Objectivity of Environmental Science
| Objectivity of Environmental Science09-08-2019 01:27 | |
| olyz★☆☆☆☆ (87) |
Books on the subject on Amazon don't show a table of contents- unusual. However, I did find table of contents of two on line and one had a chapter on greenhouse gases and the other on global warming. Can you guess why? Hint: it ain't about agriculture. To an environmental scientist global warming is up there with the law of gravity. Chapters on planned environments reminded me of the 5yr plans of the early Soviet Union. If the newspapers suddenly announced there was no such thing as global warming they would flip so fast you would feel the breeze. Edited on 09-08-2019 01:33 |
| 09-08-2019 02:13 | |
IBdaMann ★★★★★(14403) |
olyz wrote:To an environmental scientist global warming is up there with the law of gravity. You are, of course, free to use whatever terms you wish but you need to define them. Clearly when you write "environmental scientist" you really mean "Climate Scientist." olyz wrote: If the newspapers suddenly announced there was no such thing as global warming they would flip so fast you would feel the breeze. They would be religiously offended in the same way fundamentalist Christians would be if the newspapers were to announce "Darwinism proves Creationism FALSE." They simply would not accept it and would cease to trust the newspapers. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
Join the debate Objectivity of Environmental Science:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| The History of Science | 10 | 22-04-2024 16:30 |
| There is still no Global Warming science. | 387 | 28-02-2024 23:50 |
| A Science Test | 18 | 09-12-2023 00:53 |
| Magic or Science | 7 | 06-12-2023 00:29 |
| Science and Atmospheric Chemistry | 6 | 25-11-2023 20:55 |
| Articles |
| Appendix C - China's Environmental Crisis |