Remember me
▼ Content

Objectivity of Environmental Science


Objectivity of Environmental Science09-08-2019 01:27
olyz
★☆☆☆☆
(87)
Books on the subject on Amazon don't show a table of contents- unusual.
However, I did find table of contents of two on line and one had a chapter on greenhouse gases and the other on global warming. Can you guess why? Hint: it ain't about agriculture.

To an environmental scientist global warming is up there with the law of gravity.

Chapters on planned environments reminded me of the 5yr plans of the early Soviet Union.

If the newspapers suddenly announced there was no such thing as global warming they would flip so fast you would feel the breeze.
Edited on 09-08-2019 01:33
09-08-2019 02:13
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(6245)
olyz wrote:To an environmental scientist global warming is up there with the law of gravity.

You are, of course, free to use whatever terms you wish but you need to define them. Clearly when you write "environmental scientist" you really mean "Climate Scientist."

olyz wrote: If the newspapers suddenly announced there was no such thing as global warming they would flip so fast you would feel the breeze.

They would be religiously offended in the same way fundamentalist Christians would be if the newspapers were to announce "Darwinism proves Creationism FALSE." They simply would not accept it and would cease to trust the newspapers.


.


Sea level varies from place to place in the world - keepit

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
Join the debate Objectivity of Environmental Science:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
There is still no Global Warming science.27123-03-2020 07:26
Etymology of Science5908-02-2020 12:09
Mobile carbonalyser: an app to estimate your mobile environmental impact1109-01-2020 02:25
Western Science - is it declining?1124-12-2019 12:43
About the damage that Obama did to science.18417-12-2019 05:36
Articles
Appendix C - China's Environmental Crisis
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact