Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat

duncan61 wrote:
You state Semantics fallacy. But offer no explanation which makes you incomplete.

duncan61 wrote:
Why does light appear green?

duncan61 wrote:
It has stopped raining and I can see a rainbow.

duncan61 wrote:
Sunlight is not white it is all colours of the spectrum

duncan61 wrote:
but her comment had no semantic value. It is an observation she has made.

James_ wrote:
Not that it matters but the Sun emits in the orange/red spectrum. Why the Sun can appear white is because when a person looks to closely at the Sun they're looking at direct exposure to solar radiation which has a lot of energy. This video is an example.
https://youtu.be/Wvm4hurlock

duncan61 wrote:
I believe the claim is gasses in the air like CO2 Methane and water vapour take longer to cool down once the sun has stopped shining and the result is the Earth is warmer because of more CO2.It is not possible to calculate the amount and no human can prove it.In the desert it is hot as during the day then very cold at night as the skies are clear and no humidity so no water vapour to take time to cool.CO2 does very little and a little bit more of very little is still very little.To take away the power we have become dependant on on a unproven theory would be very interesting.Renewables have been tried and failed.When it is cold we need more power not less.Gas turbines will work better in colder conditions as the air they burn is denser in the cold.Gas turbines generate electricity very well in all conditions and create very little pollution

duncan61 wrote:
I do not understand yellow glass container?

Into the Night wrote:The Sun does not appear white as viewed from the surface of Earth. It appears yellow to red, depending on it's viewing angle through the atmosphere and the amount of particulates in the atmosphere, such as smoke or haze.

Into the Night wrote:

duncan61 wrote:
I believe the claim is gasses in the air like CO2 Methane and water vapour take longer to cool down once the sun has stopped shining and the result is the Earth is warmer because of more CO2.It is not possible to calculate the amount and no human can prove it.In the desert it is hot as during the day then very cold at night as the skies are clear and no humidity so no water vapour to take time to cool.CO2 does very little and a little bit more of very little is still very little.To take away the power we have become dependant on on a unproven theory would be very interesting.Renewables have been tried and failed.When it is cold we need more power not less.Gas turbines will work better in colder conditions as the air they burn is denser in the cold.Gas turbines generate electricity very well in all conditions and create very little pollution

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You are ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics again.

Swan wrote:So why is the Earth warm?

Swan wrote:Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

Guess who won't be hired as a scientist anytime soon.

gfm7175 wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

Guess who won't be hired as a scientist anytime soon.

But......... but........ but 97% of biogeoastropaleoclimatologists say so!!!!! SCIENCE DENIER!!!!!

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

duncan61 wrote:
I believe the claim is gasses in the air like CO2 Methane and water vapour take longer to cool down once the sun has stopped shining and the result is the Earth is warmer because of more CO2.It is not possible to calculate the amount and no human can prove it.In the desert it is hot as during the day then very cold at night as the skies are clear and no humidity so no water vapour to take time to cool.CO2 does very little and a little bit more of very little is still very little.To take away the power we have become dependant on on a unproven theory would be very interesting.Renewables have been tried and failed.When it is cold we need more power not less.Gas turbines will work better in colder conditions as the air they burn is denser in the cold.Gas turbines generate electricity very well in all conditions and create very little pollution

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You are ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics again.

So why is the Earth warm?

Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So why is the Earth warm?

You should be asking "Why is the earth so cool"? Consider daytime temperatures on the moon and notice that our ocean is never boiling away but is always cold.

Swan wrote:Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

Guess who won't be hired as a scientist anytime soon.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So why is the Earth warm?

You should be asking "Why is the earth so cool"? Consider daytime temperatures on the moon and notice that our ocean is never boiling away but is always cold.

Swan wrote:Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

Guess who won't be hired as a scientist anytime soon.

Actually since space is the temperature of 2.7K or -455F the Earth is actually very warm.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So why is the Earth warm?

You should be asking "Why is the earth so cool"? Consider daytime temperatures on the moon and notice that our ocean is never boiling away but is always cold.

Swan wrote:Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

Guess who won't be hired as a scientist anytime soon.

Actually since space is the temperature of 2.7K or -455F the Earth is actually very warm.

Space has no temperature.

IBdaMann wrote:

gfm7175 wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

Guess who won't be hired as a scientist anytime soon.

But......... but........ but 97% of biogeoastropaleoclimatologists say so!!!!! SCIENCE DENIER!!!!!

That *Mr. Atheist* Science Denier to you, sir. I'm double bad.

That's right ... I bad, I bad ... IBDaBaaaaaaad.

Religions such as Christianity are based on fulcrum miracles like a guy coming back from the dead, a virgin birth, and others. As incredible as they are, they are at least plausible in the sense that nobody can show that they did not occur and they cannot be shown to be false. The Global Warming religion, however, is based on the ongoing miracle of "heat being trapped", i.e. something that is impossible and is obviously not happening. To make it all even more absurd, physics apparently started to defy itself during the Industrial Revolution at the onset of human GREED.

To a Christian I might say "I find that a little difficult to believe" ... but to a warmizombie I can only say "Didn't you ever go to school?"

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So why is the Earth warm?

You should be asking "Why is the earth so cool"? Consider daytime temperatures on the moon and notice that our ocean is never boiling away but is always cold.

Swan wrote:Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

Guess who won't be hired as a scientist anytime soon.

Actually since space is the temperature of 2.7K or -455F the Earth is actually very warm.

Space has no temperature.

Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So why is the Earth warm?

You should be asking "Why is the earth so cool"? Consider daytime temperatures on the moon and notice that our ocean is never boiling away but is always cold.

Swan wrote:Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

Guess who won't be hired as a scientist anytime soon.

Actually since space is the temperature of 2.7K or -455F the Earth is actually very warm.

Space has no temperature.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

Swan wrote:
Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Swan wrote:
The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:
Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:
And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

Swan wrote:
So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So why is the Earth warm?

You should be asking "Why is the earth so cool"? Consider daytime temperatures on the moon and notice that our ocean is never boiling away but is always cold.

Swan wrote:Answer because the gasses in the atmosphere trap heat from the Sun

Guess who won't be hired as a scientist anytime soon.

Actually since space is the temperature of 2.7K or -455F the Earth is actually very warm.

Space has no temperature.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

An astronaut is not space.

Swan wrote:
Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

An object is not space.

Swan wrote:
The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

A planet is not space.

Swan wrote:
Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

How do you know? Did you go out and measure it?
Gas and dust is not space.

Swan wrote:
And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Did you measure the entire universe?

Swan wrote:
So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

No, that would be YOU. You seem to have real difficulty with English.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

God you are cute when you stomp your little feets

Into the Night wrote:

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Into the Night wrote:

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Into the Night wrote:

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Into the Night wrote:

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

God you are cute when you stomp your little feets

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Swan wrote:

Well I was correct the first time.

As always.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

God you are cute when you stomp your little feets

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Well I was correct the first time.

As always.

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

Well I was correct the first time.

As always.

God you are cute when you stomp your little feets

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

God you are cute when you stomp your little feets

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Well I was correct the first time.

As always.

Repetition does not make you right. Argument by repetition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:

And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

God you are cute when you stomp your little feets

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Well I was correct the first time.

As always.

Repetition does not make you right. Argument by repetition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

LOL repeating your denials of science does not make you right, which has no effect on the -455F temp of space.

Swan wrote:
Cheers to you and your 100 percent unsubstantiated trolling's

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:

And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

God you are cute when you stomp your little feets

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Well I was correct the first time.

As always.

Repetition does not make you right. Argument by repetition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

LOL repeating your denials of science does not make you right, which has no effect on the -455F temp of space.

It is you that denies science. Space has no temperature. Inversion fallacy.

You have already denied the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law, now you deny the 0th law of thermodynamics as well.

Swan wrote:
Cheers to you and your 100 percent unsubstantiated trolling's

Bulverism fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.

Swan wrote:Can you please post a link not created by you that says

Swan wrote: ... that space has no temperature

Swan wrote:Now if something had no heat

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Can you please post a link not created by you that says

Swan, don't be a moron. Why ask for an internet link? You are just asking to be manipulated. Why do you believe that everything on the internet must be true?

It's basic science that you should have learned as a child. Only matter can have temperature and it is thermal energy that gives matter its temperature. Thermal energy becomes associated with matter via conduction (including convection) and via absorption and emission of electromagnetic radiation per the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

Now, link to this post on Climate-Debate and you will have your link to the straight scoop on the relevant science surrounding this topic.

By the way, science does not change according to who is using it. Anyone who says something other than what a given science model specifies is incorrect to the extent that what he is saying differs from the science model.

You will find that what I wrote above does not deviate from any science and I'm not Into the Night, ... so you have your link if you want it.

Swan wrote: ... that space has no temperature

Only matter can have temperature.

No vacuum can have temperature. No energy has any temperature, e.g. light, motion, electrical energy, etc... No force has any temperature, e.g. gravity, magnetism, contact force, centripetal acceleration, etc ...

Only a body of matter can have temperature. A body of matter can be a single atom, a Rawlings baseball, a planet with both an atmosphere and a hydrosphere, a comet hurling through space, i.e. anything. All science applies to all matter, always, everywhere. Because Stefan-Boltzmann is one of the governing factors in a body's temperature, the body's emissivity ultimately determines the body's equilibrium temperature. Two bodies with different emissivities but at the same location in space will each arrive at separate equilibrium temperatures.

No human has ever been able to measure either the earth's temperature or the earth's emissivity, to within any usable margin of error.

Swan wrote:Now if something had no heat

I'm going to stop you right here. You are raving in your cell again. You will be relegated to raving in your cell until you learn what heat is. Heat is not temperature, nor is it thermal energy.

All matter has temperature. No non-matter has any temperature. That should be pretty straightforward.

Let me know if you have any questions, and don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:

And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

God you are cute when you stomp your little feets

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Well I was correct the first time.

As always.

Repetition does not make you right. Argument by repetition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

LOL repeating your denials of science does not make you right, which has no effect on the -455F temp of space.

It is you that denies science. Space has no temperature. Inversion fallacy.

You have already denied the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law, now you deny the 0th law of thermodynamics as well.

Swan wrote:
Cheers to you and your 100 percent unsubstantiated trolling's

Bulverism fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.

Can you please post a link

Swan wrote:
not created by you that says that space has no temperature instead of just making up stuff as you meander thru life making your fantasies real in your deformed mind?

Swan wrote:
Now if something had no heat it would still be the temperature of 0 Kelvin or 459.67 Fahrenheit.

Swan wrote:
However you know better which is why your only skill is doing what you are told

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Can you please post a link not created by you that says

Swan, don't be a moron. Why ask for an internet link? You are just asking to be manipulated. Why do you believe that everything on the internet must be true?

It's basic science that you should have learned as a child. Only matter can have temperature and it is thermal energy that gives matter its temperature. Thermal energy becomes associated with matter via conduction (including convection) and via absorption and emission of electromagnetic radiation per the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

Now, link to this post on Climate-Debate and you will have your link to the straight scoop on the relevant science surrounding this topic.

By the way, science does not change according to who is using it. Anyone who says something other than what a given science model specifies is incorrect to the extent that what he is saying differs from the science model.

You will find that what I wrote above does not deviate from any science and I'm not Into the Night, ... so you have your link if you want it.

Swan wrote: ... that space has no temperature

Only matter can have temperature.

No vacuum can have temperature. No energy has any temperature, e.g. light, motion, electrical energy, etc... No force has any temperature, e.g. gravity, magnetism, contact force, centripetal acceleration, etc ...

Only a body of matter can have temperature. A body of matter can be a single atom, a Rawlings baseball, a planet with both an atmosphere and a hydrosphere, a comet hurling through space, i.e. anything. All science applies to all matter, always, everywhere. Because Stefan-Boltzmann is one of the governing factors in a body's temperature, the body's emissivity ultimately determines the body's equilibrium temperature. Two bodies with different emissivities but at the same location in space will each arrive at separate equilibrium temperatures.

No human has ever been able to measure either the earth's temperature or the earth's emissivity, to within any usable margin of error.

Swan wrote:Now if something had no heat

I'm going to stop you right here. You are raving in your cell again. You will be relegated to raving in your cell until you learn what heat is. Heat is not temperature, nor is it thermal energy.

All matter has temperature. No non-matter has any temperature. That should be pretty straightforward.

Let me know if you have any questions, and don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

.

So no one else on Earth believes your delusions and there can be no links to your as said delusions because you make up stuff as you go.

Next fool

Swan wrote:So no one else on Earth believes your delusions

Swan wrote: ... and there can be no links to your as said delusions

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So no one else on Earth believes your delusions

It's interesting that you perceive the science I described previously as my "delusions" that I somehow "make up" as I go along ... while pretending to speak for everyone else.

It really is very interesting indeed.

Swan wrote: ... and there can be no links to your as said delusions

You are assigning a bogus position to me that I do not hold ... because that's all you have. You can't attack the science I posted so you attack a view that I do not have.

Very interesting.

In any event, you totally EVADED yet another question, this one having to do with why you presume everything on the internet to be true and why you beg to be bent over furniture and manipulated, You EVADE because answer gives you shame.

Did you just lose yet another friendly conversation?

.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:

And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

God you are cute when you stomp your little feets

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Well I was correct the first time.

As always.

Repetition does not make you right. Argument by repetition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

LOL repeating your denials of science does not make you right, which has no effect on the -455F temp of space.

It is you that denies science. Space has no temperature. Inversion fallacy.

You have already denied the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law, now you deny the 0th law of thermodynamics as well.

Swan wrote:
Cheers to you and your 100 percent unsubstantiated trolling's

Bulverism fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.

Can you please post a link

Science isn't an URL.

Swan wrote:
not created by you that says that space has no temperature instead of just making up stuff as you meander thru life making your fantasies real in your deformed mind?

See the 0th law of thermodynamics.

Swan wrote:
Now if something had no heat it would still be the temperature of 0 Kelvin or 459.67 Fahrenheit.

Heat has no temperature.

Swan wrote:
However you know better which is why your only skill is doing what you are told

You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.

Swan wrote:Says the crack addict who refuses to accept that space has a multitude of temperatures depending on where one is in space.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun,

What about as you travel towards another star?

Swan wrote:the temperature of an object in space plummets.

Notice that the temperature of the object plummets, not the temperature of the space without matter, because the object has matter and can therefore have temperature, not the space that is devoid of any matter.

Swan wrote:The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

That's the surface of Pluto, not any space that is devoid of matter.

Swan wrote:Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

You are referring to clouds of matter; space has no matter and therefore cannot have any temperature.

Swan wrote:And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

How do you know? Why should any rational adult believe that?

Swan wrote:So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

1. You do not know what NASA, as an organization, knows or doesn't know.
2. You do not speak for NASA
3. I can find people at NASA who are completely aware that only matter can have temperature.
4. Two different objects with different emissivities positioned relatively close to each other in the same region of space will have different temperatures.
5. Two different alligators on earth are both nonetheless amphibian.

Enjoy. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Astronauts can experience vast differences in temperature between the side facing the Sun, and the side in shadow. Their spacesuits compensate for this using heaters and cooling systems.

Let's talk a little further out. As you travel away from the Sun, the temperature of an object in space plummets.

The surface temperature of Pluto can get as low as -240 Celsius, just 33 degrees above absolute zero.

Clouds of gas and dust between the stars within our galaxy are only 10 to 20 degrees above absolute zero.

Swan wrote:

And if you travel out far away from everything in the Universe, you can never get lower than a minimum of just 2.7 Kelvin or -270.45 Celsius.

So if space has no temperature you might want to inform NASA because they do not know

God you are cute when you stomp your little feets

You already posted this. Argument by repetition fallacy.

Well I was correct the first time.

As always.

Repetition does not make you right. Argument by repetition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

LOL repeating your denials of science does not make you right, which has no effect on the -455F temp of space.

It is you that denies science. Space has no temperature. Inversion fallacy.

You have already denied the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law, now you deny the 0th law of thermodynamics as well.

Swan wrote:
Cheers to you and your 100 percent unsubstantiated trolling's

Bulverism fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.

Can you please post a link

Science isn't an URL.

Swan wrote:
not created by you that says that space has no temperature instead of just making up stuff as you meander thru life making your fantasies real in your deformed mind?

See the 0th law of thermodynamics.

Swan wrote:
Now if something had no heat it would still be the temperature of 0 Kelvin or 459.67 Fahrenheit.

Heat has no temperature.

Swan wrote:
However you know better which is why your only skill is doing what you are told

You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.

Says the crack addict who refuses to accept that space has a multitude of temperatures depending on where one is in space. Eventually you will accept that all you can ever do here is to confuse yourself even more that your mother did with the power drill in your ear.

CIAO