Remember me
▼ Content

Olympics and Climate Marxism



Page 4 of 6<<<23456>
21-08-2024 07:30
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: But according to you, Khelif and Yu-Ting are secretly males.

Not secretly. Overtly. The IBA let that cat out of the bag and now the world, to include you, is aware that both Khelif and Yu-Ting are males with XY chromosomes.

Senator Claire Chandler from Tasmania is Recognized


Well now that you have Claire Chandler on your side, it's only a matter of time before the tide turns, no doubt.

I'm still holding my breath waiting for the arrests of Khelif and Yu-Ting.

Given the iron clad evidence from the IBA, and the danger posed by this crime, how soon do you think we can get a judge to sign off on a warrant for their arrests?




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
21-08-2024 10:45
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote:Well now that you have Claire Chandler on your side, it's only a matter of time before the tide turns, no doubt.

It's not so much a turning of the tide as it is the avalanche falling.

Spongy Iris wrote: I'm still holding my breath waiting for the arrests of Khelif and Yu-Ting.

Your sticking of your head in the sand doesn't conceal your sickness. Your pivots won't convince anyone.

21-08-2024 17:27
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:Well now that you have Claire Chandler on your side, it's only a matter of time before the tide turns, no doubt.

It's not so much a turning of the tide as it is the avalanche falling.

Spongy Iris wrote: I'm still holding my breath waiting for the arrests of Khelif and Yu-Ting.

Your sticking of your head in the sand doesn't conceal your sickness. Your pivots won't convince anyone.



Hey Jack ass, the IBA's evidence is about as convincing as the false cover Sputnik launch. You are trusting a very conflicted source.

Honestly, I think Khelif and Yu-Ting may have dominated because they retained their life force, like Tyson said he did for 5 years, after he was looking for glory as a 12 year old.

It is not only beneficial to males to practice this, but also females. I do not have any doubt Khelif and Yu-Ting are female. Now perhaps on another unseen level, their practice did kill the "women" attached to them.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
Edited on 21-08-2024 17:37
21-08-2024 19:25
gfm7175Profile picture★★★★★
(3343)
Spongy Iris wrote:
Hey Jack ass,

@IbdaMann -- You've made Spongy angry now...
21-08-2024 19:49
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
gfm7175 wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
Hey Jack ass,

@IbdaMann -- You've made Spongy angry now...


I have just about pissed off all the chill in me

Bitches be trippin and losing their grip




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
Edited on 21-08-2024 19:53
22-08-2024 07:00
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: Hey Jack ass, the IBA's evidence is about as convincing as the false cover Sputnik launch.

Let's see, two blood tests at independent labs, verifying their XY chromosomes.

Hmmmm. You find that unconvincing?

Spongy Iris wrote: I do not have any doubt Khelif and Yu-Ting are female.

You have no doubt that two XY chromosome-confirmed men are female. You are brilliant.
22-08-2024 17:19
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Hey Jack ass, the IBA's evidence is about as convincing as the false cover Sputnik launch.

Let's see, two blood tests at independent labs, verifying their XY chromosomes.

Hmmmm. You find that unconvincing?

Spongy Iris wrote: I do not have any doubt Khelif and Yu-Ting are female.

You have no doubt that two XY chromosome-confirmed men are female. You are brilliant.


Conflicted witness. Probably pushing some kind of lie or half baked truth or just foolish to believe they know it all about biology.

Hey look I can agree with you, the fights looked like God pounding on Man..

But I'm not going to accuse these 2 ladies of being gentlemen, nor play secret word games about the definition of Woman.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
22-08-2024 21:13
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: Conflicted witness.

An independent lab conducting a blind blood test is somehow a conflicted witness?

... and you are certain that men with XY chromosomes are female?

At least you're not reaching.

Spongy Iris wrote: But I'm not going to accuse these 2 ladies of being gentlemen,

These men have XY chromosomes, which they have had since they began forming in the womb.

Spongy Iris wrote: nor play secret word games about the definition of Woman.

The defining attributes of men and women are not secret. Men have XY chromosomes and women XX chromosomes. There are no other biological definitions.
23-08-2024 03:28
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(24251)
Spongy Iris wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Hey Jack ass, the IBA's evidence is about as convincing as the false cover Sputnik launch.

Let's see, two blood tests at independent labs, verifying their XY chromosomes.

Hmmmm. You find that unconvincing?

Spongy Iris wrote: I do not have any doubt Khelif and Yu-Ting are female.

You have no doubt that two XY chromosome-confirmed men are female. You are brilliant.


Conflicted witness. Probably pushing some kind of lie or half baked truth or just foolish to believe they know it all about biology.

Hey look I can agree with you, the fights looked like God pounding on Man..

But I'm not going to accuse these 2 ladies of being gentlemen, nor play secret word games about the definition of Woman.

You are playing word games. It is no secret.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
23-08-2024 04:46
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Hey Jack ass, the IBA's evidence is about as convincing as the false cover Sputnik launch.

Let's see, two blood tests at independent labs, verifying their XY chromosomes.

Hmmmm. You find that unconvincing?

Spongy Iris wrote: I do not have any doubt Khelif and Yu-Ting are female.

You have no doubt that two XY chromosome-confirmed men are female. You are brilliant.


Conflicted witness. Probably pushing some kind of lie or half baked truth or just foolish to believe they know it all about biology.

Hey look I can agree with you, the fights looked like God pounding on Man..

But I'm not going to accuse these 2 ladies of being gentlemen, nor play secret word games about the definition of Woman.

You are playing word games. It is no secret.


It's called a conversation. You should try it some time instead of breaking apart words like a kidnapper writing a ransom note.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
23-08-2024 05:24
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Conflicted witness.

An independent lab conducting a blind blood test is somehow a conflicted witness?

... and you are certain that men with XY chromosomes are female?

At least you're not reaching.

Spongy Iris wrote: But I'm not going to accuse these 2 ladies of being gentlemen,

These men have XY chromosomes, which they have had since they began forming in the womb.

Spongy Iris wrote: nor play secret word games about the definition of Woman.

The defining attributes of men and women are not secret. Men have XY chromosomes and women XX chromosomes. There are no other biological definitions.


Here we go on the merry go round again.

XY chromosome female gives birth to 2 children, unassisted pregnancies.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2190741/




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
Edited on 23-08-2024 05:29
23-08-2024 19:27
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: Here we go on the merry go round again.

Nope. You simply didn't read it.

Spongy Iris wrote: XY chromosome female gives birth to 2 children, unassisted pregnancies.

I realize that's what you desperately want it to say. Unfortunately it reads entirely differently, if you actually read it for comprehension.

A woman gave birth. She has XX chromosomes ... except for her skin and ovaries, which developed XY chromosomes due to a genetic disorder.

Her children include males, of the Imane Khelif type, who do not have developed genetalia and who cannot have children.


You were thrown off by the article's misgendering of the son as an "XY daughter" and using female pronouns.
Edited on 23-08-2024 19:31
23-08-2024 21:03
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Here we go on the merry go round again.

Nope. You simply didn't read it.

Spongy Iris wrote: XY chromosome female gives birth to 2 children, unassisted pregnancies.

I realize that's what you desperately want it to say. Unfortunately it reads entirely differently, if you actually read it for comprehension.

A woman gave birth. She has XX chromosomes ... except for her skin and ovaries, which developed XY chromosomes due to a genetic disorder.

Her children include males, of the Imane Khelif type, who do not have developed genetalia and who cannot have children.


You were thrown off by the article's misgendering of the son as an "XY daughter" and using female pronouns.


So you admit this is an example of XY chromosomes in the skin and ovaries of a female who gave birth to 2 children.

Your biological definition of a woman is not absolute. Are you now ready to conclude the argument?




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
23-08-2024 22:41
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: So you admit this is an example of XY chromosomes in the skin and ovaries of a female who gave birth to 2 children.

I don't really know. What I do know is the following:

1. You lied about what the article read
2. For some reason, the authors of the article happen to adhere to the WOKE agenda, as you do, and place that political agenda above the integrity of the medical information they seek to share, compromising the entire article.

Whereas I don't know what to believe in that article, beyond the intention to push an agenda, I do see that you are totally irrational and dishonest on this subject.

To answer your question, I can certainly entertain the possibility that a woman nonetheless developed skin and ovaries with XY chromosomes. Further, I can see how any disorder that causes that to happen to a woman's ovaries can cause terrible detriment to offspring resulting from those ovaries, e.g. male offspring with unformed genetalia. Sure. We can discuss such possibilities.

However, such abnormalities don't create a new gender. It is wrong to refer to a male with a defect as an "XY female."

Spongy Iris wrote: Your biological definition of a woman is not absolute.

Yes, it absolutely is.

Spongy Iris wrote: Are you now ready to conclude the argument?

It ended years ago, but perhaps you missed it.

Please watch this video and let me know what part(s) you find to be mistaken, and with what part(s) you disagree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YMhkweABfQ
24-08-2024 08:43
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(24251)
Spongy Iris wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Hey Jack ass, the IBA's evidence is about as convincing as the false cover Sputnik launch.

Let's see, two blood tests at independent labs, verifying their XY chromosomes.

Hmmmm. You find that unconvincing?

Spongy Iris wrote: I do not have any doubt Khelif and Yu-Ting are female.

You have no doubt that two XY chromosome-confirmed men are female. You are brilliant.


Conflicted witness. Probably pushing some kind of lie or half baked truth or just foolish to believe they know it all about biology.

Hey look I can agree with you, the fights looked like God pounding on Man..

But I'm not going to accuse these 2 ladies of being gentlemen, nor play secret word games about the definition of Woman.

You are playing word games. It is no secret.


It's called a conversation. You should try it some time instead of breaking apart words like a kidnapper writing a ransom note.

Word games are not a conversation. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ANYBODY ELSE!


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
24-08-2024 18:57
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: So you admit this is an example of XY chromosomes in the skin and ovaries of a female who gave birth to 2 children.

I don't really know. What I do know is the following:

1. You lied about what the article read
2. For some reason, the authors of the article happen to adhere to the WOKE agenda, as you do, and place that political agenda above the integrity of the medical information they seek to share, compromising the entire article.

Whereas I don't know what to believe in that article, beyond the intention to push an agenda, I do see that you are totally irrational and dishonest on this subject.

To answer your question, I can certainly entertain the possibility that a woman nonetheless developed skin and ovaries with XY chromosomes. Further, I can see how any disorder that causes that to happen to a woman's ovaries can cause terrible detriment to offspring resulting from those ovaries, e.g. male offspring with unformed genetalia. Sure. We can discuss such possibilities.

However, such abnormalities don't create a new gender. It is wrong to refer to a male with a defect as an "XY female."

Spongy Iris wrote: Your biological definition of a woman is not absolute.

Yes, it absolutely is.

Spongy Iris wrote: Are you now ready to conclude the argument?

It ended years ago, but perhaps you missed it.

Please watch this video and let me know what part(s) you find to be mistaken, and with what part(s) you disagree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YMhkweABfQ


The article said a female with xy chromosomes gave birth to 2 babies unassisted. Fact.

This is just to show it is possible for a female to test positive for xy chromosomes. Nothing more.

I have no idea what Khelif's and Yu-Ting's circumstances are, for why they apparently tested positive for xy chromosomes. Unless you are omniscient, neither do you. For you to state that Khelif is just like the son in the study, again shows you display omniscience fallacy.

This topic is speculative, and any conclusive type of comments should be qualified as opinions. Since you can't qualify anything you say as opinion, and assert all your statements to be true, that makes you the liar here.

Furthermore, you assert that there is some grand cultural agenda behind this event. That qualifies you as a conspiracy theorist. Yet you consistently deny being a conspiracy theorist. Why can't you own it?

Here is a conspiracy theory type of comment I found, made by Khelif's sparring partner, published by the NY Post.

Joana Nwamerue claimed that she was approached by teammates of Khelif's and that the newly crowned gold medalist had been "biologically altered" by her environment.

Khelif's team mates said she is a woman and just lives high in the mountains with her relatives and parents and so there may be a change in her testosterone or chromosomes and the like.... I think we played three-to-four sparring sessions. I have a record of everything. I can confirm that this is a man to me. Male power. Men's techniques, everything.


https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/sports/imane-khelifs-ex-sparring-partners-bizarre-claims-after-olympic-controversy/




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
Edited on 24-08-2024 18:59
25-08-2024 12:54
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: The article said a female with xy chromosomes gave birth to 2 babies unassisted.

You are making a lie by omission. The female had XX chromosomes in her blood and everywhere she had no genetic disorders, but had XY chromosomes in the skin and ovaries due to genetic disorders.

The female had XX chromosomes. Fact.

Spongy Iris wrote: This is just to show it is possible for a female to test positive for xy chromosomes.

... in some organs/glands, but not in her blood and not in any normally developed organs and glands. You can't omit that part.

Spongy Iris wrote: I have no idea what Khelif's and Yu-Ting's circumstances are

Liar. Yes you do.

Spongy Iris wrote: For you to state that Khelif is just like the son in the study, again shows you display omniscience fallacy.

You were the one who presented the example. The omniscience fallacy is yours.

Spongy Iris wrote: This topic is speculative,

The biology is not speculative.

Spongy Iris wrote: Furthermore, you assert that there is some grand cultural agenda behind this event.

Are you talking about WOKE? That's an observation, not some mere unsupported claim. The world listened to the IOC President's lame justification for allowing men into the women's games.

Spongy Iris wrote: That qualifies you as a conspiracy theorist.

Nope. What qualifies me as a conspiracy theorist is that I fully recognize that humans conspire every day all over the world. Tell me, why do you deny it? I'll tell you right now that such denial makes you a moron.

Spongy Iris wrote: Yet you consistently deny being a conspiracy theorist. Why can't you own it?

Show me where I even once denied that humans conspire or issue me an apology.
Edited on 25-08-2024 12:54
25-08-2024 21:44
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: The article said a female with xy chromosomes gave birth to 2 babies unassisted.

You are making a lie by omission. The female had XX chromosomes in her blood and everywhere she had no genetic disorders, but had XY chromosomes in the skin and ovaries due to genetic disorders.

The female had XX chromosomes. Fact.

Spongy Iris wrote: This is just to show it is possible for a female to test positive for xy chromosomes.

... in some organs/glands, but not in her blood and not in any normally developed organs and glands. You can't omit that part.

Spongy Iris wrote: I have no idea what Khelif's and Yu-Ting's circumstances are

Liar. Yes you do.

Spongy Iris wrote: For you to state that Khelif is just like the son in the study, again shows you display omniscience fallacy.

You were the one who presented the example. The omniscience fallacy is yours.

Spongy Iris wrote: This topic is speculative,

The biology is not speculative.

Spongy Iris wrote: Furthermore, you assert that there is some grand cultural agenda behind this event.

Are you talking about WOKE? That's an observation, not some mere unsupported claim. The world listened to the IOC President's lame justification for allowing men into the women's games.

Spongy Iris wrote: That qualifies you as a conspiracy theorist.

Nope. What qualifies me as a conspiracy theorist is that I fully recognize that humans conspire every day all over the world. Tell me, why do you deny it? I'll tell you right now that such denial makes you a moron.

Spongy Iris wrote: Yet you consistently deny being a conspiracy theorist. Why can't you own it?

Show me where I even once denied that humans conspire or issue me an apology.


You're spread thin, in your lame accusation. I just provided a generalized fact to show it is possible for a female to have xy chromosomes. We don't know how this happened in Khelif and in Yu Ting do we?

There was no lie that males were allowed to compete in female boxing. You're lying by calling these 2 ladies gentlemen. I'm fairly certain of this, that is.

But since you apparently know all about the nature of the conspiracy that has occurred, please lay it out for me again.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
26-08-2024 03:29
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: You're spread thin,

So, you're not going to apologize?

Spongy Iris wrote: I just provided a generalized fact to show it is possible for a female to have xy chromosomes.

You used misleading weasel-wording to omit the fact that the woman had XX chromosomes, because your overarching purpose is to be dishonest. You didn't say that she had some XY chromosomes, you said only that she had XY chromosomes. You lied by omission.

Spongy Iris wrote: We don't know how this happened in Khelif and in Yu Ting do we?

Yes, we do. An enzyme deficiency caused their male genetalia to not develop, causing them to be misgendered at birth by doctors/nurses/midwives who filled out the birth certificate as "female" based on the absence of a penis, leading to the dishonest people of the world (e.g. you, the press, the Olympic committee, WOKE people, et. al.) to assert that they were "born female," causing the unimaginable tragedy of the boys being taken home and raised as girls, leading to the dishonest people of the world (e.g. you, the press, the Olympic committee, WOKE people, et. al.) to assert that they "always self-identified as female," leading to a horrifically traumatic realization upon reaching puberty that forced these men to tragically seek alternate gender affirmation by competing in women's sports.

Spongy Iris wrote: There was no lie that males were allowed to compete in female boxing.

... because it's not a lie.

Spongy Iris wrote: You're lying by calling these 2 ladies gentlemen.

Nope. You are lying by calling these men women.
26-08-2024 07:38
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: You're spread thin,

So, you're not going to apologize?

Spongy Iris wrote: I just provided a generalized fact to show it is possible for a female to have xy chromosomes.

You used misleading weasel-wording to omit the fact that the woman had XX chromosomes, because your overarching purpose is to be dishonest. You didn't say that she had some XY chromosomes, you said only that she had XY chromosomes. You lied by omission.

Spongy Iris wrote: We don't know how this happened in Khelif and in Yu Ting do we?

Yes, we do. An enzyme deficiency caused their male genetalia to not develop, causing them to be misgendered at birth by doctors/nurses/midwives who filled out the birth certificate as "female" based on the absence of a penis, leading to the dishonest people of the world (e.g. you, the press, the Olympic committee, WOKE people, et. al.) to assert that they were "born female," causing the unimaginable tragedy of the boys being taken home and raised as girls, leading to the dishonest people of the world (e.g. you, the press, the Olympic committee, WOKE people, et. al.) to assert that they "always self-identified as female," leading to a horrifically traumatic realization upon reaching puberty that forced these men to tragically seek alternate gender affirmation by competing in women's sports.

Spongy Iris wrote: There was no lie that males were allowed to compete in female boxing.

... because it's not a lie.

Spongy Iris wrote: You're lying by calling these 2 ladies gentlemen.

Nope. You are lying by calling these men women.


Your statements show you have no clue about Khelif's and Yu Ting's biology, other than trusting a claim that they have XY chromosomes, by the IBA.

And even if that claim is correct, you still can't rule out that they are anatomically female.

You're over-reaching by diagnosing them medically. You're spread thin.

You really should assert your statement as an opinion. I will do it for you.

Your opinion shows a motive that is very unlikely: two males deceiving the authorities about their gender to win Olympic gold.

If your opinion is proven to be true, it means I can expect the arrests of Khelif and Yu Ting.

But I bet that never happens, because your opinion will never be proven to be true.

IMO, you are way off base as far as what the real story is here.

https://youtu.be/CNweikbZyrE?si=qeygClMKNKVat2b2

I don't believe Khelif and Yu-Ting have any disorders. Their performances shows them to be in perfect health.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
Edited on 26-08-2024 08:06
27-08-2024 19:25
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: Your statements show you have no clue about Khelif's and Yu Ting's biology, other than trusting a claim that they have XY chromosomes, by the IBA.

You backed yourself into a corner whereby you will not admit that you cannot be honest with yourself, much less with anyone else.

Spongy Iris wrote: You're over-reaching by diagnosing them medically. You're spread thin.

You are projecting. You cannot reconcile the lies you are telling yourself. I feel sorry for you.

Spongy Iris wrote: If your opinion is proven to be true, it means I can expect the arrests of Khelif and Yu Ting.

Your coping mechanism is to characterize reality as the delusion. You pretend to "confirm" your self-delusion by pointing to the absence of FBI agents swarming in to arrest people. I truly pity you.
28-08-2024 00:08
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Your statements show you have no clue about Khelif's and Yu Ting's biology, other than trusting a claim that they have XY chromosomes, by the IBA.

You backed yourself into a corner whereby you will not admit that you cannot be honest with yourself, much less with anyone else.

Spongy Iris wrote: You're over-reaching by diagnosing them medically. You're spread thin.

You are projecting. You cannot reconcile the lies you are telling yourself. I feel sorry for you.

Spongy Iris wrote: If your opinion is proven to be true, it means I can expect the arrests of Khelif and Yu Ting.

Your coping mechanism is to characterize reality as the delusion. You pretend to "confirm" your self-delusion by pointing to the absence of FBI agents swarming in to arrest people. I truly pity you.


There is simply not enough information to medically diagnose their anatomy.

You have been exposed!

https://youtu.be/4S1Kkm8gtic?si=HnWRG4UIdSapa02C




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
28-08-2024 08:45
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: There is simply not enough information to medically diagnose their anatomy.

No anatomy need by diagnosed. They are men with XY chromosomes.
28-08-2024 22:51
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: There is simply not enough information to medically diagnose their anatomy.

No anatomy need by diagnosed. They are men with XY chromosomes.


There is a conflict.

The competitors, their parents, doctors, and state identities say female.

You should probably respect that their histories show female identities. Innocent until proven guilty. I bet that a diagnosis of anatomy would prove your assumptions to be wrong.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
29-08-2024 06:46
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: There is a conflict.

You just pivoted again. Conflict?

Spongy Iris wrote: The competitors, their parents, doctors, and state identities say female.

First, it doesn't matter who says what. Khelif and Yu-Ting are, in fact, male, because of their XY chromosomes. That put the period on this discussion before it started.

Second, competitors all say "male" and find it totally unacceptable.



Third, their parents and doctors imposed the most cruel of injustices on them by misgendering them at birth, and tragically condemning them to be raised as girls. Of course their parents treated them as females, and of course as children they thought they were girls. A terrible mistake on the part of parents and doctors does not transform boys into girls. Khelif and Yu-Ting were boys with XY chromosomes the entire time, and when they reached puberty, the confusion and mental anguish must have been unbearable.

You should probably respect the wishes of female athletes who don't want men to be allowed into women's sports, and you should grow a conscience that abhors the idea of men beating the shit out of women, not being delighted by it.
29-08-2024 07:52
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: There is a conflict.

You just pivoted again. Conflict?

Spongy Iris wrote: The competitors, their parents, doctors, and state identities say female.

First, it doesn't matter who says what. Khelif and Yu-Ting are, in fact, male, because of their XY chromosomes. That put the period on this discussion before it started.

Second, competitors all say "male" and find it totally unacceptable.



Third, their parents and doctors imposed the most cruel of injustices on them by misgendering them at birth, and tragically condemning them to be raised as girls. Of course their parents treated them as females, and of course as children they thought they were girls. A terrible mistake on the part of parents and doctors does not transform boys into girls. Khelif and Yu-Ting were boys with XY chromosomes the entire time, and when they reached puberty, the confusion and mental anguish must have been unbearable.

You should probably respect the wishes of female athletes who don't want men to be allowed into women's sports, and you should grow a conscience that abhors the idea of men beating the shit out of women, not being delighted by it.


This matter is not settled science.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
30-08-2024 02:35
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote:This matter is not settled science.

It is. Watch the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YMhkweABfQ
30-08-2024 04:23
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote:This matter is not settled science.

It is.


Again, if the matter is settled, where are the arrests?




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
30-08-2024 19:40
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: Again, if the matter is settled, where are the arrests?

The two are not related.

You are struggling to maintain your self-delusion. Why?
30-08-2024 22:50
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Again, if the matter is settled, where are the arrests?

The two are not related.

You are struggling to maintain your self-delusion. Why?


They indeed are related.

It is not legal for men to compete in women's boxing.

Any men found deceiving authorities to do this would be arrested.

DNA tests are used to prosecute violent offenders frequently.

Sounds like a slam dunk case to me! What's the hold up?!




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
31-08-2024 09:18
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: They indeed are related.

They are not related.

Spongy Iris wrote: It is not legal for men to compete in women's boxing.

It is legal.

Spongy Iris wrote: Any men found deceiving authorities to do this would be arrested.

Subjunctive error. You don't get to claim that something that is not the case nonetheless somehow would be the case.

Spongy Iris wrote: DNA tests are used to prosecute violent offenders frequently.

Yes. Irrelevant.

Spongy Iris wrote: Sounds like a slam dunk case to me!

Nope. It's not illegal in the first place.
31-08-2024 17:36
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: They indeed are related.

They are not related.

Spongy Iris wrote: It is not legal for men to compete in women's boxing.

It is legal.

Spongy Iris wrote: Any men found deceiving authorities to do this would be arrested.

Subjunctive error. You don't get to claim that something that is not the case nonetheless somehow would be the case.

Spongy Iris wrote: DNA tests are used to prosecute violent offenders frequently.

Yes. Irrelevant.

Spongy Iris wrote: Sounds like a slam dunk case to me!

Nope. It's not illegal in the first place.



At the Olympics, it is not legal for men to compete in women's boxing.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
01-09-2024 04:44
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
Spongy Iris wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: They indeed are related.

They are not related.

Spongy Iris wrote: It is not legal for men to compete in women's boxing.

It is legal.

Spongy Iris wrote: Any men found deceiving authorities to do this would be arrested.

Subjunctive error. You don't get to claim that something that is not the case nonetheless somehow would be the case.

Spongy Iris wrote: DNA tests are used to prosecute violent offenders frequently.

Yes. Irrelevant.

Spongy Iris wrote: Sounds like a slam dunk case to me!

Nope. It's not illegal in the first place.



At the Olympics, it is not legal for men to compete in women's boxing.


Algeria most certainly does not tolerate men competing in women's boxing.




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
01-09-2024 05:15
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: At the Olympics, it is not legal for men to compete in women's boxing.

It is entirely legal. The world watched it occur. The IOC declared the men to be women and allowed them to compete against women.
02-09-2024 01:56
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: At the Olympics, it is not legal for men to compete in women's boxing.

It is entirely legal. The world watched it occur. The IOC declared the men to be women and allowed them to compete against women.


Nope, you are declaring women to be men.

Again, Algerian authorities would not tolerate a man pretending to be a woman in the Olympics.

Khelif's team mates vouched for her, saying she is a woman. That should be convincing as they may know her intimately. They said she just trains and lives in the mountains with her family, and that may have resulted in a change in her chromosomes.

That's very subtle innuendo. I prefer to be explicit.

Have you heard the "myth" about boxers avoiding sex (orgasms) to achieve their greatest potential?




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
Edited on 02-09-2024 01:58
02-09-2024 03:09
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: Nope, you are declaring women to be men.

Nope. I declare males to be those with XY chromosomes, i.e. per the definition, and females to be those with XX chromosomes, i.e. per the definition.

You, on the other hand, are declaring males, i.e. those with XY chromosomes, to be female.

Error, on your part.

Spongy Iris wrote: Again, Algerian authorities would not tolerate ...

You do not get to speak for what Algerian authorities would not tolerate, especially when they just finished "tolerating" it.

Spongy Iris wrote: Khelif's team mates vouched for her,

There is no such thing as "vouching" for someone having different chromosomes.

Spongy Iris wrote: They said she just trains and lives in the mountains with her family, and that may have resulted in a change in her chromosomes.

Living and training in the mountains cannot change one's chromosomes.
02-09-2024 04:24
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Nope, you are declaring women to be men.

Nope. I declare males to be those with XY chromosomes, i.e. per the definition, and females to be those with XX chromosomes, i.e. per the definition.

You, on the other hand, are declaring males, i.e. those with XY chromosomes, to be female.

Error, on your part.

Spongy Iris wrote: Again, Algerian authorities would not tolerate ...

You do not get to speak for what Algerian authorities would not tolerate, especially when they just finished "tolerating" it.

Spongy Iris wrote: Khelif's team mates vouched for her,

There is no such thing as "vouching" for someone having different chromosomes.

Spongy Iris wrote: They said she just trains and lives in the mountains with her family, and that may have resulted in a change in her chromosomes.

Living and training in the mountains cannot change one's chromosomes.


Yet again you avoid the real topic behind this news story.

How does a woman get XY chromosomes?

Is there a particular reason why you are not addressing the "myth" about boxers improving their performance by quitting orgasms?




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
02-09-2024 20:50
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote: Yet again you avoid the real topic behind this news story.

... because it belongs in the other thread you created. You are simply derailing this discussion for an irrelevant topic.

Spongy Iris wrote: Is there a particular reason why you are not addressing the "myth" about boxers improving their performance by quitting orgasms?

Old wives tails are inappropriate in this thread.
02-09-2024 21:41
Spongy IrisProfile picture★★★★★
(3538)
IBdaMann wrote:
Spongy Iris wrote: Yet again you avoid the real topic behind this news story.

... because it belongs in the other thread you created. You are simply derailing this discussion for an irrelevant topic.

Spongy Iris wrote: Is there a particular reason why you are not addressing the "myth" about boxers improving their performance by quitting orgasms?

Old wives tails are inappropriate in this thread.


How else would a woman get XY chromosomes?




https://uccastandoff12424.blogspot.com/2024/01/this-blog-post-is-about-relationship.html
03-09-2024 00:49
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(15313)
Spongy Iris wrote:How else would a woman get XY chromosomes?

Invalid question.

Correct Questions:

QUESTION: How can a man, using his own blood, fool an independent laboratory blood test into rendering a false positive for being female?
ANSWER: He can't.

QUESTION: How can a male newborn fool a delivering doctor/nurse into thinking he's a baby girl?
ANSWER: By having an undeveloped penis.

QUESTION: How can the IOC be convinced to allow a man to compete in women's boxing?
ANSWER: By having an undeveloped penis and a birth certificate confirming that he fooled the delivering doctor/nurse.

But you are putting the cart before the horse. The topic involves the specific men who competed in the Paris Olympic boxing who you contend are actually women. You have no reason to believe either Khelif or Yu-Ting have any XX chromosomes. You have no reason to believe that either is a woman.

On the other hand, any onlooker to either of their gold medal bouts won't have any doubt that they are men. It's obvious. Even if nothing is known about their XY chromosomes, they will be assumed. If one were to only watch their performances throughout the competition, i.e. never even losing even a single round, it would be obvious that they are both men.

It is you who has to be asked how you allowed yourself to be convinced that these men were somehow women, and why you didn't change your stance the moment you learned they had XY chromosomes. Until you clarify, the only possible assumption is that you relish watching men beat the living crap out of women.
Page 4 of 6<<<23456>





Join the debate Olympics and Climate Marxism:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Climate at the Olympics129-07-2024 19:50
Marxism, Climate and Utter Dishonesty6401-10-2019 06:40
Amy Kloubuchar uses snow to prove there is climate change. Now that's top level Marxism.613-02-2019 23:05
What is this Church of Marxism?17216-10-2016 19:41
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact