Remember me
▼ Content

The Global Warming Fraud


The Global Warming Fraud24-05-2020 02:47
RenaissanceMan
★☆☆☆☆
(63)
http://TheGlobalWarmingFraud.wordpress.com

More sources of information, facts, and science than you can handle, showing how fraudulent and frightened these people are as they grub for billions more research dollars to keep studying to death what they claim is already "fact, fact, fact."
24-05-2020 03:41
duncan61
★★☆☆☆
(251)
This AGW/CC Hoax is nearing an end
24-05-2020 05:02
tmiddlesProfile picture★★★★★
(2922)
RenaissanceMan wrote:
http://TheGlobalWarmingFraud.wordpress.com

More sources of information, facts, and science than you can handle, showing how fraudulent and frightened these people are as they grub for billions more research dollars to keep studying to death what they claim is already "fact, fact, fact."


Thanks for posting RenaissanceMan.

A number of things are alleged (or claimed as Facts) in the article you've linked to. Please let me know if I left anything important out:

"...shills tell everybody else that global warming is manmade"

1- "Fudging figures," Now the term fudging is a bit vague but I think it's fair to say the allegation is that data has been changed to draw a conclusion falsely.

The supplied support of this allegation in the paper is: ?

2- "biased papers and extremely misleading graphs," Self explanatory.

The supplied support of this allegation in the paper is: ?

3- "focus almost exclusively on CO2, and ignore the far larger concentration of water vapor, the dominant greenhouse gas, which is some forty times the concentration of CO2. " This clearly states that water vapor is not included in the study of global warming. Hard to believe.

The supplied support of this allegation in the paper is: ?

4- "Promoters of The Global Warming Fraud are raking in billions of tax dollars for research grants" Independently verified that:

https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/follow-the-climate-change-money

However this would be ture if it were not a "Fraud" so it only provides a motive and not proof of a crime.

These are points worth discussing.

The link is very long and appears to be a list of links and quotes that are not organized.

Maybe we can pick one thing and drill down on it?
24-05-2020 05:52
duncan61
★★☆☆☆
(251)
We are in the middle of a storm here in Perth West Australia so I have some spare time.I went to this link https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/follow-the-climate-change-money and found it interesting.I am not sure what you wish to debate Tmiddles you seem to be pro AGW/CC yet you post links to complete opposite sites.Do you agree Micheal mann has been exposed.By point blank refusing to supply the data requested
24-05-2020 21:19
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(12381)
tmiddles wrote:
RenaissanceMan wrote:
http://TheGlobalWarmingFraud.wordpress.com

More sources of information, facts, and science than you can handle, showing how fraudulent and frightened these people are as they grub for billions more research dollars to keep studying to death what they claim is already "fact, fact, fact."


Thanks for posting RenaissanceMan.

A number of things are alleged (or claimed as Facts) in the article you've linked to. Please let me know if I left anything important out:

"...shills tell everybody else that global warming is manmade"

1- "Fudging figures," Now the term fudging is a bit vague but I think it's fair to say the allegation is that data has been changed to draw a conclusion falsely.

The supplied support of this allegation in the paper is: ?

2- "biased papers and extremely misleading graphs," Self explanatory.

The supplied support of this allegation in the paper is: ?

3- "focus almost exclusively on CO2, and ignore the far larger concentration of water vapor, the dominant greenhouse gas, which is some forty times the concentration of CO2. " This clearly states that water vapor is not included in the study of global warming. Hard to believe.

The supplied support of this allegation in the paper is: ?

4- "Promoters of The Global Warming Fraud are raking in billions of tax dollars for research grants" Independently verified that:

https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/follow-the-climate-change-money

However this would be ture if it were not a "Fraud" so it only provides a motive and not proof of a crime.

These are points worth discussing.

The link is very long and appears to be a list of links and quotes that are not organized.

Maybe we can pick one thing and drill down on it?

Attempted force of negative proof fallacies. Inversion fallacy. Mantras 38b...17...36c...6...39d.

No argument presented.


The Parrot Killer
Edited on 24-05-2020 21:22
30-05-2020 23:32
RenaissanceMan
★☆☆☆☆
(63)
tmiddles wrote:
RenaissanceMan wrote:
http://TheGlobalWarmingFraud.wordpress.com

More sources of information, facts, and science than you can handle, showing how fraudulent and frightened these people are as they grub for billions more research dollars to keep studying to death what they claim is already "fact, fact, fact."


Thanks for posting RenaissanceMan.

A number of things are alleged (or claimed as Facts) in the article you've linked to. Please let me know if I left anything important out:

"...shills tell everybody else that global warming is manmade"

1- "Fudging figures," Now the term fudging is a bit vague but I think it's fair to say the allegation is that data has been changed to draw a conclusion falsely.

The supplied support of this allegation in the paper is: ?

2- "biased papers and extremely misleading graphs," Self explanatory.

The supplied support of this allegation in the paper is: ?

3- "focus almost exclusively on CO2, and ignore the far larger concentration of water vapor, the dominant greenhouse gas, which is some forty times the concentration of CO2. " This clearly states that water vapor is not included in the study of global warming. Hard to believe.

The supplied support of this allegation in the paper is: ?

4- "Promoters of The Global Warming Fraud are raking in billions of tax dollars for research grants" Independently verified that:

https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/follow-the-climate-change-money

However this would be ture if it were not a "Fraud" so it only provides a motive and not proof of a crime.

These are points worth discussing.

The link is very long and appears to be a list of links and quotes that are not organized.

Maybe we can pick one thing and drill down on it?


The supplied support of all these points you question is amply provided in the extensive documentation at the website.
The "one thing" for you to study is the Keeling Curve, which I call the Scary Graph.

OMG! Look, it goes UP a LOT! So does TEMPERATURE. The same way.
oOOoO scary.

So does a population explosion graph if you have a base at 1,000,000 and a top at 1,000,001.

The Keeling Curve's fraudulent nature is thoroughly explained. You obviously did not bother to read it. Shameful for someone who pretends to want to "drill down on it." You don't want to "drill" at all. You simply want to keep pushing the Global Warming Fraud. Listen to Willie Soon's lectures. He's one of many scholars who has exposed the Climate Change Cult.




Join the debate The Global Warming Fraud:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
The Global Warming Fraud16421-08-2019 10:31
Research Grant Fraud931-03-2019 17:28
In Your Face - the IPCC and Fraud904-01-2018 01:14
climate change expert sentenced to 32 months for fraud. So much for SCIENCE, eh? More like POLITICAL scie527-04-2017 22:31
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact