to reveal the truth about future climate change18-03-2019 23:17
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1061)
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-uncertain-reveal-truth-future-climate.html
19-03-2019 01:42
Wake
★★★★★
(4031)
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-uncertain-reveal-truth-future-climate.html


In order to make "projections" you have to start with honest data and NASA has seen that you cannot get it. Therefore you are constrained within the limits of the false data that NASA has given.
19-03-2019 02:02
HarveyH55
★★★★☆
(1177)
Climate can't be defined in equations, it's a subject observation, describing how we feel about our surroundings. There is no 'normal', and there isn't a global climate, since no one can observe the entire planet. One person's 'feelings' doesn't reflect those of everyone else, except maybe in a dictatorship government country, where disagreement is short lived. No some people don't respect other people's opinions, and will go to great lengths to convince everyone else, that they are right (well, usually far 'left'), every who disagrees are wrong.
19-03-2019 02:23
Into the Night
★★★★★
(9232)
Wake wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-uncertain-reveal-truth-future-climate.html


In order to make "projections" you have to start with honest data and NASA has seen that you cannot get it. Therefore you are constrained within the limits of the false data that NASA has given.


Nah. NASA had no power in this. There is no data to begin with. NASA isn't hiding data. There simply isn't any in the first place.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.


The Parrot Killer
Edited on 19-03-2019 02:23
19-03-2019 03:58
IBdaMann
★★★★★
(4613)
Into the Night wrote:
Nah. NASA had no power in this. There is no data to begin with. NASA isn't hiding data. There simply isn't any in the first place.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

Buried in all this is the incorrect assumption that data is somehow needed.

If you have science, you no longer need data. You have the science.

[rant]
On the other board, I was explaining how warmizombies should just shut up about this amazing "the data" they have (that strangely no one has ever seen) and worry about getting some science because then they wouldn't need "the data". I then got the predictable scientifically illiterate response "You can't have science without data."

I want to learn the secret to the warmizombies' Jedi mind trick that gets the stupidest people to perceive themselves as virtual Einsteins. They say the stupidest crap with the utmost confidence that it is settled science and that they somehow sound smart by saying it with a straight face.
[/rant]


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
19-03-2019 04:55
Into the Night
★★★★★
(9232)
IBdaMann wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Nah. NASA had no power in this. There is no data to begin with. NASA isn't hiding data. There simply isn't any in the first place.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

Buried in all this is the incorrect assumption that data is somehow needed.

If you have science, you no longer need data. You have the science.

[rant]
On the other board, I was explaining how warmizombies should just shut up about this amazing "the data" they have (that strangely no one has ever seen) and worry about getting some science because then they wouldn't need "the data". I then got the predictable scientifically illiterate response "You can't have science without data."

I want to learn the secret to the warmizombies' Jedi mind trick that gets the stupidest people to perceive themselves as virtual Einsteins. They say the stupidest crap with the utmost confidence that it is settled science and that they somehow sound smart by saying it with a straight face.
[/rant]


Yup. They don't realize the data or even data collection is not science, and has nothing to do with science. Science is just the falsifiable theories themselves.

Their 'settled science' and manufactured data is just their way of trying to claim Universal Truths.


The Parrot Killer
19-03-2019 14:37
IBdaMann
★★★★★
(4613)
Into the Night wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Nah. NASA had no power in this. There is no data to begin with. NASA isn't hiding data. There simply isn't any in the first place.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

Buried in all this is the incorrect assumption that data is somehow needed.

If you have science, you no longer need data. You have the science.

[rant]
On the other board, I was explaining how warmizombies should just shut up about this amazing "the data" they have (that strangely no one has ever seen) and worry about getting some science because then they wouldn't need "the data". I then got the predictable scientifically illiterate response "You can't have science without data."

I want to learn the secret to the warmizombies' Jedi mind trick that gets the stupidest people to perceive themselves as virtual Einsteins. They say the stupidest crap with the utmost confidence that it is settled science and that they somehow sound smart by saying it with a straight face.
[/rant]


Yup. They don't realize the data or even data collection is not science, and has nothing to do with science. Science is just the falsifiable theories themselves.

Their 'settled science' and manufactured data is just their way of trying to claim Universal Truths.

This is the Global Warming faith:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka9mfZbTFbk


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
19-03-2019 16:10
gfm7175
★★☆☆☆
(186)
IBdaMann wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Nah. NASA had no power in this. There is no data to begin with. NASA isn't hiding data. There simply isn't any in the first place.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

Buried in all this is the incorrect assumption that data is somehow needed.

If you have science, you no longer need data. You have the science.

[rant]
On the other board, I was explaining how warmizombies should just shut up about this amazing "the data" they have (that strangely no one has ever seen) and worry about getting some science because then they wouldn't need "the data". I then got the predictable scientifically illiterate response "You can't have science without data."

I want to learn the secret to the warmizombies' Jedi mind trick that gets the stupidest people to perceive themselves as virtual Einsteins. They say the stupidest crap with the utmost confidence that it is settled science and that they somehow sound smart by saying it with a straight face.
[/rant]


The idea of "settled science" that these twits confidently chant is quite laughable... Science is never "settled"... A theory of science isn't a proof in any way. That theory just hasn't been falsified as of yet...




Join the debate Uncertain projections help to reveal the truth about future climate change:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
CNN: Wind farms of the future may be underwater202-05-2019 02:51
O2C predicted to rise in the future?1622-04-2019 22:19
Experts reveal that clouds have moderated warming triggered by climate change328-03-2019 01:34
Students globally protest warming, pleading for their future016-03-2019 14:04
'Just asking for a safe future': Thousands of B.C. students protest political inaction on climate016-03-2019 14:01
Articles
Barack Obama: Securing Our Energy Future
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact