Remember me
▼ Content

petition to encourage president to use executive order to seize carbon assets and place in public trust


petition to encourage president to use executive order to seize carbon assets and place in public trust21-08-2012 04:53
blissdragon
☆☆☆☆☆
(5)
http://www.change.org/petitions/encourage-president-to-use-executive-order-to-seize-carbon-assets-and-place-in-public-trust?fb_action_ids=10151109934803011&fb_action_types=change-org%3Arecruit&fb_ref=__RbFaSjixlI&fb_source=timeline_og

Makes sense to me!


blissdragon

www.pacingtheplanet.org
05-05-2014 10:36
Kano
☆☆☆☆☆
(23)
You are just playing into their hands, this is not about the environment, this is about rules regulations taxes, in other words more money more power by the governments.
14-11-2017 05:18
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
petition to encourage president to use executive order to seize carbon assets and place in public trust
///////
Hey, what a good idea. Instead of nuclear war against North Korea, just have president "don'T rump" use an executive order seizing North Korean assets & place NK nuclear weapons in public trust(destroy them). Ain't that how IN-ter-nat-nul pol-o-ticks Op-r-8.
14-11-2017 06:41
GreenMan
★★★☆☆
(661)
blissdragon wrote:
http://www.change.org/petitions/encourage-president-to-use-executive-order-to-seize-carbon-assets-and-place-in-public-trust?fb_action_ids=10151109934803011&fb_action_types=change-org%3Arecruit&fb_ref=__RbFaSjixlI&fb_source=timeline_og

Makes sense to me!


There, I put it in a [url] Box for ya. That makes it easier for someone to read.

Once I finally did read it, I couldn't really figure out what it is saying. Is it saying that fossil fuel companies should give up their assets to the Federal Government? That doesn't really make sense, since that is coal and oil, and natural gas. They're not going to give that up. Or is there some way to just seize the CO2 that they are going to produce with the amount of fossil fuel they have?

I confused.

But I did notice this. The author of that petition is under the assumption that he can use the amount of CO2 that has been produced, and directly equate that to a rise in temperature. It doesn't work exackery like that. He thinks that we can add as much as we have so far, before the temperature increases above the magic 2C limit. He's nuts, lol. The amount of CO2 and CH4 that have been released to date will eventually push the temperature of the planet way past that magic 2C limit. The planet is gradually warming up, and will continue to warm for hundreds or thousands of years before it begins to cool back down, unless something happens to block the sun, like a major volcanic eruption. We don't have a few hundred more gigatons that we can safely produce. We are already beyond safely producing CO2 and CH4.


~*~ GreenMan ~*~

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/leftbehind/index.php
14-11-2017 07:00
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
[b]GreenMan wrote: I put it in a Box for ya. That makes it easier for someone to read.
Sorra. Ya mite have a tough time gettin' a response from a poster 3.5 years ago. I resurrected this thread fer a joke!
Edited on 14-11-2017 07:01
14-11-2017 07:35
GreenMan
★★★☆☆
(661)
litesong wrote:
[b]GreenMan wrote: I put it in a Box for ya. That makes it easier for someone to read.
Sorra. Ya mite have a tough time gettin' a response from a poster 3.5 years ago. I resurrected this thread fer a joke!


Ohhhh, lol. I'm surprised the link still works. It probably won't catch on.


~*~ GreenMan ~*~

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/leftbehind/index.php
14-11-2017 16:06
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
GreenMan wrote:
litesong wrote:
[b]GreenMan wrote: I put it in a Box for ya. That makes it easier for someone to read.
Sorra. Ya mite have a tough time gettin' a response from a poster 3.5 years ago. I resurrected this thread fer a joke!
Ohhhh, lol. I'm surprised the link still works. It probably won't catch on.
Yer right! Jokes ain't intended to be long lived.
Edited on 14-11-2017 16:07
14-11-2017 19:30
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(21597)
GreenMan wrote:
blissdragon wrote:
http://www.change.org/petitions/encourage-president-to-use-executive-order-to-seize-carbon-assets-and-place-in-public-trust?fb_action_ids=10151109934803011&fb_action_types=change-org%3Arecruit&fb_ref=__RbFaSjixlI&fb_source=timeline_og

Makes sense to me!


There, I put it in a [url] Box for ya. That makes it easier for someone to read.

Once I finally did read it, I couldn't really figure out what it is saying. Is it saying that fossil fuel companies should give up their assets to the Federal Government? That doesn't really make sense, since that is coal and oil, and natural gas. They're not going to give that up. Or is there some way to just seize the CO2 that they are going to produce with the amount of fossil fuel they have?

I confused.

But I did notice this. The author of that petition is under the assumption that he can use the amount of CO2 that has been produced, and directly equate that to a rise in temperature. It doesn't work exackery like that. He thinks that we can add as much as we have so far, before the temperature increases above the magic 2C limit. He's nuts, lol. The amount of CO2 and CH4 that have been released to date will eventually push the temperature of the planet way past that magic 2C limit. The planet is gradually warming up, and will continue to warm for hundreds or thousands of years before it begins to cool back down, unless something happens to block the sun, like a major volcanic eruption. We don't have a few hundred more gigatons that we can safely produce. We are already beyond safely producing CO2 and CH4.


Neither CO2 nor CH4 is capable of warming the Earth or any part of it (unless you burn the CH4).


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
14-11-2017 23:12
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin" filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" bluffed: Neither CO2 nor CH4 is capable of warming the Earth...
Good that "badnight" continues to willfully NOT understand AGW.




Join the debate petition to encourage president to use executive order to seize carbon assets and place in public trust:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Maximizing Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial Agroecosystems83525-04-2024 09:20
Can we trust the satellite and surface-based temperature records?123-04-2024 16:21
One World Order722-02-2024 01:11
The new President elect of Haagen Dazs, demonstrating an ice cream filled donut017-11-2023 14:07
So you trust your doctor and nurse do you................018-08-2023 19:26
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact