Transgender Democrat murders Charlie Kirk

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

Or someone like me with a 130 IQ, which is something that you cannot begin to fathom. I also know that there is a link to France that the FBI is staying mum on because this shooting is intended to silence fellow podcaster and mother Candace Owens who is being sued by the faggot in charge of France and his trannie cock waving tranny he she alien b-uttoy butt f-ucking ugly excuse for a human.

Or to make it simpler Kirk answered a question about transgenders right before he was shot.

Supergenius, you ain't. Make sure the judge and jury reads this.

CIAO

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

I saw some posts over on Deny Ignoranve, citing info from the FBI the shooter had Trans ideology. I remember seeing those posts before Swan's here, but I'm not gonna dig up the time stamps.

I think they were both posted before it was reported the rifle was found, but probably after the rifle was actually found, but not reported yet.

Turns out there are no explicit engravings in the bullets about Trans ideologies.

But an implicit engraving could be the words, What is this?

As in you can get with This, or you can get with That.

https://youtu.be/9w1nz8Ld_gI?si=AqJoXh_senKwXFH9

Then there was the engraving, If you are reading this you're gay.

It's not hard to imagine a kid growing up gay in Utah might be more prone to being triggered than most.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

Or someone like me with a 130 IQ, which is something that you cannot begin to fathom. I also know that there is a link to France that the FBI is staying mum on because this shooting is intended to silence fellow podcaster and mother Candace Owens who is being sued by the faggot in charge of France and his trannie cock waving tranny he she alien b-uttoy butt f-ucking ugly excuse for a human.

Or to make it simpler Kirk answered a question about transgenders right before he was shot.

Supergenius, you ain't. Make sure the judge and jury reads this.

CIAO

I imagine you will continue to believe your delusion of a tranny democrat shooter, regardless of all evidence to the contrary.

Given the potential for so many crazies with guns to decide it's time to do something, it is fortunate that the shooter was a local white heterosexual boy from a good Republican Trump-supporting family.

The kid was pro-Trump when he proudly went of to college with 4.0 high school GPA and prestigious scholarship to fund him.

Something happened.

The weekend at the college didn't turn out like he planned.

By the time it was Trump 2.0, the kid appears to have soured on dear leader.

Given the recriminations and declarations of "war", it is fortunate that the shooter was not a tranny democrat from California or New York.

In North Korea, one risked severe punishment if they did not put on a sufficient public display of sobbing and wailing uncontrollably in despair and grief when dear leader died.

Some among the "vermin" enemy within the US failed to display sufficient grief for Charlie Kirk. Some are openly calling for their identification and punishment.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

Or someone like me with a 130 IQ, which is something that you cannot begin to fathom. I also know that there is a link to France that the FBI is staying mum on because this shooting is intended to silence fellow podcaster and mother Candace Owens who is being sued by the faggot in charge of France and his trannie cock waving tranny he she alien b-uttoy butt f-ucking ugly excuse for a human.

Or to make it simpler Kirk answered a question about transgenders right before he was shot.

Supergenius, you ain't. Make sure the judge and jury reads this.

CIAO

I imagine you will continue to believe your delusion of a tranny democrat shooter, regardless of all evidence to the contrary.

Given the potential for so many crazies with guns to decide it's time to do something, it is fortunate that the shooter was a local white heterosexual boy from a good Republican Trump-supporting family.

The kid was pro-Trump when he proudly went of to college with 4.0 high school GPA and prestigious scholarship to fund him.

Something happened.

The weekend at the college didn't turn out like he planned.

By the time it was Trump 2.0, the kid appears to have soured on dear leader.

Given the recriminations and declarations of "war", it is fortunate that the shooter was not a tranny democrat from California or New York.

In North Korea, one risked severe punishment if they did not put on a sufficient public display of sobbing and wailing uncontrollably in despair and grief when dear leader died.

Some among the "vermin" enemy within the US failed to display sufficient grief for Charlie Kirk. Some are openly calling for their identification and punishment.

Im a BM wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

Or someone like me with a 130 IQ, which is something that you cannot begin to fathom. I also know that there is a link to France that the FBI is staying mum on because this shooting is intended to silence fellow podcaster and mother Candace Owens who is being sued by the faggot in charge of France and his trannie cock waving tranny he she alien b-uttoy butt f-ucking ugly excuse for a human.

Or to make it simpler Kirk answered a question about transgenders right before he was shot.

Supergenius, you ain't. Make sure the judge and jury reads this.

CIAO

I imagine you will continue to believe your delusion of a tranny democrat shooter, regardless of all evidence to the contrary.

Given the potential for so many crazies with guns to decide it's time to do something, it is fortunate that the shooter was a local white heterosexual boy from a good Republican Trump-supporting family.

The kid was pro-Trump when he proudly went of to college with 4.0 high school GPA and prestigious scholarship to fund him.

Something happened.

The weekend at the college didn't turn out like he planned.

By the time it was Trump 2.0, the kid appears to have soured on dear leader.

Given the recriminations and declarations of "war", it is fortunate that the shooter was not a tranny democrat from California or New York.

In North Korea, one risked severe punishment if they did not put on a sufficient public display of sobbing and wailing uncontrollably in despair and grief when dear leader died.

Some among the "vermin" enemy within the US failed to display sufficient grief for Charlie Kirk. Some are openly calling for their identification and punishment.

Two very plausible explanations:

1. More than 20 years ago, someone anticipated that it would be useful to plant a fake birthday card to Epstein among the presents to be bound into the book.

2. Charlie Kirk's assassin collaborated with the questioner in the audience to get him to say something about transsexuals, to perfectly time the shot. He would not have fired otherwise.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

Or someone like me with a 130 IQ, which is something that you cannot begin to fathom. I also know that there is a link to France that the FBI is staying mum on because this shooting is intended to silence fellow podcaster and mother Candace Owens who is being sued by the faggot in charge of France and his trannie cock waving tranny he she alien b-uttoy butt f-ucking ugly excuse for a human.

Or to make it simpler Kirk answered a question about transgenders right before he was shot.

Supergenius, you ain't. Make sure the judge and jury reads this.

CIAO

I imagine you will continue to believe your delusion of a tranny democrat shooter, regardless of all evidence to the contrary.

Given the potential for so many crazies with guns to decide it's time to do something, it is fortunate that the shooter was a local white heterosexual boy from a good Republican Trump-supporting family.

The kid was pro-Trump when he proudly went of to college with 4.0 high school GPA and prestigious scholarship to fund him.

Something happened.

The weekend at the college didn't turn out like he planned.

By the time it was Trump 2.0, the kid appears to have soured on dear leader.

Given the recriminations and declarations of "war", it is fortunate that the shooter was not a tranny democrat from California or New York.

In North Korea, one risked severe punishment if they did not put on a sufficient public display of sobbing and wailing uncontrollably in despair and grief when dear leader died.

Some among the "vermin" enemy within the US failed to display sufficient grief for Charlie Kirk. Some are openly calling for their identification and punishment.

Two very plausible explanations:

1. More than 20 years ago, someone anticipated that it would be useful to plant a fake birthday card to Epstein among the presents to be bound into the book.

2. Charlie Kirk's assassin collaborated with the questioner in the audience to get him to say something about transsexuals, to perfectly time the shot. He would not have fired otherwise.

You are an example of a very confused democrat operative and fag.

Remember when Hillary ducked snipers or when she said that no one would vote for a black man?

Doop

Swan wrote:
Well since you are claiming that I had info about Kirks shooter before that info was available, then your only ethical move is to inform the FBI of my post along with its timestamp. I will include a link to the FBI tip line here https://tips.fbi.gov/home

PS. I should warn you that the FBI already has a hefty file on me, myself and Irene

The FBI will be expecting your immediate participation in the tipline, or you may be charged with withholding information.

Looks like you just backed yourself into a corner super genius

Swan wrote:

Abbott: Well Costello, I'm going to New York with you. The Yankees' manager gave me a job as coach for as long as you're on the team.
Costello: Look Abbott, if your the coach, you must know all the players.
Abbott: I certainly do.
Costello: Well you know I've never met the guys. So you'll have to tell me their names, and then I'll know who's playing on the team.
Abbott: Oh, I'll tell you their names, but you know it seems to me they give these ball players now-a-days very peculiar names.
Costello: You mean funny names?
Abbott: Strange names, pet names...like Dizzy Dean...
Costello: His brother Daffy
Abbott: Daffy Dean...
Costello: And their French cousin.
Abbott: French?
Costello: Goofe'
Abbott: Goofe' Dean. Well, let's see, we have on the bags, Who's on first, What's on second, I Don't Know is on third...
Costello: That's what I want to find out.
Abbott: I say Who's on first, What's on second, I Don't Know's on third.
Costello: Are you the manager?
Abbott: Yes.
Costello: You gonna be the coach too?
Abbott: Yes.
Costello: And you don't know the fellows' names.
Abbott: Well I should.
Costello: Well then who's on first?
Abbott: Yes.
Costello: I mean the fellow's name.
Abbott: Who.
Costello: The guy on first.
Abbott: Who.
Costello: The first baseman.
Abbott: Who.
Costello: The guy playing...
Abbott: Who is on first!
Costello: I'm asking you who's on first.
Abbott: That's the man's name.
Costello: That's whose name?
Abbott: Yes.
Costello: Well go ahead and tell me.
Abbott: That's it.
Costello: That's who?
Abbott: Yes.

PAUSE

Costello: Look, you gotta first baseman?
Abbott: Certainly.
Costello: Who's playing first?
Abbott: That's right.
Costello: When you pay off the first baseman every month, who gets the money?
Abbott: Every dollar of it.
Costello: All I'm trying to find out is the fellow's name on first base.
Abbott: Who.
Costello: The guy that gets...
Abbott: That's it.
Costello: Who gets the money...
Abbott: He does, every dollar of it. Sometimes his wife comes down and collects it.
Costello: Who's wife?
Abbott: Yes.

PAUSE

Abbott: What's wrong with that?
Costello: Look, all I wanna know is when you sign up the first baseman, how does he sign his name?
Abbott: Who.
Costello: The guy.
Abbott: Who.
Costello: How does he sign...
Abbott: That's how he signs it.
Costello: Who?
Abbott: Yes.

PAUSE

Costello: All I'm trying to find out is what's the guys name on first base.
Abbott: No. What is on second base.
Costello: I'm not asking you who's on second.
Abbott: Who's on first.
Costello: One base at a time!
Abbott: Well, don't change the players around.
Costello: I'm not changing nobody!
Abbott: Take it easy, buddy.
Costello: I'm only asking you, who's the guy on first base?
Abbott: That's right.
Costello: Ok.
Abbott: Alright.

PAUSE

Costello: What's the guy's name on first base?
Abbott: No. What is on second.
Costello: I'm not asking you who's on second.
Abbott: Who's on first.
Costello: I don't know.
Abbott: He's on third, we're not talking about him.
Costello: Now how did I get on third base?
Abbott: Why you mentioned his name.
Costello: If I mentioned the third baseman's name, who did I say is playing third?
Abbott: No. Who's playing first.
Costello: What's on base?
Abbott: What's on second.
Costello: I don't know.
Abbott: He's on third.
Costello: There I go, back on third again!

PAUSE

Costello: Would you just stay on third base and don't go off it.
Abbott: Alright, what do you want to know?
Costello: Now who's playing third base?
Abbott: Why do you insist on putting Who on third base?
Costello: What am I putting on third?
Abbott: No. What is on second.
Costello: You don't want who on second?
Abbott: Who is on first.
Costello: I don't know.
Together: Third base!

PAUSE

Costello: Look, you gotta outfield?
Abbott: Sure.
Costello: The left fielder's name?
Abbott: Why.
Costello: I just thought I'd ask you.
Abbott: Well, I just thought I'd tell ya.
Costello: Then tell me who's playing left field.
Abbott: Who's playing first.
Costello: I'm not...stay out of the infield!!! I want to know what's the guy's name in left field?
Abbott: No, What is on second.
Costello: I'm not asking you who's on second.
Abbott: Who's on first!
Costello: I don't know.
Together: Third base!

PAUSE

Costello: The left fielder's name?
Abbott: Why.
Costello: Because!
Abbott: Oh, he's center field.

PAUSE

Costello: Look, You gotta pitcher on this team?
Abbott: Sure.
Costello: The pitcher's name?
Abbott: Tomorrow.
Costello: You don't want to tell me today?
Abbott: I'm telling you now.
Costello: Then go ahead.
Abbott: Tomorrow!
Costello: What time?
Abbott: What time what?
Costello: What time tomorrow are you gonna tell me who's pitching?
Abbott: Now listen. Who is not pitching.
Costello: I'll break your arm if you say who's on first!!! I want to know what's the pitcher's name?
Abbott: What's on second.
Costello: I don't know.
Together: Third base!

PAUSE

Costello: Gotta catcher?
Abbott: Certainly.
Costello: The catcher's name?
Abbott: Today.
Costello: Today, and tomorrow's pitching.
Abbott: Now you've got it.
Costello: All we got is a couple of days on the team.

PAUSE

Costello: You know I'm a catcher too.
Abbott: So they tell me.
Costello: I get behind the plate to do some fancy catching, Tomorrow's pitching on my team and a heavy hitter gets up. Now the heavy hitter bunts the ball. When he bunts the ball, me, being a good catcher, I'm gonna throw the guy out at first. So I pick up the ball and throw it to who?
Abbott: Now that's the first thing you've said right.
Costello: I don't even know what I'm talking about!

PAUSE

Abbott: That's all you have to do.
Costello: Is to throw the ball to first base.
Abbott: Yes!
Costello: Now who's got it?
Abbott: Naturally.

PAUSE

Costello: Look, if I throw the ball to first base, somebody's gotta get it. Now who has it?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: Who?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: Naturally?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: So I pick up the ball and I throw it to Naturally.
Abbott: No you don't you throw the ball to Who.
Costello: Naturally.
Abbott: That's different.
Costello: That's what I said.
Abbott: Your not saying it...
Costello: I throw the ball to Naturally.
Abbott: You throw it to Who.
Costello: Naturally.
Abbott: That's it.
Costello: That's what I said!
Abbott: You ask me.
Costello: I throw the ball to who?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: Now you ask me.
Abbott: You throw the ball to Who?
Costello: Naturally.
Abbott: That's it.
Costello: Same as you! Same as YOU!!! I throw the ball to who. Whoever it is drops the ball and the guy runs to second. Who picks up the ball and throws it to What. What throws it to I Don't Know. I Don't Know throws it back to Tomorrow, Triple play. Another guy gets up and hits a long fly ball to Because. Why? I don't know! He's on third and I don't give a darn!
Abbott: What?
Costello: I said I don't give a darn!
Abbott: Oh, that's our shortstop.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Abbott: Well Costello, I'm going to New York with you. The Yankees' manager gave me a job as coach for as long as you're on the team.
Costello: Look Abbott, if your the coach, you must know all the players.
Abbott: I certainly do.
Costello: Well you know I've never met the guys. So you'll have to tell me their names, and then I'll know who's playing on the team.
Abbott: Oh, I'll tell you their names, but you know it seems to me they give these ball players now-a-days very peculiar names.
Costello: You mean funny names?
Abbott: Strange names, pet names...like Dizzy Dean...
Costello: His brother Daffy
Abbott: Daffy Dean...
Costello: And their French cousin.
Abbott: French?
Costello: Goofe'
Abbott: Goofe' Dean. Well, let's see, we have on the bags, Who's on first, What's on second, I Don't Know is on third...
Costello: That's what I want to find out.
Abbott: I say Who's on first, What's on second, I Don't Know's on third.
Costello: Are you the manager?
Abbott: Yes.
Costello: You gonna be the coach too?
Abbott: Yes.
Costello: And you don't know the fellows' names.
Abbott: Well I should.
Costello: Well then who's on first?
Abbott: Yes.
Costello: I mean the fellow's name.
Abbott: Who.
Costello: The guy on first.
Abbott: Who.
Costello: The first baseman.
Abbott: Who.
Costello: The guy playing...
Abbott: Who is on first!
Costello: I'm asking you who's on first.
Abbott: That's the man's name.
Costello: That's whose name?
Abbott: Yes.
Costello: Well go ahead and tell me.
Abbott: That's it.
Costello: That's who?
Abbott: Yes.

PAUSE

Costello: Look, you gotta first baseman?
Abbott: Certainly.
Costello: Who's playing first?
Abbott: That's right.
Costello: When you pay off the first baseman every month, who gets the money?
Abbott: Every dollar of it.
Costello: All I'm trying to find out is the fellow's name on first base.
Abbott: Who.
Costello: The guy that gets...
Abbott: That's it.
Costello: Who gets the money...
Abbott: He does, every dollar of it. Sometimes his wife comes down and collects it.
Costello: Who's wife?
Abbott: Yes.

PAUSE

Abbott: What's wrong with that?
Costello: Look, all I wanna know is when you sign up the first baseman, how does he sign his name?
Abbott: Who.
Costello: The guy.
Abbott: Who.
Costello: How does he sign...
Abbott: That's how he signs it.
Costello: Who?
Abbott: Yes.

PAUSE

Costello: All I'm trying to find out is what's the guys name on first base.
Abbott: No. What is on second base.
Costello: I'm not asking you who's on second.
Abbott: Who's on first.
Costello: One base at a time!
Abbott: Well, don't change the players around.
Costello: I'm not changing nobody!
Abbott: Take it easy, buddy.
Costello: I'm only asking you, who's the guy on first base?
Abbott: That's right.
Costello: Ok.
Abbott: Alright.

PAUSE

Costello: What's the guy's name on first base?
Abbott: No. What is on second.
Costello: I'm not asking you who's on second.
Abbott: Who's on first.
Costello: I don't know.
Abbott: He's on third, we're not talking about him.
Costello: Now how did I get on third base?
Abbott: Why you mentioned his name.
Costello: If I mentioned the third baseman's name, who did I say is playing third?
Abbott: No. Who's playing first.
Costello: What's on base?
Abbott: What's on second.
Costello: I don't know.
Abbott: He's on third.
Costello: There I go, back on third again!

PAUSE

Costello: Would you just stay on third base and don't go off it.
Abbott: Alright, what do you want to know?
Costello: Now who's playing third base?
Abbott: Why do you insist on putting Who on third base?
Costello: What am I putting on third?
Abbott: No. What is on second.
Costello: You don't want who on second?
Abbott: Who is on first.
Costello: I don't know.
Together: Third base!

PAUSE

Costello: Look, you gotta outfield?
Abbott: Sure.
Costello: The left fielder's name?
Abbott: Why.
Costello: I just thought I'd ask you.
Abbott: Well, I just thought I'd tell ya.
Costello: Then tell me who's playing left field.
Abbott: Who's playing first.
Costello: I'm not...stay out of the infield!!! I want to know what's the guy's name in left field?
Abbott: No, What is on second.
Costello: I'm not asking you who's on second.
Abbott: Who's on first!
Costello: I don't know.
Together: Third base!

PAUSE

Costello: The left fielder's name?
Abbott: Why.
Costello: Because!
Abbott: Oh, he's center field.

PAUSE

Costello: Look, You gotta pitcher on this team?
Abbott: Sure.
Costello: The pitcher's name?
Abbott: Tomorrow.
Costello: You don't want to tell me today?
Abbott: I'm telling you now.
Costello: Then go ahead.
Abbott: Tomorrow!
Costello: What time?
Abbott: What time what?
Costello: What time tomorrow are you gonna tell me who's pitching?
Abbott: Now listen. Who is not pitching.
Costello: I'll break your arm if you say who's on first!!! I want to know what's the pitcher's name?
Abbott: What's on second.
Costello: I don't know.
Together: Third base!

PAUSE

Costello: Gotta catcher?
Abbott: Certainly.
Costello: The catcher's name?
Abbott: Today.
Costello: Today, and tomorrow's pitching.
Abbott: Now you've got it.
Costello: All we got is a couple of days on the team.

PAUSE

Costello: You know I'm a catcher too.
Abbott: So they tell me.
Costello: I get behind the plate to do some fancy catching, Tomorrow's pitching on my team and a heavy hitter gets up. Now the heavy hitter bunts the ball. When he bunts the ball, me, being a good catcher, I'm gonna throw the guy out at first. So I pick up the ball and throw it to who?
Abbott: Now that's the first thing you've said right.
Costello: I don't even know what I'm talking about!

PAUSE

Abbott: That's all you have to do.
Costello: Is to throw the ball to first base.
Abbott: Yes!
Costello: Now who's got it?
Abbott: Naturally.

PAUSE

Costello: Look, if I throw the ball to first base, somebody's gotta get it. Now who has it?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: Who?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: Naturally?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: So I pick up the ball and I throw it to Naturally.
Abbott: No you don't you throw the ball to Who.
Costello: Naturally.
Abbott: That's different.
Costello: That's what I said.
Abbott: Your not saying it...
Costello: I throw the ball to Naturally.
Abbott: You throw it to Who.
Costello: Naturally.
Abbott: That's it.
Costello: That's what I said!
Abbott: You ask me.
Costello: I throw the ball to who?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: Now you ask me.
Abbott: You throw the ball to Who?
Costello: Naturally.
Abbott: That's it.
Costello: Same as you! Same as YOU!!! I throw the ball to who. Whoever it is drops the ball and the guy runs to second. Who picks up the ball and throws it to What. What throws it to I Don't Know. I Don't Know throws it back to Tomorrow, Triple play. Another guy gets up and hits a long fly ball to Because. Why? I don't know! He's on third and I don't give a darn!
Abbott: What?
Costello: I said I don't give a darn!
Abbott: Oh, that's our shortstop.

Hey that is like our conversations!

https://youtu.be/HQkSMJFJu4g?si=-XaQq4ZwOmdz_a1w

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

I saw some posts over on Deny Ignoranve, citing info from the FBI the shooter had Trans ideology. I remember seeing those posts before Swan's here, but I'm not gonna dig up the time stamps.

I think they were both posted before it was reported the rifle was found, but probably after the rifle was actually found, but not reported yet.

Turns out there are no explicit engravings in the bullets about Trans ideologies.

But an implicit engraving could be the words, What is this?

As in you can get with This, or you can get with That.

https://youtu.be/9w1nz8Ld_gI?si=AqJoXh_senKwXFH9

Then there was the engraving, If you are reading this you're gay.

It's not hard to imagine a kid growing up gay in Utah might be more prone to being triggered than most.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

745 "views" of this thread in just four days.

This is new and different.

Swan's threads usually draw very few "views", and few replies.

Could the wild card factor be the New Messiah?

Even as member participation dwindled to almost nothing, the newest incarnation of the New Messiah came back again. Only to be promptly removed.

Thank you, Branner, for staying on top of that.

And now even the most idiotic threads are getting lots of "views". Like, hundreds of views a day. Even for "Basic Dogma" by Into the Night!

Somebody is watching.

Long live climate-debate.com!

Spongy Iris wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

I saw some posts over on Deny Ignoranve, citing info from the FBI the shooter had Trans ideology. I remember seeing those posts before Swan's here, but I'm not gonna dig up the time stamps.

I think they were both posted before it was reported the rifle was found, but probably after the rifle was actually found, but not reported yet.

Turns out there are no explicit engravings in the bullets about Trans ideologies.

But an implicit engraving could be the words, What is this?

As in you can get with This, or you can get with That.

https://youtu.be/9w1nz8Ld_gI?si=AqJoXh_senKwXFH9

Then there was the engraving, If you are reading this you're gay.

It's not hard to imagine a kid growing up gay in Utah might be more prone to being triggered than most.

In regards to the linguistics of This or That,

seems people say This when something feels internal, and say That when something feels external.

So what is This?

Must be something internal.

Xadoman wrote:
Having punchable face and spreading pooptins talking points turns out to be a lethal combo. Great candidate for Darwin award.

Moral of the story is that if you are an articulate guy but have a punchable face then you must choose the sides very carefully. Be on the right side of the history, do not spread pooptins talking points and do not roll red carpets for the murderers. Simple as that.

Matthew Dowd's sudden exit from MSNBC has sent shockwaves through political media circles. The veteran pundit, known for his role as chief strategist for George W. Bush's 2004 presidential campaign and a long tenure as a political analyst at ABC News, was dismissed after making controversial remarks about the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Dowd's comments, which suggested that Kirk's provocative rhetoric may have contributed to the violent environment that led to his fatal shooting, sparked immediate backlash, and raised questions about the boundaries of political commentary in the wake of tragedy.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

I saw some posts over on Deny Ignoranve, citing info from the FBI the shooter had Trans ideology. I remember seeing those posts before Swan's here, but I'm not gonna dig up the time stamps.

I think they were both posted before it was reported the rifle was found, but probably after the rifle was actually found, but not reported yet.

Turns out there are no explicit engravings in the bullets about Trans ideologies.

But an implicit engraving could be the words, What is this?

As in you can get with This, or you can get with That.

https://youtu.be/9w1nz8Ld_gI?si=AqJoXh_senKwXFH9

Then there was the engraving, If you are reading this you're gay.

It's not hard to imagine a kid growing up gay in Utah might be more prone to being triggered than most.

In regards to the linguistics of This or That,

seems people say This when something feels internal, and say That when something feels external.

So what is This?

Must be something internal.

Thorazine helps.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

I saw some posts over on Deny Ignoranve, citing info from the FBI the shooter had Trans ideology. I remember seeing those posts before Swan's here, but I'm not gonna dig up the time stamps.

I think they were both posted before it was reported the rifle was found, but probably after the rifle was actually found, but not reported yet.

Turns out there are no explicit engravings in the bullets about Trans ideologies.

But an implicit engraving could be the words, What is this?

As in you can get with This, or you can get with That.

https://youtu.be/9w1nz8Ld_gI?si=AqJoXh_senKwXFH9

Then there was the engraving, If you are reading this you're gay.

It's not hard to imagine a kid growing up gay in Utah might be more prone to being triggered than most.

In regards to the linguistics of This or That,

seems people say This when something feels internal, and say That when something feels external.

So what is This?

Must be something internal.

Thorazine helps.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
Having punchable face and spreading pooptins talking points turns out to be a lethal combo. Great candidate for Darwin award.

Moral of the story is that if you are an articulate guy but have a punchable face then you must choose the sides very carefully. Be on the right side of the history, do not spread pooptins talking points and do not roll red carpets for the murderers. Simple as that.

Does spreading hate warrant the death penalty?

I don't think so.

Some news on the issue:

Matthew Dowd's sudden exit from MSNBC has sent shockwaves through political media circles. The veteran pundit, known for his role as chief strategist for George W. Bush's 2004 presidential campaign and a long tenure as a political analyst at ABC News, was dismissed after making controversial remarks about the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Dowd's comments, which suggested that Kirk's provocative rhetoric may have contributed to the violent environment that led to his fatal shooting, sparked immediate backlash, and raised questions about the boundaries of political commentary in the wake of tragedy.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
Having punchable face and spreading pooptins talking points turns out to be a lethal combo. Great candidate for Darwin award.

Moral of the story is that if you are an articulate guy but have a punchable face then you must choose the sides very carefully. Be on the right side of the history, do not spread pooptins talking points and do not roll red carpets for the murderers. Simple as that.

Does spreading hate warrant the death penalty?

I don't think so.

Some news on the issue:

Matthew Dowd's sudden exit from MSNBC has sent shockwaves through political media circles. The veteran pundit, known for his role as chief strategist for George W. Bush's 2004 presidential campaign and a long tenure as a political analyst at ABC News, was dismissed after making controversial remarks about the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Dowd's comments, which suggested that Kirk's provocative rhetoric may have contributed to the violent environment that led to his fatal shooting, sparked immediate backlash, and raised questions about the boundaries of political commentary in the wake of tragedy.

Then there is this heavy debate.

https://youtu.be/M59tcsXPEtw?si=u13G_PkZj35qsGcm

Is it ok for the Israeli defense forces to indiscriminately bomb Palestinian civilians, because the Palestinian government sponsored the brutal rapes and killings of Israeli people attending a concert?

My position is No.

The civilians should not be held accountable for their government's failures, because most of them have no choice as to where live.

But Charlie Kirk said Yes, because Israel is the good guy, and Hamas is the bad guy.

Kirk was towing the party line.

Looks like in popular politics, there is no choice but to tow the party line. That is why I would never aspire to a career in popular politics.

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Does spreading hate warrant the death penalty?

I don't think so.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

Im a BM wrote:I imagine you will continue to believe your delusion of a tranny democrat shooter, regardless of all evidence to the contrary.

Im a BM wrote:By the time it was Trump 2.0,

Im a BM wrote:In North Korea, one risked severe punishment if they did not put on a ..

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

The Roman leader did not care or want to crucify Jesus, such being true he left the decision up to the Jews who chanted crucify him, so Pilot knowing that he had to keep the masses in line, gave the Jews what they wanted and crucified the Jew to keep the other Jews happy.

The Hebrew shits have their own story that they tell their little hebe shits. The other 8.5 billion people regardless of what religion they are all know that the Jews crucified the Jew in Jerusalem, and mocked him as he cried.

So eat shit **** off and die sweety, and enjoy your kosher nitrites

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

The Roman leader did not care or want to crucify Jesus, such being true he left the decision up to the Jews who chanted crucify him, so Pilot knowing that he had to keep the masses in line, gave the Jews what they wanted and crucified the Jew to keep the other Jews happy.

The Hebrew shits have their own story that they tell their little hebe shits. The other 8.5 billion people regardless of what religion they are all know that the Jews crucified the Jew in Jerusalem, and mocked him as he cried.

So eat shit **** off and die sweety, and enjoy your kosher nitrites

Pontius Pilate washed his hands of his revenge porn production, did he? Just giving the multitudes what they were craving, yea?

This reminds me of Hunter Moore, the most hated man on the internet, who got 2.5 years of time for stealing people's naked pictures without their consent, and posting them online.

I watched the documentary about Moore on Netflix, The Most Hated Man on the Internet, turns out a lot of the people he violated wound up feeling very traumatized by him.

It is quite naive to think one can literally wash their hands from the damage of sex and masturbation which does cause major trauma.

The phrase, bringing a knife to a gun fight, fits well IMO, thinking that some soap and water can cure a disease traumatizing everybody from the inside out.

The story of Jesus refusing to wash his hands for the priests at a dinner meeting tells the same kind of thing IMO.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

The Roman leader did not care or want to crucify Jesus, such being true he left the decision up to the Jews who chanted crucify him, so Pilot knowing that he had to keep the masses in line, gave the Jews what they wanted and crucified the Jew to keep the other Jews happy.

The Hebrew shits have their own story that they tell their little hebe shits. The other 8.5 billion people regardless of what religion they are all know that the Jews crucified the Jew in Jerusalem, and mocked him as he cried.

So eat shit **** off and die sweety, and enjoy your kosher nitrites

Pontius Pilate washed his hands of his revenge porn production, did he? Just giving the multitudes what they were craving, yea?

This reminds me of Hunter Moore, the most hated man on the internet, who got 2.5 years of time for stealing people's naked pictures without their consent, and posting them online.

I watched the documentary about Moore on Netflix, The Most Hated Man on the Internet, turns out a lot of the people he violated wound up feeling very traumatized by him.

It is quite naive to think one can literally wash their hands from the damage of sex and masturbation which does cause major trauma.

The phrase, bringing a knife to a gun fight, fits well IMO, thinking that some soap and water can cure a disease traumatizing everybody from the inside out.

The story of Jesus refusing to wash his hands for the priests at a dinner meeting tells the same kind of thing IMO.

LOL, you just said that the rabbis chanted to crucify Jesus, because he did not participate in their phony purification ritual of hand washing. Thanks for making my point. Tortured to death for not washing his hands.

Next dumb kosher nitrite comment.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

The Roman leader did not care or want to crucify Jesus, such being true he left the decision up to the Jews who chanted crucify him, so Pilot knowing that he had to keep the masses in line, gave the Jews what they wanted and crucified the Jew to keep the other Jews happy.

The Hebrew shits have their own story that they tell their little hebe shits. The other 8.5 billion people regardless of what religion they are all know that the Jews crucified the Jew in Jerusalem, and mocked him as he cried.

So eat shit **** off and die sweety, and enjoy your kosher nitrites

Pontius Pilate washed his hands of his revenge porn production, did he? Just giving the multitudes what they were craving, yea?

This reminds me of Hunter Moore, the most hated man on the internet, who got 2.5 years of time for stealing people's naked pictures without their consent, and posting them online.

I watched the documentary about Moore on Netflix, The Most Hated Man on the Internet, turns out a lot of the people he violated wound up feeling very traumatized by him.

It is quite naive to think one can literally wash their hands from the damage of sex and masturbation which does cause major trauma.

The phrase, bringing a knife to a gun fight, fits well IMO, thinking that some soap and water can cure a disease traumatizing everybody from the inside out.

The story of Jesus refusing to wash his hands for the priests at a dinner meeting tells the same kind of thing IMO.

LOL, you just said that the rabbis chanted to crucify Jesus, because he did not participate in their phony purification ritual of hand washing. Thanks for making my point. Tortured to death for not washing his hands.

Next dumb kosher nitrite comment.

MSG heavy meal last night seems to be helping with some productive BMs.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

The Roman leader did not care or want to crucify Jesus, such being true he left the decision up to the Jews who chanted crucify him, so Pilot knowing that he had to keep the masses in line, gave the Jews what they wanted and crucified the Jew to keep the other Jews happy.

The Hebrew shits have their own story that they tell their little hebe shits. The other 8.5 billion people regardless of what religion they are all know that the Jews crucified the Jew in Jerusalem, and mocked him as he cried.

So eat shit **** off and die sweety, and enjoy your kosher nitrites

Pontius Pilate washed his hands of his revenge porn production, did he? Just giving the multitudes what they were craving, yea?

This reminds me of Hunter Moore, the most hated man on the internet, who got 2.5 years of time for stealing people's naked pictures without their consent, and posting them online.

I watched the documentary about Moore on Netflix, The Most Hated Man on the Internet, turns out a lot of the people he violated wound up feeling very traumatized by him.

It is quite naive to think one can literally wash their hands from the damage of sex and masturbation which does cause major trauma.

The phrase, bringing a knife to a gun fight, fits well IMO, thinking that some soap and water can cure a disease traumatizing everybody from the inside out.

The story of Jesus refusing to wash his hands for the priests at a dinner meeting tells the same kind of thing IMO.

LOL, you just said that the rabbis chanted to crucify Jesus, because he did not participate in their phony purification ritual of hand washing. Thanks for making my point. Tortured to death for not washing his hands.

Next dumb kosher nitrite comment.

MSG heavy meal last night seems to be helping with some productive BMs.

So you want to skip on the conversation that you started where the rabbis chanted crucify Jesus because he didn't pretend to be cleaner than thou by washing his hands.

Not surprised

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

The Roman leader did not care or want to crucify Jesus, such being true he left the decision up to the Jews who chanted crucify him, so Pilot knowing that he had to keep the masses in line, gave the Jews what they wanted and crucified the Jew to keep the other Jews happy.

The Hebrew shits have their own story that they tell their little hebe shits. The other 8.5 billion people regardless of what religion they are all know that the Jews crucified the Jew in Jerusalem, and mocked him as he cried.

So eat shit **** off and die sweety, and enjoy your kosher nitrites

Pontius Pilate washed his hands of his revenge porn production, did he? Just giving the multitudes what they were craving, yea?

This reminds me of Hunter Moore, the most hated man on the internet, who got 2.5 years of time for stealing people's naked pictures without their consent, and posting them online.

I watched the documentary about Moore on Netflix, The Most Hated Man on the Internet, turns out a lot of the people he violated wound up feeling very traumatized by him.

It is quite naive to think one can literally wash their hands from the damage of sex and masturbation which does cause major trauma.

The phrase, bringing a knife to a gun fight, fits well IMO, thinking that some soap and water can cure a disease traumatizing everybody from the inside out.

The story of Jesus refusing to wash his hands for the priests at a dinner meeting tells the same kind of thing IMO.

LOL, you just said that the rabbis chanted to crucify Jesus, because he did not participate in their phony purification ritual of hand washing. Thanks for making my point. Tortured to death for not washing his hands.

Next dumb kosher nitrite comment.

MSG heavy meal last night seems to be helping with some productive BMs.

So you want to skip on the conversation that you started where the rabbis chanted crucify Jesus because he didn't pretend to be cleaner than thou by washing his hands.

Not surprised

Like I said, I believe the crucifixion was a Roman orgy festival, not some unbelievably cruel and unusual capital punishment.

Jesus' body was his temple.

When Jesus was 46, and had turned the water of his temple to wine, and turned the tables on the money changers, drove them out with a scourge of small chords, had regained the vitality of a 30 year old, he said, destroy my temple and I will build it again in, "3 days."

So seems to me that was Jesus asking to participate in the Roman orgy festival.

A 46 year old man who had achieved so long a streak as to regain the vitality of a 30 year old, is bound to be a very magnetic individual. The envy of everybody.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

The Roman leader did not care or want to crucify Jesus, such being true he left the decision up to the Jews who chanted crucify him, so Pilot knowing that he had to keep the masses in line, gave the Jews what they wanted and crucified the Jew to keep the other Jews happy.

The Hebrew shits have their own story that they tell their little hebe shits. The other 8.5 billion people regardless of what religion they are all know that the Jews crucified the Jew in Jerusalem, and mocked him as he cried.

So eat shit **** off and die sweety, and enjoy your kosher nitrites

Pontius Pilate washed his hands of his revenge porn production, did he? Just giving the multitudes what they were craving, yea?

This reminds me of Hunter Moore, the most hated man on the internet, who got 2.5 years of time for stealing people's naked pictures without their consent, and posting them online.

I watched the documentary about Moore on Netflix, The Most Hated Man on the Internet, turns out a lot of the people he violated wound up feeling very traumatized by him.

It is quite naive to think one can literally wash their hands from the damage of sex and masturbation which does cause major trauma.

The phrase, bringing a knife to a gun fight, fits well IMO, thinking that some soap and water can cure a disease traumatizing everybody from the inside out.

The story of Jesus refusing to wash his hands for the priests at a dinner meeting tells the same kind of thing IMO.

LOL, you just said that the rabbis chanted to crucify Jesus, because he did not participate in their phony purification ritual of hand washing. Thanks for making my point. Tortured to death for not washing his hands.

Next dumb kosher nitrite comment.

MSG heavy meal last night seems to be helping with some productive BMs.

So you want to skip on the conversation that you started where the rabbis chanted crucify Jesus because he didn't pretend to be cleaner than thou by washing his hands.

Not surprised

Like I said, I believe the crucifixion was a Roman orgy festival, not some unbelievably cruel and unusual capital punishment.

Jesus' body was his temple.

When Jesus was 46, and had turned the water of his temple to wine, and turned the tables on the money changers, drove them out with a scourge of small chords, had regained the vitality of a 30 year old, he said, destroy my temple and I will build it again in, "3 days."

So seems to me that was Jesus asking to participate in the Roman orgy festival.

A 46 year old man who had achieved so long a streak as to regain the vitality of a 30 year old, is bound to be a very magnetic individual. The envy of everybody.

Why do you bother putting in obvious errors to fool me, when I already know that you do this. See kid this is 130 vs 100 with 20 years of college debt.

The average agreement on Jesus age of crucifiction is 33. But you knew that, so stop being silly

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

The Roman leader did not care or want to crucify Jesus, such being true he left the decision up to the Jews who chanted crucify him, so Pilot knowing that he had to keep the masses in line, gave the Jews what they wanted and crucified the Jew to keep the other Jews happy.

The Hebrew shits have their own story that they tell their little hebe shits. The other 8.5 billion people regardless of what religion they are all know that the Jews crucified the Jew in Jerusalem, and mocked him as he cried.

So eat shit **** off and die sweety, and enjoy your kosher nitrites

Pontius Pilate washed his hands of his revenge porn production, did he? Just giving the multitudes what they were craving, yea?

This reminds me of Hunter Moore, the most hated man on the internet, who got 2.5 years of time for stealing people's naked pictures without their consent, and posting them online.

I watched the documentary about Moore on Netflix, The Most Hated Man on the Internet, turns out a lot of the people he violated wound up feeling very traumatized by him.

It is quite naive to think one can literally wash their hands from the damage of sex and masturbation which does cause major trauma.

The phrase, bringing a knife to a gun fight, fits well IMO, thinking that some soap and water can cure a disease traumatizing everybody from the inside out.

The story of Jesus refusing to wash his hands for the priests at a dinner meeting tells the same kind of thing IMO.

LOL, you just said that the rabbis chanted to crucify Jesus, because he did not participate in their phony purification ritual of hand washing. Thanks for making my point. Tortured to death for not washing his hands.

Next dumb kosher nitrite comment.

MSG heavy meal last night seems to be helping with some productive BMs.

So you want to skip on the conversation that you started where the rabbis chanted crucify Jesus because he didn't pretend to be cleaner than thou by washing his hands.

Not surprised

Like I said, I believe the crucifixion was a Roman orgy festival, not some unbelievably cruel and unusual capital punishment.

Jesus' body was his temple.

When Jesus was 46, and had turned the water of his temple to wine, and turned the tables on the money changers, drove them out with a scourge of small chords, had regained the vitality of a 30 year old, he said, destroy my temple and I will build it again in, "3 days."

So seems to me that was Jesus asking to participate in the Roman orgy festival.

A 46 year old man who had achieved so long a streak as to regain the vitality of a 30 year old, is bound to be a very magnetic individual. The envy of everybody.

Why do you bother putting in obvious errors to fool me, when I already know that you do this. See kid this is 130 vs 100 with 20 years of college debt.

The average agreement on Jesus age of crucifiction is 33. But you knew that, so stop being silly

I think 49 might be more accurate for Jesus' age at crucifixion.

See when he said tear down my temple, they said his temple was 46.

Then apparently there were 3 passovers: 46 + 3 = 49

The consensus that Jesus was 33, is because they said when the Holy Dove descended upon Jesus he began to be about 30.

Nobody would say he is about an age unless they knew nothing about him. Calendars make measuring age an exact science. And the Bible is extremely specific when it comes to numbers.

They would only say somebody is about an age, if it was a measurement of biological age, or vitality. If somebody wanted to believe in the Bible, they should interpret the 4 gospels as the Holy Dove restoring vitality.

So my belief is still the same, that by the time Jesus was 46, he had attained the vitality of a 30 year old.

Impressive!

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

The Roman leader did not care or want to crucify Jesus, such being true he left the decision up to the Jews who chanted crucify him, so Pilot knowing that he had to keep the masses in line, gave the Jews what they wanted and crucified the Jew to keep the other Jews happy.

The Hebrew shits have their own story that they tell their little hebe shits. The other 8.5 billion people regardless of what religion they are all know that the Jews crucified the Jew in Jerusalem, and mocked him as he cried.

So eat shit **** off and die sweety, and enjoy your kosher nitrites

Pontius Pilate washed his hands of his revenge porn production, did he? Just giving the multitudes what they were craving, yea?

This reminds me of Hunter Moore, the most hated man on the internet, who got 2.5 years of time for stealing people's naked pictures without their consent, and posting them online.

I watched the documentary about Moore on Netflix, The Most Hated Man on the Internet, turns out a lot of the people he violated wound up feeling very traumatized by him.

It is quite naive to think one can literally wash their hands from the damage of sex and masturbation which does cause major trauma.

The phrase, bringing a knife to a gun fight, fits well IMO, thinking that some soap and water can cure a disease traumatizing everybody from the inside out.

The story of Jesus refusing to wash his hands for the priests at a dinner meeting tells the same kind of thing IMO.

LOL, you just said that the rabbis chanted to crucify Jesus, because he did not participate in their phony purification ritual of hand washing. Thanks for making my point. Tortured to death for not washing his hands.

Next dumb kosher nitrite comment.

MSG heavy meal last night seems to be helping with some productive BMs.

So you want to skip on the conversation that you started where the rabbis chanted crucify Jesus because he didn't pretend to be cleaner than thou by washing his hands.

Not surprised

Like I said, I believe the crucifixion was a Roman orgy festival, not some unbelievably cruel and unusual capital punishment.

Jesus' body was his temple.

When Jesus was 46, and had turned the water of his temple to wine, and turned the tables on the money changers, drove them out with a scourge of small chords, had regained the vitality of a 30 year old, he said, destroy my temple and I will build it again in, "3 days."

So seems to me that was Jesus asking to participate in the Roman orgy festival.

A 46 year old man who had achieved so long a streak as to regain the vitality of a 30 year old, is bound to be a very magnetic individual. The envy of everybody.

Why do you bother putting in obvious errors to fool me, when I already know that you do this. See kid this is 130 vs 100 with 20 years of college debt.

The average agreement on Jesus age of crucifiction is 33. But you knew that, so stop being silly

I think 49 might be more accurate for Jesus' age at crucifixion.

See when he said tear down my temple, they said his temple was 46.

Then apparently there were 3 passovers: 46 + 3 = 49

The consensus that Jesus was 33, is because they said when the Holy Dove descended upon Jesus he began to be about 30.

Nobody would say he is about an age unless they knew nothing about him. Calendars make measuring age an exact science. And the Bible is extremely specific when it comes to numbers.

They would only say somebody is about an age, if it was a measurement of biological age, or vitality. If somebody wanted to believe in the Bible, they should interpret the 4 gospels as the Holy Dove restoring vitality.

So my belief is still the same, that by the time Jesus was 46, he had attained the vitality of a 30 year old.

Impressive!

Except that almost nobody lived to 49 years old in the year zero, but you know that as well and you are continuing to test me and fail yourself.

Besides, they voted not to release the Epstein files on the very same day that Kirk was shot and seemingly nobody cares because the media will not report anything but Kirk.

Process that silly

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

First of all kid I did not know within hours of the shooting that the shooter was a democrat/faggot/tranny. I knew this instantly, I might have said this within hours, but I knew it instantly. How did I know this? You will never know because intelligence is required.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Only a high ranking member of the deep state would have known within hours that the assassin was a transgender democrat.

Swan is posting information that isn't even available to the mainstream media yet.

When the story comes out, we will know that Swan is likely with the FBI.

How else could he have known?

First of all kid I did not know within hours of the shooting that the shooter was a democrat/faggot/tranny. I knew this instantly, I might have said this within hours, but I knew it instantly. How did I know this? You will never know because intelligence is required.

Is it a cry for help?

In such a lonely echo chamber.

High Apple$IQ makes such a fulfilling life as this one possible.

With a little help from climate-debate.com

You should thank Branner for giving you a home where wife and kids don't nag.

Sing out in glory! Victory is yours!

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

If I ever get to go to Israel I want to go to Jerusalem when they have a reenactment of Jesus trial, and jump up and down and chant with the Hebs, crucify the Jew, crucify the Jew. Yup me and the rabbis jumping up and down screaming crucify the Jew.

My hero was a Jew, until the Jews condemned him that is.

But since it all worked out the Hebs never tell this story.

Carve it in stone

Well I wasn't expecting you to bring up the parable of Jesus being crucified by the Jews & Romans. That's totally a topic change from my last response. Fine by me.

I don't believe that the Roman government actually crucified Jesus just for his interpretation of the Old Testament. But I believe Jesus was a real person, who interpreted the Old Testament in a manner much like I do now.

The way I interpret the story of Jesus' crucifixion is it was one of those Roman orgies, that Jesus partook in after he had attained, what they call in the Semen Retention subreddits, A Long Streak.

His streak was so long, by the time his calendar age was 46, he had begun to be about 30 years of biological age.

That was when he said, tear down my temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days. The temple he referred to was his body.

The Roman leader did not care or want to crucify Jesus, such being true he left the decision up to the Jews who chanted crucify him, so Pilot knowing that he had to keep the masses in line, gave the Jews what they wanted and crucified the Jew to keep the other Jews happy.

The Hebrew shits have their own story that they tell their little hebe shits. The other 8.5 billion people regardless of what religion they are all know that the Jews crucified the Jew in Jerusalem, and mocked him as he cried.

So eat shit **** off and die sweety, and enjoy your kosher nitrites

Pontius Pilate washed his hands of his revenge porn production, did he? Just giving the multitudes what they were craving, yea?

This reminds me of Hunter Moore, the most hated man on the internet, who got 2.5 years of time for stealing people's naked pictures without their consent, and posting them online.

I watched the documentary about Moore on Netflix, The Most Hated Man on the Internet, turns out a lot of the people he violated wound up feeling very traumatized by him.

It is quite naive to think one can literally wash their hands from the damage of sex and masturbation which does cause major trauma.

The phrase, bringing a knife to a gun fight, fits well IMO, thinking that some soap and water can cure a disease traumatizing everybody from the inside out.

The story of Jesus refusing to wash his hands for the priests at a dinner meeting tells the same kind of thing IMO.

LOL, you just said that the rabbis chanted to crucify Jesus, because he did not participate in their phony purification ritual of hand washing. Thanks for making my point. Tortured to death for not washing his hands.

Next dumb kosher nitrite comment.

MSG heavy meal last night seems to be helping with some productive BMs.

So you want to skip on the conversation that you started where the rabbis chanted crucify Jesus because he didn't pretend to be cleaner than thou by washing his hands.

Not surprised

Like I said, I believe the crucifixion was a Roman orgy festival, not some unbelievably cruel and unusual capital punishment.

Jesus' body was his temple.

When Jesus was 46, and had turned the water of his temple to wine, and turned the tables on the money changers, drove them out with a scourge of small chords, had regained the vitality of a 30 year old, he said, destroy my temple and I will build it again in, "3 days."

So seems to me that was Jesus asking to participate in the Roman orgy festival.

A 46 year old man who had achieved so long a streak as to regain the vitality of a 30 year old, is bound to be a very magnetic individual. The envy of everybody.

Why do you bother putting in obvious errors to fool me, when I already know that you do this. See kid this is 130 vs 100 with 20 years of college debt.

The average agreement on Jesus age of crucifiction is 33. But you knew that, so stop being silly

I think 49 might be more accurate for Jesus' age at crucifixion.

See when he said tear down my temple, they said his temple was 46.

Then apparently there were 3 passovers: 46 + 3 = 49

The consensus that Jesus was 33, is because they said when the Holy Dove descended upon Jesus he began to be about 30.

Nobody would say he is about an age unless they knew nothing about him. Calendars make measuring age an exact science. And the Bible is extremely specific when it comes to numbers.

They would only say somebody is about an age, if it was a measurement of biological age, or vitality. If somebody wanted to believe in the Bible, they should interpret the 4 gospels as the Holy Dove restoring vitality.

So my belief is still the same, that by the time Jesus was 46, he had attained the vitality of a 30 year old.

Impressive!

Except that almost nobody lived to 49 years old in the year zero, but you know that as well and you are continuing to test me and fail yourself.

Besides, they voted not to release the Epstein files on the very same day that Kirk was shot and seemingly nobody cares because the media will not report anything but Kirk.

Process that silly

Swan wrote:

So nobody wants to talk about how Charlie Kirk was murdered to keep the vote not to release the Epstein files out of the media who is now only permitted to babble about Kirk the doofus who wanted every baby murderer to give birth to more baby murderers. How stupid is that? I say kill them all, and if they want to kill themselves, so that there are less baby murderers, this is a good thing.

PS. Charlie Kirk wasn't Jesus, all you f0wads better wake up

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

So nobody wants to talk about how Charlie Kirk was murdered to keep the vote not to release the Epstein files out of the media who is now only permitted to babble about Kirk the doofus who wanted every baby murderer to give birth to more baby murderers. How stupid is that? I say kill them all, and if they want to kill themselves, so that there are less baby murderers, this is a good thing.

PS. Charlie Kirk wasn't Jesus, all you f0wads better wake up

Like I believe, the actual crucifixion of Jesus was not a martyrdom scapegoating ritual.

But this is how it gets interpreted.

And this is how the drum beats pound by most media pundits and famous politicians about Charlie Kirk

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

Swan wrote:

Swan wrote:
Ban Democrats, trannies and fags, not guns.

CNN reports that the shooter was mostly white and a 2nd amendment supporter was clearly a white supremacist. No mention that he was wearing a wig and skirt and a shirt saying that Trump banned Sesame Street

RIP Charlie

LOL, its always a tranny,