The Atlantic Ocean Is Growing

James___ wrote: Could something like this be influenced by tectonic plate uplift associated with melting glaciers?

James___ wrote:
If this article is accurate, is the up welling along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge also causing the Atlantic Ocean to warm? The Pacific Ocean is also expanding as well.
Could something like this be influenced by tectonic plate uplift associated with melting glaciers?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/atlantic-ocean-getting-wider-every-190102525.html
Basically, when the Earth starts cooling again, will both oceans shorelines decrease the width of those oceans?

James___ wrote:
If this article is accurate, is the up welling along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge also causing the Atlantic Ocean to warm? The Pacific Ocean is also expanding as well.
Could something like this be influenced by tectonic plate uplift associated with melting glaciers?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/atlantic-ocean-getting-wider-every-190102525.html
Basically, when the Earth starts cooling again, will both oceans shorelines decrease the width of those oceans?

HarveyH55 wrote:
I've lived in Florida for a few decades, there hasn't been any difference in sea level, height or width. That means that the only other option, would be oceans getting deeper. For oceans to get deeper, the land would need to get taller. Nothing to indicate that happening either.

IBdaMann wrote:

James___ wrote: Could something like this be influenced by tectonic plate uplift associated with melting glaciers?

No.

Well, that was easy.


.

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:
If this article is accurate, is the up welling along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge also causing the Atlantic Ocean to warm? The Pacific Ocean is also expanding as well.
Could something like this be influenced by tectonic plate uplift associated with melting glaciers?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/atlantic-ocean-getting-wider-every-190102525.html
Basically, when the Earth starts cooling again, will both oceans shorelines decrease the width of those oceans?

LOL up welled water is cold not warm

Yawning

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:
If this article is accurate, is the up welling along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge also causing the Atlantic Ocean to warm? The Pacific Ocean is also expanding as well.
Could something like this be influenced by tectonic plate uplift associated with melting glaciers?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/atlantic-ocean-getting-wider-every-190102525.html
Basically, when the Earth starts cooling again, will both oceans shorelines decrease the width of those oceans?

LOL up welled water is cold not warm

Yawning

Back in the 1970's, scientists said that deep ocean currents warmed 10 years ahead of the atmosphere. And the Greenland Sea abyss a decade or so again was warming 10 times faster than other bodies of water.

James___ wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

James___ wrote: Could something like this be influenced by tectonic plate uplift associated with melting glaciers?

No.

Well, that was easy.

I'd feel better if you put a little more effort into it.

IBdaMann wrote:

James___ wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

James___ wrote: Could something like this be influenced by tectonic plate uplift associated with melting glaciers?

No.

Well, that was easy.

I'd feel better if you put a little more effort into it.

You asked a simple yes/no question. How much more effort do you need?

Instead of "No" did you want a "Hell, no!"?

.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Do you think all that extra water, from melted polar ice, is leaking out of the ozone hole?

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Do you think all that extra water, from melted polar ice, is leaking out of the ozone hole?

Actually, depleted ozone might help to warm the arctic. With Antarctica, it changes the winds around the land mass displacing heat. The arctic has no such land mass so it's winds behave differently.
If so, then this is an example of AGW and your sarcasm was noted as well.

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Do you think all that extra water, from melted polar ice, is leaking out of the ozone hole?

Actually, depleted ozone might help to warm the arctic. With Antarctica, it changes the winds around the land mass displacing heat. The arctic has no such land mass so it's winds behave differently.
If so, then this is an example of AGW and your sarcasm was noted as well.

There is no longer an ozone hole.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Do you think all that extra water, from melted polar ice, is leaking out of the ozone hole?

Actually, depleted ozone might help to warm the arctic. With Antarctica, it changes the winds around the land mass displacing heat. The arctic has no such land mass so it's winds behave differently.
If so, then this is an example of AGW and your sarcasm was noted as well.

There is no longer an ozone hole.

Yes there is. It still appears every winter at each pole and still is about the same size as always, and still have the same cause (lack of sunlight).

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Do you think all that extra water, from melted polar ice, is leaking out of the ozone hole?

Actually, depleted ozone might help to warm the arctic. With Antarctica, it changes the winds around the land mass displacing heat. The arctic has no such land mass so it's winds behave differently.
If so, then this is an example of AGW and your sarcasm was noted as well.

There is no longer an ozone hole.

Yes there is. It still appears every winter at each pole and still is about the same size as always, and still have the same cause (lack of sunlight).

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Do you think all that extra water, from melted polar ice, is leaking out of the ozone hole?

Actually, depleted ozone might help to warm the arctic. With Antarctica, it changes the winds around the land mass displacing heat. The arctic has no such land mass so it's winds behave differently.
If so, then this is an example of AGW and your sarcasm was noted as well.

There is no longer an ozone hole.

Yes there is. It still appears every winter at each pole and still is about the same size as always, and still have the same cause (lack of sunlight).

Wrong the ozone hole totally closed up after the banning of chlorofluorocarbons, though it still opens it is not nearly as large.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Do you think all that extra water, from melted polar ice, is leaking out of the ozone hole?

Actually, depleted ozone might help to warm the arctic. With Antarctica, it changes the winds around the land mass displacing heat. The arctic has no such land mass so it's winds behave differently.
If so, then this is an example of AGW and your sarcasm was noted as well.

There is no longer an ozone hole.

Yes there is. It still appears every winter at each pole and still is about the same size as always, and still have the same cause (lack of sunlight).

Wrong the ozone hole totally closed up after the banning of chlorofluorocarbons, though it still opens it is not nearly as large.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Do you think all that extra water, from melted polar ice, is leaking out of the ozone hole?

Actually, depleted ozone might help to warm the arctic. With Antarctica, it changes the winds around the land mass displacing heat. The arctic has no such land mass so it's winds behave differently.
If so, then this is an example of AGW and your sarcasm was noted as well.

There is no longer an ozone hole.

Yes there is. It still appears every winter at each pole and still is about the same size as always, and still have the same cause (lack of sunlight).

Wrong the ozone hole totally closed up after the banning of chlorofluorocarbons, though it still opens it is not nearly as large.

Check the NASA website... The O-hole, hasn't really changed much, since they started monitoring and recording it's size. It's like everything else on the planet, constantly changing. Some years, it gets really big, other years it shrinks down considerably. Do you think arctic ice will stop melting every year, if we stop burning carbon based fuels? You know, like how we 'fixed' the O-hole? Far as anyone can tell, the ice melts and reforms every year. Not always the same amounts, or in a predictable manner. We've had hurricanes far back as anyone can remember. I've lived in Florida over 30 years. They really haven't changed a whole lot, just the way they are measured, and reported. What use to be tropical storms, are now named storms. A Cat 3 hurricane, almost always drops down to tropical storm, or less, within an hour, after landfall. I remember when Cat 3 storms, were serious business, and would keep most of it's strength after landfall, all across our state, sometimes would weaken much, until reaching Georgia or Alabama. The main change, is that they send planes into the storms, and get direct measurements. Where 10 years ago, they relied entirely on land-based measurements. A lot of what were once considered tropical storms, not even worth naming, reach hurricane wind-speeds (intermittently) closer to the center. This newer system, though might be scientifically more accurate, is deceptive, since it doesn't accurately depict the overall strength of the storms.

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Do you think all that extra water, from melted polar ice, is leaking out of the ozone hole?

Actually, depleted ozone might help to warm the arctic. With Antarctica, it changes the winds around the land mass displacing heat. The arctic has no such land mass so it's winds behave differently.
If so, then this is an example of AGW and your sarcasm was noted as well.

There is no longer an ozone hole.

Yes there is. It still appears every winter at each pole and still is about the same size as always, and still have the same cause (lack of sunlight).

Wrong the ozone hole totally closed up after the banning of chlorofluorocarbons, though it still opens it is not nearly as large.

Check the NASA website... The O-hole, hasn't really changed much, since they started monitoring and recording it's size. It's like everything else on the planet, constantly changing. Some years, it gets really big, other years it shrinks down considerably. Do you think arctic ice will stop melting every year, if we stop burning carbon based fuels? You know, like how we 'fixed' the O-hole? Far as anyone can tell, the ice melts and reforms every year. Not always the same amounts, or in a predictable manner. We've had hurricanes far back as anyone can remember. I've lived in Florida over 30 years. They really haven't changed a whole lot, just the way they are measured, and reported. What use to be tropical storms, are now named storms. A Cat 3 hurricane, almost always drops down to tropical storm, or less, within an hour, after landfall. I remember when Cat 3 storms, were serious business, and would keep most of it's strength after landfall, all across our state, sometimes would weaken much, until reaching Georgia or Alabama. The main change, is that they send planes into the storms, and get direct measurements. Where 10 years ago, they relied entirely on land-based measurements. A lot of what were once considered tropical storms, not even worth naming, reach hurricane wind-speeds (intermittently) closer to the center. This newer system, though might be scientifically more accurate, is deceptive, since it doesn't accurately depict the overall strength of the storms.

I do not believe that climate change is caused by humanity. Which does not mean that the humans who say that the climate is not changing are not simpletons.

So is the climate changing?

Sure is

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Do you think all that extra water, from melted polar ice, is leaking out of the ozone hole?

Actually, depleted ozone might help to warm the arctic. With Antarctica, it changes the winds around the land mass displacing heat. The arctic has no such land mass so it's winds behave differently.
If so, then this is an example of AGW and your sarcasm was noted as well.

There is no longer an ozone hole.

Yes there is. It still appears every winter at each pole and still is about the same size as always, and still have the same cause (lack of sunlight).

Wrong the ozone hole totally closed up after the banning of chlorofluorocarbons, though it still opens it is not nearly as large.

Check the NASA website... The O-hole, hasn't really changed much, since they started monitoring and recording it's size. It's like everything else on the planet, constantly changing. Some years, it gets really big, other years it shrinks down considerably. Do you think arctic ice will stop melting every year, if we stop burning carbon based fuels? You know, like how we 'fixed' the O-hole? Far as anyone can tell, the ice melts and reforms every year. Not always the same amounts, or in a predictable manner. We've had hurricanes far back as anyone can remember. I've lived in Florida over 30 years. They really haven't changed a whole lot, just the way they are measured, and reported. What use to be tropical storms, are now named storms. A Cat 3 hurricane, almost always drops down to tropical storm, or less, within an hour, after landfall. I remember when Cat 3 storms, were serious business, and would keep most of it's strength after landfall, all across our state, sometimes would weaken much, until reaching Georgia or Alabama. The main change, is that they send planes into the storms, and get direct measurements. Where 10 years ago, they relied entirely on land-based measurements. A lot of what were once considered tropical storms, not even worth naming, reach hurricane wind-speeds (intermittently) closer to the center. This newer system, though might be scientifically more accurate, is deceptive, since it doesn't accurately depict the overall strength of the storms.

I do not believe that climate change is caused by humanity. Which does not mean that the humans who say that the climate is not changing are not simpletons.

So is the climate changing?

Sure is

It's a dynamic world, everything changes, all the time. There is no 'normal', and nothing we can do to avoid the changes, or prevent them. We can build, to better protect ourselves from extreme changes.

Swan wrote:Wrong the ozone hole totally closed up after the banning of chlorofluorocarbons, though it still opens it is not nearly as large.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Wrong the ozone hole totally closed up after the banning of chlorofluorocarbons, though it still opens it is not nearly as large.

Nope. You were gullible to absorb that crap and to then regurgitate it.

For as long as earth has had oxygen in its atmosphere and has been in orbit around the sun, it has had a solid daytime ozone layer. Thus there is always, and always has been, an ozone hole over whichever pole is in winter darkness (devoid of sunlight) because ozone is a product of solar UV radiation on oxygen.

Solar radiation, i.e. daylight, specifically the UV band, is absorbed by the O2 (oxygen) in the stratosphere and becomes O3 (ozone). At night, there just isn't any daylight to maintain the O3 and the ozone returns to normal O2 (oxygen).

Presuming you are not at either pole, look up into the noon sky and be certain that you're looking at plenty of ozone in that stratosphere. At two o'clock in the morning, look up at that same sky and be certain that there just isn't a whole lot of ozone up in that stratosphere any more ... but don't fear, in just a few hours that stratosphere will be swimming in ozone once again.

You can read more about it here.

.

Swan wrote:Ozone alert....................