Some Things To Consider

James_ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

James_ wrote:
ITN and Wake,
Do you guys know what a waste of time is ?
Trying to discuss anything with either one of you. This is because both of you maintain the position that you are right.

You two need some soul. Then you might get rid of the hate. :-)

Inversion fallacy. Did you even consider the possibility that you're wrong?

I checked what Wake posted. He was obviously wrong. As for you, I think you just like messing with Europeans.
When you say "inversion fallacy", that is your opinion just as Wake's opinion is that ice ages aren't cyclical. You both present your opinions as fact when they are merely opinions.
fal·la·cy
ˈfaləsē/
noun
a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument.
"the notion that the camera never lies is a fallacy"

In this case when both Wake and ITN state their opinions as fact they are demonstrating what a fallacy is.

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

James_ wrote:
ITN and Wake,
Do you guys know what a waste of time is ?
Trying to discuss anything with either one of you. This is because both of you maintain the position that you are right.

You two need some soul. Then you might get rid of the hate. :-)

Inversion fallacy. Did you even consider the possibility that you're wrong?

I checked what Wake posted. He was obviously wrong. As for you, I think you just like messing with Europeans.
When you say "inversion fallacy", that is your opinion just as Wake's opinion is that ice ages aren't cyclical. You both present your opinions as fact when they are merely opinions.
fal·la·cy
ˈfaləsē/
noun
a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument.
"the notion that the camera never lies is a fallacy"

In this case when both Wake and ITN state their opinions as fact they are demonstrating what a fallacy is.

You cannot say that ice ages are cyclical because in the last half million years they have occurred approximately ever 100,000 years. Before that they did not occur on any sort of schedule and this last ice age appears all to be one continuous ice age with alternating interglacial periods. This means that it has been one continuous ice age with warmer and colder periods but far colder than the normal climate before it.

You don't HAVE to take my word for it. All you have to do is look it up.

James_ wrote:

Wake wrote:

James_ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

James_ wrote:
ITN and Wake,
Do you guys know what a waste of time is ?
Trying to discuss anything with either one of you. This is because both of you maintain the position that you are right.

You two need some soul. Then you might get rid of the hate. :-)

Inversion fallacy. Did you even consider the possibility that you're wrong?

I checked what Wake posted. He was obviously wrong. As for you, I think you just like messing with Europeans.
When you say "inversion fallacy", that is your opinion just as Wake's opinion is that ice ages aren't cyclical. You both present your opinions as fact when they are merely opinions.
fal·la·cy
ˈfaləsē/
noun
a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument.
"the notion that the camera never lies is a fallacy"

In this case when both Wake and ITN state their opinions as fact they are demonstrating what a fallacy is.

You cannot say that ice ages are cyclical because in the last half million years they have occurred approximately ever 100,000 years. Before that they did not occur on any sort of schedule and this last ice age appears all to be one continuous ice age with alternating interglacial periods. This means that it has been one continuous ice age with warmer and colder periods but far colder than the normal climate before it.

You don't HAVE to take my word for it. All you have to do is look it up.

Wake,
In this article, they do mention both that ice ages are cyclical and that they do not understand why they are. And I think most people in here know that I want to understand that relationship.
This means that I will need to consider different things. Sometimes I might be wrong and that's okay, I can live with it. That is a part of the learning process.

[url]https://m.phys.org/news/2015-05-ice-cores-atmospheric-million-years.html
[/url]

Wake wrote:

This is more difficult to interpret because while it looks somewhat cyclic the scale is far too coarse to properly time with any accuracy.