So for about a year at lease, I have argued with theoretical physicist, Sabine Hossenfelder

Swan wrote:
Anyway German theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder a youtube dork who taught at the Munich center for math and philosophy, got on my nerves for her youtube BS. Then the college agreed with me and fired her for her anti science nonsense.

Theoretical Physicist 0
Swan 1

Thank you thank you very much

Earlier today, theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder relayed the news in one of her popular physics podcasts at YouTube:

My former academic institution discontinued my affiliation with them after members of the community complained about my criticism, on their research, and on academic conduct in general, and I refused to agree to tone policing. Free speech in Germany has a big problem indeed.

"I can't believe this really happened." Sabine Hossenfelder, September 17, 2025

[0:00] Welcome to another episode of Sabine's getting herself into trouble. I was recently contacted by a physicist who was very upset that I judge their research to be 100% [ __ ].

He demanded that I remove my video and when I politely declined, complained about me to some people he must have thought were my supervisors in a very deliberate attempt to exert pressure on me.

I am no longer affiliated with the Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy. Germany, the land of the free thinkers.

If science was a circus, they'd all be clowns by now.

Serves her right, you might say. Shouldn't have used the B- word. Fair enough. I know some people get offended by my language, though. I think that when it comes to swear words, I'm very moderate. Come on. What the [ __ ] Is this the 16th century or what? I express myself this way because well, for one thing, it's what I think.

But more importantly, I don't want to leave you guessing what I mean. But I can say this entirely without swear words:. A lot of research [in] the foundations of physics is now pseudocience. It hasn't followed the scientific method for decades.

I'm not bothered by this person's behavior or by losing my affiliation again because thanks to you, I'm now fully financially independent, which is why I can, in contrast to many others, afford to publicly criticize academic research. But what does bother me is that some physicists still don't understand the problem with what they call science.

Of course, I'm not the only one who has noticed this problem. I call it mathematical stories or mathematical fiction or just [ __ ] Others have called it mathematical gymnastics or fairy tale physics. It's why David Lindley declared the end of physics. And one of the reasons why John Horgan declared the end of science. I'm not making any particularly novel observation here.

But it keeps going on. This is what blows my mind. It doesn't matter how obviously this is pseudocience. It doesn't matter how many people call out this problem, how many books are written about it. It doesn't matter what I say in any of my videos. It keeps going.

They keep on producing more of these garbage papers each day and they continue to get published and they continue to get paid for it and then they put out press releases and the media picks it up and people ask me what I think and I say it's [ __ ] because that's what it is.

The problem is widely known among people in the field who tend to acknowledge it privately but would never admit to it in public because their money and their reputation depends on it. Well, most of them wouldn't admit it...

Anyway I called it

Swan wrote:
Anyway German theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder a youtube dork who taught at the Munich center for math and philosophy, got on my nerves for her youtube BS. Then the college agreed with me and fired her for her anti science nonsense.

Theoretical Physicist 0
Swan 1

Swan wrote:
Thank you thank you very much

Earlier today, theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder relayed the news in one of her popular physics podcasts at YouTube:

My former academic institution discontinued my affiliation with them after members of the community complained about my criticism, on their research, and on academic conduct in general, and I refused to agree to tone policing. Free speech in Germany has a big problem indeed.

Swan wrote:
"I can't believe this really happened." Sabine Hossenfelder, September 17, 2025

Swan wrote:
[0:00] Welcome to another episode of Sabine's getting herself into trouble. I was recently contacted by a physicist who was very upset that I judge their research to be 100% [ __ ].

Swan wrote:
He demanded that I remove my video and when I politely declined, complained about me to some people he must have thought were my supervisors in a very deliberate attempt to exert pressure on me.

Swan wrote:
I am no longer affiliated with the Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy. Germany, the land of the free thinkers.

Swan wrote:
If science was a circus, they'd all be clowns by now.

Swan wrote:
Serves her right, you might say. Shouldn't have used the B- word. Fair enough. I know some people get offended by my language, though. I think that when it comes to swear words, I'm very moderate. Come on. What the [ __ ] Is this the 16th century or what? I express myself this way because well, for one thing, it's what I think.

But more importantly, I don't want to leave you guessing what I mean. But I can say this entirely without swear words:. A lot of research [in] the foundations of physics is now pseudocience.

Swan wrote:
It hasn't followed the scientific method for decades.

Swan wrote:
I'm not bothered by this person's behavior or by losing my affiliation again because thanks to you, I'm now fully financially independent, which is why I can, in contrast to many others, afford to publicly criticize academic research. But what does bother me is that some physicists still don't understand the problem with what they call science.

Swan wrote:
Of course, I'm not the only one who has noticed this problem. I call it mathematical stories or mathematical fiction or just [ __ ] Others have called it mathematical gymnastics or fairy tale physics. It's why David Lindley declared the end of physics. And one of the reasons why John Horgan declared the end of science. I'm not making any particularly novel observation here.

Swan wrote:
But it keeps going on. This is what blows my mind. It doesn't matter how obviously this is pseudocience. It doesn't matter how many people call out this problem, how many books are written about it. It doesn't matter what I say in any of my videos. It keeps going.

They keep on producing more of these garbage papers each day and they continue to get published and they continue to get paid for it and then they put out press releases and the media picks it up and people ask me what I think and I say it's [ __ ] because that's what it is.

The problem is widely known among people in the field who tend to acknowledge it privately but would never admit to it in public because their money and their reputation depends on it. Well, most of them wouldn't admit it...

Anyway I called it

Swan wrote:
Anyway German theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder a youtube dork who taught at the Munich center for math and philosophy, got on my nerves for her youtube BS. Then the college agreed with me and fired her for her anti science nonsense.

Theoretical Physicist 0
Swan 1

Thank you thank you very much

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:
Anyway German theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder a youtube dork who taught at the Munich center for math and philosophy, got on my nerves for her youtube BS. Then the college agreed with me and fired her for her anti science nonsense.

Theoretical Physicist 0
Swan 1

Thank you thank you very much

With what specifically did you take offense? Did she denigrate your apple stock, or did she disparage your tomatoes?

I know, she told you that there is no quantum computing, and that geese are amphibious. You just couldn't stand for that, right?

GasGuzzler wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:
Anyway German theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder a youtube dork who taught at the Munich center for math and philosophy, got on my nerves for her youtube BS. Then the college agreed with me and fired her for her anti science nonsense.

Theoretical Physicist 0
Swan 1

Thank you thank you very much

With what specifically did you take offense? Did she denigrate your apple stock, or did she disparage your tomatoes?

I know, she told you that there is no quantum computing, and that geese are amphibious. You just couldn't stand for that, right?

It was none of that. She simply knocked him off his bicycle.

IBdaMann wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:
Anyway German theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder a youtube dork who taught at the Munich center for math and philosophy, got on my nerves for her youtube BS. Then the college agreed with me and fired her for her anti science nonsense.

Theoretical Physicist 0
Swan 1

Thank you thank you very much

With what specifically did you take offense? Did she denigrate your apple stock, or did she disparage your tomatoes?

I know, she told you that there is no quantum computing, and that geese are amphibious. You just couldn't stand for that, right?

It was none of that. She simply knocked him off his bicycle.

Nope. Swan exaggerates. This is what happened:

.

GasGuzzler wrote:Swan actually authored this theory, and it does have plausibility as it has not been falsified for some 20,000 years.

GasGuzzler wrote:Maybe one day he and Swan will ride together in solidarity,...

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
Anyway German theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder a youtube dork who taught at the Munich center for math and philosophy, got on my nerves for her youtube BS. Then the college agreed with me and fired her for her anti science nonsense.

Theoretical Physicist 0
Swan 1

Thank you thank you very much

Earlier today, theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder relayed the news in one of her popular physics podcasts at YouTube:

My former academic institution discontinued my affiliation with them after members of the community complained about my criticism, on their research, and on academic conduct in general, and I refused to agree to tone policing. Free speech in Germany has a big problem indeed.

"I can't believe this really happened." Sabine Hossenfelder, September 17, 2025

[0:00] Welcome to another episode of Sabine's getting herself into trouble. I was recently contacted by a physicist who was very upset that I judge their research to be 100% [ __ ].

He demanded that I remove my video and when I politely declined, complained about me to some people he must have thought were my supervisors in a very deliberate attempt to exert pressure on me.

I am no longer affiliated with the Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy. Germany, the land of the free thinkers.

If science was a circus, they'd all be clowns by now.

Serves her right, you might say. Shouldn't have used the B- word. Fair enough. I know some people get offended by my language, though. I think that when it comes to swear words, I'm very moderate. Come on. What the [ __ ] Is this the 16th century or what? I express myself this way because well, for one thing, it's what I think.

But more importantly, I don't want to leave you guessing what I mean. But I can say this entirely without swear words:. A lot of research [in] the foundations of physics is now pseudocience. It hasn't followed the scientific method for decades.

I'm not bothered by this person's behavior or by losing my affiliation again because thanks to you, I'm now fully financially independent, which is why I can, in contrast to many others, afford to publicly criticize academic research. But what does bother me is that some physicists still don't understand the problem with what they call science.

Of course, I'm not the only one who has noticed this problem. I call it mathematical stories or mathematical fiction or just [ __ ] Others have called it mathematical gymnastics or fairy tale physics. It's why David Lindley declared the end of physics. And one of the reasons why John Horgan declared the end of science. I'm not making any particularly novel observation here.

But it keeps going on. This is what blows my mind. It doesn't matter how obviously this is pseudocience. It doesn't matter how many people call out this problem, how many books are written about it. It doesn't matter what I say in any of my videos. It keeps going.

They keep on producing more of these garbage papers each day and they continue to get published and they continue to get paid for it and then they put out press releases and the media picks it up and people ask me what I think and I say it's [ __ ] because that's what it is.

The problem is widely known among people in the field who tend to acknowledge it privately but would never admit to it in public because their money and their reputation depends on it. Well, most of them wouldn't admit it...

Anyway I called it

It sounds like some effing a-hole got somebody fired for not being politically correct. Was SWAN the "Karen" who did this?

IBdaMann wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:
Anyway German theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder a youtube dork who taught at the Munich center for math and philosophy, got on my nerves for her youtube BS. Then the college agreed with me and fired her for her anti science nonsense.

Theoretical Physicist 0
Swan 1

Thank you thank you very much

With what specifically did you take offense? Did she denigrate your apple stock, or did she disparage your tomatoes?

I know, she told you that there is no quantum computing, and that geese are amphibious. You just couldn't stand for that, right?

It was none of that. She simply knocked him off his bicycle.

Nope. Swan exaggerates. This is what happened:

.

Swan wrote:She literally said that CERN was useless and irrelevant. LOL the people at CERN still have jobs though.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:She literally said that CERN was useless and irrelevant. LOL the people at CERN still have jobs though.

How is CERN useful?

IBDaMann 336
Swan 0

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:She literally said that CERN was useless and irrelevant. LOL the people at CERN still have jobs though.

How is CERN useful?

IBDaMann 336
Swan 0

CERN's major discoveries include the W and Z bosons (1983), confirming electroweak theory; the first creation of anti-atoms (1995); and the landmark discovery of the Higgs boson (2012), explaining mass. More recently, the LHC has revealed exotic hadrons (like pentaquarks and tetraquarks), new insights into matter-antimatter differences (CP violation in baryons), and even briefly created gold from lead, pushing the boundaries of the Standard Model.
Key Discoveries & Milestones:
1973: Weak Neutral Currents: First direct evidence found in the Gargamelle chamber, showing neutrinos interacting without being scattered by an electric charge.
1983: W and Z Bosons: Discoveries at the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) confirmed the carriers of the weak nuclear force, earning the Nobel Prize for Rubbia and van der Meer.
1995: Anti-atoms: First production of antihydrogen atoms.
2000: Quark-Gluon Plasma: Discovery of this new state of matter from heavy-ion collisions.
2012: Higgs Boson: The ATLAS and CMS experiments confirmed the existence of the particle that gives other particles mass.
2015 Onwards: Exotic Hadrons: The LHCb experiment found numerous new particles made of four or five quarks (tetraquarks and pentaquarks).
2022-2025: Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry: LHCb observations of CP violation in heavy baryons (like the Lambda

provide clues to why matter dominates the universe.
2025 (July): Lead to Gold: Achieved the alchemist's dream, creating gold for a fleeting moment in LHC collisions.
Other Major Contributions:
World Wide Web: The first website, server, and browser went live at CERN in 1990, revolutionizing information sharing

LOL do you really need more

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:She literally said that CERN was useless and irrelevant. LOL the people at CERN still have jobs though.

How is CERN useful?

IBDaMann 336
Swan 0

CERN's major discoveries include the W and Z bosons (1983), confirming electroweak theory; the first creation of anti-atoms (1995); and the landmark discovery of the Higgs boson (2012), explaining mass. More recently, the LHC has revealed exotic hadrons (like pentaquarks and tetraquarks), new insights into matter-antimatter differences (CP violation in baryons), and even briefly created gold from lead, pushing the boundaries of the Standard Model.
Key Discoveries & Milestones:
1973: Weak Neutral Currents: First direct evidence found in the Gargamelle chamber, showing neutrinos interacting without being scattered by an electric charge.
1983: W and Z Bosons: Discoveries at the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) confirmed the carriers of the weak nuclear force, earning the Nobel Prize for Rubbia and van der Meer.
1995: Anti-atoms: First production of antihydrogen atoms.
2000: Quark-Gluon Plasma: Discovery of this new state of matter from heavy-ion collisions.
2012: Higgs Boson: The ATLAS and CMS experiments confirmed the existence of the particle that gives other particles mass.
2015 Onwards: Exotic Hadrons: The LHCb experiment found numerous new particles made of four or five quarks (tetraquarks and pentaquarks).
2022-2025: Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry: LHCb observations of CP violation in heavy baryons (like the Lambda

provide clues to why matter dominates the universe.
2025 (July): Lead to Gold: Achieved the alchemist's dream, creating gold for a fleeting moment in LHC collisions.
Other Major Contributions:
World Wide Web: The first website, server, and browser went live at CERN in 1990, revolutionizing information sharing

LOL do you really need more

Reasonably nice summary (a few inaccuracies).

The (CERN) browser is no longer used. The server is though, rather heavily modified (as open source software tends to be after it's been around awhile). The pair was not built by CERN, but by a guy working at CERN at the time, using ideas that have been kicking around the internet at the time.

The first web was gopher using the server and browser known as Archie and Veronica...long before CERN was built.

Gopher still runs.

The server developed at CERN is still used. Because of the constant number of patches made to it, they simply called it the patchy server. Today, it's known as the Apache Server.

This fellow was primarily inspired by Microsoft's help engine at the time, and created the HTML page description language and the protocol HTTP to transfer pages (a rather simple protocol).

Today's web consists mostly of stuff that was NOT developed at CERN at all:
* ECMA
* HTML4 and HTML5 (in current use)
* HTTPS (transmitting HTTP over SSL)
* Databases
* Back end code interfacing ECMA and databases.
* Condenser languages for back end code.
* Languages and libraries built on top of ECMA.

Essentially. Today's web has almost NOTHING to do with CERN.

Now, to the 'discoveries'.

The CERN group, like most accelerators, try to learn music by smashing pianos together and seeing what parts come out of it. They give these parts names and call it a 'discovery'.

No theory of science of any significance ever came out of a particle accelerator other than CRTs being instrumental in the development of Heisenberg's theory.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.
It IS possible to show a theory to be False.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:She literally said that CERN was useless and irrelevant. LOL the people at CERN still have jobs though.

How is CERN useful?

IBDaMann 336
Swan 0

CERN's major discoveries include the W and Z bosons (1983), confirming electroweak theory; the first creation of anti-atoms (1995); and the landmark discovery of the Higgs boson (2012), explaining mass. More recently, the LHC has revealed exotic hadrons (like pentaquarks and tetraquarks), new insights into matter-antimatter differences (CP violation in baryons), and even briefly created gold from lead, pushing the boundaries of the Standard Model.
Key Discoveries & Milestones:
1973: Weak Neutral Currents: First direct evidence found in the Gargamelle chamber, showing neutrinos interacting without being scattered by an electric charge.
1983: W and Z Bosons: Discoveries at the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) confirmed the carriers of the weak nuclear force, earning the Nobel Prize for Rubbia and van der Meer.
1995: Anti-atoms: First production of antihydrogen atoms.
2000: Quark-Gluon Plasma: Discovery of this new state of matter from heavy-ion collisions.
2012: Higgs Boson: The ATLAS and CMS experiments confirmed the existence of the particle that gives other particles mass.
2015 Onwards: Exotic Hadrons: The LHCb experiment found numerous new particles made of four or five quarks (tetraquarks and pentaquarks).
2022-2025: Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry: LHCb observations of CP violation in heavy baryons (like the Lambda

provide clues to why matter dominates the universe.
2025 (July): Lead to Gold: Achieved the alchemist's dream, creating gold for a fleeting moment in LHC collisions.
Other Major Contributions:
World Wide Web: The first website, server, and browser went live at CERN in 1990, revolutionizing information sharing

LOL do you really need more

Reasonably nice summary (a few inaccuracies).

The (CERN) browser is no longer used. The server is though, rather heavily modified (as open source software tends to be after it's been around awhile). The pair was not built by CERN, but by a guy working at CERN at the time, using ideas that have been kicking around the internet at the time.

The first web was gopher using the server and browser known as Archie and Veronica...long before CERN was built.

Gopher still runs.

The server developed at CERN is still used. Because of the constant number of patches made to it, they simply called it the patchy server. Today, it's known as the Apache Server.

This fellow was primarily inspired by Microsoft's help engine at the time, and created the HTML page description language and the protocol HTTP to transfer pages (a rather simple protocol).

Today's web consists mostly of stuff that was NOT developed at CERN at all:
* ECMA
* HTML4 and HTML5 (in current use)
* HTTPS (transmitting HTTP over SSL)
* Databases
* Back end code interfacing ECMA and databases.
* Condenser languages for back end code.
* Languages and libraries built on top of ECMA.

Essentially. Today's web has almost NOTHING to do with CERN.

Now, to the 'discoveries'.

The CERN group, like most accelerators, try to learn music by smashing pianos together and seeing what parts come out of it. They give these parts names and call it a 'discovery'.

No theory of science of any significance ever came out of a particle accelerator other than CRTs being instrumental in the development of Heisenberg's theory.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.
It IS possible to show a theory to be False.

LOL you are clueless as there was no internet or ideas kicking around the internet before it was invented at CERN.

Go back to playing with your mom

Into the Night wrote:
The internet was not invented at CERN, moron.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:She literally said that CERN was useless and irrelevant. LOL the people at CERN still have jobs though.

How is CERN useful?

IBDaMann 336
Swan 0

CERN's major discoveries include the W and Z bosons (1983), confirming electroweak theory; the first creation of anti-atoms (1995); and the landmark discovery of the Higgs boson (2012), explaining mass. More recently, the LHC has revealed exotic hadrons (like pentaquarks and tetraquarks), new insights into matter-antimatter differences (CP violation in baryons), and even briefly created gold from lead, pushing the boundaries of the Standard Model.
Key Discoveries & Milestones:
1973: Weak Neutral Currents: First direct evidence found in the Gargamelle chamber, showing neutrinos interacting without being scattered by an electric charge.
1983: W and Z Bosons: Discoveries at the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) confirmed the carriers of the weak nuclear force, earning the Nobel Prize for Rubbia and van der Meer.
1995: Anti-atoms: First production of antihydrogen atoms.
2000: Quark-Gluon Plasma: Discovery of this new state of matter from heavy-ion collisions.
2012: Higgs Boson: The ATLAS and CMS experiments confirmed the existence of the particle that gives other particles mass.
2015 Onwards: Exotic Hadrons: The LHCb experiment found numerous new particles made of four or five quarks (tetraquarks and pentaquarks).
2022-2025: Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry: LHCb observations of CP violation in heavy baryons (like the Lambda

provide clues to why matter dominates the universe.
2025 (July): Lead to Gold: Achieved the alchemist's dream, creating gold for a fleeting moment in LHC collisions.
Other Major Contributions:
World Wide Web: The first website, server, and browser went live at CERN in 1990, revolutionizing information sharing

LOL do you really need more

Reasonably nice summary (a few inaccuracies).

The (CERN) browser is no longer used. The server is though, rather heavily modified (as open source software tends to be after it's been around awhile). The pair was not built by CERN, but by a guy working at CERN at the time, using ideas that have been kicking around the internet at the time.

The first web was gopher using the server and browser known as Archie and Veronica...long before CERN was built.

Gopher still runs.

The server developed at CERN is still used. Because of the constant number of patches made to it, they simply called it the patchy server. Today, it's known as the Apache Server.

This fellow was primarily inspired by Microsoft's help engine at the time, and created the HTML page description language and the protocol HTTP to transfer pages (a rather simple protocol).

Today's web consists mostly of stuff that was NOT developed at CERN at all:
* ECMA
* HTML4 and HTML5 (in current use)
* HTTPS (transmitting HTTP over SSL)
* Databases
* Back end code interfacing ECMA and databases.
* Condenser languages for back end code.
* Languages and libraries built on top of ECMA.

Essentially. Today's web has almost NOTHING to do with CERN.

Now, to the 'discoveries'.

The CERN group, like most accelerators, try to learn music by smashing pianos together and seeing what parts come out of it. They give these parts names and call it a 'discovery'.

No theory of science of any significance ever came out of a particle accelerator other than CRTs being instrumental in the development of Heisenberg's theory.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.
It IS possible to show a theory to be False.

LOL you are clueless as there was no internet or ideas kicking around the internet before it was invented at CERN.

Go back to playing with your mom

The internet was not invented at CERN, moron.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:She literally said that CERN was useless and irrelevant. LOL the people at CERN still have jobs though.

How is CERN useful?

IBDaMann 336
Swan 0

CERN's major discoveries include the W and Z bosons (1983), confirming electroweak theory; the first creation of anti-atoms (1995); and the landmark discovery of the Higgs boson (2012), explaining mass. More recently, the LHC has revealed exotic hadrons (like pentaquarks and tetraquarks), new insights into matter-antimatter differences (CP violation in baryons), and even briefly created gold from lead, pushing the boundaries of the Standard Model.
Key Discoveries & Milestones:
1973: Weak Neutral Currents: First direct evidence found in the Gargamelle chamber, showing neutrinos interacting without being scattered by an electric charge.
1983: W and Z Bosons: Discoveries at the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) confirmed the carriers of the weak nuclear force, earning the Nobel Prize for Rubbia and van der Meer.
1995: Anti-atoms: First production of antihydrogen atoms.
2000: Quark-Gluon Plasma: Discovery of this new state of matter from heavy-ion collisions.
2012: Higgs Boson: The ATLAS and CMS experiments confirmed the existence of the particle that gives other particles mass.
2015 Onwards: Exotic Hadrons: The LHCb experiment found numerous new particles made of four or five quarks (tetraquarks and pentaquarks).
2022-2025: Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry: LHCb observations of CP violation in heavy baryons (like the Lambda

provide clues to why matter dominates the universe.
2025 (July): Lead to Gold: Achieved the alchemist's dream, creating gold for a fleeting moment in LHC collisions.
Other Major Contributions:
World Wide Web: The first website, server, and browser went live at CERN in 1990, revolutionizing information sharing

LOL do you really need more

Reasonably nice summary (a few inaccuracies).

The (CERN) browser is no longer used. The server is though, rather heavily modified (as open source software tends to be after it's been around awhile). The pair was not built by CERN, but by a guy working at CERN at the time, using ideas that have been kicking around the internet at the time.

The first web was gopher using the server and browser known as Archie and Veronica...long before CERN was built.

Gopher still runs.

The server developed at CERN is still used. Because of the constant number of patches made to it, they simply called it the patchy server. Today, it's known as the Apache Server.

This fellow was primarily inspired by Microsoft's help engine at the time, and created the HTML page description language and the protocol HTTP to transfer pages (a rather simple protocol).

Today's web consists mostly of stuff that was NOT developed at CERN at all:
* ECMA
* HTML4 and HTML5 (in current use)
* HTTPS (transmitting HTTP over SSL)
* Databases
* Back end code interfacing ECMA and databases.
* Condenser languages for back end code.
* Languages and libraries built on top of ECMA.

Essentially. Today's web has almost NOTHING to do with CERN.

Now, to the 'discoveries'.

The CERN group, like most accelerators, try to learn music by smashing pianos together and seeing what parts come out of it. They give these parts names and call it a 'discovery'.

No theory of science of any significance ever came out of a particle accelerator other than CRTs being instrumental in the development of Heisenberg's theory.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.
It IS possible to show a theory to be False.

LOL you are clueless as there was no internet or ideas kicking around the internet before it was invented at CERN.

Go back to playing with your mom

The internet was not invented at CERN, moron.

The internet as it exist now was invented at CERN in 1993, before that it was just a collection of proprietary secret codes that could not share information. Aren't you glad that you invested in that?

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:She literally said that CERN was useless and irrelevant. LOL the people at CERN still have jobs though.

How is CERN useful?

IBDaMann 336
Swan 0

CERN's major discoveries include the W and Z bosons (1983), confirming electroweak theory; the first creation of anti-atoms (1995); and the landmark discovery of the Higgs boson (2012), explaining mass. More recently, the LHC has revealed exotic hadrons (like pentaquarks and tetraquarks), new insights into matter-antimatter differences (CP violation in baryons), and even briefly created gold from lead, pushing the boundaries of the Standard Model.
Key Discoveries & Milestones:
1973: Weak Neutral Currents: First direct evidence found in the Gargamelle chamber, showing neutrinos interacting without being scattered by an electric charge.
1983: W and Z Bosons: Discoveries at the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) confirmed the carriers of the weak nuclear force, earning the Nobel Prize for Rubbia and van der Meer.
1995: Anti-atoms: First production of antihydrogen atoms.
2000: Quark-Gluon Plasma: Discovery of this new state of matter from heavy-ion collisions.
2012: Higgs Boson: The ATLAS and CMS experiments confirmed the existence of the particle that gives other particles mass.
2015 Onwards: Exotic Hadrons: The LHCb experiment found numerous new particles made of four or five quarks (tetraquarks and pentaquarks).
2022-2025: Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry: LHCb observations of CP violation in heavy baryons (like the Lambda

provide clues to why matter dominates the universe.
2025 (July): Lead to Gold: Achieved the alchemist's dream, creating gold for a fleeting moment in LHC collisions.
Other Major Contributions:
World Wide Web: The first website, server, and browser went live at CERN in 1990, revolutionizing information sharing

LOL do you really need more

Reasonably nice summary (a few inaccuracies).

The (CERN) browser is no longer used. The server is though, rather heavily modified (as open source software tends to be after it's been around awhile). The pair was not built by CERN, but by a guy working at CERN at the time, using ideas that have been kicking around the internet at the time.

The first web was gopher using the server and browser known as Archie and Veronica...long before CERN was built.

Gopher still runs.

The server developed at CERN is still used. Because of the constant number of patches made to it, they simply called it the patchy server. Today, it's known as the Apache Server.

This fellow was primarily inspired by Microsoft's help engine at the time, and created the HTML page description language and the protocol HTTP to transfer pages (a rather simple protocol).

Today's web consists mostly of stuff that was NOT developed at CERN at all:
* ECMA
* HTML4 and HTML5 (in current use)
* HTTPS (transmitting HTTP over SSL)
* Databases
* Back end code interfacing ECMA and databases.
* Condenser languages for back end code.
* Languages and libraries built on top of ECMA.

Essentially. Today's web has almost NOTHING to do with CERN.

Now, to the 'discoveries'.

The CERN group, like most accelerators, try to learn music by smashing pianos together and seeing what parts come out of it. They give these parts names and call it a 'discovery'.

No theory of science of any significance ever came out of a particle accelerator other than CRTs being instrumental in the development of Heisenberg's theory.

It is not possible to prove any theory True.
It IS possible to show a theory to be False.

LOL you are clueless as there was no internet or ideas kicking around the internet before it was invented at CERN.

Go back to playing with your mom

The internet was not invented at CERN, moron.

The internet as it exist now was invented at CERN in 1993, before that it was just a collection of proprietary secret codes that could not share information. Aren't you glad that you invested in that?

The internet was not invented at CERN. The internet is not secret codes. Since the internet was created, it has always shared information. That's it's purpose.

Swan wrote:
Nope the internet began as defense dept codes designed to be able to share info only with the intended recipient it was rudimentary and called the arpanet

Swan wrote:
The first "internet codes"

Swan wrote:
from the DoD involved the ARPANET, starting with early protocols like the Network Control Program (NCP) in the late 60s, but the defining moment was adopting the TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) suite as the standard in 1983,

Swan wrote:
The ARPA project resulted in TWO networks...the Internet and MILNET. BOTH use the same protocols.

Swan wrote:
making interconnected networks possible and splitting off the military-only MILNET. Key developments included packet switching,

Packet switching

Swan wrote:
early email (SMTP),

Swan wrote:
the Domain Name System (DNS) in 1983,

Swan wrote:
and the first domain: .mil in 1985.

Swan wrote:
...deleted strawmen...[quote]
CERN did not develop the internet, despite your insistence that it did.
Swan wrote:
However your childish ignorance is refreshing

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Nope the internet began as defense dept codes designed to be able to share info only with the intended recipient it was rudimentary and called the arpanet

Arpa is a project, moron. Internet is a network. MILNET is another network. In reality, Internet is a meta-network, tying many networks together under a common protocol.
Arpa first ran a network between ULCA and Stanford. These are not military installations. As time went on, other universities and even several businesses joined this network...mostly as a way to share files.

Swan wrote:
The first "internet codes"

Internet is not a 'code'.

Swan wrote:
from the DoD involved the ARPANET, starting with early protocols like the Network Control Program (NCP) in the late 60s, but the defining moment was adopting the TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) suite as the standard in 1983,

The Internet Protocol was developed in 1974. The TCP protocol was developed with it.
Machines already had names, designated by a HOSTS file that was copied to each machine as new ones were added.

Swan wrote:
The ARPA project resulted in TWO networks...the Internet and MILNET. BOTH use the same protocols.
[quote]Swan wrote:
making interconnected networks possible and splitting off the military-only MILNET. Key developments included packet switching,

Packet switching

Swan wrote:
early email (SMTP),

Swan wrote:
the Domain Name System (DNS) in 1983,

Swan wrote:
and the first domain: .mil in 1985.

Swan wrote:
...deleted strawmen...

CERN did not develop the internet, despite your insistence that it did.
Swan wrote:
However your childish ignorance is refreshing

CERN built the Hadron Collider (the one that 'discovered' the Higgs Boson) in 2008.

The HTTP protocol was developed in 1990. The HTML1 protocol was designed with it.

SSL was first developed around 1994. HTTP didn't start using it until a bit later.

SSL itself has changed over the years, as older codecs became insecure and were replaced with newer codecs.

ECMA came into regular use around 1995/1996. Most web content today is ECMA running over HTTPS, with HTML4 or HTML5 rendering code.

CERN did not build the internet. The only software that CERN developed that is still used today is the Apache server. While a popular one, it certainly isn't the only one.

The browser that CERN developed is long gone.

Even HTML has gone through several major iterations. Websites typically use HTML5 now, with some still stuck on HTML4. HTML is just a graphical rendering language...rather limited at that.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Nope the internet began as defense dept codes designed to be able to share info only with the intended recipient it was rudimentary and called the arpanet

Arpa is a project, moron. Internet is a network. MILNET is another network. In reality, Internet is a meta-network, tying many networks together under a common protocol.
Arpa first ran a network between ULCA and Stanford. These are not military installations. As time went on, other universities and even several businesses joined this network...mostly as a way to share files.

Swan wrote:
The first "internet codes"

Internet is not a 'code'.

Swan wrote:
from the DoD involved the ARPANET, starting with early protocols like the Network Control Program (NCP) in the late 60s, but the defining moment was adopting the TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) suite as the standard in 1983,

The Internet Protocol was developed in 1974. The TCP protocol was developed with it.
Machines already had names, designated by a HOSTS file that was copied to each machine as new ones were added.

Swan wrote:
The ARPA project resulted in TWO networks...the Internet and MILNET. BOTH use the same protocols.
[quote]Swan wrote:
making interconnected networks possible and splitting off the military-only MILNET. Key developments included packet switching,

Packet switching

This was developed in the 1950's, even before the ARPA project.

Swan wrote:
early email (SMTP),

Email still uses SMTP. It was developed around 1980. Before that, emails were sent with a special header packet (not SMTP), first sent in 1971.

FTP was developed in 1971 and is the oldest level 7 protocol on the internet.

Swan wrote:
the Domain Name System (DNS) in 1983,

Machines were already named. DNS was just a better of handling the HOST files. It is not Internet...just another protocol running UNDER internet. Resolvers now use a combination of a local HOST file and DNS (sort of a distributed HOST database, constructed much like a tree.

Swan wrote:
and the first domain: .mil in 1985.

Dead wrong. Machines have been named throughout the ARPA project. Names were already in a tree structure (like names are today).

Swan wrote:
...deleted strawmen...

CERN did not develop the internet, despite your insistence that it did.
Swan wrote:
However your childish ignorance is refreshing

CERN built the Hadron Collider (the one that 'discovered' the Higgs Boson) in 2008.

The HTTP protocol was developed in 1990. The HTML1 protocol was designed with it.

SSL was first developed around 1994. HTTP didn't start using it until a bit later.

SSL itself has changed over the years, as older codecs became insecure and were replaced with newer codecs.

ECMA came into regular use around 1995/1996. Most web content today is ECMA running over HTTPS, with HTML4 or HTML5 rendering code.

CERN did not build the internet. The only software that CERN developed that is still used today is the Apache server. While a popular one, it certainly isn't the only one.

The browser that CERN developed is long gone.

Even HTML has gone through several major iterations. Websites typically use HTML5 now, with some still stuck on HTML4. HTML is just a graphical rendering language...rather limited at that.

You are dumb

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Nope the internet began as defense dept codes designed to be able to share info only with the intended recipient it was rudimentary and called the arpanet

Arpa is a project, moron. Internet is a network. MILNET is another network. In reality, Internet is a meta-network, tying many networks together under a common protocol.
Arpa first ran a network between ULCA and Stanford. These are not military installations. As time went on, other universities and even several businesses joined this network...mostly as a way to share files.

Swan wrote:
The first "internet codes"

Internet is not a 'code'.

Swan wrote:
from the DoD involved the ARPANET, starting with early protocols like the Network Control Program (NCP) in the late 60s, but the defining moment was adopting the TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) suite as the standard in 1983,

The Internet Protocol was developed in 1974. The TCP protocol was developed with it.
Machines already had names, designated by a HOSTS file that was copied to each machine as new ones were added.

Swan wrote:
The ARPA project resulted in TWO networks...the Internet and MILNET. BOTH use the same protocols.
[quote]Swan wrote:
making interconnected networks possible and splitting off the military-only MILNET. Key developments included packet switching,

Packet switching

This was developed in the 1950's, even before the ARPA project.

Swan wrote:
early email (SMTP),

Email still uses SMTP. It was developed around 1980. Before that, emails were sent with a special header packet (not SMTP), first sent in 1971.

FTP was developed in 1971 and is the oldest level 7 protocol on the internet.

Swan wrote:
the Domain Name System (DNS) in 1983,

Machines were already named. DNS was just a better of handling the HOST files. It is not Internet...just another protocol running UNDER internet. Resolvers now use a combination of a local HOST file and DNS (sort of a distributed HOST database, constructed much like a tree.

Swan wrote:
and the first domain: .mil in 1985.

Dead wrong. Machines have been named throughout the ARPA project. Names were already in a tree structure (like names are today).

Swan wrote:
...deleted strawmen...

CERN did not develop the internet, despite your insistence that it did.
Swan wrote:
However your childish ignorance is refreshing

CERN built the Hadron Collider (the one that 'discovered' the Higgs Boson) in 2008.

The HTTP protocol was developed in 1990. The HTML1 protocol was designed with it.

SSL was first developed around 1994. HTTP didn't start using it until a bit later.

SSL itself has changed over the years, as older codecs became insecure and were replaced with newer codecs.

ECMA came into regular use around 1995/1996. Most web content today is ECMA running over HTTPS, with HTML4 or HTML5 rendering code.

CERN did not build the internet. The only software that CERN developed that is still used today is the Apache server. While a popular one, it certainly isn't the only one.

The browser that CERN developed is long gone.

Even HTML has gone through several major iterations. Websites typically use HTML5 now, with some still stuck on HTML4. HTML is just a graphical rendering language...rather limited at that.

You are dumb

YOU'RE the one that can't seem to figure out how to quote a response properly!

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Yup I am the idiot who bought Apples.

Apple Inc
NASDAQ: AAPL
278.28 USD
+278.19 (309,100.00%)all time

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Yup I am the idiot who bought Apples.

Apple Inc
NASDAQ: AAPL
278.28 USD
+278.19 (309,100.00%)all time

Now you think ignoring what you did to yourself is gonna work! Hilarious!

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Yup I am the idiot who bought Apples.

Apple Inc
NASDAQ: AAPL
278.28 USD
+278.19 (309,100.00%)all time

Now you think ignoring what you did to yourself is gonna work! Hilarious!

So what does it feel like to be a perpetually failed behavioral analyst?

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Yup I am the idiot who bought Apples.

Apple Inc
NASDAQ: AAPL
278.28 USD
+278.19 (309,100.00%)all time

Now you think ignoring what you did to yourself is gonna work! Hilarious!

So what does it feel like to be a perpetually failed behavioral analyst?

NOW you try to blame your problem on psychoquackery! Hilarious!

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Yup I am the idiot who bought Apples.

Apple Inc
NASDAQ: AAPL
278.28 USD
+278.19 (309,100.00%)all time

Now you think ignoring what you did to yourself is gonna work! Hilarious!

So what does it feel like to be a perpetually failed behavioral analyst?

NOW you try to blame your problem on psychoquackery! Hilarious!

LOL, now you are trying to make your obvious inadequacies mine.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Yup I am the idiot who bought Apples.

Apple Inc
NASDAQ: AAPL
278.28 USD
+278.19 (309,100.00%)all time

Now you think ignoring what you did to yourself is gonna work! Hilarious!

So what does it feel like to be a perpetually failed behavioral analyst?

NOW you try to blame your problem on psychoquackery! Hilarious!

LOL, now you are trying to make your obvious inadequacies mine.

...annnnnnnnd back to your inversion fallacy!

Im a BM wrote:

Am I really the only one here who would inform Branner that the Newest Messiah has spammed up the place again?

Im a BM wrote:

It really doesn't matter any more for me getting MY needs met here.

Im a BM wrote:

Someone would have to take the extra step to open up "View older threads", and then scroll down past DOZENS of Newest Messiah posts to find any biogeochemistry related threads.

Im a BM wrote:

Some weeks are better than others, but a couple of those threads got about 100 views a day, just in the last week.

I couldn't help but also notice that virtually nobody is adding new "views" to Swan's older threads. And there are a LOT of them.

The Newest Messiah threads that comprise the massive spam wall pick up even fewer new "views" than SWAN's threads. Yes, I'm keeping count.

At some point, Branner will notice, or someone else will contact him to remove the massive spam wall created by the newest version of our money-grubbing SaviorGodLegendBuddah...

Im a BM wrote:

But that spam wall isn't high enough to stop people from looking up biogeochemistry threads buried WAY down the list.

Out of vague curiosity, I can only wonder if the OTHER posters here are getting THEIR needs met from this website.

Once Branner knocks down the spam wall, and I'm curious to see how long that will take, I can "bump" biogeochemistry threads back up to where they are easier to find. Meanwhile, people keep finding them anyway.

I can't imagine anyone going through all the extra steps to find the "Maximizing Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial Agroecosystems" thread if they are just a climate-curious skeptic type. Cult member climate deniers wouldn't be opening the thread without making some kind of stupid comment in the process.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Am I really the only one here who would inform Branner that the Newest Messiah has spammed up the place again?

No.

Im a BM wrote:

It really doesn't matter any more for me getting MY needs met here.

Your needs to spam are no different.

Im a BM wrote:

Someone would have to take the extra step to open up "View older threads", and then scroll down past DOZENS of Newest Messiah posts to find any biogeochemistry related threads.

There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry'.

Im a BM wrote:

Some weeks are better than others, but a couple of those threads got about 100 views a day, just in the last week.

I couldn't help but also notice that virtually nobody is adding new "views" to Swan's older threads. And there are a LOT of them.

The Newest Messiah threads that comprise the massive spam wall pick up even fewer new "views" than SWAN's threads. Yes, I'm keeping count.

At some point, Branner will notice, or someone else will contact him to remove the massive spam wall created by the newest version of our money-grubbing SaviorGodLegendBuddah...

Apparently not. The forum appears to have been abandoned.

Im a BM wrote:

But that spam wall isn't high enough to stop people from looking up biogeochemistry threads buried WAY down the list.

Out of vague curiosity, I can only wonder if the OTHER posters here are getting THEIR needs met from this website.

Once Branner knocks down the spam wall, and I'm curious to see how long that will take, I can "bump" biogeochemistry threads back up to where they are easier to find. Meanwhile, people keep finding them anyway.

I can't imagine anyone going through all the extra steps to find the "Maximizing Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial Agroecosystems" thread if they are just a climate-curious skeptic type. Cult member climate deniers wouldn't be opening the thread without making some kind of stupid comment in the process.

There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry'.

No one is denying climate.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Yup I am the idiot who bought Apples.

Apple Inc
NASDAQ: AAPL
278.28 USD
+278.19 (309,100.00%)all time

Now you think ignoring what you did to yourself is gonna work! Hilarious!

So what does it feel like to be a perpetually failed behavioral analyst?

NOW you try to blame your problem on psychoquackery! Hilarious!

LOL, now you are trying to make your obvious inadequacies mine.

...annnnnnnnd back to your inversion fallacy!

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Yup I am the idiot who bought Apples.

Apple Inc
NASDAQ: AAPL
278.28 USD
+278.19 (309,100.00%)all time

Now you think ignoring what you did to yourself is gonna work! Hilarious!

So what does it feel like to be a perpetually failed behavioral analyst?

NOW you try to blame your problem on psychoquackery! Hilarious!

LOL, now you are trying to make your obvious inadequacies mine.

...annnnnnnnd back to your inversion fallacy!

LOL, you strike me as being like the chink in the gym who yells at me. See you are both brainwashed into thinking that you matter, when in reality you do not matter to anyone.

Yo you go right on yelping like a chink who is out of dog meat to eat

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Yup I am the idiot who bought Apples.

Apple Inc
NASDAQ: AAPL
278.28 USD
+278.19 (309,100.00%)all time

Now you think ignoring what you did to yourself is gonna work! Hilarious!

So what does it feel like to be a perpetually failed behavioral analyst?

NOW you try to blame your problem on psychoquackery! Hilarious!

LOL, now you are trying to make your obvious inadequacies mine.

...annnnnnnnd back to your inversion fallacy!

LOL, you strike me as being like the chink in the gym who yells at me. See you are both brainwashed into thinking that you matter, when in reality you do not matter to anyone.

Yo you go right on yelping like a chink who is out of dog meat to eat

Now you go try racism!

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.

You just called yourself an idiot. Hilarious!

Yup I am the idiot who bought Apples.

Apple Inc
NASDAQ: AAPL
278.28 USD
+278.19 (309,100.00%)all time

Now you think ignoring what you did to yourself is gonna work! Hilarious!

So what does it feel like to be a perpetually failed behavioral analyst?

NOW you try to blame your problem on psychoquackery! Hilarious!

LOL, now you are trying to make your obvious inadequacies mine.

...annnnnnnnd back to your inversion fallacy!

LOL, you strike me as being like the chink in the gym who yells at me. See you are both brainwashed into thinking that you matter, when in reality you do not matter to anyone.

Yo you go right on yelping like a chink who is out of dog meat to eat

Now you go try racism!

Chinks eat dogs, just accept it Pedro.

Im a BM wrote:
You believe that anything here matters, because you are dumb and delusional.

So quote that and pretend that your IQ went up from absolute zero.

PS. And do try to keep a level headed psychological perspective on what matters most.