New amusement park rule, no fat slobs allowed on the rides

Swan wrote:Why let a person who needs to buy two airplane tickets just to sit down cause an amusement park ride to tilt endangering everyone?

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Why let a person who needs to buy two airplane tickets just to sit down cause an amusement park ride to tilt endangering everyone?

Apparently, the ride operators should have disallowed the dude from riding (because he exceeded the weight limit) but they allowed him to ride.

I can't say to what extent the dude is to blame for his having fallen. The fake news won't ever supply any necessary/key/crucial details. Just emotional disinformation.

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

Nope. The criteria are race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Weight is not a consideration, nor is ugliness, nor is belief in Climate Change.

You have to cite an actual State or local law.

Schizzo.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Why let a person who needs to buy two airplane tickets just to sit down cause an amusement park ride to tilt endangering everyone?

Apparently, the ride operators should have disallowed the dude from riding (because he exceeded the weight limit) but they allowed him to ride.

I can't say to what extent the dude is to blame for his having fallen. The fake news won't ever supply any necessary/key/crucial details. Just emotional disinformation.

Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Swan wrote:
so the ride operators could not tell him that he could not ride.

Swan wrote:
Besides unless their was a scale present then the ride operator had no alternative but to let him ride as there was no way to determine his weight

Swan wrote:
because as I said discrimination because of weight is as I said illegal.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

.

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

Swan wrote:
Ask Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley

Obesity stats for black Americans

https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=4&lvlid=25

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

Nope. The criteria are race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Weight is not a consideration, nor is ugliness, nor is belief in Climate Change.

You have to cite an actual State or local law.

Schizzo.

As Reagan would say.

Well there you go again telling me that I have to do what you say because you say it. In the hospital this is what they call delusions of grandeur.

Besides the man could not be determined to be overweight without a scale and since there was no scale the man could not be determined to be overweight. They always have a ruler but always forget the need for the scale because in some areas, and the ride by the snow cone stand is one of those areas everyone is a fat slob. So if the park denied fat slobs the right to ride and buy snow cones, KFC and funnel cakes the park would shut down for lack of revenue.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

.

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

None. Weight is not a race.

Swan wrote:
Ask Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley

Obesity stats for black Americans

https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=4&lvlid=25

Why are you concentrating only on fat 'black' men and women. There's plenty of fat 'white' folk that can't ride those rides either.

I can only assume that you are racist.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

Nope. The criteria are race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Weight is not a consideration, nor is ugliness, nor is belief in Climate Change.

You have to cite an actual State or local law.

Schizzo.

As Reagan would say.

Well there you go again telling me that I have to do what you say because you say it. In the hospital this is what they call delusions of grandeur.

Besides the man could not be determined to be overweight without a scale and since there was no scale the man could not be determined to be overweight. They always have a ruler but always forget the need for the scale because in some areas, and the ride by the snow cone stand is one of those areas everyone is a fat slob. So if the park denied fat slobs the right to ride and buy snow cones, KFC and funnel cakes the park would shut down for lack of revenue.

Determining 'overweight' is done by the ride operators and is pretty easy.

Eyeballing for fat people to warn them of the weight limits of the ride before they waste their time standing in line for it, and observing that the safety harness doesn't properly close or does not properly protect the rider.

Fat people can buy and eat all the snow cones, KFC chicken, and funnel cakes they want. No one is going to stop them.

Some rides are much more generous concerning weight limits. They can still ride those rides in perfect safety (well, as much safety as the ride itself provides).

All amusement rides have weight limits that MUST BE OBSERVED.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

.

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

None. Weight is not a race.

Swan wrote:
Ask Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley

Obesity stats for black Americans

https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=4&lvlid=25

Why are you concentrating only on fat 'black' men and women. There's plenty of fat 'white' folk that can't ride those rides either.

I can only assume that you are racist.

LOL the man who died was black, and it's not my fault that 76 percent of African Americans are obese. Technically my BMI is overweight and near obese, then again I do deadlift 400lbs and do 50 to 100 mile bike rides so who cares

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

Nope. The criteria are race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Weight is not a consideration, nor is ugliness, nor is belief in Climate Change.

You have to cite an actual State or local law.

Schizzo.

As Reagan would say.

Well there you go again telling me that I have to do what you say because you say it. In the hospital this is what they call delusions of grandeur.

Besides the man could not be determined to be overweight without a scale and since there was no scale the man could not be determined to be overweight. They always have a ruler but always forget the need for the scale because in some areas, and the ride by the snow cone stand is one of those areas everyone is a fat slob. So if the park denied fat slobs the right to ride and buy snow cones, KFC and funnel cakes the park would shut down for lack of revenue.

Determining 'overweight' is done by the ride operators and is pretty easy.

Eyeballing for fat people to warn them of the weight limits of the ride before they waste their time standing in line for it, and observing that the safety harness doesn't properly close or does not properly protect the rider.

Fat people can buy and eat all the snow cones, KFC chicken, and funnel cakes they want. No one is going to stop them.

Some rides are much more generous concerning weight limits. They can still ride those rides in perfect safety (well, as much safety as the ride itself provides).

All amusement rides have weight limits that MUST BE OBSERVED.

Again whether a person weighs 1 pound under the max or 1 pound over the max by eyeballing is impossible. In fact the ride operator did eyeball the rider and let him ride, so as usual you contradict yourself at every chance. As usual

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

Nope. The criteria are race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Weight is not a consideration, nor is ugliness, nor is belief in Climate Change.

You have to cite an actual State or local law.

Schizzo.

As Reagan would say.

Well there you go again telling me that I have to do what you say because you say it. In the hospital this is what they call delusions of grandeur.

Besides the man could not be determined to be overweight without a scale and since there was no scale the man could not be determined to be overweight. They always have a ruler but always forget the need for the scale because in some areas, and the ride by the snow cone stand is one of those areas everyone is a fat slob. So if the park denied fat slobs the right to ride and buy snow cones, KFC and funnel cakes the park would shut down for lack of revenue.

Determining 'overweight' is done by the ride operators and is pretty easy.

Eyeballing for fat people to warn them of the weight limits of the ride before they waste their time standing in line for it, and observing that the safety harness doesn't properly close or does not properly protect the rider.

Fat people can buy and eat all the snow cones, KFC chicken, and funnel cakes they want. No one is going to stop them.

Some rides are much more generous concerning weight limits. They can still ride those rides in perfect safety (well, as much safety as the ride itself provides).

All amusement rides have weight limits that MUST BE OBSERVED.

Again whether a person weighs 1 pound under the max or 1 pound over the max by eyeballing is impossible. In fact the ride operator did eyeball the rider and let him ride, so as usual you contradict yourself at every chance. As usual

He shouldn't have. The ride limits were exceeded. The operator is liable.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

Nope. The criteria are race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Weight is not a consideration, nor is ugliness, nor is belief in Climate Change.

You have to cite an actual State or local law.

Schizzo.

As Reagan would say.

Well there you go again telling me that I have to do what you say because you say it. In the hospital this is what they call delusions of grandeur.

Besides the man could not be determined to be overweight without a scale and since there was no scale the man could not be determined to be overweight. They always have a ruler but always forget the need for the scale because in some areas, and the ride by the snow cone stand is one of those areas everyone is a fat slob. So if the park denied fat slobs the right to ride and buy snow cones, KFC and funnel cakes the park would shut down for lack of revenue.

Determining 'overweight' is done by the ride operators and is pretty easy.

Eyeballing for fat people to warn them of the weight limits of the ride before they waste their time standing in line for it, and observing that the safety harness doesn't properly close or does not properly protect the rider.

Fat people can buy and eat all the snow cones, KFC chicken, and funnel cakes they want. No one is going to stop them.

Some rides are much more generous concerning weight limits. They can still ride those rides in perfect safety (well, as much safety as the ride itself provides).

All amusement rides have weight limits that MUST BE OBSERVED.

Again whether a person weighs 1 pound under the max or 1 pound over the max by eyeballing is impossible. In fact the ride operator did eyeball the rider and let him ride, so as usual you contradict yourself at every chance. As usual

He shouldn't have. The ride limits were exceeded. The operator is liable.

Swan wrote:
unlike this fool.
[quote]Swan wrote:
Sorry to say that you are correct and retarded is not technically illegal, as the 100,000 morons dying every year from snorting or injecting fentanyl denote quite well, that is 273 people dying every day that no one in law enforcement gives a shit about. So why does fatty on the ride matter more than the 100,000 who remain nameless because diaper Joe Biden is letting poison into the USA

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:[quote]IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Nope, it is against the law to discriminate against people because of their weight,

Which law?

All civil rights laws are in play if you deny an overweight black man the right to ride an amusement park ride that the skinny white chicks are allowed on.

Nope. The criteria are race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Weight is not a consideration, nor is ugliness, nor is belief in Climate Change.

You have to cite an actual State or local law.

Schizzo.

As Reagan would say.

Well there you go again telling me that I have to do what you say because you say it. In the hospital this is what they call delusions of grandeur.

Besides the man could not be determined to be overweight without a scale and since there was no scale the man could not be determined to be overweight. They always have a ruler but always forget the need for the scale because in some areas, and the ride by the snow cone stand is one of those areas everyone is a fat slob. So if the park denied fat slobs the right to ride and buy snow cones, KFC and funnel cakes the park would shut down for lack of revenue.

Determining 'overweight' is done by the ride operators and is pretty easy.

Eyeballing for fat people to warn them of the weight limits of the ride before they waste their time standing in line for it, and observing that the safety harness doesn't properly close or does not properly protect the rider.

Fat people can buy and eat all the snow cones, KFC chicken, and funnel cakes they want. No one is going to stop them.

Some rides are much more generous concerning weight limits. They can still ride those rides in perfect safety (well, as much safety as the ride itself provides).

All amusement rides have weight limits that MUST BE OBSERVED.

Again whether a person weighs 1 pound under the max or 1 pound over the max by eyeballing is impossible. In fact the ride operator did eyeball the rider and let him ride, so as usual you contradict yourself at every chance. As usual

He shouldn't have. The ride limits were exceeded. The operator is liable.

Swan wrote:
unlike this fool.

Swan wrote:
Sorry to say that you are correct and retarded is not technically illegal, as the 100,000 morons dying every year from snorting or injecting fentanyl denote quite well, that is 273 people dying every day that no one in law enforcement gives a shit about. So why does fatty on the ride matter more than the 100,000 who remain nameless because diaper Joe Biden is letting poison into the USA

Joe Biden is powerless to stop it. The War on Drugs has never worked. Prohibition has never worked. All it does is feed organized crime.

Law enforcement does give a shit about it. Fentanyl can cause violent behavior. Organized crime also benefits from it's use and sale.

Pivot fallacy.

Drug use has nothing to do with overweight people on amusement rides.

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Rides have height and weight restrictions, for safety (see OSHA, the Vaccine Nazis). If the harness doesn't fit, the rider is probably outside the safety rating. No real need of a scale, unless the rider is insistent and obnoxious (British/gay). Would you prefer be sent home with hurt feelings, or sent home in a box?

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Rides have height and weight restrictions, for safety (see OSHA, the Vaccine Nazis). If the harness doesn't fit, the rider is probably outside the safety rating. No real need of a scale, unless the rider is insistent and obnoxious (British/gay). Would you prefer be sent home with hurt feelings, or sent home in a box?

Again if he was 1 pound under the max he was legal and his weight meant nothing since there is no way to weigh people with eyes a scale is needed. The park will never weigh people because they would be calling 70 percent of the population fat and none of these people would ever come back and then the park has to close with no patrons. So this one persons feelings are not the ones that matter. That said if he was too stupid to know that the belt had to click his mother should have been supervising him at all times, so the parents are partly at fault for raising an obese moron

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Rides have height and weight restrictions, for safety (see OSHA, the Vaccine Nazis). If the harness doesn't fit, the rider is probably outside the safety rating. No real need of a scale, unless the rider is insistent and obnoxious (British/gay). Would you prefer be sent home with hurt feelings, or sent home in a box?

Again if he was 1 pound under the max he was legal and his weight meant nothing since there is no way to weigh people with eyes a scale is needed. The park will never weigh people because they would be calling 70 percent of the population fat and none of these people would ever come back and then the park has to close with no patrons. So this one persons feelings are not the ones that matter. That said if he was too stupid to know that the belt had to click his mother should have been supervising him at all times, so the parents are partly at fault for raising an obese moron

You already said this and I already answered it. You are mindlessly chanting now.

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Rides have height and weight restrictions, for safety (see OSHA, the Vaccine Nazis). If the harness doesn't fit, the rider is probably outside the safety rating. No real need of a scale, unless the rider is insistent and obnoxious (British/gay). Would you prefer be sent home with hurt feelings, or sent home in a box?

Again if he was 1 pound under the max he was legal and his weight meant nothing since there is no way to weigh people with eyes a scale is needed. The park will never weigh people because they would be calling 70 percent of the population fat and none of these people would ever come back and then the park has to close with no patrons. So this one persons feelings are not the ones that matter. That said if he was too stupid to know that the belt had to click his mother should have been supervising him at all times, so the parents are partly at fault for raising an obese moron

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Rides have height and weight restrictions, for safety (see OSHA, the Vaccine Nazis). If the harness doesn't fit, the rider is probably outside the safety rating. No real need of a scale, unless the rider is insistent and obnoxious (British/gay). Would you prefer be sent home with hurt feelings, or sent home in a box?

Again if he was 1 pound under the max he was legal and his weight meant nothing since there is no way to weigh people with eyes a scale is needed. The park will never weigh people because they would be calling 70 percent of the population fat and none of these people would ever come back and then the park has to close with no patrons. So this one persons feelings are not the ones that matter. That said if he was too stupid to know that the belt had to click his mother should have been supervising him at all times, so the parents are partly at fault for raising an obese moron

The ride was rate for 287 lbs. The boy was 340 lbs. Do you really need a scale? Come to think of it, how often do you see a people weighing scale that goes that high? Maybe your mother had to special order hers...

There are weigh limits on a lot of things. You exceed the limit, they tend to break. Maximum, isn't the ideal weight either. For most things, you want to stay well below the maximum rating, specially when lives are at risk.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Rides have height and weight restrictions, for safety (see OSHA, the Vaccine Nazis). If the harness doesn't fit, the rider is probably outside the safety rating. No real need of a scale, unless the rider is insistent and obnoxious (British/gay). Would you prefer be sent home with hurt feelings, or sent home in a box?

Again if he was 1 pound under the max he was legal and his weight meant nothing since there is no way to weigh people with eyes a scale is needed. The park will never weigh people because they would be calling 70 percent of the population fat and none of these people would ever come back and then the park has to close with no patrons. So this one persons feelings are not the ones that matter. That said if he was too stupid to know that the belt had to click his mother should have been supervising him at all times, so the parents are partly at fault for raising an obese moron

You already said this and I already answered it. You are mindlessly chanting now.

There you go being delusional again as you clearly believe that people pay attention to your babbling

No one does, however I must admit that I find you amusing. I bet your basement cubicle where your mother keeps you chained is quite comical

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Rides have height and weight restrictions, for safety (see OSHA, the Vaccine Nazis). If the harness doesn't fit, the rider is probably outside the safety rating. No real need of a scale, unless the rider is insistent and obnoxious (British/gay). Would you prefer be sent home with hurt feelings, or sent home in a box?

Again if he was 1 pound under the max he was legal and his weight meant nothing since there is no way to weigh people with eyes a scale is needed. The park will never weigh people because they would be calling 70 percent of the population fat and none of these people would ever come back and then the park has to close with no patrons. So this one persons feelings are not the ones that matter. That said if he was too stupid to know that the belt had to click his mother should have been supervising him at all times, so the parents are partly at fault for raising an obese moron

The ride was rate for 287 lbs. The boy was 340 lbs. Do you really need a scale? Come to think of it, how often do you see a people weighing scale that goes that high? Maybe your mother had to special order hers...

There are weigh limits on a lot of things. You exceed the limit, they tend to break. Maximum, isn't the ideal weight either. For most things, you want to stay well below the maximum rating, specially when lives are at risk.

Well they weigh animals so perhaps an animal scale would be needed? This is why they do not use a scale because it would humiliate the public and none of the 70 percent of fat American slobs would ever return to the park and it would close. Not sure if the weight was the issue as the seatbelt may not have been clicked which makes the rider a moron for not speaking up. Or perhaps the rider opened the seatbelt and jumped, happens every day somewhere

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Rides have height and weight restrictions, for safety (see OSHA, the Vaccine Nazis). If the harness doesn't fit, the rider is probably outside the safety rating. No real need of a scale, unless the rider is insistent and obnoxious (British/gay). Would you prefer be sent home with hurt feelings, or sent home in a box?

Again if he was 1 pound under the max he was legal and his weight meant nothing since there is no way to weigh people with eyes a scale is needed. The park will never weigh people because they would be calling 70 percent of the population fat and none of these people would ever come back and then the park has to close with no patrons. So this one persons feelings are not the ones that matter. That said if he was too stupid to know that the belt had to click his mother should have been supervising him at all times, so the parents are partly at fault for raising an obese moron

The ride was rate for 287 lbs. The boy was 340 lbs. Do you really need a scale? Come to think of it, how often do you see a people weighing scale that goes that high? Maybe your mother had to special order hers...

