Remember me
▼ Content

There is still no Global Warming science.

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Explanations > There is still no Global Warming science. > Page 13


Page 13 of 13<<<111213
08-07-2026 05:57
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Im a BM wrote: I can "acidify" any pHucking "alkaline" that I feel like acidifying.

Too funny! Any chemist can tell you that you can't acidify any alkaline, because you would ultimately change it to another chemical.
08-07-2026 17:09
Im a BM
★★★★★
(3712)
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote: I can "acidify" any pHucking "alkaline" that I feel like acidifying.

Too funny! Any chemist can tell you that you can't acidify any alkaline, because you would ultimately change it to another chemical.


Science is not funny.

Funny is not a chemical.

Checkmate!
12-07-2026 20:39
Im a BM
★★★★★
(3712)
IBdaMann wrote:
In order to have any Global Warming science there must be a falsifiable Global Warming model (that isn't false). Without one, Global Warming cannot rise above the level of "religion."

If anyone believes s/he has Global Warming science, please post the falsifiable Global Warming model into this thread. I prefer the actual model be posted into this thread, not the link, because thus far every single person who has posted a link has posted a bogus link that did not lead to the falsifiable Global Warming model (that isn't false).


A cry for help, from October 2014.

IBdaMann advances in rank to TOP troll according to the SENIORITY system.

Just a few months shy of a FULL DOZEN years of TROLLING here at the discussion site known as climate-debate.com

Dude, we're gonna hafta PARTY when that anniversary comes!

Into the Night now has nearly ELEVEN years of TROLLING, but seniority is clearly established in IBdaMann's favor.

But shouldn't climate-debate.com be a MERITOCRACY?

What about the QUALITY of trolling as a factor to consider?

In terms of QUANTITY of trolling, the prize goes to Into the Night.

Into the Night has 24,238 posts here, whereas IBdaMann only has 15,301 posts.

Between the two of them, that is more than 35% of ALL POSTS EVER on this website by all 1745 members!

Is it possible that neither of them knows that he is a troll?

They are both delusional enough to self identify as "scientists", so they may very well be so divorced from reality that they don't even realize they are TROLLS.

Looking at the posts from the first year of this thread, it is impressive to see how many different members used to participate in discussions nearly a dozen years ago.

Those other members all left, but IBdaMann and Into the Night are still here.
13-07-2026 10:06
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Im a BM wrote: IBdaMann advances in rank to TOP troll according to the SENIORITY system.

...

Those other members all left, but IBdaMann and Into the Night are still here.

This is spam. You are once again spamming the boards. You are a troll.
Page 13 of 13<<<111213





Join the debate There is still no Global Warming science.:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Science, Technology, Numerology For Low Level Beings Since They Are LIMITED, High Level Beings Think Abov018-07-2026 06:56
The SCIENCE of the "Greenhouse Effect"41811-07-2026 21:25
Science and the Scientific Method - Any Connection?1818-05-2026 20:57
Global Change Science and Applied Biogeochemistry Moderated Sub Forum1518-07-2024 21:11
The History of Science1022-04-2024 16:30
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US
10% [58 Votes]

EU
27% [149 Votes]

China
19% [103 Votes]

Japan
4% [24 Votes]

India
5% [25 Votes]

Brazil
2% [13 Votes]

Other
6% [35 Votes]

Don't know
27% [148 Votes]

Votes: 555
Started: 07-02-2018

Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact