Polar Ice Melt Now 6 Times Greater Than 1990s

HarveyH55 wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
ITN,

Who said CO2 is heating up the entire solar system???

No one.

Spongy Iris wrote:
That is basically what you are arguing by citing the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics incessantly.

You are hallucinating. Put down the bong.

Spongy Iris wrote:
It should be pretty obvious who is the one making irrelevant comments.

You.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I'm just saying evidence is substantial ice levels in the Arctic have decreased significantly in the past few decades. Why do you think that is?

They aren't.

Spongy Iris wrote:
You know they never had solid proof connecting Ted Bundy to any murders. But the evidence was substantial enough to light his ass up.

Irrelevant.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Earth is not entirely a closed system.

Yes it is.

Spongy Iris wrote:
People are born everyday.

So?

Spongy Iris wrote:
You might want to consider it like a bicycle tire with air getting pumped into it.

So people are all aliens? I thought you said they were born here. Which is it, dude?

Spongy Iris wrote:
One more thing, please tell me how gloves can warm my hands without violating the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.

Already did. RQAA.

You're arguing that you can't add energy to a closed system.

Do you need me to spell out that people being born adds pressure to system when there was once none???

So, people dying relieves the pressure of the births. Does that include the 1500 abortion performed in America every day?

I tend to look at things from an electronic stand point, something I've work in a long time. When you have a weak signal, you need to amplify it. That can only be done, by adding energy. You get nothing for free, there is a certain cost to everything, a trade off.

Spongy Iris wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
ITN,

Who said CO2 is heating up the entire solar system???

No one.

Spongy Iris wrote:
That is basically what you are arguing by citing the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics incessantly.

You are hallucinating. Put down the bong.

Spongy Iris wrote:
It should be pretty obvious who is the one making irrelevant comments.

You.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I'm just saying evidence is substantial ice levels in the Arctic have decreased significantly in the past few decades. Why do you think that is?

They aren't.

Spongy Iris wrote:
You know they never had solid proof connecting Ted Bundy to any murders. But the evidence was substantial enough to light his ass up.

Irrelevant.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Earth is not entirely a closed system.

Yes it is.

Spongy Iris wrote:
People are born everyday.

So?

Spongy Iris wrote:
You might want to consider it like a bicycle tire with air getting pumped into it.

So people are all aliens? I thought you said they were born here. Which is it, dude?

Spongy Iris wrote:
One more thing, please tell me how gloves can warm my hands without violating the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.

Already did. RQAA.

You're arguing that you can't add energy to a closed system.

Do you need me to spell out that people being born adds pressure to system when there was once none???

So, people dying relieves the pressure of the births. Does that include the 1500 abortion performed in America every day?

I tend to look at things from an electronic stand point, something I've work in a long time. When you have a weak signal, you need to amplify it. That can only be done, by adding energy. You get nothing for free, there is a certain cost to everything, a trade off.

Population growth tends to be exponential.

I'm not sure what the max capacity of people the planet can handle. 21 billion???

Probably depends a lot where they live.

In the US more than half the country lives in the east. That's probably by necessity. It would probably be ruinous if the West and East populations migrated to reverse those numbers.

Also, half the people in the world live 125 miles from the coast. Also probably a necessity. All those people moving to the rural inland I think would be ruinous.

Spongy Iris wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
ITN,

Who said CO2 is heating up the entire solar system???

No one.

Spongy Iris wrote:
That is basically what you are arguing by citing the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics incessantly.

You are hallucinating. Put down the bong.

Spongy Iris wrote:
It should be pretty obvious who is the one making irrelevant comments.

You.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I'm just saying evidence is substantial ice levels in the Arctic have decreased significantly in the past few decades. Why do you think that is?

They aren't.

Spongy Iris wrote:
You know they never had solid proof connecting Ted Bundy to any murders. But the evidence was substantial enough to light his ass up.

Irrelevant.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Earth is not entirely a closed system.

Yes it is.

Spongy Iris wrote:
People are born everyday.

So?

Spongy Iris wrote:
You might want to consider it like a bicycle tire with air getting pumped into it.

So people are all aliens? I thought you said they were born here. Which is it, dude?

Spongy Iris wrote:
One more thing, please tell me how gloves can warm my hands without violating the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.

Already did. RQAA.

You're arguing that you can't add energy to a closed system.

Do you need me to spell out that people being born adds pressure to system when there was once none???

So, people dying relieves the pressure of the births. Does that include the 1500 abortion performed in America every day?

I tend to look at things from an electronic stand point, something I've work in a long time. When you have a weak signal, you need to amplify it. That can only be done, by adding energy. You get nothing for free, there is a certain cost to everything, a trade off.

Population growth tends to be exponential.

I'm not sure what the max capacity of people the planet can handle. 21 billion???

Probably depends a lot where they live.

In the US more than half the country lives in the east. That's probably by necessity. It would probably be ruinous if the West and East populations migrated to reverse those numbers.

Also, half the people in the world live 125 miles from the coast. Also probably a necessity. All those people moving to the rural inland I think would be ruinous.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
ITN,

Who said CO2 is heating up the entire solar system???

No one.

Spongy Iris wrote:
That is basically what you are arguing by citing the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics incessantly.

You are hallucinating. Put down the bong.

Spongy Iris wrote:
It should be pretty obvious who is the one making irrelevant comments.

You.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I'm just saying evidence is substantial ice levels in the Arctic have decreased significantly in the past few decades. Why do you think that is?

They aren't.

Spongy Iris wrote:
You know they never had solid proof connecting Ted Bundy to any murders. But the evidence was substantial enough to light his ass up.

Irrelevant.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Earth is not entirely a closed system.

Yes it is.

Spongy Iris wrote:
People are born everyday.

So?

Spongy Iris wrote:
You might want to consider it like a bicycle tire with air getting pumped into it.

So people are all aliens? I thought you said they were born here. Which is it, dude?

Spongy Iris wrote:
One more thing, please tell me how gloves can warm my hands without violating the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.

Already did. RQAA.

You're arguing that you can't add energy to a closed system.

Do you need me to spell out that people being born adds pressure to system when there was once none???

So, people dying relieves the pressure of the births. Does that include the 1500 abortion performed in America every day?

I tend to look at things from an electronic stand point, something I've work in a long time. When you have a weak signal, you need to amplify it. That can only be done, by adding energy. You get nothing for free, there is a certain cost to everything, a trade off.

Population growth tends to be exponential.

I'm not sure what the max capacity of people the planet can handle. 21 billion???

Probably depends a lot where they live.

In the US more than half the country lives in the east. That's probably by necessity. It would probably be ruinous if the West and East populations migrated to reverse those numbers.

Also, half the people in the world live 125 miles from the coast. Also probably a necessity. All those people moving to the rural inland I think would be ruinous.

Population is self-correcting, just like most everything else on this planet. With a higher population, more people die during pandemics, a lot quicker too. Every critter on earth fights to survive. As food, resources, territory become scares, people will slaughter those who wish to take, what is not theirs, or kill others to do the taking. People live near the coast, because of the sandy beaches, fishing, surfing chicks... Partly, because it gives them a sense of security, having the water at their back. Though that hasn't applied in a long time, but it's where most civilizations made their start, plenty of job opportunities. Inland cities are generally limited the local industries. Many have expanded into other businesses, but still a more limited job market.

duncan61 wrote: The rift vally was created by glacier and there are Arctic type sea life fossils in Kenya.

duncan61 wrote:So different enviroments greatly affect the temperature.

duncan61 wrote:I have done hearth brazing where the work is pinned then placed in a bed of coke and heated with bellows then the lugs are bronzed welded on

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
ITN,

Who said CO2 is heating up the entire solar system???

No one.

Spongy Iris wrote:
That is basically what you are arguing by citing the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics incessantly.

You are hallucinating. Put down the bong.

Spongy Iris wrote:
It should be pretty obvious who is the one making irrelevant comments.

You.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I'm just saying evidence is substantial ice levels in the Arctic have decreased significantly in the past few decades. Why do you think that is?

They aren't.

Spongy Iris wrote:
You know they never had solid proof connecting Ted Bundy to any murders. But the evidence was substantial enough to light his ass up.

Irrelevant.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Earth is not entirely a closed system.

Yes it is.

Spongy Iris wrote:
People are born everyday.

So?

Spongy Iris wrote:
You might want to consider it like a bicycle tire with air getting pumped into it.

So people are all aliens? I thought you said they were born here. Which is it, dude?

Spongy Iris wrote:
One more thing, please tell me how gloves can warm my hands without violating the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.

Already did. RQAA.

You're arguing that you can't add energy to a closed system.

Do you need me to spell out that people being born adds pressure to system when there was once none???

So, people dying relieves the pressure of the births. Does that include the 1500 abortion performed in America every day?

I tend to look at things from an electronic stand point, something I've work in a long time. When you have a weak signal, you need to amplify it. That can only be done, by adding energy. You get nothing for free, there is a certain cost to everything, a trade off.

Population growth tends to be exponential.

I'm not sure what the max capacity of people the planet can handle. 21 billion???

Probably depends a lot where they live.

In the US more than half the country lives in the east. That's probably by necessity. It would probably be ruinous if the West and East populations migrated to reverse those numbers.

Also, half the people in the world live 125 miles from the coast. Also probably a necessity. All those people moving to the rural inland I think would be ruinous.

So you have a problem with world population. Okay. You die first.

Spongy Iris wrote:Oceans absorb CO2,

Spongy Iris wrote:The Pacific Ocean off the North American West Coast is not likely to absorb as much CO2 emissions as the Atlantic ocean off the North American East coast because the winds usually prevail eastward.

duncan61 wrote:
Yes. The point that needs corroboration is whether Kenya and everywhere else was all under ice at the same time. You are claiming they were. I claim otherwise. I claim that different spots on the earth each get their "turn" being the Greenland ice sheet as it were while their close neighbors are plush Icelands. I claim that they were never all under ice at the same time.

Since we don't have time machines, neither your speculation nor mine can be verified. It's just that my speculation doesn't make for profitable animated movies.

Totally agree.Everything is spinning and moving

Spongy Iris wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
ITN,

Who said CO2 is heating up the entire solar system???

No one.

Spongy Iris wrote:
That is basically what you are arguing by citing the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics incessantly.

You are hallucinating. Put down the bong.

Spongy Iris wrote:
It should be pretty obvious who is the one making irrelevant comments.

You.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I'm just saying evidence is substantial ice levels in the Arctic have decreased significantly in the past few decades. Why do you think that is?

They aren't.

Spongy Iris wrote:
You know they never had solid proof connecting Ted Bundy to any murders. But the evidence was substantial enough to light his ass up.

Irrelevant.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Earth is not entirely a closed system.

Yes it is.

Spongy Iris wrote:
People are born everyday.

So?

Spongy Iris wrote:
You might want to consider it like a bicycle tire with air getting pumped into it.

So people are all aliens? I thought you said they were born here. Which is it, dude?

Spongy Iris wrote:
One more thing, please tell me how gloves can warm my hands without violating the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.

Already did. RQAA.

You're arguing that you can't add energy to a closed system.

Do you need me to spell out that people being born adds pressure to system when there was once none???

So, people dying relieves the pressure of the births. Does that include the 1500 abortion performed in America every day?

I tend to look at things from an electronic stand point, something I've work in a long time. When you have a weak signal, you need to amplify it. That can only be done, by adding energy. You get nothing for free, there is a certain cost to everything, a trade off.

Population growth tends to be exponential.

I'm not sure what the max capacity of people the planet can handle. 21 billion???

Probably depends a lot where they live.

In the US more than half the country lives in the east. That's probably by necessity. It would probably be ruinous if the West and East populations migrated to reverse those numbers.

Also, half the people in the world live 125 miles from the coast. Also probably a necessity. All those people moving to the rural inland I think would be ruinous.

Population is self-correcting, just like most everything else on this planet. With a higher population, more people die during pandemics, a lot quicker too. Every critter on earth fights to survive. As food, resources, territory become scares, people will slaughter those who wish to take, what is not theirs, or kill others to do the taking. People live near the coast, because of the sandy beaches, fishing, surfing chicks... Partly, because it gives them a sense of security, having the water at their back. Though that hasn't applied in a long time, but it's where most civilizations made their start, plenty of job opportunities. Inland cities are generally limited the local industries. Many have expanded into other businesses, but still a more limited job market.

Oceans absorb CO2, so it's ideal for most people to live near the coast.

Spongy Iris wrote:
The Pacific Ocean off the North American West Coast is not likely to absorb as much CO2 emissions as the Atlantic ocean off the North American East coast because the winds usually prevail eastward.

abdullah wrote:
You are right. If this continues the world will come to an end. Our generations would be finished. But there are many solution to this cause. Here is the detailed description on this issue
https://globalwarmingat.blogspot.com/2020/10/globalwarming-planet-isheating-up-fast.html

abdullah wrote:
You are right. If this continues the world will come to an end. Our generations would be finished. But there are many solution to this cause. Here is the detailed description on this issue
https://globalwarmingat.blogspot.com/2020/10/globalwarming-planet-isheating-up-fast.html

muhammadsaad wrote:
The melting of the polar caps will result in the form of the rise of sea level and this would absolutely result in the form of disappearing of the island countries like Maldives, Australia, New Zealand etc. It means that our population will be slowly and gradually finished. For more detail click here https://201256saad.blogspot.com/2020/10/global-warming-causes-and-effects.html

muhammadsaad wrote:
The melting of the polar caps will result in the form of the rise of sea level

muhammadsaad wrote:
and this would absolutely result in the form of disappearing of the island countries like Maldives, Australia, New Zealand etc.

muhammadsaad wrote:
It means that our population will be slowly and gradually finished.
...deleted scripture from the Church of Global Warming...

HarveyH55 wrote:

muhammadsaad wrote:
The melting of the polar caps will result in the form of the rise of sea level and this would absolutely result in the form of disappearing of the island countries like Maldives, Australia, New Zealand etc. It means that our population will be slowly and gradually finished. For more detail click here https://201256saad.blogspot.com/2020/10/global-warming-causes-and-effects.html

Hasn't happened yet, not even close. The great prophet Al Gore, predicted all gone, along with the polar bears and penguins. Not sure why he was picking on the poor critters, neither eat ice...

It's the magic ozone holes at the poles, that keep it cold, and preserves the frozen wastelands.

BrendaM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

muhammadsaad wrote:
The melting of the polar caps will result in the form of the rise of sea level and this would absolutely result in the form of disappearing of the island countries like Maldives, Australia, New Zealand etc. It means that our population will be slowly and gradually finished. For more detail click here https://201256saad.blogspot.com/2020/10/global-warming-causes-and-effects.html

Hasn't happened yet, not even close. The great prophet Al Gore, predicted all gone, along with the polar bears and penguins. Not sure why he was picking on the poor critters, neither eat ice...

It's the magic ozone holes at the poles, that keep it cold, and preserves the frozen wastelands.

It is not that far away either. Have you noticed the string of crazy weather all over the world lately? I often look at the weather of other places on climacell, and most places of the world are battered by storms that they have'nt faced in a long time, be it America, India, Philippines, or any other place. It is just the beginning of a string of events that might change the face of the earth as we know it.

BrendaM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

muhammadsaad wrote:
The melting of the polar caps will result in the form of the rise of sea level and this would absolutely result in the form of disappearing of the island countries like Maldives, Australia, New Zealand etc. It means that our population will be slowly and gradually finished. For more detail click here https://201256saad.blogspot.com/2020/10/global-warming-causes-and-effects.html

Hasn't happened yet, not even close. The great prophet Al Gore, predicted all gone, along with the polar bears and penguins. Not sure why he was picking on the poor critters, neither eat ice...

It's the magic ozone holes at the poles, that keep it cold, and preserves the frozen wastelands.

It is not that far away either. Have you noticed the string of crazy weather all over the world lately? I often look at the weather of other places on climacell, and most places of the world are battered by storms that they have'nt faced in a long time, be it America, India, Philippines, or any other place. It is just the beginning of a string of events that might change the face of the earth as we know it.

BrendaM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

muhammadsaad wrote:
The melting of the polar caps will result in the form of the rise of sea level and this would absolutely result in the form of disappearing of the island countries like Maldives, Australia, New Zealand etc. It means that our population will be slowly and gradually finished. For more detail click here https://201256saad.blogspot.com/2020/10/global-warming-causes-and-effects.html

Hasn't happened yet, not even close. The great prophet Al Gore, predicted all gone, along with the polar bears and penguins. Not sure why he was picking on the poor critters, neither eat ice...

It's the magic ozone holes at the poles, that keep it cold, and preserves the frozen wastelands.

BrendaM wrote:
It is not that far away either. Have you noticed the string of crazy weather all over the world lately?

BrendaM wrote:
I often look at the weather of other places on climacell, and most places of the world are battered by storms that they have'nt faced in a long time, be it America, India, Philippines, or any other place.

BrendaM wrote:
It is just the beginning of a string of events that might change the face of the earth as we know it.

James___ wrote:

BrendaM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

muhammadsaad wrote:
The melting of the polar caps will result in the form of the rise of sea level and this would absolutely result in the form of disappearing of the island countries like Maldives, Australia, New Zealand etc. It means that our population will be slowly and gradually finished. For more detail click here https://201256saad.blogspot.com/2020/10/global-warming-causes-and-effects.html

Hasn't happened yet, not even close. The great prophet Al Gore, predicted all gone, along with the polar bears and penguins. Not sure why he was picking on the poor critters, neither eat ice...

It's the magic ozone holes at the poles, that keep it cold, and preserves the frozen wastelands.

It is not that far away either. Have you noticed the string of crazy weather all over the world lately? I often look at the weather of other places on climacell, and most places of the world are battered by storms that they have'nt faced in a long time, be it America, India, Philippines, or any other place. It is just the beginning of a string of events that might change the face of the earth as we know it.

What these guys don't understand is that if the total energy in storms increase regardless of the number of storms, then that shows that the seas are giving up more heat type energy.

BrendaM wrote: Have you noticed the string of crazy weather all over the world lately?

BrendaM wrote: I often look at the weather of other places on climacell, and most places of the world are battered by storms that they have'nt faced in a long time, be it America, India, Philippines, or any other place.

BrendaM wrote: It is just the beginning of a string of events that might change the face of the earth as we know it.