Olympics and Climate Marxism

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Your video can now be dismissed as inconclusive speculation, and I won't bother watching the rest.

Of course you won't. You don't want anyone ruining your enjoyment of men beating women.

Spongy Iris wrote: Your statements that these 2 boxers are males is speculation.

Nope. My statement is the correct, trivial assessment of humans having XY chromosomes.

Spongy Iris wrote: Admittedly, I'm also speculating they are female.

... and your statement is mere denial of human physiology.

Spongy Iris wrote: My opinion is ...

Your (deliberate) error is ...

Spongy Iris wrote: ... they would have realized if they were male,

Subjunctive Error: "They" did not realize they were male. Such assessments are/were made by the presence, or lack, of a penis and/or ambiguous genetalia.

Spongy Iris wrote: certainly by their 20s, and would not have wanted to compete in the Olympics as females.

Subjunctive Error: Their hopes and dreams were to compete in the Olympics against women, not against other men. They all knew that what would happen to them if they were to compete against men is exactly what they do to women competitors.

Spongy Iris wrote: Certainly the matter could be settled by determining if they have ovaries and a uterus.

Subjunctive Error: The matter has been settled. They have XY chromosomes.

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Wow, you admit you were wrong, but still double down on your bigotry by changing the definition of a woman.

I'll leave you with this: Now We Know The Truth

Khelif, Yu-Ting and Mboma were likely born with 5alpha-reductase deficiency, a genetic condition that affects sexual development before birth and during puberty. It is caused by mutations in the SRD5A2 gene, which encodes the enzyme 5α-reductase type 2. This enzyme is crucial for converting testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a hormone essential for male sexual development. The enzyme deficiency caused their genitalia to not develop, causing the doctor/nurse/midwife to misgender the newborn as "female" simply on the basis of a missing penis.

They are all men, just not necessarily "whole" men. Those who claim that these men are women who can give birth are gullible morons.

The expert in that interview, around 17 minute mark, said there aren't to her knowledge any men competing in women's sports.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Your video can now be dismissed as inconclusive speculation, and I won't bother watching the rest.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Your statements that these 2 boxers are males is speculation.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Admittedly, I'm also speculating they are female.

Spongy Iris wrote:
My opinion is they would have realized if they were male, certainly by their 20s, and would not have wanted to compete in the Olympics as females.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Certainly the matter could be settled by determining if they have ovaries and a uterus.

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Your video can now be dismissed as inconclusive speculation, and I won't bother watching the rest.

Of course you won't. You don't want anyone ruining your enjoyment of men beating women.

Spongy Iris wrote: Your statements that these 2 boxers are males is speculation.

Nope. My statement is the correct, trivial assessment of humans having XY chromosomes.

Spongy Iris wrote: Admittedly, I'm also speculating they are female.

... and your statement is mere denial of human physiology.

Spongy Iris wrote: My opinion is ...

Your (deliberate) error is ...

Spongy Iris wrote: ... they would have realized if they were male,

Subjunctive Error: "They" did not realize they were male. Such assessments are/were made by the presence, or lack, of a penis and/or ambiguous genetalia.

Spongy Iris wrote:
certainly by their 20s, and would not have wanted to compete in the Olympics as females.

Subjunctive Error: Their hopes and dreams were to compete in the Olympics against women, not against other men. They all knew that what would happen to them if they were to compete against men is exactly what they do to women competitors.

Spongy Iris wrote: Certainly the matter could be settled by determining if they have ovaries and a uterus.

Subjunctive Error: The matter has been settled. They have XY chromosomes.

You can't even concede that you are speculating. What a loser. It shows that opposing your judgment is probably correct.

Spongy Iris wrote:
You used a source to support your claim,

Spongy Iris wrote:
who admitted your claim was speculative,

Spongy Iris wrote:
and you continue to assert that you know your claim is true. Omniscience fallacy.

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Wow, you admit you were wrong, but still double down on your bigotry by changing the definition of a woman.

I'll leave you with this: Now We Know The Truth

Khelif, Yu-Ting and Mboma were likely born with 5alpha-reductase deficiency, a genetic condition that affects sexual development before birth and during puberty. It is caused by mutations in the SRD5A2 gene, which encodes the enzyme 5α-reductase type 2. This enzyme is crucial for converting testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a hormone essential for male sexual development. The enzyme deficiency caused their genitalia to not develop, causing the doctor/nurse/midwife to misgender the newborn as "female" simply on the basis of a missing penis.

They are all men, just not necessarily "whole" men. Those who claim that these men are women who can give birth are gullible morons.

The expert in that interview, around 17 minute mark, said there aren't to her knowledge any men competing in women's sports.

'Expert' worship. Argument of ignorance fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Your video can now be dismissed as inconclusive speculation, and I won't bother watching the rest.

Bulverism fallacy.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Your statements that these 2 boxers are males is speculation.

Describing a chromosome is not speculation. They are male.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Admittedly, I'm also speculating they are female.

They are male. You cannot speculate that away.

Spongy Iris wrote:
My opinion is they would have realized if they were male, certainly by their 20s, and would not have wanted to compete in the Olympics as females.

They are male.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Certainly the matter could be settled by determining if they have ovaries and a uterus.

Not necessary. It's all in the chromosomes, easily tested.

Spongy Iris wrote: If it was so simple, the expert would have stated unequivocally that she knows these 2 boxers are male.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: If it was so simple, the expert would have stated unequivocally that she knows these 2 boxers are male.

Incorrect. It is a simple matter because the IBA confirmed their XY chromosomes. Full stop.

The expert in the video was commenting on one of her areas of expertise, i.e. mutations in the SRD5A2 gene, i.e. the gene that encodes the enzyme 5α-reductase type 2. This enzyme is crucial for converting testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a hormone essential for male sexual development.

This issue is so amazingly simple, making Jello looks complex by comparison.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Wow, you admit you were wrong, but still double down on your bigotry by changing the definition of a woman.

I'll leave you with this: Now We Know The Truth

Khelif, Yu-Ting and Mboma were likely born with 5alpha-reductase deficiency, a genetic condition that affects sexual development before birth and during puberty. It is caused by mutations in the SRD5A2 gene, which encodes the enzyme 5α-reductase type 2. This enzyme is crucial for converting testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a hormone essential for male sexual development. The enzyme deficiency caused their genitalia to not develop, causing the doctor/nurse/midwife to misgender the newborn as "female" simply on the basis of a missing penis.

They are all men, just not necessarily "whole" men. Those who claim that these men are women who can give birth are gullible morons.

The expert in that interview, around 17 minute mark, said there aren't to her knowledge any men competing in women's sports.

'Expert' worship. Argument of ignorance fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Your video can now be dismissed as inconclusive speculation, and I won't bother watching the rest.

Bulverism fallacy.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Your statements that these 2 boxers are males is speculation.

Describing a chromosome is not speculation. They are male.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Admittedly, I'm also speculating they are female.

They are male. You cannot speculate that away.

Spongy Iris wrote:
My opinion is they would have realized if they were male, certainly by their 20s, and would not have wanted to compete in the Olympics as females.

They are male.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Certainly the matter could be settled by determining if they have ovaries and a uterus.

Not necessary. It's all in the chromosomes, easily tested.

If it was so simple, the expert would have stated unequivocally that she knows these 2 boxers are male. She said she does not know, and engaged in speculative attacks.

Spongy Iris wrote:
You're even worse because you assert speculation to be knowledge.

Spongy Iris wrote:
My face is turning red, as I hold my breath, waiting for your justice to be delivered.

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: If it was so simple, the expert would have stated unequivocally that she knows these 2 boxers are male.

Incorrect. It is a simple matter because the IBA confirmed their XY chromosomes. Full stop.

The expert in the video was commenting on one of her areas of expertise, i.e. mutations in the SRD5A2 gene, i.e. the gene that encodes the enzyme 5α-reductase type 2. This enzyme is crucial for converting testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a hormone essential for male sexual development.

This issue is so amazingly simple, making Jello looks complex by comparison.

Then at any moment I should be expecting swift justice to the frauds allowing what you know to be true, if it such a simple matter.

It really is a global conspiracy to allow such a fraud. This should be exciting to see the big reveal.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Ladies and gentlemen, eating your popcorn, behold, IBdaMann, Teacher's Pet.

https://youtu.be/ViCeCxqgIyU?si=da-hjJbzc5Qkyb-S

Not since Ace Ventura Pet Detective have we seen such great cinema.

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: If it was so simple, the expert would have stated unequivocally that she knows these 2 boxers are male.

