Overpopulation - How not to solve the problem.

trafn wrote: Said like a true Reaganite. What is this: trickle-down birth control?

Totototo wrote:
@Into the Night - Interesting, thanks for answering.

Another question. IF overpopulation were to become a huge source of trouble in the future, what would be a possible solution? Or maybe it's a self-solving issue?

trafn wrote:
@Into the Night - you wrote Now whether you believe in a God or not (evolution presupposes certain urges as well), these rights or urges exist. To deny them to someone only invites revolt or at the least a clandestine activity which will eventually lead to a revolt.

You wrote this in reference to "Natural Law."

So let me see if I get this right. You advocate thinking with your dick instead of your brain.

PS - God is a homosexual.

trafn wrote:
@Into the night - you wrote This use of removing a child is simply because of the violation of an arbitrary limit on family size set by the government. You are confusing the two. It is you that is confusing the conversation.

There was nothing arbitrary about it. Jakob clearly stated that the child was removed if the mother did not have the means to support it when he wrote In Denmark if at women has a child but no income the social worker may tell her that if she breeds another child they will take the first child away from her.

Wow, you will stop at nothing to spin things toward your twisted point of view.

trafn wrote:
@Into the Night - you wrote And what has this to do with any discussion of overpopulation? Are you trying to turn this into a religion discussion instead?

Because people like you Into the Night (see his Who's Who profile) like to use faith-based religious bullshit as a counterpoint to scientific discourse. I just thought you'd like to know that you worship a fag.*

* - though "fag" is a derogatory word, I use it here as it is the preferred terminology of faith-based extremist like Fred Phelps of Westboro Baptisit Church, and I just wanted to phrase it in a way you were familiar with.

trafn wrote:
@Into the Night - you wrote You failed to answer the first question. What happens to the kidnap victim in Denmark?

You continued attacks against Jakob only prove how much you need a moderator to help you learn how to post like an adult. How about joining Sharing Ideas?

trafn wrote:
@IBdaMann - since you continue to use your standard troll tactics, I think it's worth asking here in this thread as well:

My profile - trafn

Your profile - IBdaMann

Notice any difference?

Care to tell us what your background is in science?

trafn wrote:
@Into the Night - you wrote Is this relevant?

Absolutely.

Now, answer the question.

Jakob wrote:
­
@Into the Night

The danish mothers I know would never allow themselves to have another baby if it meant the first had to go.
I am sorry to hear if is different anywhere else.­

Jakob wrote:
Do you know any healthy women who would handle it differently..?­

Jakob wrote:
The victims are not one but two children if the mother cannot take care of them.­

Jakob wrote:
I am sure you have something like it in the USA.­

Jakob wrote:
I have seen Amys Court on TV.­

Jakob wrote:
But I also realize you are not the person to ask about it.
­

Into the Night wrote:

Jakob wrote:
But I also realize you are not the person to ask about it.
­

Then why did you bring it up?

But I also realize you are not the person to be asked about it.

trafn wrote:
@Into the Night - you wrote You wrote both 'profiles' in the Kiddie Pool!

Check again, retard. They are posted in:

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Debate about Climate-Debate.com > Who is who on Climate-debate.com

PS - you can't slander a retarded avitar. And by the way, douche bag, I'm just playing by your rules in the "Adult Pool."

trafn wrote:
@Tim the plumber - you wrote Being reasonably wealthy is generally the best way to ensure that families don't become huge.

Said like a true Reaganite. What is this: trickle-down birth control?

It takes a lot of poor people to make a rich person. (a trafnism!)

Jakob wrote:
­
@Tim the plumber

It is good for you to be optimistic I suppose.
But it may also be good to be prepared for less a happy future fairytale.
Instead of us mining from smart crafts not invented yet you could as well predict an asteroid colliding with earth and coursing huge GW.­

Tim the Plumber
There is no over population problem. Talk of it is just the same as talk of how to solve the issue of Jewish existance.

Totototo wrote:

Tim the Plumber
There is no over population problem. Talk of it is just the same as talk of how to solve the issue of Jewish existance.

What if we discuss it in a theoretical fashion? As in what IF? Into the Night already answered he thinks it is a self-solving issue, I don't share the opinion but I respect he thinks that way and I could see why.

Do you think it could be a self-solving issue or that action is necesary?

Jakob wrote:
­



@Into the Night


In Denmark social workers are not allowed to hand over that kind of problems to any kind of a religious sect.
They often use family care.

Into the Night wrote:

Jakob wrote:
But I also realize you are not the person to ask about it.
­

Then why did you bring it up?

I am so sorry I was too late to correct it.
I wanted to say:

But I also realize you are not the person to be asked about it.

It was an answer and not a question.

­

trafn wrote:
@Into the Night - you wrote You wrote both 'profiles' in the Kiddie Pool!

Check again, retard. They are posted in:

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Debate about Climate-Debate.com > Who is who on Climate-debate.com

PS - you can't slander a retarded avitar. And by the way, douche bag, I'm just playing by your rules in the "Adult Pool."

Tim the plumber wrote:

Totototo wrote:

Tim the Plumber
There is no over population problem. Talk of it is just the same as talk of how to solve the issue of Jewish existance.

What if we discuss it in a theoretical fashion? As in what IF? Into the Night already answered he thinks it is a self-solving issue, I don't share the opinion but I respect he thinks that way and I could see why.

Do you think it could be a self-solving issue or that action is necesary?

If you start a thread of "Is there an over population probelm?" then OK, that is fine.

The problem I have with "How to solve the over population problem?" is that it instantly presupposes that there is such a thing and obviously there must be a mechanism to get rid of a few billion people.

I think that the more humans we have applying their inventiveness to problems and generating greater efficiency and wealth the better.

There is currently no real practicle limit we are anywhere near to the maximum human population. Africa alone could feed us all if we organised it.

trafn wrote: Why do people always think they can buy their way out of their problems rather than take responsibility for them in the first place?

trafn wrote:It was the insane pursuit of wealth after Spindletop that got us into all of this.

trafn wrote: We're past the tipping point.

trafn wrote: The bar on the Titanic can only stay open so long.

trafn wrote:
@IBdaMann - you wrote Whatever that means...

Yes, what does it mean?

trafn wrote:
It was the insane pursuit of wealth after Spindletop that got us into all of this.

We're past the tipping point.

It doesn't matter what you spend.

The bar on the Titanic can only stay open so long.