Now About that Greenhouse Gas25-02-2017 19:00 | |
Wake★★★★★ (4034) |
I suggest you read this all the way through. This also has an reference to a paper written on this subject. http://nov79.com/gbwm/equations.html |
26-02-2017 21:23 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22820) |
Wake wrote: This site is written by a guy that actually knows his stuff pretty well. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
26-02-2017 22:31 | |
Wake★★★★★ (4034) |
Into the Night wrote:Wake wrote: Especially if you consider that the CO2 is being said by NASA and NOAA to lead to positive feedback. It that were the case why wouldn't any past fluctuations lead to the unbreakable positive feedback and the Earth reduced to an ash. So any positive feedback could ONLY occur between the levels of approximately 0 ppm and perhaps 100 or slightly less ppm. This also underscores my earlier claim that there is no energy in the bands that CO2 absorbs in. So this small amount of energy is either radiated to the next CO2 molecule of far more likely conducted to the next adjacent atoms that compose 99.06% of the atmosphere simply by collision and losing the energy that otherwise might be radiated. |
27-02-2017 01:01 | |
litesong★★★★★ (2297) |
Wake wrote: NASA and NOAA to lead to positive feedback. Meanwhile: http://iwantsomeproof.com/extimg/siv_annual_polar_graph.png |
Threads | Replies | Last post |
COW GAS! New Solutions for Earth's Oldest Line of Bacteria | 68 | 11-01-2025 17:15 |
Nitrate Reduction - Powerful Greenhouse Gas Emission AND Alkalinity | 108 | 09-12-2024 19:46 |
The SCIENCE of the "Greenhouse Effect" | 312 | 17-11-2024 06:52 |
Greenhouse gasses | 83 | 18-07-2024 21:32 |
The "radiative Greenhouse effect" does not exist | 145 | 24-04-2024 02:48 |