Incorrect. It is a simple matter because the IBA confirmed their XY chromosomes. Full stop.

The expert in the video was commenting on one of her areas of expertise, i.e. mutations in the SRD5A2 gene, i.e. the gene that encodes the enzyme 5α-reductase type 2. This enzyme is crucial for converting testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a hormone essential for male sexual development.

This issue is so amazingly simple, making Jello looks complex by comparison.

Then at any moment I should be expecting swift justice to the frauds allowing what you know to be true, if it such a simple matter.

It really is a global conspiracy to allow such a fraud. This should be exciting to see the big reveal.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy. The leftist parties around the world are all conspiracies.

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Wow, you admit you were wrong, but still double down on your bigotry by changing the definition of a woman.

I'll leave you with this: Now We Know The Truth

Khelif, Yu-Ting and Mboma were likely born with 5alpha-reductase deficiency, a genetic condition that affects sexual development before birth and during puberty. It is caused by mutations in the SRD5A2 gene, which encodes the enzyme 5α-reductase type 2. This enzyme is crucial for converting testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a hormone essential for male sexual development. The enzyme deficiency caused their genitalia to not develop, causing the doctor/nurse/midwife to misgender the newborn as "female" simply on the basis of a missing penis.

They are all men, just not necessarily "whole" men. Those who claim that these men are women who can give birth are gullible morons.

The expert in that interview, around 17 minute mark, said there aren't to her knowledge any men competing in women's sports.

'Expert' worship. Argument of ignorance fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Your video can now be dismissed as inconclusive speculation, and I won't bother watching the rest.

Bulverism fallacy.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Your statements that these 2 boxers are males is speculation.

Describing a chromosome is not speculation. They are male.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Admittedly, I'm also speculating they are female.

They are male. You cannot speculate that away.

Spongy Iris wrote:
My opinion is they would have realized if they were male, certainly by their 20s, and would not have wanted to compete in the Olympics as females.

They are male.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Certainly the matter could be settled by determining if they have ovaries and a uterus.

Not necessary. It's all in the chromosomes, easily tested.

If it was so simple, the expert would have stated unequivocally that she knows these 2 boxers are male. She said she does not know, and engaged in speculative attacks.

'Expert' worship. Describing chromosomes is not speculation. Redefinition fallacy.

Spongy Iris wrote:
You're even worse because you assert speculation to be knowledge.

Describing chromosomes is not speculation. Redefinition fallacy.

Spongy Iris wrote:
My face is turning red, as I hold my breath, waiting for your justice to be delivered.

Assumption of victory fallacy.

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
Ladies and gentlemen, eating your popcorn, behold, IBdaMann, Teacher's Pet.

https://youtu.be/ViCeCxqgIyU?si=da-hjJbzc5Qkyb-S

Not since Ace Ventura Pet Detective have we seen such great cinema.

You can't redefine words in English that way!

Spongy Iris wrote:Then at any moment I should be expecting swift justice to the frauds allowing what you know to be true, if it such a simple matter.

Spongy Iris wrote: It really is a global conspiracy to allow such a fraud.

Spongy Iris wrote: This should be exciting to see the big reveal.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Then at any moment I should be expecting swift justice to the frauds allowing what you know to be true, if it such a simple matter.

You give the IOC far too much credit.

Spongy Iris wrote: It really is a global conspiracy to allow such a fraud.

You're back to pivoting again. The IOC is not the entire world. A midwife's mistake is not a conspiracy. No abnormality or birth defect is a conspiracy.

Spongy Iris wrote: This should be exciting to see the big reveal.

I'm not excited and it already happened.

Spongy Iris wrote: Certainly nobody wants to see dudes with micro dicks beating up on chicks.

Spongy Iris wrote: If that is what has happened I should be expecting justice.

Spongy Iris wrote: Why doesn't the IBA charge the IOC with some kind of reckless endangerment?

Spongy Iris wrote: Your position demands this action at a bare minimum.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Certainly nobody wants to see dudes with micro dicks beating up on chicks.

You do. Read your posts again. All of them exist to support your desperate need to have men (XY chromosomes) beating up on women.

You have made every LAME excuse to justify your need to have men bitch-slapping women, and have completely denied XY chromosomes as estblishing male gender.

Spongy Iris wrote: If that is what has happened I should be expecting justice.

