|The most honest climate scientist among the most dishonest climate scientists02-09-2019 22:34|
|Third world guy☆☆☆☆☆
|Stephen Schneider is the lead author of the IPCC reports.|
Greek philosophers would classify him among cynics.
For current believers in the climate theory of CO2, he must be considered a pragmatic hero, but for objective science he turns out to be a cynical traitor.
Stephen Schneider made an amazing publication called "Each of us has to decide what is the right balance between being effective and being honest."
"On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but - which means that we must include all doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts . On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we'd like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. "
Some of us might know him as the father of climate alarmism.
Tell me what you want to demonstrate, give me money, and I will design a model to prove it.
Third world guy wrote:
There were some leaked Emails a few years ago, loaded with similar sentiments, basically, how to convince the morons... There was some very clear discussion about data manipulation, and fraud. No investigation, other than how the emails were leaked. Never really denied, just shrugged off, not as important as the 'crisis'.
It's really surprising they don't have a branded line of merchandise, and asking for donations. They could be making billions of dollars, beyond the government funding they already get.
[b]Stephen Schneider wrote: On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well.
Translation: "We need to eat, so we lie to get grants and to get jobs in politics. We might not appreciate all the dishonesty but we sure enjoy the benefits!"
[b]Stephen Schneider wrote: And like most people we'd like to see the world a better place [for ourselves],
[b]Stephen Schneider wrote: That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage.
Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.
Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit
Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles
Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn
You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.
The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank
:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude
IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
|What makes IPCC scientists sure warmer air hundreds of millions of years ago due to||71||06-06-2019 23:39|
|An alternative theory from a non-scientist||5||29-04-2019 18:28|
|This scientist thinks she has the key to curb climate change: super plants||1||21-04-2019 03:43|
|If it's so important why don't some climate scientists kill themselves?||0||28-03-2019 02:21|
|Climate change is creating toxic crops and poisoning some of world's poorest people, scientists warn||0||22-03-2019 17:30|