|Now About that Greenhouse Gas25-02-2017 19:00|
|I suggest you read this all the way through. This also has an reference to a paper written on this subject.|
|Into the Night★★★★★
This site is written by a guy that actually knows his stuff pretty well.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
Into the Night wrote:Wake wrote:
Especially if you consider that the CO2 is being said by NASA and NOAA to lead to positive feedback. It that were the case why wouldn't any past fluctuations lead to the unbreakable positive feedback and the Earth reduced to an ash.
So any positive feedback could ONLY occur between the levels of approximately 0 ppm and perhaps 100 or slightly less ppm.
This also underscores my earlier claim that there is no energy in the bands that CO2 absorbs in. So this small amount of energy is either radiated to the next CO2 molecule of far more likely conducted to the next adjacent atoms that compose 99.06% of the atmosphere simply by collision and losing the energy that otherwise might be radiated.
Wake wrote: NASA and NOAA to lead to positive feedback.
|The "radiative Greenhouse effect" does not exist||128||12-03-2020 02:10|
|Greenhouse Gas and Warming||110||11-02-2020 17:48|
|Will Warm Winters Balance Out The Effects Of Greenhouse Gases?||14||10-02-2020 18:23|
|Greenhouse Gases Do NOT Violate The Stefan-Boltzmann Law||743||22-11-2019 04:54|
|So what if the Chinese fossil fuel industry pays me to spread lies about greenhouse gas?||75||15-11-2019 04:47|