Nope. That is just your way of blaming others for your indefensible position.

You should state right here and now that the IOC should never have permitted male born, XY chromosome-bearing men, Khelif and Yu-Ting to participate in sports dedicated to female born, XX chromosome-bearing women.

Spongy Iris wrote: Why doesn't the IBA charge the IOC with some kind of reckless endangerment?

The IBA isn't any sort of DA. They can't charge anyone with anything.

They can, however, testify in court and hold press conferences in public.

Spongy Iris wrote: Your position demands this action at a bare minimum.

Your position cannot be blamed on anyone else.

Spongy Iris wrote: You stated, as a fact, that 2 males with micro dicks assaulted females in the Olympics.

Spongy Iris wrote: Why don't you demand justice?

Spongy Iris wrote: If I knew what you stated to be true, I would change my position and ask for justice.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: You stated, as a fact, that 2 males with micro dicks assaulted females in the Olympics.

That I did. I created a thread to point out the issue, to elaborate on it and to answer any questions.

Spongy Iris wrote: Why don't you demand justice?

I am demanding that the problem be fixed.

Spongy Iris wrote: If I knew what you stated to be true, I would change my position and ask for justice.

Since you should have verified by now that what I stated is true, you should be demanding that the problem be rectified.

Spongy Iris wrote: Great. Then I expect the Algerian and Taiwanese authorities will be ...

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Great. Then I expect the Algerian and Taiwanese authorities will be ...

Nope. You are still trying to deflect. Instead of talking about Algeria, Taiwan, Bigfoot, your grandmother, and everybody else, you should remain focused on you and on letting go of your need to watch men physically abuse women for your entertainment.

Stop inappropriately talking about "justice" and stay focused on fixing the problem. Stop trying to pivot to grand conspiracies and other topics. We have men beating up women and you supporting it.

Is there a chance that you will denounce Khelif's and Yu-ting's competing in women's boxing? I get it, you entirely supported it when you were under the sway of the WOKE Marxist disinformation that these men were actually women, but now that you know that they are, and always have been, men, do you (not shifting attention to anyone else) change your position on the participation of these men in the women's Olympic boxing?

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Great. Then I expect the Algerian and Taiwanese authorities will be ...

Nope. You are still trying to deflect. Instead of talking about Algeria, Taiwan, Bigfoot, your grandmother, and everybody else, you should remain focused on you and on letting go of your need to watch men physically abuse women for your entertainment.

Stop inappropriately talking about "justice" and stay focused on fixing the problem. Stop trying to pivot to grand conspiracies and other topics. We have men beating up women and you supporting it.

Is there a chance that you will denounce Khelif's and Yu-ting's competing in women's boxing? I get it, you entirely supported it when you were under the sway of the WOKE Marxist disinformation that these men were actually women, but now that you know that they are, and always have been, men, do you (not shifting attention to anyone else) change your position on the participation of these men in the women's Olympic boxing?

Nope, according to you a heinous crime has been committed which needs more than keyboard warrior justice. If that justice is not delivered, your position can never be accepted as truth.

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Unless you have some real support for your position, it will remain a fantasy.

That must be so sad for you. Do you need a shoulder to cry on?

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Unless you have some real support for your position, it will remain a fantasy.

That must be so sad for you. Do you need a shoulder to cry on?

Murder and men beating up on women is not a fantasy.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Unless you have some real support for your position, it will remain a fantasy.

That must be so sad for you. Do you need a shoulder to cry on?

Murder and men beating up on women is not a fantasy.

Do you mean attempted murder?

Spongy Iris wrote:
In any case, if no arrests are made,

Spongy Iris wrote:
your interpretation of this story dies as a fantasy.

How sad.

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Unless you have some real support for your position, it will remain a fantasy.

That must be so sad for you. Do you need a shoulder to cry on?

Murder and men beating up on women is not a fantasy.

Do you mean attempted murder?

No. Pay attention.

Spongy Iris wrote:
In any case, if no arrests are made,

I know. Crime commission doesn't always result in an arrest.

Spongy Iris wrote:
your interpretation of this story dies as a fantasy.

How sad.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

Spongy Iris wrote: The topic of murder has not been discussed in this thread. You must be hallucinating.

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: The topic of murder has not been discussed in this thread. You must be hallucinating.

The topic of crimes being committed weren't discussed either until you backed yourself into a corner and ran out of options for effective EVASION and deflection.

The issue is the problem of men competing in women's sports, in particular, martial arts in which men simply deliver the smackdown to women and dangerously abuse them. You are all for it, professing your support for men who beat the holy crap out of women for its entertainment value. You are currently arguing that you aren't somehow a totally sick fuqk until international criminal investigations commence. You are mistaken. You are a totally sick fuqk right now.

You tried to pivot to men's boxing and to Mike Tyson's early success as an equivalent problem ... but it isn't.

Spongy Iris wrote: Why do you keep trying to declare me guilty?

Spongy Iris wrote: This is out of my jurisdiction, ...

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Why do you keep trying to declare me guilty?

Of what? I said you were a sick fuqk. I would have been more accurate if I had said you were a dishonest sick fuqk, but "sick fuqk" covers it well enough.

Spongy Iris wrote: This is out of my jurisdiction, ...

There is no such thing as "jurisdiction" when discussing the fixing of a problem. It is, however, entirely within your power to assert that Khelif, Yu-Ting and Wboma, among others, should never have been allowed to compete in women's sports, but you can't, and thus won't, because you are a sick fuqk who, despite his dishonest and insincere claims to the contrary, enjoys watching men beat the shi-t out of women. Such men become your heroes and you cheer them on.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Unless you have some real support for your position, it will remain a fantasy.

That must be so sad for you. Do you need a shoulder to cry on?

Murder and men beating up on women is not a fantasy.

Do you mean attempted murder?

No. Pay attention.

Spongy Iris wrote:
In any case, if no arrests are made,

I know. Crime commission doesn't always result in an arrest.

Spongy Iris wrote:
your interpretation of this story dies as a fantasy.

How sad.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

The topic of murder has not been discussed in this thread. You must be hallucinating.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Since it's such a simple matter, according to you and your friends, that dudes with micro dicks are beating up on chicks, where are the police to make an arrest?

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Unless you have some real support for your position, it will remain a fantasy.

That must be so sad for you. Do you need a shoulder to cry on?

Murder and men beating up on women is not a fantasy.

Do you mean attempted murder?

No. Pay attention.

Spongy Iris wrote:
In any case, if no arrests are made,

I know. Crime commission doesn't always result in an arrest.

Spongy Iris wrote:
your interpretation of this story dies as a fantasy.

How sad.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

The topic of murder has not been discussed in this thread. You must be hallucinating.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Spongy Iris wrote:
Since it's such a simple matter, according to you and your friends, that dudes with micro dicks are beating up on chicks, where are the police to make an arrest?

RQAA.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Unless you have some real support for your position, it will remain a fantasy.

That must be so sad for you. Do you need a shoulder to cry on?

Murder and men beating up on women is not a fantasy.

Do you mean attempted murder?

No. Pay attention.

Spongy Iris wrote:
In any case, if no arrests are made,

I know. Crime commission doesn't always result in an arrest.

Spongy Iris wrote:
your interpretation of this story dies as a fantasy.

How sad.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

The topic of murder has not been discussed in this thread. You must be hallucinating.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Spongy Iris wrote:
Since it's such a simple matter, according to you and your friends, that dudes with micro dicks are beating up on chicks, where are the police to make an arrest?

RQAA.

The topic of murder has been discussed in a different thread, but not this one. Nobody was murdered at the Olympics.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I said a male pretending to be female to win a boxing competition might be guilty of attempted murder.

Spongy Iris wrote:
However, since the appropriate authorities have not taken up this concern, I must assume you and your friends are mistaken, until proven otherwise.

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Unless you have some real support for your position, it will remain a fantasy.

That must be so sad for you. Do you need a shoulder to cry on?

Murder and men beating up on women is not a fantasy.

Do you mean attempted murder?

No. Pay attention.

Spongy Iris wrote:
In any case, if no arrests are made,

I know. Crime commission doesn't always result in an arrest.

Spongy Iris wrote:
your interpretation of this story dies as a fantasy.

How sad.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

The topic of murder has not been discussed in this thread. You must be hallucinating.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Spongy Iris wrote:
Since it's such a simple matter, according to you and your friends, that dudes with micro dicks are beating up on chicks, where are the police to make an arrest?

RQAA.

The topic of murder has been discussed in a different thread, but not this one. Nobody was murdered at the Olympics.

Dead wrong, literally.

The Olympic Games has seen many murders, including an entire team killed by Islamic terrorists.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I said a male pretending to be female to win a boxing competition might be guilty of attempted murder.

Nope. Murder. She died.

Spongy Iris wrote:
However, since the appropriate authorities have not taken up this concern, I must assume you and your friends are mistaken, until proven otherwise.

Crime does not require any authorities to take it up to exist.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Unless you have some real support for your position, it will remain a fantasy.

That must be so sad for you. Do you need a shoulder to cry on?

Murder and men beating up on women is not a fantasy.

Do you mean attempted murder?

No. Pay attention.

Spongy Iris wrote:
In any case, if no arrests are made,

I know. Crime commission doesn't always result in an arrest.

Spongy Iris wrote:
your interpretation of this story dies as a fantasy.

How sad.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

The topic of murder has not been discussed in this thread. You must be hallucinating.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Spongy Iris wrote:
Since it's such a simple matter, according to you and your friends, that dudes with micro dicks are beating up on chicks, where are the police to make an arrest?

RQAA.

The topic of murder has been discussed in a different thread, but not this one. Nobody was murdered at the Olympics.

Dead wrong, literally.

The Olympic Games has seen many murders, including an entire team killed by Islamic terrorists.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I said a male pretending to be female to win a boxing competition might be guilty of attempted murder.

Nope. Murder. She died.

Spongy Iris wrote:
However, since the appropriate authorities have not taken up this concern, I must assume you and your friends are mistaken, until proven otherwise.

Crime does not require any authorities to take it up to exist.

What murders happened in connection with the 2024 Paris Olympics??? Who died???

Spongy Iris wrote:
You seem to be talking about an alternate reality, or drifting off into irrelevant tangents.

Spongy Iris wrote:
If we are even talking about the same crime, everybody saw the fights on video. No plausible deniability.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Therefore, again, if it's as simple a matter as you say it is, we can soon expect the authorities to be making arrests of Khelif and Yu-Ting.

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote: Nope,

I didn't think so. You're a sick fuqq who is trying to deflect and distract attention away from his indefensible position.

Spongy Iris wrote:. according to you a heinous crime has been committed

Nope. It's all according to you and your desperate deflection. You don't want to fix the problem because you consider it the main attraction.

Unless you have some real support for your position, it will remain a fantasy.

That must be so sad for you. Do you need a shoulder to cry on?

Murder and men beating up on women is not a fantasy.

Do you mean attempted murder?

No. Pay attention.

Spongy Iris wrote:
In any case, if no arrests are made,

I know. Crime commission doesn't always result in an arrest.

Spongy Iris wrote:
your interpretation of this story dies as a fantasy.

How sad.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Redefinition fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

The topic of murder has not been discussed in this thread. You must be hallucinating.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Spongy Iris wrote:
Since it's such a simple matter, according to you and your friends, that dudes with micro dicks are beating up on chicks, where are the police to make an arrest?

RQAA.

The topic of murder has been discussed in a different thread, but not this one. Nobody was murdered at the Olympics.

Dead wrong, literally.

The Olympic Games has seen many murders, including an entire team killed by Islamic terrorists.

Spongy Iris wrote:
I said a male pretending to be female to win a boxing competition might be guilty of attempted murder.

Nope. Murder. She died.

Spongy Iris wrote:
However, since the appropriate authorities have not taken up this concern, I must assume you and your friends are mistaken, until proven otherwise.

Crime does not require any authorities to take it up to exist.

What murders happened in connection with the 2024 Paris Olympics??? Who died???

RQAA.

Spongy Iris wrote:
You seem to be talking about an alternate reality, or drifting off into irrelevant tangents.

Inversion fallacy. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!

Spongy Iris wrote:
If we are even talking about the same crime, everybody saw the fights on video. No plausible deniability.

No one is denying the fights took place, moron.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Therefore, again, if it's as simple a matter as you say it is, we can soon expect the authorities to be making arrests of Khelif and Yu-Ting.

Why? It's the OIympic Boxing committee that committed the crime.

Spongy Iris wrote: I'm suggesting you may not know it all,

Spongy Iris wrote: and you zealously attack me for reserving judgment.

Spongy Iris wrote: But according to you, Khelif and Yu-Ting are secretly males.