Robert, How's the Library Coming Along?
| Robert, How's the Library Coming Along?28-03-2026 13:00 | |
IBdaMann ★★★★★(15126) |
Have your followers found your library? Is it thriving? I'm excited for all those wide-eyed people looking to feast their eyes on authoritative information about how water evaporates, about chemical categories and about what happened to the Dominican coral reef that caused it to disappear. Let me know. |
| 28-03-2026 13:30 | |
Swan ★★★★★(7864) |
IBdaMann wrote: A coral reef cannot disappear IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?  Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy  Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
| 24-04-2026 19:26 | |
| sealover★★★★☆ (1953) |
IBdaMann wrote: I don't know whose followers they are, but there are hundreds of them every week. They somehow find the older threads that are not displayed on the home page. It requires extra steps to find them. Perhaps people know that they need to click the "View older threads" button above the blue box at the bottom of the home page. They would then see the titles of ALL threads on a multi-page list. I think it is more likely someone forwarded them a link or something to log on and immediately find the post or thread that someone thought they should take a look at. Based on past experience (for more than six months now), I will see a new burst of "Views" show up when I update the references for the "Carbon sequestration.." On second thought, that won't work anymore because that thread is already maxed out at 65,535 "Views". The software can't record numbers any higher than that. Well, when I have time to update them with newer references, I'll bump some of the other old biogeochemistry threads back to the home page. Until they rack up 65,535 "Views", it will be possible to monitor the ebb and flow of viewership. The library is doing fine. I suspect that the handful of local trolls account for very few of those library "Views" that require digging up old threads not displayed on the home page. I suspect that it is my "target audience" of non members who are specifically interested basic biogeochemistry research or applied biogeochemistry that comprises the majority of "Views". IBdaMann, why don't you look up your OWN best threads at this website to see if anyone is going out of their way to find them? It is easy to calculate how many views per day or views per year they are racking up. Your fans have had more than 11 years to discover you here, and spread the word to others that this is the website where they can find your posts. |
| 25-04-2026 22:32 | |
| sealover★★★★☆ (1953) |
The library doing just fine. Thanks for asking! Any new viewers who want to find this "library" can click on "sealover" by the avatar to the left. This opens the "Profile Page". Toward the middle, where it says "Number of Posts", you can click on "View all" IBdaMann wrote: I don't know whose followers they are, but there are hundreds of them every week. They somehow find the older threads that are not displayed on the home page. It requires extra steps to find them. Perhaps people know that they need to click the "View older threads" button above the blue box at the bottom of the home page. They would then see the titles of ALL threads on a multi-page list. I think it is more likely someone forwarded them a link or something to log on and immediately find the post or thread that someone thought they should take a look at. Based on past experience (for more than six months now), I will see a new burst of "Views" show up when I update the references for the "Carbon sequestration.." On second thought, that won't work anymore because that thread is already maxed out at 65,535 "Views". The software can't record numbers any higher than that. Well, when I have time to update them with newer references, I'll bump some of the other old biogeochemistry threads back to the home page. Until they rack up 65,535 "Views", it will be possible to monitor the ebb and flow of viewership. The library is doing fine. I suspect that the handful of local trolls account for very few of those library "Views" that require digging up old threads not displayed on the home page. I suspect that it is my "target audience" of non members who are specifically interested basic biogeochemistry research or applied biogeochemistry that comprises the majority of "Views". IBdaMann, why don't you look up your OWN best threads at this website to see if anyone is going out of their way to find them? It is easy to calculate how many views per day or views per year they are racking up. Your fans have had more than 11 years to discover you here, and spread the word to others that this is the website where they can find your posts.[/quote] |
| 26-04-2026 21:30 | |
Into the Night ★★★★★(23896) |
sealover wrote:IBdaMann wrote: You are your only follower, Robert. You click on your own threads and then claim they are 'popular'. King Newsom did the same thing with his book. Is this an SDTC thing? The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 26-04-2026 21:31 |
| 27-04-2026 00:42 | |
| Im a BM★★★★★ (3283) |
Into the Night wrote:sealover wrote:IBdaMann wrote: There is no way that I can fool YOU, is there, YARP? (Yellow And Red Parrot) I have not actually read all 23,000 plus posts by you. I have seen hundreds of them, mostly directed to me in an unsolicited reply. Not one of your posts to me or otherwise that I have read gave me ANY reason to respect your intellect or honesty. Not one of your attempts to "debunk" the chemistry I present gave me ANY reason to believe you are a "chemist" by any normal definition of the term. I think you have a personality disorder that is manifest in the way you troll. |
| 27-04-2026 05:27 | |
| Into the Night★★★★★ (23896) |
Im a BM wrote: Nope. Im a BM wrote: YARP is not a parrot. Redefinition fallacy. Im a BM wrote: And you ignored ever one of them, except to try to ridicule them. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy. Im a BM wrote: Bulverism fallacy. Im a BM wrote: You aren't presenting any chemistry, Robert. Im a BM wrote: Mantra 1d. Lame. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
Join the debate Robert, How's the Library Coming Along?:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| Robert R. Northup, PhD, Biogeochemistry discussion archived here, now at Facebook. | 11 | 12-05-2026 19:06 |
| Response to Robert | 6 | 16-12-2024 18:08 |
| Safe Friends of "sealover" - Troll-free Library Networking. Join the List. | 6 | 22-03-2022 05:21 |
| ICE AGE?: Is The End OF The Interglacial Phase Coming Or Have We Accidentally Saved Humanity With Fossil | 144 | 23-06-2020 21:01 |
| the coming little ice age will wreck havoc on global economy | 6 | 13-05-2020 21:36 |