Remember me
▼ Content

The echo chamber



Page 2 of 2<12
28-01-2020 21:02
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(7464)
tmiddles wrote:I looked for that and couldn't find it. I believe they talk about theories be falsifiable but no one has ever said Science is ONLY that. Except for ITN that is

Great, another example of a correct answer you cannot manage to locate on the internet. Are you implying that it cannot be, that your internet search defines reality?

Are you thinking about answering something to the effect of "No! ... but yes"?

The correct answer is that science is a set of falsifiable models that predict nature and that have endured the scrutiny of the scientific method.

I don't care how you want to discover the truth of the matter but I'll advise you that if you deviate from that definition, you won't have science. Let me know if you have any questions.


.


A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
29-01-2020 05:24
tmiddlesProfile picture★★★★★
(3375)
Harry C wrote:I'm trying to learn and you are not.
And I say precisely the same thing about you!

Think of it this way Harry:

It's not about if I think you're crazy/wrong/ect. or if you think I'm crazy/wrong/ect.

The question is, assuming at least one of us is, is that party the least bit self aware?

What if I/YOU/READER is crazy and blind in this endeavor. Would they know?

I am convinced that not only am I hear to learn, I am learning, as I bet you are. I look at you and I see a total sham. You look at me and see the same.

Neither one of us is classically stupid.

History is full of smart people being crazy.
29-01-2020 05:26
tmiddlesProfile picture★★★★★
(3375)
Into the Night wrote:
tmiddles wrote:...I believe they talk about theories be falsifiable but no one has ever said Science is ONLY that. Except for ITN that is

Lie.


tmiddles wrote:
Into the Night wrote:Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

Your definition of science has long since been debunked:
Google: 7 results, pretty much just you

Don't suppose you'd be willing to define what you mean when you say "lie".

Pretty unclear to me.
29-01-2020 05:52
tmiddlesProfile picture★★★★★
(3375)


Should have put this in the first post.
29-01-2020 07:21
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(13293)
tmiddles wrote:
Harry C wrote:I'm trying to learn and you are not.
And I say precisely the same thing about you!

Think of it this way Harry:

It's not about if I think you're crazy/wrong/ect. or if you think I'm crazy/wrong/ect.

The question is, assuming at least one of us is, is that party the least bit self aware?

What if I/YOU/READER is crazy and blind in this endeavor. Would they know?

I am convinced that not only am I hear to learn, I am learning, as I bet you are. I look at you and I see a total sham. You look at me and see the same.

Neither one of us is classically stupid.

History is full of smart people being crazy.

You are not here to learn. You are here to preach.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
29-01-2020 07:22
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(13293)
tmiddles wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
tmiddles wrote:...I believe they talk about theories be falsifiable but no one has ever said Science is ONLY that. Except for ITN that is

Lie.


tmiddles wrote:
Into the Night wrote:Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

Your definition of science has long since been debunked:
Google: 7 results, pretty much just you

Don't suppose you'd be willing to define what you mean when you say "lie".

Pretty unclear to me.


Your are trolling again.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
29-01-2020 15:01
Harry CProfile picture★☆☆☆☆
(143)
tmiddles wrote:
Harry C wrote:I'm trying to learn and you are not.
And I say precisely the same thing about you!

Think of it this way Harry:

It's not about if I think you're crazy/wrong/ect. or if you think I'm crazy/wrong/ect.

The question is, assuming at least one of us is, is that party the least bit self aware?

What if I/YOU/READER is crazy and blind in this endeavor. Would they know?

I am convinced that not only am I hear to learn, I am learning, as I bet you are. I look at you and I see a total sham. You look at me and see the same.

Neither one of us is classically stupid.

History is full of smart people being crazy.


Just put me on your ignore list because I upset you so much.


You learn something new every day if you are lucky!
Page 2 of 2<12





Join the debate The echo chamber:

Remember me

▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact