New Ice age by 2030

Into the Night wrote:
So...reduced to just spewing some Holy Link? Can't think for yourself?

I was bored, so I read their article. It is full of fallacies. I won't list them all here, but there are a few juicy ones:

This article is based on a single event, the Maunder Minimum, being extended to the 'My God, we're all gonna die!' level. It essentially claims that such a Minimum occurs every 90 years (even though it didn't). it then goes on to calculating the wattage level of the Sun (rolling my eyes), and then makes dire predictions of a coming ice age by 2040.

Numerous examples are given of stating the temperature of the Earth (which can't be measured), and describing unobserved events as given facts, which are then used to 'prove' their predictions. It's little more than Seers and crystal balls.

Of course all of this is again 'supported' by proxy observations, which are utterly useless.

CO2 is also blamed, of course, although it comes from 'natural' sources instead of 'man made' sources. This is despite the 1st law of thermodynamics. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So...reduced to just spewing some Holy Link? Can't think for yourself?

I was bored, so I read their article. It is full of fallacies. I won't list them all here, but there are a few juicy ones:

This article is based on a single event, the Maunder Minimum, being extended to the 'My God, we're all gonna die!' level. It essentially claims that such a Minimum occurs every 90 years (even though it didn't). it then goes on to calculating the wattage level of the Sun (rolling my eyes), and then makes dire predictions of a coming ice age by 2040.

Numerous examples are given of stating the temperature of the Earth (which can't be measured), and describing unobserved events as given facts, which are then used to 'prove' their predictions. It's little more than Seers and crystal balls.

Of course all of this is again 'supported' by proxy observations, which are utterly useless.

CO2 is also blamed, of course, although it comes from 'natural' sources instead of 'man made' sources. This is despite the 1st law of thermodynamics. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

LOL did you get the fake vaccine because the communist told you too?

If so the fallacy is you?

Swan wrote:
20,000 years ago half of the USA was buried under 1000 to 2000 feet of ice, then it started warming, a full 20,000 years before the industrial revolution.

Swan wrote:
Not that democrappic clowns like you will ever know

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So...reduced to just spewing some Holy Link? Can't think for yourself?

I was bored, so I read their article. It is full of fallacies. I won't list them all here, but there are a few juicy ones:

This article is based on a single event, the Maunder Minimum, being extended to the 'My God, we're all gonna die!' level. It essentially claims that such a Minimum occurs every 90 years (even though it didn't). it then goes on to calculating the wattage level of the Sun (rolling my eyes), and then makes dire predictions of a coming ice age by 2040.

Numerous examples are given of stating the temperature of the Earth (which can't be measured), and describing unobserved events as given facts, which are then used to 'prove' their predictions. It's little more than Seers and crystal balls.

Of course all of this is again 'supported' by proxy observations, which are utterly useless.

CO2 is also blamed, of course, although it comes from 'natural' sources instead of 'man made' sources. This is despite the 1st law of thermodynamics. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

LOL did you get the fake vaccine because the communist told you too?

If so the fallacy is you?

Irrelevant.

Swan wrote:
20,000 years ago half of the USA was buried under 1000 to 2000 feet of ice, then it started warming, a full 20,000 years before the industrial revolution.

How do you know? Were you there?

Swan wrote:
Not that democrappic clowns like you will ever know

I am not a Democrat.

Swan wrote:LOL have you been a climate denier for long?

Swan wrote:See kid you know nothing about the climate ...

Swan wrote: ...as you now claim that the last ice age was not a climate event when everyone not delusionary knows that it was.

Swan wrote:Or are you claiming that the glacial moraines that I cycle over are not real?

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL have you been a climate denier for long?

LOL What does that mean? Yawn. Are you asking if he operates under some sort of Climate delusion? LOL

What is a Climate denier exactly? LOL What is a global Climate for that matter? I think I'm about to have some fun! Yesssss!

Swan wrote:See kid you know nothing about the climate ...

Yawn. This is the part I like. Are you pretending him to mock someone for "not knowing" something about which you know nothing? LOL

Yawn. How long do you expect it to take for you to demonstrate a complete inability to define the Global Climate, Climate Change, greenhouse effect, or any of the crap surrounding that for which you are pretending to mock others?

Swan wrote: ...as you now claim that the last ice age was not a climate event when everyone not delusionary knows that it was.

LOL. What's a "Climate Event"? Yawn. LOL. Yawn. Are you pretending to speak for everybody, LOL.

Swan wrote:Or are you claiming that the glacial moraines that I cycle over are not real?

LOL. Are we in an ice age right now? Yawn. Will the ice of Greenland ultimately create moraines? If we're not in an ice age and we will nonetheless see moraines produced, moraines aren't evidence of an ice age. They are merely evidence of previous ice in that spot. LOL.

What is a Climate Denier event? I want to claim one of those, LOL.

Yawn.

Swan wrote:He denies that the last ice age or the current glacial moraines formed by the advancing glaciers are real.

Swan wrote:That son is denial of climate, technically he denies that climate was real before the current warming trend

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:He denies that the last ice age or the current glacial moraines formed by the advancing glaciers are real.

You are misrepresenting his position.

His question is how do you know that there was an ice age at that time? Were you there? It is a question, not a denial of anything.

My question is why should any rational adult believe that more than one region such as Greenland was ever buried under ice at the same time? Why should anyone believe that your moraines were formed at the same time as other moraines that are geographically displaced by a great distance?

The technical term for these questions is "questions." The technical term for what you are supposed to provide is "answers."

Let me know if you have any of what we technical people like to call "questions."

Swan wrote:That son is denial of climate, technically he denies that climate was real before the current warming trend

Have you defined either the global climate or climate event? If not, then he is right and you are whining.

Define global climate. Define climate event.

You don't get to claim someone is denying something that you won't define.

Yawn.

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
So...reduced to just spewing some Holy Link? Can't think for yourself?

I was bored, so I read their article. It is full of fallacies. I won't list them all here, but there are a few juicy ones:

This article is based on a single event, the Maunder Minimum, being extended to the 'My God, we're all gonna die!' level. It essentially claims that such a Minimum occurs every 90 years (even though it didn't). it then goes on to calculating the wattage level of the Sun (rolling my eyes), and then makes dire predictions of a coming ice age by 2040.

Numerous examples are given of stating the temperature of the Earth (which can't be measured), and describing unobserved events as given facts, which are then used to 'prove' their predictions. It's little more than Seers and crystal balls.

Of course all of this is again 'supported' by proxy observations, which are utterly useless.

CO2 is also blamed, of course, although it comes from 'natural' sources instead of 'man made' sources. This is despite the 1st law of thermodynamics. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

LOL did you get the fake vaccine because the communist told you too?

If so the fallacy is you?

Irrelevant.

Swan wrote:
20,000 years ago half of the USA was buried under 1000 to 2000 feet of ice, then it started warming, a full 20,000 years before the industrial revolution.

How do you know? Were you there?

Swan wrote:
Not that democrappic clowns like you will ever know

I am not a Democrat.

LOL have you been a climate denier for long?

Swan wrote:
See kid you know nothing about the climate as you now claim that the last ice age was not a climate event when everyone not delusionary knows that it was.

Swan wrote:
Or are you claiming that the glacial moraines that I cycle over are not real?

Swan wrote:
See on any level you are a delusional democrat.

Swan wrote:
No need for you to admit that I am right.

Swan wrote:
Next

LOL the last ice age is irrelevant to climate you said.

Swan wrote:
PS Lay off the acid

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL have you been a climate denier for long?

LOL What does that mean? Yawn. Are you asking if he operates under some sort of Climate delusion? LOL

What is a Climate denier exactly? LOL What is a global Climate for that matter? I think I'm about to have some fun! Yesssss!

Swan wrote:See kid you know nothing about the climate ...

Yawn. This is the part I like. Are you pretending him to mock someone for "not knowing" something about which you know nothing? LOL

Yawn. How long do you expect it to take for you to demonstrate a complete inability to define the Global Climate, Climate Change, greenhouse effect, or any of the crap surrounding that for which you are pretending to mock others?

Swan wrote: ...as you now claim that the last ice age was not a climate event when everyone not delusionary knows that it was.

LOL. What's a "Climate Event"? Yawn. LOL. Yawn. Are you pretending to speak for everybody, LOL.

Swan wrote:Or are you claiming that the glacial moraines that I cycle over are not real?

LOL. Are we in an ice age right now? Yawn. Will the ice of Greenland ultimately create moraines? If we're not in an ice age and we will nonetheless see moraines produced, moraines aren't evidence of an ice age. They are merely evidence of previous ice in that spot. LOL.

What is a Climate Denier event? I want to claim one of those, LOL.

Yawn.

He denies that the last ice age

Swan wrote:
or the current glacial moraines

Swan wrote:
formed by the advancing glaciers are real.

Swan wrote:
That son is denial of climate,

Swan wrote:
technically he denies that climate was real

Swan wrote:
before the current warming trend

Swan wrote:
that began 20,000 years ago not 150 years ago.

Swan wrote:
So yea he is a TOTAL climate denier,

Swan wrote:
all he wants to believe in is his chosen mass hysterical delusion.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:He denies that the last ice age or the current glacial moraines formed by the advancing glaciers are real.

You are misrepresenting his position.

His question is how do you know that there was an ice age at that time? Were you there? It is a question, not a denial of anything.

My question is why should any rational adult believe that more than one region such as Greenland was ever buried under ice at the same time? Why should anyone believe that your moraines were formed at the same time as other moraines that are geographically displaced by a great distance?

The technical term for these questions is "questions." The technical term for what you are supposed to provide is "answers."

Let me know if you have any of what we technical people like to call "questions."

Swan wrote:That son is denial of climate, technically he denies that climate was real before the current warming trend

Have you defined either the global climate or climate event? If not, then he is right and you are whining.

Define global climate. Define climate event.

You don't get to claim someone is denying something that you won't define.

Yawn.

Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA

Swan wrote:
when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

Swan wrote:
There is nothing that you can do to change this

Swan wrote:
as Eskimo DNA matches the DNA of the Siberian Yupiks.

Swan wrote:
The real question is why are you denying that the last ice age happened?

Swan wrote:
No need though as you deny deny deny the truth that invalidates your delusion.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind

Swan wrote:
and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age.

Swan wrote:
The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

HarveyH55 wrote:
There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

HarveyH55 wrote:
A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

OK now that you have established that you fully believe that the distant past is At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

Swan wrote:
And with that your stay at the LA stress free convalescent home is now fully covered by Medicare, some nice men will now be coming to your home shortly with a dart gun if needed.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

OK now that you have established that you fully believe that the distant past is At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

It is.

Swan wrote:
And with that your stay at the LA stress free convalescent home is now fully covered by Medicare, some nice men will now be coming to your home shortly with a dart gun if needed.

Psychoquackery. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

OK now that you have established that you fully believe that the distant past is At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

It is.

Swan wrote:
And with that your stay at the LA stress free convalescent home is now fully covered by Medicare, some nice men will now be coming to your home shortly with a dart gun if needed.

Psychoquackery. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

LOL 1000 of 1000 climate scientist agree that the last ice age happened,

Swan wrote:
not that you will comprehend any more now than you did in the past,

Swan wrote:
but on the flip side for you is that ignorance is bliss

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

OK now that you have established that you fully believe that the distant past is At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

It is.

Swan wrote:
And with that your stay at the LA stress free convalescent home is now fully covered by Medicare, some nice men will now be coming to your home shortly with a dart gun if needed.

Psychoquackery. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

LOL 1000 of 1000 climate scientist agree that the last ice age happened,

You say all your priests agree that the 'last ice age happened'. So what? Do you speak for all of your priests? Omniscience fallacy.

Swan wrote:
not that you will comprehend any more now than you did in the past,

Comprehend what? Your religion? I comprehend it more than you will ever know, it seems. I know exactly what the Church of Global Warming is, what that religion stems from, and it's ultimate goals (due to it's stem).

Swan wrote:
but on the flip side for you is that ignorance is bliss

You are describing yourself...only I call it 'illiteracy'.

Swan wrote:... and that all climate scientist are in agreement

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

OK now that you have established that you fully believe that the distant past is At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

It is.

Swan wrote:
And with that your stay at the LA stress free convalescent home is now fully covered by Medicare, some nice men will now be coming to your home shortly with a dart gun if needed.

Psychoquackery. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

LOL 1000 of 1000 climate scientist agree that the last ice age happened,

You say all your priests agree that the 'last ice age happened'. So what? Do you speak for all of your priests? Omniscience fallacy.

Swan wrote:
not that you will comprehend any more now than you did in the past,

Comprehend what? Your religion? I comprehend it more than you will ever know, it seems. I know exactly what the Church of Global Warming is, what that religion stems from, and it's ultimate goals (due to it's stem).

Swan wrote:
but on the flip side for you is that ignorance is bliss

You are describing yourself...only I call it 'illiteracy'.

Again you are psychologically unable to rectify that the last ice age happened and that all climate scientist are in agreement with this.

Swan wrote:
Which does not apply to you because your job is to humiliate yourself on the internet as often as is possible and always when I am in the room.

PS. You finish your lego climate model yet

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

OK now that you have established that you fully believe that the distant past is At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

It is.

Swan wrote:
And with that your stay at the LA stress free convalescent home is now fully covered by Medicare, some nice men will now be coming to your home shortly with a dart gun if needed.

Psychoquackery. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

LOL 1000 of 1000 climate scientist agree that the last ice age happened,

You say all your priests agree that the 'last ice age happened'. So what? Do you speak for all of your priests? Omniscience fallacy.

Swan wrote:
not that you will comprehend any more now than you did in the past,

Comprehend what? Your religion? I comprehend it more than you will ever know, it seems. I know exactly what the Church of Global Warming is, what that religion stems from, and it's ultimate goals (due to it's stem).

Swan wrote:
but on the flip side for you is that ignorance is bliss

You are describing yourself...only I call it 'illiteracy'.

Again you are psychologically unable to rectify that the last ice age happened and that all climate scientist are in agreement with this.

What ice age? How do you know it happened? Did you vote on it?

Argument by repetition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

Swan wrote:
Which does not apply to you because your job is to humiliate yourself on the internet as often as is possible and always when I am in the room.

PS. You finish your lego climate model yet

You are describing yourself, even when you are alone in a room.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

OK now that you have established that you fully believe that the distant past is At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

It is.

Swan wrote:
And with that your stay at the LA stress free convalescent home is now fully covered by Medicare, some nice men will now be coming to your home shortly with a dart gun if needed.

Psychoquackery. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

LOL 1000 of 1000 climate scientist agree that the last ice age happened,

You say all your priests agree that the 'last ice age happened'. So what? Do you speak for all of your priests? Omniscience fallacy.

Swan wrote:
not that you will comprehend any more now than you did in the past,

Comprehend what? Your religion? I comprehend it more than you will ever know, it seems. I know exactly what the Church of Global Warming is, what that religion stems from, and it's ultimate goals (due to it's stem).

Swan wrote:
but on the flip side for you is that ignorance is bliss

You are describing yourself...only I call it 'illiteracy'.

Again you are psychologically unable to rectify that the last ice age happened and that all climate scientist are in agreement with this.

What ice age? How do you know it happened? Did you vote on it?

Argument by repetition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

Swan wrote:
Which does not apply to you because your job is to humiliate yourself on the internet as often as is possible and always when I am in the room.

PS. You finish your lego climate model yet

You are describing yourself, even when you are alone in a room.

LOL See kid what you can never truly see is that 99.999 percent of people that deny that the last ice age was real also believe that Snoopy was the real Red Baron.

In fact Woodstock makes you look bright.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

OK now that you have established that you fully believe that the distant past is At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

It is.

Swan wrote:
And with that your stay at the LA stress free convalescent home is now fully covered by Medicare, some nice men will now be coming to your home shortly with a dart gun if needed.

Psychoquackery. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

LOL 1000 of 1000 climate scientist agree that the last ice age happened,

You say all your priests agree that the 'last ice age happened'. So what? Do you speak for all of your priests? Omniscience fallacy.

Swan wrote:
not that you will comprehend any more now than you did in the past,

Comprehend what? Your religion? I comprehend it more than you will ever know, it seems. I know exactly what the Church of Global Warming is, what that religion stems from, and it's ultimate goals (due to it's stem).

Swan wrote:
but on the flip side for you is that ignorance is bliss

You are describing yourself...only I call it 'illiteracy'.

Again you are psychologically unable to rectify that the last ice age happened and that all climate scientist are in agreement with this.

What ice age? How do you know it happened? Did you vote on it?

Argument by repetition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

Swan wrote:
Which does not apply to you because your job is to humiliate yourself on the internet as often as is possible and always when I am in the room.

PS. You finish your lego climate model yet

You are describing yourself, even when you are alone in a room.

LOL See kid what you can never truly see is that 99.999 percent of people that deny that the last ice age was real also believe that Snoopy was the real Red Baron.

In fact Woodstock makes you look bright.

It has been shown that 99.999 percent of your numbers are random numbers.

Argument from randU fallacy. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

It has been shown that 99.999 percent of your numbers are random numbers.

Argument from randU fallacy. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

OK Woodstock, you deny that there was ever an ice age. This puts you in the group of people that believe in alien time machines provide all bananas directly to grocery stores.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:OK Woodstock, you deny that there was ever an ice age. This puts you in the group of people that believe in alien time machines provide all bananas directly to grocery stores.

I never said there was never an ice age. YOU seem to believe there was. It is YOU making the claim, not me. I simply don't care if there was one or not. I am simply pointing out that you weren't there to see it. You don't know it happened.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

It has been shown that 99.999 percent of your numbers are random numbers.

Argument from randU fallacy. Insult fallacy. No argument presented.

OK Woodstock, you deny that there was ever an ice age. This puts you in the group of people that believe in alien time machines provide all bananas directly to grocery stores.

I never said there was never an ice age. YOU seem to believe there was. It is YOU making the claim, not me. I simply don't care if there was one or not. I am simply pointing out that you weren't there to see it. You don't know it happened.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:OK Woodstock, you deny that there was ever an ice age. This puts you in the group of people that believe in alien time machines provide all bananas directly to grocery stores.

I never said there was never an ice age. YOU seem to believe there was. It is YOU making the claim, not me. I simply don't care if there was one or not. I am simply pointing out that you weren't there to see it. You don't know it happened.

This is the crux of the matter. Swan has embraced the dogma of a fanatical religion and becomes injured if he is forced to view it as the mere speculation that it is rather than as the Truth that he was hoodwinked into believing it is.

@Swan, I will assume that you simply don't see your error because you are blinded by your faith. Into the Night is not claiming that there was no ice age. He is simply asking you a question that you are EVADING because it kills your religious faith dead ... so you refuse to answer it.

I am the one denying ice ages. My argument is that there is no way for one to happen, and that all the evidence ever cited, such as moraines in one particular place, are simply stupid logic errors on the part of people who are either trying to make names/careers for themselves or who otherwise just want to appear THMART at social gatherings ... or who want to cash in on producing blockbuster movies.

You still haven't answered my question either. Why do you believe that your moraine farm was created at the same time as other moraine farms very far away?

You see? You simply EVADE the questions that get to the heart of the matter and that expose your WACKY religious dogma. I too believe that there was an ice bridge at said geographic location at one point. I just believe that it was that geographic location's turn to play Greenland and that Greenland was playing Iceland, and Iceland was playing UK, etc ... I claim that THAT is the logical and intuitive effect of earth's rotational wobble. However, the earth's (mostly) spherical shape precludes any sort of ice age because no matter how you rotate the (mostly) spherical earth, the same amount of earth is facing the sun and the same amount of earth is in nighttime. Your moraine farm was created when your geographic location was taking its turn to play Greenland, and nothing more.

So yes, I deny ice ages. Bring it on.

Swan wrote:...[no answers to any dangerous questions]...

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:...[no answers to any dangerous questions]...

Swan,

1) Into the Night's question, which you are EVADING by referring to it as some sort of denial on his part is: "How do you know there was an ice age? Were you there?"

2) My question is : "Why do you believe that your moraine farm was created at the same time as other moraine farms very far away?"


At this time, I'd like to open the floor to any other questions this board might have for Swan regarding his belief that he knows what happened in the distant, unobserved past.

Swan wrote:LOL the schizzo is now claiming that reality is based upon my having been there.

Swan wrote: PS How old is the Earth in your opinion?

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL the schizzo is now claiming that reality is based upon my having been there.

Yawn. Your knowledge is dependent upon you having been there, LOL, LOL, LOL.

LOL You think your speculative beliefs are confirmed knowledge LOL. Yawn.

LOL You think that reality is whatever you believe LOL LOL.

Yawn.

LOL You think all questions about your claims of knowledge must be denials of reality LOL. LOL. LOL.

Yawn.

You have an omniscience delusion. tmiddles is not the only one. LOL

Swan wrote: PS How old is the Earth in your opinion?

I believe the earth is old ... very old ... on the order of billions of years.

[did you see that word "believe" up there?]

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

OK now that you have established that you fully believe that the distant past is At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

And with that your stay at the LA stress free convalescent home is now fully covered by Medicare, some nice men will now be coming to your home shortly with a dart gun if needed.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Dude the first American inhabitants walked from Asia to the USA when the 50 miles between the USA and Asia was frozen.

You aren't doing a very good job answering questions as of late.

Once again, Into the Night's question is "How do you know? Were you there?"

My question is "Why would any rational adult believe that the frozen land bridge necessarily occurred while other geographically disparate locations were simultaneously buried under ice?"

You are the one professing an emotional investment in a particular speculation about the past. Why should others believe as you do?

Are you prepared to lend me your time machine so I can check out your story?

Again I ride up and down the glacial moraines that the ice age left behind and furthermore 100 percent of climate scientist agree that there was an ice age. The only people that do not believe in the last ice age are schizzo turds farting away as they profess their ignorance here.

At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy. There are bits and pieces to support one belief, or another. If it's not written the bible. it never happened, least what some believe as well. Science, and faith are two different things. Well, except climate change, but that's more of a cult, if you get sucked into it.

A glacier, doesn't necessarily need to be a remnant of an ice age. Just needs to be a patch of snow an ice, that doesn't completely melt every year. There is really no way to date the rocks and crap left after the glacier finally melts. Or how far it dragged those rocks. Some probably hadn't moved at all, just the soil, sand, and smaller chunks washed away, as the snow and ice melted.

Lot of rocks fall, do to erosion as well. The ice and snow would have stopped them from tumbling further down, until some of the ice melted, then they shift a little more.

All anybody can do is just guess at what happened, try to find some evidence to support our belief, to convince other people. Just because a story makes sense, does it make it factual.

OK now that you have established that you fully believe that the distant past is At best, the distant past is all theory and fantasy.

And with that your stay at the LA stress free convalescent home is now fully covered by Medicare, some nice men will now be coming to your home shortly with a dart gun if needed.

I enjoy science fiction, as much as actual science. I just keep the two separate. Some people don't know where fantasy and imagination end, and reality begins. When there were no people to witness and record events, we imagine, fill in the blanks, the best we can. There is no way to know if we guessed right or wrong, but it makes for an interesting story.

Ice age makes little difference in the grand scheme of things. Humans probably had nothing to do with causing it, but we did manage to survive as a species, as many others. Global warming? So what, we will survive that as well. We evolved without an abundance of body hair for a reason. Thick fur isn't great in a warm climate...

Swan wrote:LOL how do you consider glacial moraines to be speculative,

Swan wrote:Oh yea I forgot people with schizophrenia recreate the World as their brain sees the need for.

Swan wrote:Are you claiming that the last ice age was science fiction,

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL how do you consider glacial moraines to be speculative,

I don't consider rocks to be speculative. Why do you believe that your moraine farm was created at the same time as other moraine farms very far away?

How do you know there was an ice age? Were you there?

Why are you trying to recreate the world as your brain sees the need for?

Swan wrote:Oh yea I forgot people with schizophrenia recreate the World as their brain sees the need for.

Oh. Is that why you need a padded cell?