There are weigh limits on a lot of things. You exceed the limit, they tend to break. Maximum, isn't the ideal weight either. For most things, you want to stay well below the maximum rating, specially when lives are at risk.

Well they weigh animals so perhaps an animal scale would be needed? This is why they do not use a scale because it would humiliate the public and none of the 70 percent of fat American slobs would ever return to the park and it would close. Not sure if the weight was the issue as the seatbelt may not have been clicked which makes the rider a moron for not speaking up. Or perhaps the rider opened the seatbelt and jumped, happens every day somewhere

Not everyone weighs 340 lbs, dude.

If all fat people left the park and never returned, it would still be doing a good business.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Rides have height and weight restrictions, for safety (see OSHA, the Vaccine Nazis). If the harness doesn't fit, the rider is probably outside the safety rating. No real need of a scale, unless the rider is insistent and obnoxious (British/gay). Would you prefer be sent home with hurt feelings, or sent home in a box?

Again if he was 1 pound under the max he was legal and his weight meant nothing since there is no way to weigh people with eyes a scale is needed. The park will never weigh people because they would be calling 70 percent of the population fat and none of these people would ever come back and then the park has to close with no patrons. So this one persons feelings are not the ones that matter. That said if he was too stupid to know that the belt had to click his mother should have been supervising him at all times, so the parents are partly at fault for raising an obese moron

The ride was rate for 287 lbs. The boy was 340 lbs. Do you really need a scale? Come to think of it, how often do you see a people weighing scale that goes that high? Maybe your mother had to special order hers...

There are weigh limits on a lot of things. You exceed the limit, they tend to break. Maximum, isn't the ideal weight either. For most things, you want to stay well below the maximum rating, specially when lives are at risk.

Well they weigh animals so perhaps an animal scale would be needed? This is why they do not use a scale because it would humiliate the public and none of the 70 percent of fat American slobs would ever return to the park and it would close. Not sure if the weight was the issue as the seatbelt may not have been clicked which makes the rider a moron for not speaking up. Or perhaps the rider opened the seatbelt and jumped, happens every day somewhere

Not everyone weighs 340 lbs, dude.

If all fat people left the park and never returned, it would still be doing a good business.

40 percent of Americans are obese. That said if these people are not allowed on the rides guess what, they do not come to the park and neither in many cases do their families who do not want to have fun while the really overweight members of their family eat a funnel cake and KFC because they are not allowed to have fun and are now depressed. This translates into a 50 to 60 percent loss of patrons in the park that now has to close for lack of revenue. I have been to the largest theme park in the USA and have seen this all quite plainly. Also weighing fat people and telling them that they are fat would translate into park suicides which might have happened here, unless anyone can point out that this person was too dumb to know that the seatbelt had to be hooked properly.

Next

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
The boy was 14 years old, 6'5", 340 lbs! Good Lord... Plenty old enough to know he is too big for most normal sized people stuff. Wonder how many bicycles he destroyed... Don't think he was obese, as they say he was on a football team. Ben Crump is involved, so likely the kid used his size to intimidate, and there are possibly witnesses to 'talk' with. Ride operator was young, but still should have know to call for help, if something isn't right. The ride just opened last December, but 3 months is still plenty of time to know what is normal, and when a harness doesn't fit right.

This is going to be a major national case, which is likely to have worldwide implications. Every theme park, amusement park with thrill rides will be affected. These high-dollar lawyers are going to milk this for every penny, and political power point they can get.

If the ride did not have a scale the ride operator had no clue as to the weight of the person. Now one could easily say that a scale could be put into the platform in some way, but as I said they will never do this because the park would be hit with fat discrimination suits so this will never happen. All this kid ever did on the football team was stand in front of the quarterback which takes zero athleticism

Rides have height and weight restrictions, for safety (see OSHA, the Vaccine Nazis). If the harness doesn't fit, the rider is probably outside the safety rating. No real need of a scale, unless the rider is insistent and obnoxious (British/gay). Would you prefer be sent home with hurt feelings, or sent home in a box?

Again if he was 1 pound under the max he was legal and his weight meant nothing since there is no way to weigh people with eyes a scale is needed. The park will never weigh people because they would be calling 70 percent of the population fat and none of these people would ever come back and then the park has to close with no patrons. So this one persons feelings are not the ones that matter. That said if he was too stupid to know that the belt had to click his mother should have been supervising him at all times, so the parents are partly at fault for raising an obese moron

The ride was rate for 287 lbs. The boy was 340 lbs. Do you really need a scale? Come to think of it, how often do you see a people weighing scale that goes that high? Maybe your mother had to special order hers...

There are weigh limits on a lot of things. You exceed the limit, they tend to break. Maximum, isn't the ideal weight either. For most things, you want to stay well below the maximum rating, specially when lives are at risk.

Well they weigh animals so perhaps an animal scale would be needed? This is why they do not use a scale because it would humiliate the public and none of the 70 percent of fat American slobs would ever return to the park and it would close. Not sure if the weight was the issue as the seatbelt may not have been clicked which makes the rider a moron for not speaking up. Or perhaps the rider opened the seatbelt and jumped, happens every day somewhere

Not everyone weighs 340 lbs, dude.

If all fat people left the park and never returned, it would still be doing a good business.

40 percent of Americans are obese. That said if these people are not allowed on the rides guess what, they do not come to the park and neither in many cases do their families who do not want to have fun while the really overweight members of their family eat a funnel cake and KFC because they are not allowed to have fun and are now depressed. This translates into a 50 to 60 percent loss of patrons in the park that now has to close for lack of revenue. I have been to the largest theme park in the USA and have seen this all quite plainly. Also weighing fat people and telling them that they are fat would translate into park suicides which might have happened here, unless anyone can point out that this person was too dumb to know that the seatbelt had to be hooked properly.

Next

Fat people know they are fat. It's not some dirty secret. Don't doctors tell fat patients to lose weight? Aren't there dozens of TV ads, that target fat people? Treating them as unhealthy slobs, is doing them a favor. Gives them incentive to gt off the couch, an hit the treadmill occasionally. Majority of covid fatalities, are fat people

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
Not everyone weighs 340 lbs, dude.

If all fat people left the park and never returned, it would still be doing a good business.

40 percent of Americans are obese.

sealover wrote:
That said if these people are not allowed on the rides guess what, they do not come to the park and neither in many cases do their families who do not want to have fun while the really overweight members of their family eat a funnel cake and KFC because they are not allowed to have fun and are now depressed.

sealover wrote:
This translates into a 50 to 60 percent loss of patrons in the park that now has to close for lack of revenue.

sealover wrote:
I have been to the largest theme park in the USA and have seen this all quite plainly. Also weighing fat people and telling them that they are fat would translate into park suicides which might have happened here, unless anyone can point out that this person was too dumb to know that the seatbelt had to be hooked properly.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
Not everyone weighs 340 lbs, dude.

If all fat people left the park and never returned, it would still be doing a good business.

40 percent of Americans are obese.

Making up numbers is not going to help you. Argument from randU fallacy.

sealover wrote:
That said if these people are not allowed on the rides guess what, they do not come to the park and neither in many cases do their families who do not want to have fun while the really overweight members of their family eat a funnel cake and KFC because they are not allowed to have fun and are now depressed.

I know quite a few overweight people that go to fairs and amusement parks specifically so they can let their kids enjoy the park while they chow down on funnel cake, corn dogs, fried chicken, and any other fair food.

sealover wrote:
This translates into a 50 to 60 percent loss of patrons in the park that now has to close for lack of revenue.

Making up numbers is not going to help you.

sealover wrote:
I have been to the largest theme park in the USA and have seen this all quite plainly. Also weighing fat people and telling them that they are fat would translate into park suicides which might have happened here, unless anyone can point out that this person was too dumb to know that the seatbelt had to be hooked properly.

You are lying. Most of what is in Disney World isn't even a ride.

If Disney World finds itself financially hurting, it will be because people will reject Disney park's attitude toward supporting child abuse.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

40 percent of Americans are obese. That said if these people are not allowed on the rides guess what, they do not come to the park and neither in many cases do their families who do not want to have fun while the really overweight members of their family eat a funnel cake and KFC because they are not allowed to have fun and are now depressed. This translates into a 50 to 60 percent loss of patrons in the park that now has to close for lack of revenue. I have been to the largest theme park in the USA and have seen this all quite plainly. Also weighing fat people and telling them that they are fat would translate into park suicides which might have happened here, unless anyone can point out that this person was too dumb to know that the seatbelt had to be hooked properly.

Next

Fat people know they are fat. It's not some dirty secret. Don't doctors tell fat patients to lose weight? Aren't there dozens of TV ads, that target fat people? Treating them as unhealthy slobs, is doing them a favor. Gives them incentive to gt off the couch, an hit the treadmill occasionally. Majority of covid fatalities, are fat people

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Fat people know they are fat. It's not some dirty secret. Don't doctors tell fat patients to lose weight? Aren't there dozens of TV ads, that target fat people? Treating them as unhealthy slobs, is doing them a favor. Gives them incentive to gt off the couch, an hit the treadmill occasionally. Majority of covid fatalities, are fat people

The park is in a unique situation as they sell food to fat people to make money, they also want everyone to be happy. As for fat people knowing that they are fat, some do and some do not, but they all get depressed when they are told that they can not participate in life because of their condition. Fat people also commit suicide because of what they can not do which is everything except sit and eat. Amusement parks also hire young adults to run these rides not security experts to tell the fats that they are not welcome

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
Not everyone weighs 340 lbs, dude.

If all fat people left the park and never returned, it would still be doing a good business.

40 percent of Americans are obese.

Making up numbers is not going to help you. Argument from randU fallacy.

sealover wrote:
That said if these people are not allowed on the rides guess what, they do not come to the park and neither in many cases do their families who do not want to have fun while the really overweight members of their family eat a funnel cake and KFC because they are not allowed to have fun and are now depressed.

I know quite a few overweight people that go to fairs and amusement parks specifically so they can let their kids enjoy the park while they chow down on funnel cake, corn dogs, fried chicken, and any other fair food.

sealover wrote:
This translates into a 50 to 60 percent loss of patrons in the park that now has to close for lack of revenue.

Making up numbers is not going to help you.

sealover wrote:
I have been to the largest theme park in the USA and have seen this all quite plainly. Also weighing fat people and telling them that they are fat would translate into park suicides which might have happened here, unless anyone can point out that this person was too dumb to know that the seatbelt had to be hooked properly.

You are lying. Most of what is in Disney World isn't even a ride.

If Disney World finds itself financially hurting, it will be because people will reject Disney park's attitude toward supporting child abuse.

As I said most of a theme park is geared to selling KFC, funnel cakes and soda which cost a dime a gallon and sells for 8 bucks a pint. The last thing they want is no fat people on the rides

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
Not everyone weighs 340 lbs, dude.

If all fat people left the park and never returned, it would still be doing a good business.

40 percent of Americans are obese.

Making up numbers is not going to help you. Argument from randU fallacy.

sealover wrote:
That said if these people are not allowed on the rides guess what, they do not come to the park and neither in many cases do their families who do not want to have fun while the really overweight members of their family eat a funnel cake and KFC because they are not allowed to have fun and are now depressed.

I know quite a few overweight people that go to fairs and amusement parks specifically so they can let their kids enjoy the park while they chow down on funnel cake, corn dogs, fried chicken, and any other fair food.

sealover wrote:
This translates into a 50 to 60 percent loss of patrons in the park that now has to close for lack of revenue.

Making up numbers is not going to help you.

sealover wrote:
I have been to the largest theme park in the USA and have seen this all quite plainly. Also weighing fat people and telling them that they are fat would translate into park suicides which might have happened here, unless anyone can point out that this person was too dumb to know that the seatbelt had to be hooked properly.

You are lying. Most of what is in Disney World isn't even a ride.

If Disney World finds itself financially hurting, it will be because people will reject Disney park's attitude toward supporting child abuse.

As I said most of a theme park is geared to selling KFC, funnel cakes and soda which cost a dime a gallon and sells for 8 bucks a pint. The last thing they want is no fat people on the rides

Why? If most of a theme park is geared to selling food, and fat people can certainly enjoy all they want (paying for it all the way, of course), why would barring them from rides (which don't actually make any money!), be a problem, financially speaking?

People bring their kids to Disneyland, and it's largely the kids riding the rides. Their fat parents (assuming they are fat) spend their time spending MORE money in the park to eat their meals while their kids are having fun.

Fat people have no problem with certain rides and are not restricted from them. Disney has a financial interest in keeping fat people off of certain rides. The last think Disney wants is for someone to suffer serious injury or death because the ride was overloaded or the rider couldn't be properly secured.

Lawsuits cost money, dude.