spamming

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > spamming

spamming23-05-2024 18:11
keepit ★★★★★ (3330)	All this complaining about spamming is more like spamming itself than what is being complained about. I wouldn't even say that itn has legitimate complaints about spamming. It sounds more like manipulation to me. I've never believed that repetitious false accusations ever make something actually true.
23-05-2024 21:28
Into the Night★★★★★ (22337)	You cannot defend spamming by sealover, keepit.
23-05-2024 22:45
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1002)	Into the Night wrote: You cannot defend spamming by sealover, keepit. You cannot defend doxing by IBdaMann, itn. If you had something of value to contribute, you would have done it by now. Eight years is long enough to make your point, whatever that point may be. You keep repeating the same one liners, such as "climate cannot change". Maybe someday you will make an affirmative argument to clarify your point, whatever it is. That would be a huge improvement over trolling threads with topics that are of no genuine interest to you, nor touch upon anything you actually understand. SO CLOSE TO 20,000 posts now.... WHAT AN AMAZING ACCOMPLISHMENT!
23-05-2024 23:45
keepit ★★★★★ (3330)	itn, It's easy to defend im a bm. You're the one that's doing most of the spamming.
24-05-2024 00:52
Into the Night★★★★★ (22337)	Im a BM wrote: Into the Night wrote: You cannot defend spamming by sealover, keepit. You cannot defend doxing by IBdaMann, itn. You can't blame anyone else for your problem. You doxed yourself. Im a BM wrote: If you had something of value to contribute, you would have done it by now. Eight years is long enough to make your point, whatever that point may be. You keep repeating the same one liners, such as "climate cannot change". Maybe someday you will make an affirmative argument to clarify your point, whatever it is. That would be a huge improvement over trolling threads with topics that are of no genuine interest to you, nor touch upon anything you actually understand. SO CLOSE TO 20,000 posts now.... WHAT AN AMAZING ACCOMPLISHMENT! Stop whining. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 24-05-2024 00:53

24-05-2024 00:54
Into the Night★★★★★ (22337)	keepit wrote: itn, It's easy to defend im a bm. You're the one that's doing most of the spamming. Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame The Sock's problems on me or anybody else. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
24-05-2024 02:31
Im a BM ★★★★☆ (1002)	Into the Night wrote: You cannot defend spamming by sealover, keepit. You cannot defend doxing by IBdaMann, itn. Even if he accidentally doxed the CURRENT resident of a house I used to live in. If you had something of value to contribute, you would have done it by now. Eight years is long enough to make your point, whatever that point may be. You keep repeating the same one liners, such as "climate cannot change". Maybe someday you will make an affirmative argument to clarify your point, whatever it is. That would be a huge improvement over trolling threads with topics that are of no genuine interest to you, nor touch upon anything you actually understand. SO CLOSE TO 20,000 posts now.... WHAT AN AMAZING ACCOMPLISHMENT!
24-05-2024 05:50
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14817)	keepit wrote:It's easy to defend im a bm. You're the one that's doing most of the spamming. keepit, you're full of baloney. Every single one of your posts is a complete waste of bandwidth. keepit, you've too many false statements. You can't be believed.
24-05-2024 06:36
GasGuzzler ★★★★★ (3028)	Im a BM wrote: Maybe someday you will make an affirmative argument to clarify your point, whatever it is. Maybe someday you will actually define "climate change". Seriously, I've heard so many things blamed on "climate change" I feel like climate could be most anything. Just define your terms if you are looking for a meaningful discussion. It seems all you want to do is Bitch and Moan Newsflash Nobody gives a shit if Jupiter's rings are filled with helium stolen from Earth. Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan
24-05-2024 18:00
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14817)	Im a BM wrote: You cannot defend doxing by IBdaMann, itn. What about doxxing yourself? Is that defensible? Is it permissable?

Join the debate spamming:

Threads	Replies	Last post
dox spamming	2	06-05-2024 21:30