There is no scientific theory or evidence that suggest CO2 traps heat better than O2 or N2

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > There is no scientific theory or evidence that suggest CO2 traps heat better than O2 or N2 > Page 14

Page 14 of 14

14

24-01-2020 02:00
Into the Night★★★★★ (18436)	tmiddles wrote: Into the Night wrote: tmiddles wrote: gfm7175 wrote:...you are missing quite a bit.... So gfm7175 you consider these twelve reference to be bogus? ITN calls them false authority, which means they are not from credible sources: Not the meaning of 'false authority'. Already described why. RDCF. False authority fallacy. The ONLY authoritative reference to any theory of science is the theory itself. I love it! I provide no less than three references showing the definition of "False Authority" and ITN denies all three and provides no reference of his own. You have shown NO valid references, liar. I have already answered your question. RDCF. RQAA. tmiddles wrote: You can just never admit you made a mistake ITN. So you have to live with all of them forever Thought terminating cliche fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (logic<->void). tmiddles wrote: Where is there a good reference on the logical fallacies? Logic. tmiddles wrote: Can you recommend one? Seems you've been making up your own and they don't correspond to anything ever written down by anyone else? Logic. tmiddles wrote: How about these?: ...deleted Amazon catalog... Are any of those accurate? What would you trust as a guide? False authority fallacies. tmiddles wrote: I want to get my terminology right. There is no 'official list' of fallacies. Learn logic. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
24-01-2020 02:08
tmiddles★★★★★ (3975)	Into the Night wrote: You have shown NO valid references, liar. I'm asking you for one ITN. You are giving the names of fallacies all day long on here, all of which reference definitions. Where, according to you, can I find the best and most accurate definitions? You tell me. And no you never have before.
24-01-2020 02:20
Into the Night★★★★★ (18436)	tmiddles wrote: Into the Night wrote: You have shown NO valid references, liar. I'm asking you for one ITN. You are giving the names of fallacies all day long on here, all of which reference definitions. Where, according to you, can I find the best and most accurate definitions? You tell me. And no you never have before. RQAA The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
24-01-2020 02:21
tmiddles★★★★★ (3975)	Into the Night wrote: RQAA How did you learn the definitions of all the fallacies ITN?
24-01-2020 02:35
Into the Night★★★★★ (18436)	tmiddles wrote: Into the Night wrote: RQAA How did you learn the definitions of all the fallacies ITN? RQAA The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan

24-01-2020 03:24
tmiddles★★★★★ (3975)	Into the Night wrote: tmiddles wrote: Into the Night wrote: RQAA How did you learn the definitions of all the fallacies ITN? RQAA How did you learn the definitions of all the fallacies ITN?
24-01-2020 06:17
James___ ★★★★★ (5513)	tmiddles wrote: Into the Night wrote: tmiddles wrote: Into the Night wrote: RQAA How did you learn the definitions of all the fallacies ITN? RQAA How did you learn the definitions of all the fallacies ITN? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_jWEuN8New This is the debate, it's ugly Compared to you guys, nothing to discuss. Edited on 24-01-2020 06:27

Page 14 of 14

14

Join the debate There is no scientific theory or evidence that suggest CO2 traps heat better than O2 or N2:

Related content

Threads	Replies	Last post
Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat	98	29-05-2022 08:26
Co2 ice samples	7	27-05-2022 15:38
Evolutionary Biology and the Endosymbiotic Theory of Consciousness.	89	18-05-2022 18:19
Grand Unified Theory	32	12-05-2022 19:54
Fossil Fuel Substitution for reduced emission of CO2, mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium..	71	07-05-2022 20:14

Articles

▲ Top of page

Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact