Remember me
▼ Content

Objectivity of Environmental Science


Objectivity of Environmental Science09-08-2019 01:27
olyz
★☆☆☆☆
(72)
Books on the subject on Amazon don't show a table of contents- unusual.
However, I did find table of contents of two on line and one had a chapter on greenhouse gases and the other on global warming. Can you guess why? Hint: it ain't about agriculture.

To an environmental scientist global warming is up there with the law of gravity.

Chapters on planned environments reminded me of the 5yr plans of the early Soviet Union.

If the newspapers suddenly announced there was no such thing as global warming they would flip so fast you would feel the breeze.
Edited on 09-08-2019 01:33
09-08-2019 02:13
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4906)
olyz wrote:To an environmental scientist global warming is up there with the law of gravity.

You are, of course, free to use whatever terms you wish but you need to define them. Clearly when you write "environmental scientist" you really mean "Climate Scientist."

olyz wrote: If the newspapers suddenly announced there was no such thing as global warming they would flip so fast you would feel the breeze.

They would be religiously offended in the same way fundamentalist Christians would be if the newspapers were to announce "Darwinism proves Creationism FALSE." They simply would not accept it and would cease to trust the newspapers.


.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
Join the debate Objectivity of Environmental Science:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Argument against AGW science314-08-2019 20:51
Crown Capital Management Environmental Reviews 16 Things That Colleges are Doing to Help the Environment509-08-2019 23:48
Still No Climate Change Science1111-07-2019 04:23
Trump Administration's Attempts to Limit Climate Change Science 'Like Designing Cars Without Seat128-05-2019 20:13
Trump Administration Hardens Its Attack on Climate Science028-05-2019 15:12
Articles
Appendix C - China's Environmental Crisis
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact