Thread: What Are Your Favorite Climate Prayers?

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > Thread: What Are Your Favorite Climate Prayers?

Thread: What Are Your Favorite Climate Prayers?28-05-2026 22:37
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15223)	Mine is: Hail Climate, full of grace, the warmth is with thee, Blessed art thou among data, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, feedbacks. It's simple and gets the job done.
29-05-2026 01:21
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3489)	IBdaMann wrote: Mine is: Hail Climate, full of grace, the warmth is with thee, Blessed art thou among data, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, feedbacks. It's simple and gets the job done. Oh, Holy Gas of Life! Praise the Greening! Oh, magic petroleum, Praise the Fischer's Trope! Oh, numbers that confuse, Praise the New Science of Thermodenial! You only need ONE other "scientist" to agree that your theories make sense.
29-05-2026 02:03
IBdaMann★★★★★ (15223)	Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Mine is: Hail Climate, full of grace, the warmth is with thee, Blessed art thou among data, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, feedbacks. It's simple and gets the job done. Oh, Holy Gas of Life! Praise the Greening! Oh, magic petroleum, Praise the Fischer's Trope! Oh, numbers that confuse, Praise the New Science of Thermodenial! You only need ONE other "scientist" to agree that your theories make sense. Good! Very good!
29-05-2026 18:35
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3489)	IBdaMann wrote: Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Mine is: Hail Climate, full of grace, the warmth is with thee, Blessed art thou among data, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, feedbacks. It's simple and gets the job done. Oh, Holy Gas of Life! Praise the Greening! Oh, magic petroleum, Praise the Fischer's Trope! Oh, numbers that confuse, Praise the New Science of Thermodenial! You only need ONE other "scientist" to agree that your theories make sense. Good! Very good! You are, literally, scientifically illiterate. By definition. If you were scientifically literate, you would not find the "gibber babble" of scientific papers to be "incomprehensible". You are unable to understand, read, or write the language of science. Your scientific illiteracy is manifest in many ways among your 15,000 posts, Too bad you never learned what those "buzzwords" mean. You might have had something useful to say, but you don't.
29-05-2026 20:22
Into the Night★★★★★ (24080)	Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Mine is: Hail Climate, full of grace, the warmth is with thee, Blessed art thou among data, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, feedbacks. It's simple and gets the job done. Oh, Holy Gas of Life! Praise the Greening! Oh, magic petroleum, Praise the Fischer's Trope! Oh, numbers that confuse, Praise the New Science of Thermodenial! You only need ONE other "scientist" to agree that your theories make sense. Good! Very good! You are, literally, scientifically illiterate. By definition. Inversion fallacy. Im a BM wrote: If you were scientifically literate, you would not find the "gibber babble" of scientific papers to be "incomprehensible". Science is not gibber babble. Science is not a paper. Science is comprehensible. Im a BM wrote: You are unable to understand, read, or write the language of science. Science is not a language. Im a BM wrote: Your scientific illiteracy is manifest in many ways among your 15,000 posts, Inversion fallacy. Im a BM wrote: Too bad you never learned what those "buzzwords" mean. Science is not a buzzword. Im a BM wrote: You might have had something useful to say, but you don't. He did. He complimented you on your poetry. I guess you can't even take a compliment. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
30-05-2026 16:49
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3489)	Into the Night wrote: Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Mine is: Hail Climate, full of grace, the warmth is with thee, Blessed art thou among data, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, feedbacks. It's simple and gets the job done. Oh, Holy Gas of Life! Praise the Greening! Oh, magic petroleum, Praise the Fischer's Trope! Oh, numbers that confuse, Praise the New Science of Thermodenial! You only need ONE other "scientist" to agree that your theories make sense. Good! Very good! You are, literally, scientifically illiterate. By definition. Inversion fallacy. Im a BM wrote: If you were scientifically literate, you would not find the "gibber babble" of scientific papers to be "incomprehensible". Science is not gibber babble. Science is not a paper. Science is comprehensible. Im a BM wrote: You are unable to understand, read, or write the language of science. Science is not a language. Im a BM wrote: Your scientific illiteracy is manifest in many ways among your 15,000 posts, Inversion fallacy. Im a BM wrote: Too bad you never learned what those "buzzwords" mean. Science is not a buzzword. Im a BM wrote: You might have had something useful to say, but you don't. He did. He complimented you on your poetry. I guess you can't even take a compliment. In behalf of Jeppe Branner and the other 1745 members, I want to thank IBdaMann and YARP (Yellow And Red Parrot) for being so vigilant and diligent to maintain the highest quality discussion of "science" at this website. Whenever the New Messiah comes back with new demands for ransom in order to save humanity, the two most prolific members of climate-debate.com always let the website administrator know. Otherwise, it can take a LONG TIME before Branner comes back on his own. So, thanks again, guys! You have 39,000 posts here between the two of you. In the space of less than eleven years, you guys transformed this website into a great Temple of Truth where the resident experts in science have much to teach. On behalf of Jeppe Branner and the other 1747 members, THANK YOU!
30-05-2026 22:01
Into the Night★★★★★ (24080)	Im a BM wrote: In behalf of Jeppe Branner and the other 1745 members, ...deleted whining... Omniscience fallacy. You don't get to speak for Branner or anybody else. You only get to speak for you. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
31-05-2026 16:54
Im a BM ★★★★★ (3489)	Into the Night wrote: Im a BM wrote: In behalf of Jeppe Branner and the other 1745 members, ...deleted whining... Omniscience fallacy. You don't get to speak for Branner or anybody else. You only get to speak for you. Speaking strictly for ME, purely in behalf of MYSELF, I want to express my VERY OWN appreciation for how YARP (Yellow And Red Parrot) is so vigilant about informing the website administrator about "spamming" incidents, such as the newest incursion by the newest version of the new, New Messiah. Now it's just a question of how long will it take before Branner gets that message from YARP and deletes all the newest spam threads by the New Messiah. Of course, IBdaMann might have gotten that message to Branner first. Even if they BOTH contacted Branner, it could still be weeks before the New Messiah threads get removed. Depends on when Branner feels like doing it.

Join the debate Thread: What Are Your Favorite Climate Prayers?:

Threads	Replies	Last post
Biogeochemistry-related Thread Guide for "sealover" threads.	103	27-05-2026 13:58
Biogeochemistry Related Thread List	83	06-12-2025 21:19
New thread added, no content other than	42	15-07-2025 23:55
Please keep climate debate.com in your prayers, remember the great discussions like, the Earth is a terra	25	21-06-2025 18:11
Homemade Ketchup Thread	7	02-08-2023 18:33