This should clear up any confusion about climate

Im a BM wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
GasGuzzler, we almost never hear from you these days!

Around mid December 2025, I made a terrible error that could have been catastrophic. Instead it was only a major garage fire that did significant smoke damage throughout my home. Could have cost me my life.

The past 5 months have forced me to take a hard look at my life and question what I'm doing with it. It is clear to me I wasted too much time at Climate Debate, arguing with miserable fools who refuse to learn science but claim that the earth is magically warming.

1) learn what heat is
2) learn what energy is
3) learn what pollution is
4) define climate change

Until then, there really is no discussion to be had.....unless of course you can falsify the 1st, 2nd, 3rd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan Boltzman law. Otherwise, it's a waste of the one life I have to live. Chasing the wife around the acreage is a lot more fun anyway LOL.

So, it wasn't MY trolling and spam that drove you away, specifically.

I can see how you reevaluate your life now and question the value of the time and energy you invested at climate-debate.com

Well, any scientist, anywhere in the world can now look up your well-informed and informative posts and learn from them.

Funny thing started happening here about a year ago.

As fewer members than ever actually posted anything, there was an exponential increase in the number of "views" that those spam-infested, biogeochemistry-related threads started getting.

Scientifically illiterate trolls with chips on their shoulders were never the "target audience" for my threads.

Im a BM wrote:
That target audience would be people with enough scientific literacy to go out of their way to open up threads not even displayed on the home page.

Im a BM wrote:
Threads with titles that included meaningless buzzwords like "biogeochemistry", "carbon sequestration", and "alkalinity". They rack up new "views" by the thousands now. But the software limits the highest possible "views" count to 65,535. It is not possible to assess how many additional new
"views" the threads get once they max out at 65,535.

Im a BM wrote:
THIS thread of yours, for example, has racked up more than 5,000 "views" in just three and a half years. Now that it is "bumped" to the top of the home page, we can see how many new "views" it attracts. Your fan club may be just waiting for you to post again, so they can learn all about "thermodynamics"!

Into the Night wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
GasGuzzler, we almost never hear from you these days!

Around mid December 2025, I made a terrible error that could have been catastrophic. Instead it was only a major garage fire that did significant smoke damage throughout my home. Could have cost me my life.

The past 5 months have forced me to take a hard look at my life and question what I'm doing with it. It is clear to me I wasted too much time at Climate Debate, arguing with miserable fools who refuse to learn science but claim that the earth is magically warming.

1) learn what heat is
2) learn what energy is
3) learn what pollution is
4) define climate change

Until then, there really is no discussion to be had.....unless of course you can falsify the 1st, 2nd, 3rd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan Boltzman law. Otherwise, it's a waste of the one life I have to live. Chasing the wife around the acreage is a lot more fun anyway LOL.

Hope you catch her...or she catches you!

GasGuzzler wrote:I was in such a hurry to get the heater going I filled the tank, left the cap off, and left the can of 4 remaining gallons of fuel right beside the heater. Here's the kicker, I accidentally grabbed gasoline instead of diesel. When I hit the switch the fireball was quite real and by the time I got the hose on it, it was too late.