|petition to encourage president to use executive order to seize carbon assets and place in public trust21-08-2012 04:53|
Makes sense to me!
|You are just playing into their hands, this is not about the environment, this is about rules regulations taxes, in other words more money more power by the governments.|
|petition to encourage president to use executive order to seize carbon assets and place in public trust|
Hey, what a good idea. Instead of nuclear war against North Korea, just have president "don'T rump" use an executive order seizing North Korean assets & place NK nuclear weapons in public trust(destroy them). Ain't that how IN-ter-nat-nul pol-o-ticks Op-r-8.
There, I put it in a [url] Box for ya. That makes it easier for someone to read.
Once I finally did read it, I couldn't really figure out what it is saying. Is it saying that fossil fuel companies should give up their assets to the Federal Government? That doesn't really make sense, since that is coal and oil, and natural gas. They're not going to give that up. Or is there some way to just seize the CO2 that they are going to produce with the amount of fossil fuel they have?
But I did notice this. The author of that petition is under the assumption that he can use the amount of CO2 that has been produced, and directly equate that to a rise in temperature. It doesn't work exackery like that. He thinks that we can add as much as we have so far, before the temperature increases above the magic 2C limit. He's nuts, lol. The amount of CO2 and CH4 that have been released to date will eventually push the temperature of the planet way past that magic 2C limit. The planet is gradually warming up, and will continue to warm for hundreds or thousands of years before it begins to cool back down, unless something happens to block the sun, like a major volcanic eruption. We don't have a few hundred more gigatons that we can safely produce. We are already beyond safely producing CO2 and CH4.
~*~ GreenMan ~*~
[b]GreenMan wrote: I put it in a Box for ya. That makes it easier for someone to read.Sorra. Ya mite have a tough time gettin' a response from a poster 3.5 years ago. I resurrected this thread fer a joke!
Edited on 14-11-2017 07:01
litesong wrote:[b]GreenMan wrote: I put it in a Box for ya. That makes it easier for someone to read.Sorra. Ya mite have a tough time gettin' a response from a poster 3.5 years ago. I resurrected this thread fer a joke!
Ohhhh, lol. I'm surprised the link still works. It probably won't catch on.
~*~ GreenMan ~*~
GreenMan wrote:Yer right! Jokes ain't intended to be long lived.litesong wrote:Ohhhh, lol. I'm surprised the link still works. It probably won't catch on.[b]GreenMan wrote: I put it in a Box for ya. That makes it easier for someone to read.Sorra. Ya mite have a tough time gettin' a response from a poster 3.5 years ago. I resurrected this thread fer a joke!
Edited on 14-11-2017 16:07
|Into the Night★★★★★
GreenMan wrote:blissdragon wrote:
Neither CO2 nor CH4 is capable of warming the Earth or any part of it (unless you burn the CH4).
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin" filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" bluffed: Neither CO2 nor CH4 is capable of warming the Earth...Good that "badnight" continues to willfully NOT understand AGW.
|Geneticaly modifying plants and trees for carbon capture?||4||11-06-2022 09:21|
|Maximizing Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial Agroecosystems||420||18-05-2022 18:45|
|Water Vapor And The Climate, Why Carbon Dioxide Is A Very Minor Player||9||03-05-2022 16:54|
|Forgivable Carbon Sins...||2||24-04-2022 05:52|
|Maximizing Carbon Sequestration in Wetlands||80||23-04-2022 17:38|