There is "No such thing" as "Fossil fuel"?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Maybe he is correct if you dig deep enough you can find oil anywhere. Problem is, nobody can dig deep enough before the earth collapses on the hole they dug.

Might wanna watch out for digging into volcanoes too...

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Maybe he is correct if you dig deep enough you can find oil anywhere. Problem is, nobody can dig deep enough before the earth collapses on the hole they dug.

Might wanna watch out for digging into volcanoes too...

They can. The Russians have already have an oil well that extends 40,000 ft deep. That's about 7.5 miles down.

They HAVE already dug even deeper holes for research purposes.

Oil comes closest to the surface near the edges of tectonic plates, particularly where spreading or sliding action is taking place. This is where you find the most oil wells.

Most water wells are typically anywhere from 30 to 800 ft deep.

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Maybe he is correct if you dig deep enough you can find oil anywhere. Problem is, nobody can dig deep enough before the earth collapses on the hole they dug.

Might wanna watch out for digging into volcanoes too...

They can. The Russians have already have an oil well that extends 40,000 ft deep. That's about 7.5 miles down.

They HAVE already dug even deeper holes for research purposes.

Oil comes closest to the surface near the edges of tectonic plates, particularly where spreading or sliding action is taking place. This is where you find the most oil wells.

Most water wells are typically anywhere from 30 to 800 ft deep.

A tiny part of what ITN asserts actually corresponds, somewhat, to reality.

Most oil fields are indeed found "near the edges of tectonic plates".

The edge of a tectonic plate is also known as the "continental shelf" in many places. Ancient shallow seas occurred at the "edges of tectonic plates" because that is where the continental shelf could be found. At least at the time of formation, it was below sea level as a shallow continental shelf.

Continental shelf is DIFFERENT material than sea floor. Sea floor is called "mafic", being richer in heavier elements than the continents. Continental material is called "lithic". Lighter, and richer in lighter elements. It floats much higher on the mantle than the heavier sea floor material.

At the subduction zone, some mafic sea floor material gets mixed in with the lithic material of the continental shelf. Some of that mix gets pushed up into the new coastal mountain range that forms.

Continents get thicker over time, and their surface materials float higher and higher above the mantle. The lightest material from the constantly expanding sea floor gets incorporated into the new continental shelf, as it expands.

Former continental shelf and shallow sea becomes today's central valley, prarie, etc. And THAT is why you find the oil fields there.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Maybe he is correct if you dig deep enough you can find oil anywhere. Problem is, nobody can dig deep enough before the earth collapses on the hole they dug.

Might wanna watch out for digging into volcanoes too...

They can. The Russians have already have an oil well that extends 40,000 ft deep. That's about 7.5 miles down.

They HAVE already dug even deeper holes for research purposes.

Oil comes closest to the surface near the edges of tectonic plates, particularly where spreading or sliding action is taking place. This is where you find the most oil wells.

Most water wells are typically anywhere from 30 to 800 ft deep.

A tiny part of what ITN asserts actually corresponds, somewhat, to reality.

Most oil fields are indeed found "near the edges of tectonic plates".

The edge of a tectonic plate is also known as the "continental shelf" in many places. Ancient shallow seas occurred at the "edges of tectonic plates" because that is where the continental shelf could be found. At least at the time of formation, it was below sea level as a shallow continental shelf.

Continental shelf is DIFFERENT material than sea floor. Sea floor is called "mafic", being richer in heavier elements than the continents. Continental material is called "lithic". Lighter, and richer in lighter elements. It floats much higher on the mantle than the heavier sea floor material.

At the subduction zone, some mafic sea floor material gets mixed in with the lithic material of the continental shelf. Some of that mix gets pushed up into the new coastal mountain range that forms.

Continents get thicker over time, and their surface materials float higher and higher above the mantle. The lightest material from the constantly expanding sea floor gets incorporated into the new continental shelf, as it expands.

Former continental shelf and shallow sea becomes today's central valley, prarie, etc. And THAT is why you find the oil fields there.

There is more weight pressure on the ground in subduction zone. That is more oil making potential

And if drillers can possibly dig deep enough, the pressure is probably enough to find oil anywhere.

But there would have had to be abundant life that died, to make oil deposits. The dry land of Earth appeared before life was brought forth on Earth. So the subduction process that pushed Saskatchewan ~ 1500 ft above sea level looks like it happened before there could have been oil.

Science without religion is lame.

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Maybe he is correct if you dig deep enough you can find oil anywhere. Problem is, nobody can dig deep enough before the earth collapses on the hole they dug.

Might wanna watch out for digging into volcanoes too...

They can. The Russians have already have an oil well that extends 40,000 ft deep. That's about 7.5 miles down.

They HAVE already dug even deeper holes for research purposes.

Oil comes closest to the surface near the edges of tectonic plates, particularly where spreading or sliding action is taking place. This is where you find the most oil wells.

Most water wells are typically anywhere from 30 to 800 ft deep.

A tiny part of what ITN asserts actually corresponds, somewhat, to reality.

Most oil fields are indeed found "near the edges of tectonic plates".

The edge of a tectonic plate is also known as the "continental shelf" in many places. Ancient shallow seas occurred at the "edges of tectonic plates" because that is where the continental shelf could be found. At least at the time of formation, it was below sea level as a shallow continental shelf.

Continental shelf is DIFFERENT material than sea floor. Sea floor is called "mafic", being richer in heavier elements than the continents. Continental material is called "lithic". Lighter, and richer in lighter elements. It floats much higher on the mantle than the heavier sea floor material.

At the subduction zone, some mafic sea floor material gets mixed in with the lithic material of the continental shelf. Some of that mix gets pushed up into the new coastal mountain range that forms.

Continents get thicker over time, and their surface materials float higher and higher above the mantle. The lightest material from the constantly expanding sea floor gets incorporated into the new continental shelf, as it expands.

Former continental shelf and shallow sea becomes today's central valley, prarie, etc. And THAT is why you find the oil fields there.

There is more weight pressure on the ground in subduction zone. That is more oil making potential

And if drillers can possibly dig deep enough, the pressure is probably enough to find oil anywhere.

But there would have had to be abundant life that died, to make oil deposits. The dry land of Earth appeared before life was brought forth on Earth. So the subduction process that pushed Saskatchewan ~ 1500 ft above sea level looks like it happened before there could have been oil.

Science without religion is lame.

Many, many rants have been posted on this website asserting that the "Church of Global Warming" is, in fact, a RELIGION.

So, it has the best of both. Accurate, objective reality science about climate change, as part of a supportive "Church" community.

Maybe the Church of Global Warming is exactly what YOU need to fill that religious hole in your life.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Maybe he is correct if you dig deep enough you can find oil anywhere. Problem is, nobody can dig deep enough before the earth collapses on the hole they dug.

Might wanna watch out for digging into volcanoes too...

They can. The Russians have already have an oil well that extends 40,000 ft deep. That's about 7.5 miles down.

They HAVE already dug even deeper holes for research purposes.

Oil comes closest to the surface near the edges of tectonic plates, particularly where spreading or sliding action is taking place. This is where you find the most oil wells.

Most water wells are typically anywhere from 30 to 800 ft deep.

A tiny part of what ITN asserts actually corresponds, somewhat, to reality.

Most oil fields are indeed found "near the edges of tectonic plates".

The edge of a tectonic plate is also known as the "continental shelf" in many places. Ancient shallow seas occurred at the "edges of tectonic plates" because that is where the continental shelf could be found. At least at the time of formation, it was below sea level as a shallow continental shelf.

Continental shelf is DIFFERENT material than sea floor. Sea floor is called "mafic", being richer in heavier elements than the continents. Continental material is called "lithic". Lighter, and richer in lighter elements. It floats much higher on the mantle than the heavier sea floor material.

At the subduction zone, some mafic sea floor material gets mixed in with the lithic material of the continental shelf. Some of that mix gets pushed up into the new coastal mountain range that forms.

Continents get thicker over time, and their surface materials float higher and higher above the mantle. The lightest material from the constantly expanding sea floor gets incorporated into the new continental shelf, as it expands.

Former continental shelf and shallow sea becomes today's central valley, prarie, etc. And THAT is why you find the oil fields there.

There is more weight pressure on the ground in subduction zone. That is more oil making potential

And if drillers can possibly dig deep enough, the pressure is probably enough to find oil anywhere.

But there would have had to be abundant life that died, to make oil deposits. The dry land of Earth appeared before life was brought forth on Earth. So the subduction process that pushed Saskatchewan ~ 1500 ft above sea level looks like it happened before there could have been oil.

Science without religion is lame.

Many, many rants have been posted on this website asserting that the "Church of Global Warming" is, in fact, a RELIGION.

So, it has the best of both. Accurate, objective reality science about climate change, as part of a supportive "Church" community.

Maybe the Church of Global Warming is exactly what YOU need to fill that religious hole in your life.

In reality the most cancelled man in history is Al Gore who told us all that the arctic would be ice free in 2020 just like the NSA instructed him to do.

Nice to see that the girls are so motivated

Im a BM wrote:
A tiny part of what ITN asserts actually corresponds, somewhat, to reality.

Most oil fields are indeed found "near the edges of tectonic plates".

Im a BM wrote:
The edge of a tectonic plate is also known as the "continental shelf" in many places.

Im a BM wrote:
Ancient shallow seas occurred at the "edges of tectonic plates" because that is where the continental shelf could be found. At least at the time of formation, it was below sea level as a shallow continental shelf.

Im a BM wrote:
Continental shelf is DIFFERENT material than sea floor.

Im a BM wrote:
Sea floor is called "mafic", being richer in heavier elements than the continents. Continental material is called "lithic". Lighter, and richer in lighter elements. It floats much higher on the mantle than the heavier sea floor material.

Im a BM wrote:
At the subduction zone, some mafic sea floor material gets mixed in with the lithic material of the continental shelf. Some of that mix gets pushed up into the new coastal mountain range that forms.

Im a BM wrote:
Continents get thicker over time,

Im a BM wrote:
and their surface materials float higher and higher above the mantle. The lightest material from the constantly expanding sea floor gets incorporated into the new continental shelf, as it expands.

Im a BM wrote:
Former continental shelf and shallow sea becomes today's central valley, prarie, etc. And THAT is why you find the oil fields there.

Spongy Iris wrote:
There is more weight pressure on the ground in subduction zone. That is more oil making potential
[quote]Spongy Iris wrote:
And if drillers can possibly dig deep enough, the pressure is probably enough to find oil anywhere.
[quote]Spongy Iris wrote:
But there would have had to be abundant life that died, to make oil deposits.
[quote]Spongy Iris wrote:
The dry land of Earth appeared before life was brought forth on Earth.
[quote]Spongy Iris wrote:
So the subduction process that pushed Saskatchewan ~ 1500 ft above sea level looks like it happened before there could have been oil.

Science without religion is lame.

Im a BM wrote:
Many, many rants have been posted on this website asserting that the "Church of Global Warming" is, in fact, a RELIGION.

Im a BM wrote:
So, it has the best of both. Accurate, objective reality science about climate change, as part of a supportive "Church" community.

Im a BM wrote:
Maybe the Church of Global Warming is exactly what YOU need to fill that religious hole in your life.

Spongy Iris wrote:
The Arctic sea ice decline is probably the go to indicator of Climate Change.

Spongy Iris wrote:
The summer minimum sea ice extent (around September) has shrunk by about 12.1% per decade since 1979, an area larger than Alaska disappearing.

Spongy Iris wrote:
A slowdown in the rate of sea ice decline (since the late 2000s) has been observed...

Spongy Iris wrote:
Looks like a big deal to me.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Maybe he is correct if you dig deep enough you can find oil anywhere. Problem is, nobody can dig deep enough before the earth collapses on the hole they dug.

Might wanna watch out for digging into volcanoes too...

They can. The Russians have already have an oil well that extends 40,000 ft deep. That's about 7.5 miles down.

They HAVE already dug even deeper holes for research purposes.

Oil comes closest to the surface near the edges of tectonic plates, particularly where spreading or sliding action is taking place. This is where you find the most oil wells.

Most water wells are typically anywhere from 30 to 800 ft deep.

A tiny part of what ITN asserts actually corresponds, somewhat, to reality.

Most oil fields are indeed found "near the edges of tectonic plates".

The edge of a tectonic plate is also known as the "continental shelf" in many places. Ancient shallow seas occurred at the "edges of tectonic plates" because that is where the continental shelf could be found. At least at the time of formation, it was below sea level as a shallow continental shelf.

Continental shelf is DIFFERENT material than sea floor. Sea floor is called "mafic", being richer in heavier elements than the continents. Continental material is called "lithic". Lighter, and richer in lighter elements. It floats much higher on the mantle than the heavier sea floor material.

At the subduction zone, some mafic sea floor material gets mixed in with the lithic material of the continental shelf. Some of that mix gets pushed up into the new coastal mountain range that forms.

Continents get thicker over time, and their surface materials float higher and higher above the mantle. The lightest material from the constantly expanding sea floor gets incorporated into the new continental shelf, as it expands.

Former continental shelf and shallow sea becomes today's central valley, prarie, etc. And THAT is why you find the oil fields there.

There is more weight pressure on the ground in subduction zone. That is more oil making potential

And if drillers can possibly dig deep enough, the pressure is probably enough to find oil anywhere.

But there would have had to be abundant life that died, to make oil deposits. The dry land of Earth appeared before life was brought forth on Earth. So the subduction process that pushed Saskatchewan ~ 1500 ft above sea level looks like it happened before there could have been oil.

Science without religion is lame.

Many, many rants have been posted on this website asserting that the "Church of Global Warming" is, in fact, a RELIGION.

So, it has the best of both. Accurate, objective reality science about climate change, as part of a supportive "Church" community.

Maybe the Church of Global Warming is exactly what YOU need to fill that religious hole in your life.

In reality the most cancelled man in history is Al Gore who told us all that the arctic would be ice free in 2020 just like the NSA instructed him to do.

Nice to see that the girls are so motivated

The Arctic sea ice decline is probably the go to indicator of Climate Change.

The summer minimum sea ice extent (around September) has shrunk by about 12.1% per decade since 1979, an area larger than Alaska disappearing.

A slowdown in the rate of sea ice decline (since the late 2000s) has been observed...

Looks like a big deal to me.

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
There is more weight pressure on the ground in subduction zone. That is more oil making potential
[quote]Spongy Iris wrote:
And if drillers can possibly dig deep enough, the pressure is probably enough to find oil anywhere.
[quote]Spongy Iris wrote:
But there would have had to be abundant life that died, to make oil deposits.
[quote]Spongy Iris wrote:
The dry land of Earth appeared before life was brought forth on Earth.
[quote]Spongy Iris wrote:
So the subduction process that pushed Saskatchewan ~ 1500 ft above sea level looks like it happened before there could have been oil.

Science without religion is lame.

There wasn't a subduction process that pushed Saskathewan 1500 ft above sea level.

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
The Arctic sea ice decline is probably the go to indicator of Climate Change.

What 'arctic sea ice deline'??
Climate cannot change.

Spongy Iris wrote:
The summer minimum sea ice extent (around September) has shrunk by about 12.1% per decade since 1979, an area larger than Alaska disappearing.

Argument from randU fallacy. Random numbers are not data.

Spongy Iris wrote:
A slowdown in the rate of sea ice decline (since the late 2000s) has been observed...

Argument from randU fallacy. Random numbers are not data.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Looks like a big deal to me.

Such is your religion.

You manufacture 'data', then call Doom and Gloom over it.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Maybe he is correct if you dig deep enough you can find oil anywhere. Problem is, nobody can dig deep enough before the earth collapses on the hole they dug.

Might wanna watch out for digging into volcanoes too...

They can. The Russians have already have an oil well that extends 40,000 ft deep. That's about 7.5 miles down.

They HAVE already dug even deeper holes for research purposes.

Oil comes closest to the surface near the edges of tectonic plates, particularly where spreading or sliding action is taking place. This is where you find the most oil wells.

Most water wells are typically anywhere from 30 to 800 ft deep.

A tiny part of what ITN asserts actually corresponds, somewhat, to reality.

Most oil fields are indeed found "near the edges of tectonic plates".

The edge of a tectonic plate is also known as the "continental shelf" in many places. Ancient shallow seas occurred at the "edges of tectonic plates" because that is where the continental shelf could be found. At least at the time of formation, it was below sea level as a shallow continental shelf.

Continental shelf is DIFFERENT material than sea floor. Sea floor is called "mafic", being richer in heavier elements than the continents. Continental material is called "lithic". Lighter, and richer in lighter elements. It floats much higher on the mantle than the heavier sea floor material.

At the subduction zone, some mafic sea floor material gets mixed in with the lithic material of the continental shelf. Some of that mix gets pushed up into the new coastal mountain range that forms.

Continents get thicker over time, and their surface materials float higher and higher above the mantle. The lightest material from the constantly expanding sea floor gets incorporated into the new continental shelf, as it expands.

Former continental shelf and shallow sea becomes today's central valley, prarie, etc. And THAT is why you find the oil fields there.

There is more weight pressure on the ground in subduction zone. That is more oil making potential

And if drillers can possibly dig deep enough, the pressure is probably enough to find oil anywhere.

But there would have had to be abundant life that died, to make oil deposits. The dry land of Earth appeared before life was brought forth on Earth. So the subduction process that pushed Saskatchewan ~ 1500 ft above sea level looks like it happened before there could have been oil.

Science without religion is lame.

Many, many rants have been posted on this website asserting that the "Church of Global Warming" is, in fact, a RELIGION.

So, it has the best of both. Accurate, objective reality science about climate change, as part of a supportive "Church" community.

Maybe the Church of Global Warming is exactly what YOU need to fill that religious hole in your life.

In reality the most cancelled man in history is Al Gore who told us all that the arctic would be ice free in 2020 just like the NSA instructed him to do.

Nice to see that the girls are so motivated

The Arctic sea ice decline is probably the go to indicator of Climate Change.

The summer minimum sea ice extent (around September) has shrunk by about 12.1% per decade since 1979, an area larger than Alaska disappearing.

A slowdown in the rate of sea ice decline (since the late 2000s) has been observed...

Looks like a big deal to me.

All BS kid because the North Pole was ice free in 1958 when the USS Skate surfaced there. You and Al Bore are clueless brainwashed turds.

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Spongy Iris wrote:
Not exactly sure what the process was to cause the dry land to appear, in the earlier part of the "3rd day of creation" but subduction seems like a good guess.

Im a BM wrote:
Yes, there IS such a thing as "fossil fuel".

[b]Im a BM wrote:
Fuel that has been fossilized. A fossil of ancient fuel.

Im a BM wrote:
They also call it "petrified wood".

Im a BM wrote:
It used to be fuel, before it got turned into a fossil.

Im a BM wrote:
It no longer contains any organic carbon and it cannot burn.

Im a BM wrote:
Yes, PETRIFIED WOOD is FOSSIL FUEL.

Im a BM wrote:
The evil LIARS say "there is no such thing as 'fossil fuel'".

Im a BM wrote:
Rise up against fossil fuel denialism

Eat death, fossil fuel deniers!

Petrified wood is REAL![/b]

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
Not exactly sure what the process was to cause the dry land to appear, in the earlier part of the "3rd day of creation" but subduction seems like a good guess.

Not subduction. Try again.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
Not exactly sure what the process was to cause the dry land to appear, in the earlier part of the "3rd day of creation" but subduction seems like a good guess.

Not subduction. Try again.

Let's go with plate tectonics. Subduction is just one of the dynamics of plate tectonics it looks like.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Maybe he is correct if you dig deep enough you can find oil anywhere. Problem is, nobody can dig deep enough before the earth collapses on the hole they dug.

Might wanna watch out for digging into volcanoes too...

They can. The Russians have already have an oil well that extends 40,000 ft deep. That's about 7.5 miles down.

