Remember me
▼ Content

The Questions that Need to be Answered



Page 2 of 2<12
07-07-2020 16:12
gfm7175Profile picture★★★★★
(3314)
IBdaMann wrote:
gfm7175 wrote: Looks good IBD... Now awaiting piddleboy's response so that we can actually attempt to hold a meaningful conversation with him...

He's ducking out. He can't discuss any topic in which he must answer questions about his empty buzzwords which form the entirety of his arguments. He probably needs to get approval from his slavemasters before he's allowed to make any sort of official response that obligates and/or binds them to any position.

So he's out.

.

Indeed, as is evidenced by his complete ignoring of this particular thread (and of the questions themselves)... At least the council has addressed this issue with the tmiddles ordinance...
08-07-2020 06:51
James___
★★★★★
(5513)
IBdaMann wrote:
By the way ... credit where it is due ... a Gary "Wiz" Burns carved a wooden "man-in-the-moon" and I felt motivated to use it in a pic.



It's good work. Apparently this item is sold out at TreeWizWoodCarvings.

.



The guy's definitely good. I checked out some of his other work.
08-07-2020 08:13
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14373)
James___ wrote: The guy's definitely good. I checked out some of his other work.

... and he's self-taught.

.


I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit

A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
09-07-2020 18:42
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14373)
gfm7175 wrote:Indeed, as is evidenced by his complete ignoring of this particular thread (and of the questions themselves)


I think it's official. tgoebbles' slavemasters have ordered him to retreat.




What I believe will happen is that tgoebbles will wait a little while and then try to sneak back into other discussions as though his questions are somehow sufficiently addressed.

You'll see.


.


I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit

A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
10-07-2020 18:27
gfm7175Profile picture★★★★★
(3314)
IBdaMann wrote:
gfm7175 wrote:Indeed, as is evidenced by his complete ignoring of this particular thread (and of the questions themselves)


I think it's official. tgoebbles' slavemasters have ordered him to retreat.


What I believe will happen is that tgoebbles will wait a little while and then try to sneak back into other discussions as though his questions are somehow sufficiently addressed.

You'll see.

.

I share your belief. This is a common tactic for online forums (and the tactic that my uncle is currently employing, regarding his chronic lying, that some of us in the family are trying to help him address and overcome)

This tactic is to simply "wait it out". Eventually one will just 'sweep the issue under the rug', thus the offender will 'get away with it' and everything just becomes all hunky dory, right??

WRONG. The tmiddles ordinance will continue to remain in effect until the questions are addressed... and my uncle has likewise had no luck with his "wait it out" strategy... The lies have still not been addressed (beyond denial, anger, and additional lies).
14-07-2020 04:35
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14373)
Over the course of a full year, tgoebbles has engaged in many topics of discussion but has dishonestly derailed all such topics by refusing to clarify logical contradictions into which he has backed himself. This separate thread has been generated to encapsulate all the clarifications needed to continue those discussions with him.

Here is the list of the outstanding questions that really need to be answered:

1) What are the unambiguous definitions of Global Warming, Climate Change and Greenhouse Effect that neither violate nor deny physics? [Status: Unanswered]
2) Why should any rational adult believe in either Global Warming, Climate Change or Greenhouse Effect? [Status: Unanswered]
3) How can I unambiguously demonstrate to my children thermal energy flowing from cooler to warmer? [Status: Unanswered]
4) How can I know the temperature of a large, unspecified volume, e.g. Denver, to within, say, 10degF with only one temperature measurement, e.g. the Denver airport? [Status: Unanswered]
5) What are the unambiguous definitions of "race," "negro," "black people," "white people," "brown people," "white supremacy," "white nationalsim," "white nationalist," "white supremacist," "black supremacist" and "racist"? [Status: Unanswered]
6) Is there an official list of races? [Status: Unanswered]
- 6a) How do I determine my own race or that of my children? [Status: Unanswered]
7) Why should any rational adult believe that there is a problem of racism in the United States? [Status: Unanswered]
8) Why should law abiding citizens be rendered defenseless before rampant violent crime? [Status: Unanswered]
9) Where in the 1st Amendment is "hate" prohibited such that, if shown, a prosecutor can throw someone in jail for having had that emotion/thought? [Status: Unanswered]
10) Why do you claim that an atmosphere only makes a planet's or moon's solid surface hotter since you are fully aware that no place at the bottom of earth's atmosphere ever reaches anywhere close to the daytime temperatures of the moon's atmosphereless solid surface? [Status: Unanswered]
11) If we were to discover that Lisa Gherardini was actually a shitty person, would that justify Black Lives Matter storming the Louvre to destroy the Mona Lisa? [Status: Unanswered]
12) Why should we destroy artifacts and relics pertaining to history that we never want to forget or repeat? [Status: Unanswered]
13) The Aztecs committed genocide of many other tribes and practiced human sacrifice; should their artwork and artifacts be destroyed? [Status: Unanswered]
14) Why would you or anyone pretend to be a judge of what history is to be revised or destroyed? [Status: Unanswered]
15) In what substantive/meaningful way do the platforms of Black Lives Matter, ANTIFA, The National Organization of Women, the DNC, Communist Party USA and Socialist Party USA ... differ? [Status: Unanswered]
tgoebbles, I'm not the only one who appreciates your attention to these questions. Thanks.
Edited on 14-07-2020 05:23
14-07-2020 04:50
James___
★★★★★
(5513)
IBdaMann wrote:
Over the course of a full year, tgoebbles has engaged in many topics of discussion but has dishonestly derailed all such topics by refusing to clarify logical contradictions into which he has backed himself. This separate thread has been generated to encapsulate all the clarifications needed to continue those discussions with him.

Here is the list of the outstanding questions really need to be answered:

1) Is Global Warming unambiguously defined? If so then how?
2) Is Climate Change unambiguously defined? If so then how?
3) Is Greenhouse Effect unambiguously defined? If so then how?
4) Why should any rational adult believe in Global Warming?
5) Why should any rational adult believe in Climate Change?
6) Why should any rational adult believe in Greenhouse Effect?
7) How can I unambiguously demonstrate to my children thermal energy flowing from cooler to warmer?
8) How can I know the temperature of a large, unspecified volume, e.g. Denver, to within, say, 10degF with only one temperature measurement, e.g. the Denver airport?
9) What is the unambiguous definition of "black people"?
10) What is the unambiguous definition of "white people"?
11) What is the unambiguous definition of "negro"?
12) What is the unambiguous definition of "race"?
- 12a) Is there an official list of races? How do I determine my own/that of my children?
13) Why should any rational adult believe that there is a problem of racism in the United States?
14) Why should law abiding citizens be rendered defenseless before rampant violent crime?
15) Where in the 1st Amendment is "hate" prohibited such that, if shown, a prosecutor can throw someone in jail for having had that emotion/thought?

tgoebbles, I'm not the only one who appreciates your attention to these questions. Thanks.


#1 isn't possible. It requires you to define global warming..
If you fail to define it, then we cannot know what unambiguous is. It is your condition and as a result you must define your terms. These are conditions that you support because you created them.
Failure to define your terms results in a forfeit of the match. Australian rules.

Edited on 14-07-2020 05:06
14-07-2020 05:20
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14373)
James___ wrote:
#1 isn't possible. It requires you to define global warming..

James__, thank you for catching that. I posted the wrong list right there. Bonus point for you.

This is the correct list as follows:

1) What are the unambiguous definitions of Global Warming, Climate Change and Greenhouse Effect that neither violate nor deny physics? [Status: Unanswered]
2) Why should any rational adult believe in either Global Warming, Climate Change or Greenhouse Effect? [Status: Unanswered]
3) How can I unambiguously demonstrate to my children thermal energy flowing from cooler to warmer? [Status: Unanswered]
4) How can I know the temperature of a large, unspecified volume, e.g. Denver, to within, say, 10degF with only one temperature measurement, e.g. the Denver airport? [Status: Unanswered]
5) What are the unambiguous definitions of "race," "negro," "black people," "white people," "brown people," "white supremacy," "white nationalsim," "white nationalist," "white supremacist," "black supremacist" and "racist"? [Status: Unanswered]
6) Is there an official list of races? [Status: Unanswered]
- 6a) How do I determine my own race or that of my children? [Status: Unanswered]
7) Why should any rational adult believe that there is a problem of racism in the United States? [Status: Unanswered]
8) Why should law abiding citizens be rendered defenseless before rampant violent crime? [Status: Unanswered]
9) Where in the 1st Amendment is "hate" prohibited such that, if shown, a prosecutor can throw someone in jail for having had that emotion/thought? [Status: Unanswered]
10) Why do you claim that an atmosphere only makes a planet's or moon's solid surface hotter since you are fully aware that no place at the bottom of earth's atmosphere ever reaches anywhere close to the daytime temperatures of the moon's atmosphereless solid surface? [Status: Unanswered]
11) If we were to discover that Lisa Gherardini was actually a shitty person, would that justify Black Lives Matter storming the Louvre to destroy the Mona Lisa? [Status: Unanswered]
12) Why should we destroy artifacts and relics pertaining to history that we never want to forget or repeat? [Status: Unanswered]
13) The Aztecs committed genocide of many other tribes and practiced human sacrifice; should their artwork and artifacts be destroyed? [Status: Unanswered]
14) Why would you or anyone pretend to be a judge of what history is to be revised or destroyed? [Status: Unanswered]
15) In what substantive/meaningful way do the platforms of Black Lives Matter, ANTIFA, The National Organization of Women, the DNC, Communist Party USA and Socialist Party USA ... differ? [Status: Unanswered]
Attached image:

Page 2 of 2<12





Join the debate The Questions that Need to be Answered:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
questions11813-01-2022 10:47
Questions about computers1304-01-2022 19:33
Questions for IBDM: 1) about Karl Marx411-03-2020 19:16
Questions for IBDM: 2) about Kafka611-03-2020 18:40
Questions for IBDM: 3) about Verdi's La Traviata311-03-2020 18:02
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact