Remember me
▼ Content

NOAA is Global Warming's Official Publicist


NOAA is Global Warming's Official Publicist17-08-2021 21:20
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(9934)


Similar to CNN's singular Anti-Trump focus, NOAA is singularly focused on Global Warming propaganda ... and some Climate Change propaganda too.

Just a few contemporary official NOAA announcements

(2021) It's official: July was Earth's hottest month on record
June 2021 was the hottest June on record for U.S.
June 2021 was the 5th warmest June on record for the globe
May 2021 tied for 6th-warmest May on record for the globe
April 2021 and year to date were among Earth's top-10 warmest
March 2021 and year to date were among Earth's top-10 warmest
February 2021 (ends) Northern Hemisphere's eighth-warmest winter on record
(2021) Earth just had its 7th-warmest January on record
January 2021 was among the top-10 warmest for U.S.
2020 was Earth's 2nd-hottest year, just behind 2016
Planet-warming trend continues: 2020 closes hottest decade on record
(2020) U.S. just had its 4th-hottest November and year to date on record
October 2020: "Only" the fourth-warmest October on record
September 2020 was the hottest on record worldwide
August 2020: The warmest summer on record for the Northern Hemisphere
July 2020 was record hot for many U.S. states
June 2020 tied as Earth's 3rd hottest on record
May 2020 tied for hottest on record for the globe
April 2020 was Earth's 2nd hottest April on record
(2020) Earth had its 2nd-hottest March on record
(2020) Earth just had its 2nd-hottest February on record
January 2020 was Earth's hottest January on record
2019 was 2nd-hottest year on record for Earth say NOAA, NASA
November 2019 was 2nd hottest on record for the planet
(2019) Globe had its 2nd-hottest October and year to date on record
September 2019 tied as hottest on record for planet
Summer 2019 was hottest on record for Northern Hemisphere
July 2019 was hottest month on record for the planet
June 2019 was hottest on record for the globe
May 2019 was the 4th hottest on record for the globe
April 2019 was 2nd hottest on record for the globe
March 2019 was second hottest on record for the globe
February 2019 ranked fifth hottest on record for the globe
November 2018 was fifth hottest on record for the globe
October 2018 was 2nd hottest on record for the globe
September 2018 and year to date were 4th hottest on record for the globe
Summer 2018 ranked 4th hottest on record for U.S.
August 2018 was 5th hottest August on record for the globe
July 2018 was 4th warmest July on record for the globe
June 2018 was 5th warmest on record for the globe
June 2018 ranks third warmest on record for U.S.
(2018) Contiguous U.S. had its warmest May on record
April 2018 was 3rd warmest on record for the globe
March 2018 was one of six warmest Marches on record
February 2018 was sixth warmest February on record
January 2018 was fifth warmest January on record
Edited on 17-08-2021 21:21
17-08-2021 22:31
gfm7175Profile picture★★★★★
(2452)
Holy crap there sure are a lot of those sorts of headlines... I guess I do a pretty good job at tuning them out.
18-08-2021 04:11
duncan61
★★★★☆
(1350)
Its never stated from what to what.If you dig deeper it is claimed .25 degree C a decade on average.How can that possibly be calculated over the whole planet?England started all this as there are 140,000 land weather stations in the United Kingdom and a slight average temperature increase was detected just as Mauna Loa reported CO2 had increased from 1958 to 1970.Up to the 70s the big fear factor was we are going in to an ice age.Time solves all problems when nothing happens.As I have posted before even using all the measuring devices that are claimed to collect the data to show warming have now shown a pause then a decline in warming but the Idea of closing all the research universities that make this stuff up is the real scare.So the title was changed to climate change.My personal observations of CO2 readings is it can be around 600ppm to 250ppm at any given time of the day.Increasing CO2 to 3000ppm made no measurable difference in temperature in my greenhouse testing.My thermometers are calibrated to .1 C and if it does not make a difference at that calibration myth busted.If I had thermometers calibrated to .0001 C and a more controlled test I may detect a small difference but who cares at that amount.
18-08-2021 06:17
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(16050)
duncan61 wrote:
Its never stated from what to what.

Which is why 'global warming' is undefined.
duncan61 wrote:
If you dig deeper it is claimed .25 degree C a decade on average.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
duncan61 wrote:
How can that possibly be calculated over the whole planet?

It can't.
duncan61 wrote:
England started all this as there are 140,000 land weather stations in the United Kingdom

The UK Met system uses 200 stations, not 140,000 stations. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the UK either.
duncan61 wrote:
and a slight average temperature increase was detected just as Mauna Loa reported CO2 had increased from 1958 to 1970.

Mauna Loa data is cooked. It's useless. Further, it's not possible to measure the global atmospheric CO2 content. CO2 is not evenly distributed in the atmosphere.
duncan61 wrote:
Up to the 70s the big fear factor was we are going in to an ice age.

Meh.
duncan61 wrote:
Time solves all problems when nothing happens.As I have posted before even using all the measuring devices that are claimed to collect the data to show warming have now shown a pause then a decline in warming

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
duncan61 wrote:
but the Idea of closing all the research universities that make this stuff up is the real scare.

Only to the 'scientists' that get paid these research grants, which all come from a single source: the government.
duncan61 wrote:
So the title was changed to climate change.My personal observations of CO2 readings is it can be around 600ppm to 250ppm at any given time of the day.Increasing CO2 to 3000ppm made no measurable difference in temperature in my greenhouse testing.My thermometers are calibrated to .1 C and if it does not make a difference at that calibration myth busted.If I had thermometers calibrated to .0001 C and a more controlled test I may detect a small difference but who cares at that amount.

CO2 has absolutely no capability to warm the Earth. The 'change' due to CO2 is zero. Zip. Nada. Nan. I can't say it more plainly than that. You can't create energy out of nothing.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan




Join the debate NOAA is Global Warming's Official Publicist:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
The Official Divine Cure For The Corona Virus COVID Is Find The Real Savior Messiah Buddha Online331-01-2021 19:53
NOAA's greenhouse gas forcing is fake?107-02-2019 19:12
The Stench from the EPA, NASA and NOAA8010-11-2017 05:08
Annual Global Warming Graph (NOAA)12704-08-2017 17:03
CO2, The Ozone Layer, The Chapman Cycle, The IPCC and NOAA2424-06-2017 22:37
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact