| The only new post here are from myself or the savior spammer05-06-2026 19:55 |
Swan ★★★★★
(7875) |
And since I cannot keep this place alive and spam itself is not life, this place is dead. It was more fun when you thought that you all could win, but now you have all folded
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?
Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy
Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
| 05-06-2026 20:13 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3712) |
Swan wrote:
And since I cannot keep this place alive and spam itself is not life, this place is dead. It was more fun when you thought that you all could win, but now you have all folded
Which website are you talking about?
Here at THIS website there is a new member and a new thread, not a new version of the New Messiah, and not a MAGA conspiracy nutcase.
That new thread is the most interesting discussion this website has had in the four years I've been involved.
A nitpicky naysayer might notice "sealover" joined on January 27th, 2021.
But "sealover" did not post anything until March 9th, 2022.
Like the majority of members who signed up at climate-debate.com, "sealover" did not post ANYTHING after he took a closer look at the actual discussion.
More than a year later, the discussion was still just as empty and ugly.
But "sealover" had already seen how Google directed people to this website, listed HIGH among search results for "climate discussion" or "climate change forum" or "climate website" or "climate change discussion" or "climate debate" or many other combinations of related search terms.
Therefore, "sealover" knew that a larger target audience was available, even if just a handful of trolls were doing all the discussion.
The "sealover library" gets more and more attention every day, even as the New Messiah fails to get any donations, direct contacts with Donald Trump, or more than a few dozen "views" of his threads.
Patricio's new thread will be an excellent indicator to follow.
If that "silent majority" target audience is paying attention, new member Patricio's "Beyond the Tribal Marker.." thread will be getting hundreds of "views".
If last summer's history repeats itself, by July 4th weekend Patricio's thread will be getting hundreds of new "views" per day. |
| 05-06-2026 20:34 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★★
(3538) |
Still waiting for Patricio to post some AI slop rebutting why the greenhouse GAS effect doesn't work in Jackson, MS... tick tock...
%20(1).png)
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
| 05-06-2026 20:44 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3712) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Still waiting for Patricio to post some AI slop rebutting why the greenhouse GAS effect doesn't work in Jackson, MS... tick tock...
You don't seem to like Patricio very much.
That's okay. I like him enough for BOTH of us.
Are you seriously suggesting that you advanced a coherent scientific argument?
You didn't even tell him about the glass ceiling that holds in the atmosphere! |
| 05-06-2026 20:51 |
Into the Night ★★★★★
(24251) |
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
And since I cannot keep this place alive and spam itself is not life, this place is dead. It was more fun when you thought that you all could win, but now you have all folded
Which website are you talking about?
Here at THIS website there is a new member and a new thread, not a new version of the New Messiah, and not a MAGA conspiracy nutcase.
That new thread is the most interesting discussion this website has had in the four years I've been involved.
A nitpicky naysayer might notice "sealover" joined on January 27th, 2021.
But "sealover" did not post anything until March 9th, 2022.
Like the majority of members who signed up at climate-debate.com, "sealover" did not post ANYTHING after he took a closer look at the actual discussion.
More than a year later, the discussion was still just as empty and ugly.
But "sealover" had already seen how Google directed people to this website, listed HIGH among search results for "climate discussion" or "climate change forum" or "climate website" or "climate change discussion" or "climate debate" or many other combinations of related search terms.
Therefore, "sealover" knew that a larger target audience was available, even if just a handful of trolls were doing all the discussion.
The "sealover library" gets more and more attention every day, even as the New Messiah fails to get any donations, direct contacts with Donald Trump, or more than a few dozen "views" of his threads.
Patricio's new thread will be an excellent indicator to follow.
If that "silent majority" target audience is paying attention, new member Patricio's "Beyond the Tribal Marker.." thread will be getting hundreds of "views".
If last summer's history repeats itself, by July 4th weekend Patricio's thread will be getting hundreds of new "views" per day.
You really think people are interested in the BS, Robert?
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
|
| 05-06-2026 20:55 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3712) |
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Swan wrote:
And since I cannot keep this place alive and spam itself is not life, this place is dead. It was more fun when you thought that you all could win, but now you have all folded
Which website are you talking about?
Here at THIS website there is a new member and a new thread, not a new version of the New Messiah, and not a MAGA conspiracy nutcase.
That new thread is the most interesting discussion this website has had in the four years I've been involved.
A nitpicky naysayer might notice "sealover" joined on January 27th, 2021.
But "sealover" did not post anything until March 9th, 2022.
Like the majority of members who signed up at climate-debate.com, "sealover" did not post ANYTHING after he took a closer look at the actual discussion.
More than a year later, the discussion was still just as empty and ugly.
But "sealover" had already seen how Google directed people to this website, listed HIGH among search results for "climate discussion" or "climate change forum" or "climate website" or "climate change discussion" or "climate debate" or many other combinations of related search terms.
Therefore, "sealover" knew that a larger target audience was available, even if just a handful of trolls were doing all the discussion.
The "sealover library" gets more and more attention every day, even as the New Messiah fails to get any donations, direct contacts with Donald Trump, or more than a few dozen "views" of his threads.
Patricio's new thread will be an excellent indicator to follow.
If that "silent majority" target audience is paying attention, new member Patricio's "Beyond the Tribal Marker.." thread will be getting hundreds of "views".
If last summer's history repeats itself, by July 4th weekend Patricio's thread will be getting hundreds of new "views" per day.
You really think people are interested in the BS, Robert?
BS. FU. Phallus fallacy, you prick! |
| 05-06-2026 21:11 |
Spongy Iris★★★★★
(3538) |
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Still waiting for Patricio to post some AI slop rebutting why the greenhouse GAS effect doesn't work in Jackson, MS... tick tock...
You don't seem to like Patricio very much.
That's okay. I like him enough for BOTH of us.
Are you seriously suggesting that you advanced a coherent scientific argument?
You didn't even tell him about the glass ceiling that holds in the atmosphere!
One step at a time.
That cold air cannot heat up warm land is point 1.
That Phoenix is way hotter than Jackson is point 2.
If Patricio can't get past those 2 points debunking the greenhouse GAS effect, then I'm not going to take the time to dump my whole thesis!
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
| 05-06-2026 21:26 |
Im a BM★★★★★
(3712) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Still waiting for Patricio to post some AI slop rebutting why the greenhouse GAS effect doesn't work in Jackson, MS... tick tock...
You don't seem to like Patricio very much.
That's okay. I like him enough for BOTH of us.
Are you seriously suggesting that you advanced a coherent scientific argument?
You didn't even tell him about the glass ceiling that holds in the atmosphere!
One step at a time.
That cold air cannot heat up warm land is point 1.
That Phoenix is way hotter than Jackson is point 2.
If Patricio can't get past those 2 points debunking the greenhouse GAS effect, then I'm not going to take the time to dump my whole thesis!
That would be Patricio's loss, wouldn't it?
You won't even share the whole thesis until he jumps through the first two hoops.
At least you're not saying you won't allow him to discuss climate change until you are satisfied with the "thermodynamic" plausibility of the unambiguous definition he provides for the term.
Is climate a "category"? I wouldn't know. I didn't study enough "science"! |
| 05-06-2026 21:38 |
Spongy Iris★★★★★
(3538) |
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Still waiting for Patricio to post some AI slop rebutting why the greenhouse GAS effect doesn't work in Jackson, MS... tick tock...
You don't seem to like Patricio very much.
That's okay. I like him enough for BOTH of us.
Are you seriously suggesting that you advanced a coherent scientific argument?
You didn't even tell him about the glass ceiling that holds in the atmosphere!
One step at a time.
That cold air cannot heat up warm land is point 1.
That Phoenix is way hotter than Jackson is point 2.
If Patricio can't get past those 2 points debunking the greenhouse GAS effect, then I'm not going to take the time to dump my whole thesis!
That would be Patricio's loss, wouldn't it?
You won't even share the whole thesis until he jumps through the first two hoops.
At least you're not saying you won't allow him to discuss climate change until you are satisfied with the "thermodynamic" plausibility of the unambiguous definition he provides for the term.
Is climate a "category"? I wouldn't know. I didn't study enough "science"!
I can't be sure he got the question about Phoenix and Jackson because you keep drowning it out with walls of text!
https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html |
| 05-06-2026 21:41 |
sealover★★★★★
(2123) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Still waiting for Patricio to post some AI slop rebutting why the greenhouse GAS effect doesn't work in Jackson, MS... tick tock...
I don't want to be responsible for preventing Patricio from seeing this.
Here it is, until Into the Night drowns the thread in parrot poop.
Then it will be HIS fault, not mine. |