| 05-09-2024 03:13 |
Spongy Iris ★★★★☆
(1785) |
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
There certainly aren't any body parts missing in these women boxers. Try to stay on topic instead of playing random syntax games.
Male is not female. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR SYNTAX GAMES ON ANYBODY ELSE!
What astounding insight.
Look I can play too.
Red is not white.
Yellow is not black.
Now can we get back on the topic of how these boxers are women? How do you think these women got XY chromosomes?
Syntax games won't work. You'll have to do better.
Khelif and Yu-Ting
Rule in the ring
They don't masturbate
True Climate Debate
Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. You'll have to do better.
Talking about yourself again
%20(1).png) |
| 05-09-2024 06:15 |
Into the Night ★★★★★
(22393) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
There certainly aren't any body parts missing in these women boxers. Try to stay on topic instead of playing random syntax games.
Male is not female. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR SYNTAX GAMES ON ANYBODY ELSE!
What astounding insight.
Look I can play too.
Red is not white.
Yellow is not black.
Now can we get back on the topic of how these boxers are women? How do you think these women got XY chromosomes?
Syntax games won't work. You'll have to do better.
Khelif and Yu-Ting
Rule in the ring
They don't masturbate
True Climate Debate
Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. You'll have to do better.
Talking about yourself again
LIF. Grow up.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 05-09-2024 07:47 |
Spongy Iris★★★★☆
(1785) |
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
There certainly aren't any body parts missing in these women boxers. Try to stay on topic instead of playing random syntax games.
Male is not female. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR SYNTAX GAMES ON ANYBODY ELSE!
What astounding insight.
Look I can play too.
Red is not white.
Yellow is not black.
Now can we get back on the topic of how these boxers are women? How do you think these women got XY chromosomes?
Syntax games won't work. You'll have to do better.
Khelif and Yu-Ting
Rule in the ring
They don't masturbate
True Climate Debate
Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. You'll have to do better.
Talking about yourself again
LIF. Grow up.
Keep fantasizing about micro dicks with your Climate Debate cult buddies.
|
| 05-09-2024 08:35 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22393) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
There certainly aren't any body parts missing in these women boxers. Try to stay on topic instead of playing random syntax games.
Male is not female. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR SYNTAX GAMES ON ANYBODY ELSE!
What astounding insight.
Look I can play too.
Red is not white.
Yellow is not black.
Now can we get back on the topic of how these boxers are women? How do you think these women got XY chromosomes?
Syntax games won't work. You'll have to do better.
Khelif and Yu-Ting
Rule in the ring
They don't masturbate
True Climate Debate
Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. You'll have to do better.
Talking about yourself again
LIF. Grow up.
Keep fantasizing ... Keep your sexual problems to yourself.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 05-09-2024 16:52 |
Spongy Iris★★★★☆
(1785) |
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
There certainly aren't any body parts missing in these women boxers. Try to stay on topic instead of playing random syntax games.
Male is not female. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR SYNTAX GAMES ON ANYBODY ELSE!
What astounding insight.
Look I can play too.
Red is not white.
Yellow is not black.
Now can we get back on the topic of how these boxers are women? How do you think these women got XY chromosomes?
Syntax games won't work. You'll have to do better.
Khelif and Yu-Ting
Rule in the ring
They don't masturbate
True Climate Debate
Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. You'll have to do better.
Talking about yourself again
LIF. Grow up.
Keep fantasizing ... Keep your sexual problems to yourself.
Climate Debate is about Sounding The Trumpet of the world's sexual problems.
And again you guys are the ones fantasizing about boxers with micro dicks, not me.
Im just speculating that when women abstain from orgasms for many years, that might cause them to develop XY chromosomes.
|
| 05-09-2024 17:14 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1067) |
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
There certainly aren't any body parts missing in these women boxers. Try to stay on topic instead of playing random syntax games.
Male is not female. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR SYNTAX GAMES ON ANYBODY ELSE!
What astounding insight.
Look I can play too.
Red is not white.
Yellow is not black.
Now can we get back on the topic of how these boxers are women? How do you think these women got XY chromosomes?
Syntax games won't work. You'll have to do better.
Khelif and Yu-Ting
Rule in the ring
They don't masturbate
True Climate Debate
Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. You'll have to do better.
Talking about yourself again
LIF. Grow up.
Keep fantasizing ... Keep your sexual problems to yourself.
Climate Debate is about Sounding The Trumpet of the world's sexual problems.
And again you guys are the ones fantasizing about boxers with micro dicks, not me.
Im just speculating that when women abstain from orgasms for many years, that might cause them to develop XY chromosomes.
Climate Debate.
Gotta love it!
It seems to me that there are many millions of women who are NOT boxers, nor have they ever experienced an orgasm in their entire life. And I am pretty sure that they NEVER "develop XY chromosomes" as a consequence.
Indeed, there are millions of women who had their genitals deliberately mutilated in order to ensure that they never experience an orgasm. This occurs in just a handful of countries, so if it causes chromosome transformation, those would be the places where it would be expected to occur at high rates.
But it is absurd and anti scientific to think women can develop male chromosomes by doing or not doing ANYTHING.
It would be one thing if anyone on this website were allowed to have a rational discussion about climate change, and there were also some other threads of more dubious relevance.
IBdaMann and his "Climate Marxism" thread could just be one of the sideshows.
But for a week it was the ONLY show at Climate Debate, and it is STILL being dragged out for endless "debate".
Even if it were possible for women to change from XX to XY chromosomes by abstaining from having orgasms, what is the point of discussing it as if it were relevant to "CLIMATE MARXISM"?
It would be wonderful if it were possible to have a rational discussion about science related to global change on a DIFFERENT thread, while the trolls all stay busy obsessing over penis size on THIS thread.
To dream the impossible dream... |
| 05-09-2024 19:10 |
Spongy Iris★★★★☆
(1785) |
Im a BM wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
There certainly aren't any body parts missing in these women boxers. Try to stay on topic instead of playing random syntax games.
Male is not female. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR SYNTAX GAMES ON ANYBODY ELSE!
What astounding insight.
Look I can play too.
Red is not white.
Yellow is not black.
Now can we get back on the topic of how these boxers are women? How do you think these women got XY chromosomes?
Syntax games won't work. You'll have to do better.
Khelif and Yu-Ting
Rule in the ring
They don't masturbate
True Climate Debate
Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. No argument presented. You'll have to do better.
Talking about yourself again
LIF. Grow up.
Keep fantasizing ... Keep your sexual problems to yourself.
Climate Debate is about Sounding The Trumpet of the world's sexual problems.
And again you guys are the ones fantasizing about boxers with micro dicks, not me.
Im just speculating that when women abstain from orgasms for many years, that might cause them to develop XY chromosomes.
Climate Debate.
Gotta love it!
It seems to me that there are many millions of women who are NOT boxers, nor have they ever experienced an orgasm in their entire life. And I am pretty sure that they NEVER "develop XY chromosomes" as a consequence.
Indeed, there are millions of women who had their genitals deliberately mutilated in order to ensure that they never experience an orgasm. This occurs in just a handful of countries, so if it causes chromosome transformation, those would be the places where it would be expected to occur at high rates.
But it is absurd and anti scientific to think women can develop male chromosomes by doing or not doing ANYTHING.
It would be one thing if anyone on this website were allowed to have a rational discussion about climate change, and there were also some other threads of more dubious relevance.
IBdaMann and his "Climate Marxism" thread could just be one of the sideshows.
But for a week it was the ONLY show at Climate Debate, and it is STILL being dragged out for endless "debate".
Even if it were possible for women to change from XX to XY chromosomes by abstaining from having orgasms, what is the point of discussing it as if it were relevant to "CLIMATE MARXISM"?
It would be wonderful if it were possible to have a rational discussion about science related to global change on a DIFFERENT thread, while the trolls all stay busy obsessing over penis size on THIS thread.
To dream the impossible dream...
I doubt there are as many women as you think who have quit orgasms. It is a hell of an addictive pleasure that very few talk about, which I think is just about universal in its impact of humanity.
And again, I'm just speculating about how this kind of "fast" may change the blood of women. It seems we have an interesting mystery in this news story.
I feel like it is a fountain of youth to abstain from orgasms always, and I notice major improvements trying this after my health began to rapidly decline at 41. I now almost feel like a 44 year old man child.
I thought it would be understood that a fountain of youth meant the potential to live forever.
And if everybody could live forever, by abstaining from the activity that grows population, and the world's population stays steady, forever, that solves the problem of climate change.
|