They HAVE already dug even deeper holes for research purposes.

Oil comes closest to the surface near the edges of tectonic plates, particularly where spreading or sliding action is taking place. This is where you find the most oil wells.

Most water wells are typically anywhere from 30 to 800 ft deep.

A tiny part of what ITN asserts actually corresponds, somewhat, to reality.

Most oil fields are indeed found "near the edges of tectonic plates".

The edge of a tectonic plate is also known as the "continental shelf" in many places. Ancient shallow seas occurred at the "edges of tectonic plates" because that is where the continental shelf could be found. At least at the time of formation, it was below sea level as a shallow continental shelf.

Continental shelf is DIFFERENT material than sea floor. Sea floor is called "mafic", being richer in heavier elements than the continents. Continental material is called "lithic". Lighter, and richer in lighter elements. It floats much higher on the mantle than the heavier sea floor material.

At the subduction zone, some mafic sea floor material gets mixed in with the lithic material of the continental shelf. Some of that mix gets pushed up into the new coastal mountain range that forms.

Continents get thicker over time, and their surface materials float higher and higher above the mantle. The lightest material from the constantly expanding sea floor gets incorporated into the new continental shelf, as it expands.

Former continental shelf and shallow sea becomes today's central valley, prarie, etc. And THAT is why you find the oil fields there.

There is more weight pressure on the ground in subduction zone. That is more oil making potential

And if drillers can possibly dig deep enough, the pressure is probably enough to find oil anywhere.

But there would have had to be abundant life that died, to make oil deposits. The dry land of Earth appeared before life was brought forth on Earth. So the subduction process that pushed Saskatchewan ~ 1500 ft above sea level looks like it happened before there could have been oil.

Science without religion is lame.

Many, many rants have been posted on this website asserting that the "Church of Global Warming" is, in fact, a RELIGION.

So, it has the best of both. Accurate, objective reality science about climate change, as part of a supportive "Church" community.

Maybe the Church of Global Warming is exactly what YOU need to fill that religious hole in your life.

In reality the most cancelled man in history is Al Gore who told us all that the arctic would be ice free in 2020 just like the NSA instructed him to do.

Nice to see that the girls are so motivated

The Arctic sea ice decline is probably the go to indicator of Climate Change.

The summer minimum sea ice extent (around September) has shrunk by about 12.1% per decade since 1979, an area larger than Alaska disappearing.

A slowdown in the rate of sea ice decline (since the late 2000s) has been observed...

Looks like a big deal to me.

All BS kid because the North Pole was ice free in 1958 when the USS Skate surfaced there. You and Al Bore are clueless brainwashed turds.

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article you linked?

It said they struggled to find an ice free opening, in AUGUST.

Swan wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article? Because if you did you would know that the North pole was ice free in 1958. Face it you were lied too and you are a brainwashed fart

USS Skate (SSN-578) hung below the Arctic ice.

"Heavy ice, ten feet," said one of the sailors.

When the top of the periscope came within sixty feet of the surface, he spotted heavy ice to the side. He flipped the prism to look straight up, but saw nothing except the same blurred aquamarine.

The submarine's black hull stood out in stark relief against the deep blue of the calm lake in which the ship now floated. Beyond the lake, stretching to the horizon in every direction, was the stark white of the permanent polar ice pack. The officer who had climbed to the bridge with Calvert called the skipper's attention to the port side of the ship. There a full grown polar bear was climbing slowly out of the water and up onto the ice.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Maybe he is correct if you dig deep enough you can find oil anywhere. Problem is, nobody can dig deep enough before the earth collapses on the hole they dug.

Might wanna watch out for digging into volcanoes too...

They can. The Russians have already have an oil well that extends 40,000 ft deep. That's about 7.5 miles down.

They HAVE already dug even deeper holes for research purposes.

Oil comes closest to the surface near the edges of tectonic plates, particularly where spreading or sliding action is taking place. This is where you find the most oil wells.

Most water wells are typically anywhere from 30 to 800 ft deep.

A tiny part of what ITN asserts actually corresponds, somewhat, to reality.

Most oil fields are indeed found "near the edges of tectonic plates".

The edge of a tectonic plate is also known as the "continental shelf" in many places. Ancient shallow seas occurred at the "edges of tectonic plates" because that is where the continental shelf could be found. At least at the time of formation, it was below sea level as a shallow continental shelf.

Continental shelf is DIFFERENT material than sea floor. Sea floor is called "mafic", being richer in heavier elements than the continents. Continental material is called "lithic". Lighter, and richer in lighter elements. It floats much higher on the mantle than the heavier sea floor material.

At the subduction zone, some mafic sea floor material gets mixed in with the lithic material of the continental shelf. Some of that mix gets pushed up into the new coastal mountain range that forms.

Continents get thicker over time, and their surface materials float higher and higher above the mantle. The lightest material from the constantly expanding sea floor gets incorporated into the new continental shelf, as it expands.

Former continental shelf and shallow sea becomes today's central valley, prarie, etc. And THAT is why you find the oil fields there.

There is more weight pressure on the ground in subduction zone. That is more oil making potential

And if drillers can possibly dig deep enough, the pressure is probably enough to find oil anywhere.

But there would have had to be abundant life that died, to make oil deposits. The dry land of Earth appeared before life was brought forth on Earth. So the subduction process that pushed Saskatchewan ~ 1500 ft above sea level looks like it happened before there could have been oil.

Science without religion is lame.

Many, many rants have been posted on this website asserting that the "Church of Global Warming" is, in fact, a RELIGION.

So, it has the best of both. Accurate, objective reality science about climate change, as part of a supportive "Church" community.

Maybe the Church of Global Warming is exactly what YOU need to fill that religious hole in your life.

In reality the most cancelled man in history is Al Gore who told us all that the arctic would be ice free in 2020 just like the NSA instructed him to do.

Nice to see that the girls are so motivated

The Arctic sea ice decline is probably the go to indicator of Climate Change.

The summer minimum sea ice extent (around September) has shrunk by about 12.1% per decade since 1979, an area larger than Alaska disappearing.

A slowdown in the rate of sea ice decline (since the late 2000s) has been observed...

Looks like a big deal to me.

All BS kid because the North Pole was ice free in 1958 when the USS Skate surfaced there. You and Al Bore are clueless brainwashed turds.

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article you linked?

It said they struggled to find an ice free opening, in AUGUST.

Did you read the article? Because if you did you would know that the North pole was ice free in 1958. Face it you were lied too and you are a brainwashed fart

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
Not exactly sure what the process was to cause the dry land to appear, in the earlier part of the "3rd day of creation" but subduction seems like a good guess.

Not subduction. Try again.

Let's go with plate tectonics. Subduction is just one of the dynamics of plate tectonics it looks like.

Should I ask Google about the specific case of the subduction zone along the west coast of North America?

Maybe I should test my ability to predict a Google answer.

Well, on the uphill side of it, you've got the light, lithic material of the North American continent floating high enough on the mantle for the Sierra Nevada to stick way up in the air above sea level. It's chemical composition makes it much less dense than the other stuff in the crust.

On the downhill side you have the heavy, mafic material of sea floor. It is so dense that it sinks down thousands of meters deeper into the mantle than the lithic material of the coast. The lithic mountains stick up thousands of meters above sea level. The mafic sea floor sinks down thousands of meters below sea level.

Where do they make contact? The continental shelf is lithic material on the edge of the continent. Further offshore is the "edge of the tectonic plate" where the heavy stuff gets pushed down under the light stuff. It is the continental shelf, rather than the coastline shore, which is being uplifted.

Heck, I won't even ASK Google until ITN spams it up with more of his retarded "something is not something else" declarations.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
Not exactly sure what the process was to cause the dry land to appear, in the earlier part of the "3rd day of creation" but subduction seems like a good guess.

Not subduction. Try again.

Let's go with plate tectonics. Subduction is just one of the dynamics of plate tectonics it looks like.

Should I ask Google about the specific case of the subduction zone along the west coast of North America?

Maybe I should test my ability to predict a Google answer.

Well, on the uphill side of it, you've got the light, lithic material of the North American continent floating high enough on the mantle for the Sierra Nevada to stick way up in the air above sea level. It's chemical composition makes it much less dense than the other stuff in the crust.

On the downhill side you have the heavy, mafic material of sea floor. It is so dense that it sinks down thousands of meters deeper into the mantle than the lithic material of the coast. The lithic mountains stick up thousands of meters above sea level. The mafic sea floor sinks down thousands of meters below sea level.

Where do they make contact? The continental shelf is lithic material on the edge of the continent. Further offshore is the "edge of the tectonic plate" where the heavy stuff gets pushed down under the light stuff. It is the continental shelf, rather than the coastline shore, which is being uplifted.

Heck, I won't even ASK Google until ITN spams it up with more of his retarded "something is not something else" declarations.

Google says the Rocky Mountains were pushed up by subduction, but the American Plains not directly so.

I'm not gonna copy paste Google's whole spiel.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article? Because if you did you would know that the North pole was ice free in 1958. Face it you were lied too and you are a brainwashed fart

There are small ice chunks I can see in the picture.

Some quotes from the newsletter.

USS Skate (SSN-578) hung below the Arctic ice.

"Heavy ice, ten feet," said one of the sailors.

When the top of the periscope came within sixty feet of the surface, he spotted heavy ice to the side. He flipped the prism to look straight up, but saw nothing except the same blurred aquamarine.

The submarine's black hull stood out in stark relief against the deep blue of the calm lake in which the ship now floated. Beyond the lake, stretching to the horizon in every direction, was the stark white of the permanent polar ice pack. The officer who had climbed to the bridge with Calvert called the skipper's attention to the port side of the ship. There a full grown polar bear was climbing slowly out of the water and up onto the ice.

It may be interesting, for electric universe enthusiasts, like me, to wonder how just the water at very northernmost part of the Earth appears to stay melted...

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Google says the Rocky Mountains were pushed up by subduction, but the American Plains not directly so.

I'm not gonna copy paste Google's whole spiel.

Well, they certainly didn't get pulled up out of the ground by the MOON's suction, did they? You're not convinced...
.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Google says the Rocky Mountains were pushed up by subduction, but the American Plains not directly so.

I'm not gonna copy paste Google's whole spiel.

Well, they certainly didn't get pulled up out of the ground by the MOON's suction, did they? You're not convinced...
.

Of course they didn't get pulled up by the Moon's suction, cuz the Moon wasn't made until the "4th day" of creation.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article? Because if you did you would know that the North pole was ice free in 1958. Face it you were lied too and you are a brainwashed fart

There are small ice chunks I can see in the picture.

Some quotes from the newsletter.

USS Skate (SSN-578) hung below the Arctic ice.

"Heavy ice, ten feet," said one of the sailors.

When the top of the periscope came within sixty feet of the surface, he spotted heavy ice to the side. He flipped the prism to look straight up, but saw nothing except the same blurred aquamarine.

The submarine's black hull stood out in stark relief against the deep blue of the calm lake in which the ship now floated. Beyond the lake, stretching to the horizon in every direction, was the stark white of the permanent polar ice pack. The officer who had climbed to the bridge with Calvert called the skipper's attention to the port side of the ship. There a full grown polar bear was climbing slowly out of the water and up onto the ice.

It may be interesting, for electric universe enthusiasts, like me, to wonder how just the water at very northernmost part of the Earth appears to stay melted...

Meth is a bad thing, but there is help

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article? Because if you did you would know that the North pole was ice free in 1958. Face it you were lied too and you are a brainwashed fart

There are small ice chunks I can see in the picture.

Some quotes from the newsletter.

USS Skate (SSN-578) hung below the Arctic ice.

"Heavy ice, ten feet," said one of the sailors.

When the top of the periscope came within sixty feet of the surface, he spotted heavy ice to the side. He flipped the prism to look straight up, but saw nothing except the same blurred aquamarine.

The submarine's black hull stood out in stark relief against the deep blue of the calm lake in which the ship now floated. Beyond the lake, stretching to the horizon in every direction, was the stark white of the permanent polar ice pack. The officer who had climbed to the bridge with Calvert called the skipper's attention to the port side of the ship. There a full grown polar bear was climbing slowly out of the water and up onto the ice.

It may be interesting, for electric universe enthusiasts, like me, to wonder how just the water at very northernmost part of the Earth appears to stay melted...

Meth is a bad thing, but there is help

The North Pole is the magnetic axis, and South Pole is the rotational axis.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article? Because if you did you would know that the North pole was ice free in 1958. Face it you were lied too and you are a brainwashed fart

There are small ice chunks I can see in the picture.

Some quotes from the newsletter.

USS Skate (SSN-578) hung below the Arctic ice.

"Heavy ice, ten feet," said one of the sailors.

When the top of the periscope came within sixty feet of the surface, he spotted heavy ice to the side. He flipped the prism to look straight up, but saw nothing except the same blurred aquamarine.

The submarine's black hull stood out in stark relief against the deep blue of the calm lake in which the ship now floated. Beyond the lake, stretching to the horizon in every direction, was the stark white of the permanent polar ice pack. The officer who had climbed to the bridge with Calvert called the skipper's attention to the port side of the ship. There a full grown polar bear was climbing slowly out of the water and up onto the ice.

It may be interesting, for electric universe enthusiasts, like me, to wonder how just the water at very northernmost part of the Earth appears to stay melted...

Meth is a bad thing, but there is help

The North Pole is the magnetic axis, and South Pole is the rotational axis.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article? Because if you did you would know that the North pole was ice free in 1958. Face it you were lied too and you are a brainwashed fart

There are small ice chunks I can see in the picture.

Some quotes from the newsletter.

USS Skate (SSN-578) hung below the Arctic ice.

"Heavy ice, ten feet," said one of the sailors.

When the top of the periscope came within sixty feet of the surface, he spotted heavy ice to the side. He flipped the prism to look straight up, but saw nothing except the same blurred aquamarine.

The submarine's black hull stood out in stark relief against the deep blue of the calm lake in which the ship now floated. Beyond the lake, stretching to the horizon in every direction, was the stark white of the permanent polar ice pack. The officer who had climbed to the bridge with Calvert called the skipper's attention to the port side of the ship. There a full grown polar bear was climbing slowly out of the water and up onto the ice.

It may be interesting, for electric universe enthusiasts, like me, to wonder how just the water at very northernmost part of the Earth appears to stay melted...

Meth is a bad thing, but there is help

The North Pole is the magnetic axis, and South Pole is the rotational axis.

Meaningless gibbberish image

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article? Because if you did you would know that the North pole was ice free in 1958. Face it you were lied too and you are a brainwashed fart

There are small ice chunks I can see in the picture.

Some quotes from the newsletter.

USS Skate (SSN-578) hung below the Arctic ice.

"Heavy ice, ten feet," said one of the sailors.

When the top of the periscope came within sixty feet of the surface, he spotted heavy ice to the side. He flipped the prism to look straight up, but saw nothing except the same blurred aquamarine.

The submarine's black hull stood out in stark relief against the deep blue of the calm lake in which the ship now floated. Beyond the lake, stretching to the horizon in every direction, was the stark white of the permanent polar ice pack. The officer who had climbed to the bridge with Calvert called the skipper's attention to the port side of the ship. There a full grown polar bear was climbing slowly out of the water and up onto the ice.

It may be interesting, for electric universe enthusiasts, like me, to wonder how just the water at very northernmost part of the Earth appears to stay melted...

Meth is a bad thing, but there is help

The North Pole is the magnetic axis, and South Pole is the rotational axis.

Meaningless gibbberish image

The radiation belts would connect at the poles was what the statement was intended to make.

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article? Because if you did you would know that the North pole was ice free in 1958. Face it you were lied too and you are a brainwashed fart

There are small ice chunks I can see in the picture.

Some quotes from the newsletter.

USS Skate (SSN-578) hung below the Arctic ice.

"Heavy ice, ten feet," said one of the sailors.

When the top of the periscope came within sixty feet of the surface, he spotted heavy ice to the side. He flipped the prism to look straight up, but saw nothing except the same blurred aquamarine.

The submarine's black hull stood out in stark relief against the deep blue of the calm lake in which the ship now floated. Beyond the lake, stretching to the horizon in every direction, was the stark white of the permanent polar ice pack. The officer who had climbed to the bridge with Calvert called the skipper's attention to the port side of the ship. There a full grown polar bear was climbing slowly out of the water and up onto the ice.

It may be interesting, for electric universe enthusiasts, like me, to wonder how just the water at very northernmost part of the Earth appears to stay melted...

Meth is a bad thing, but there is help

The North Pole is the magnetic axis, and South Pole is the rotational axis.

Meaningless gibbberish image

The radiation belts would connect at the poles was what the statement was intended to make.

So?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/

So wake up already

Did you read the article? Because if you did you would know that the North pole was ice free in 1958. Face it you were lied too and you are a brainwashed fart

There are small ice chunks I can see in the picture.

Some quotes from the newsletter.

USS Skate (SSN-578) hung below the Arctic ice.

"Heavy ice, ten feet," said one of the sailors.

When the top of the periscope came within sixty feet of the surface, he spotted heavy ice to the side. He flipped the prism to look straight up, but saw nothing except the same blurred aquamarine.

The submarine's black hull stood out in stark relief against the deep blue of the calm lake in which the ship now floated. Beyond the lake, stretching to the horizon in every direction, was the stark white of the permanent polar ice pack. The officer who had climbed to the bridge with Calvert called the skipper's attention to the port side of the ship. There a full grown polar bear was climbing slowly out of the water and up onto the ice.

It may be interesting, for electric universe enthusiasts, like me, to wonder how just the water at very northernmost part of the Earth appears to stay melted...

Meth is a bad thing, but there is help

The North Pole is the magnetic axis, and South Pole is the rotational axis.

Meaningless gibbberish image

The radiation belts would connect at the poles was what the statement was intended to make.

So?

That is why it gets warm at magnetic True North.

https://youtube.com/shorts/M9egDfy4t2Q?si=6qZqz-phogMBDMPR

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/


The North Pole is the magnetic axis, and South Pole is the rotational axis.

Meaningless gibbberish image

The radiation belts would connect at the poles was what the statement was intended to make.

So?

That is why it gets warm at magnetic True North.

https://youtube.com/shorts/M9egDfy4t2Q?si=6qZqz-phogMBDMPR

Wrong because it is not warm at true magnetic South. So when you grow a brain we will all know

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/


The North Pole is the magnetic axis, and South Pole is the rotational axis.

Meaningless gibbberish image

The radiation belts would connect at the poles was what the statement was intended to make.

So?

That is why it gets warm at magnetic True North.

https://youtube.com/shorts/M9egDfy4t2Q?si=6qZqz-phogMBDMPR

Wrong because it is not warm at true magnetic South. So when you grow a brain we will all know

The south is the rotational axis (NOT the magnetic axis).

Thus, it is likely to be much hotter at the South Pole, like a raging inferno.

This is one of the reason's I said I doubt anybody will confirm the weather at the South Pole.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

1958 North Pole
https://truthinenergyandclimate.com/ice-free-north-pole/


The North Pole is the magnetic axis, and South Pole is the rotational axis.

Meaningless gibbberish image

The radiation belts would connect at the poles was what the statement was intended to make.

So?

That is why it gets warm at magnetic True North.

https://youtube.com/shorts/M9egDfy4t2Q?si=6qZqz-phogMBDMPR

Wrong because it is not warm at true magnetic South. So when you grow a brain we will all know

The south is the rotational axis (NOT the magnetic axis).

Thus, it is likely to be much hotter at the South Pole, like a raging inferno.

This is one of the reason's I said I doubt anybody will confirm the weather at the South Pole.

The North pole does not melt because of magnetism, the primary driver of North Pole ice melt is current oscillations. Bye the way, all magnets have two poles, they might teach you this in the third grade, or you can continue making stuff up as you meander thru life