Remember me
▼ Content

The Complexity of Climate Change



Page 6 of 6<<<456
11-06-2024 20:12
Im a BM
★★★☆☆
(921)
sealover wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote: You have gone for days in a row without calling ANYONE a "moron". Are you okay?

You have been focused more on spamming than on preaching physics violations so the word "moron" hasn't been required to the same extent.


I just FACT CHECKED Im a BM's ASS!

You called keepit a "gullible moron" just YESTERDAY.

Im a BM gave you WAY too much credit for possibly behaving decently, for a surprising change.


As is made clear in the "extra text:" on both user profiles, I openly admit that Im a BM and sealover are one and the same.

But not the same, because sealover wanted to discuss advanced science, and Im a BM was created to respond to the personal attacks and false accusations.

Confession: I had pretty much stopped reading the troll posts. I had NO IDEA whether or not the word "moron" had already been used the same day.

Then the scientist in me became concerned whether or not I was making a false statement with no evidence.

Used "Search keywords" to see when was the last time someone said "moron".

Ah, the complexities of climate change.

Which cannot be discussed because it is a "meaningless buzzword".

Or at least it cannot be discussed without calling someone a "moron" in the process.

For all the times a sentence was posted that began with "Only a scientifically illiterate moron would.."

Maybe it is because only a scientifically illiterate moron would KNOW.

Someone incapable of comprehending that "gibber babble" and "buzzwords" are actually the language of science, which are understood perfectly (or something close enough to perfect) by real world scientists who are capable of learning, and required to learn, the definition of scientific terms.
12-06-2024 05:26
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(22183)
Im a BM wrote:
Someone incapable of comprehending that "gibber babble" and "buzzwords" are actually the language of science, which are understood perfectly (or something close enough to perfect) by real world scientists who are capable of learning, and required to learn, the definition of scientific terms.

Science is not gibber babble, or buzzwords, or terms.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.

Your gibber babble, buzzwords, and semantics fallacies are NOT science, Robert.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
12-06-2024 19:42
Im a BM
★★★☆☆
(921)
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Someone incapable of comprehending that "gibber babble" and "buzzwords" are actually the language of science, which are understood perfectly (or something close enough to perfect) by real world scientists who are capable of learning, and required to learn, the definition of scientific terms.

Science is not gibber babble, or buzzwords, or terms.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.

Your gibber babble, buzzwords, and semantics fallacies are NOT science, Robert.



If there were some way to get Branner to pay ANY attention to what happens on his website...

I would encourage him to do a "Search keywords" on one of those last names from Up North.

He would see that it has been posted 86 times already.

He would clearly see the identity of the poster.

Then you can explain to me again how I dox myself.

If it is a short enough post, I might even read it.
12-06-2024 20:08
sealover
★★★★☆
(1681)
Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Someone incapable of comprehending that "gibber babble" and "buzzwords" are actually the language of science, which are understood perfectly (or something close enough to perfect) by real world scientists who are capable of learning, and required to learn, the definition of scientific terms.

Science is not gibber babble, or buzzwords, or terms.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.

Your gibber babble, buzzwords, and semantics fallacies are NOT science, Robert.



If there were some way to get Branner to pay ANY attention to what happens on his website...

I would encourage him to do a "Search keywords" on one of those last names from Up North.

He would see that it has been posted 86 times already.

He would clearly see the identity of the poster.

Then you can explain to me again how I dox myself.

If it is a short enough post, I might even read it.



Im a BM forgot to mention a "Search keywords" for the term "moron".

2854 times so far.

Branner just LOVES it when members call each other a "moron".

And the obvious fallacy is that someone who fits the definition of "moron" would be incapable of posting ANYTHING on ANY website.
12-06-2024 20:15
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(22183)
sealover wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Someone incapable of comprehending that "gibber babble" and "buzzwords" are actually the language of science, which are understood perfectly (or something close enough to perfect) by real world scientists who are capable of learning, and required to learn, the definition of scientific terms.

Science is not gibber babble, or buzzwords, or terms.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.

Your gibber babble, buzzwords, and semantics fallacies are NOT science, Robert.



If there were some way to get Branner to pay ANY attention to what happens on his website...

I would encourage him to do a "Search keywords" on one of those last names from Up North.

He would see that it has been posted 86 times already.

He would clearly see the identity of the poster.

Then you can explain to me again how I dox myself.

If it is a short enough post, I might even read it.



Im a BM forgot to mention a "Search keywords" for the term "moron".

2854 times so far.

Branner just LOVES it when members call each other a "moron".

And the obvious fallacy is that someone who fits the definition of "moron" would be incapable of posting ANYTHING on ANY website.

Fallacy fallacy. Bulverism fallacy. Inversion fallacy.

Stop whining. Stop spamming.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
Edited on 12-06-2024 20:15
Page 6 of 6<<<456





Join the debate The Complexity of Climate Change:

Remember me

▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact