|Multilayer nature of atmosphere explains global warming18-09-2016 01:35|
|The atmosphere has multiple layers. This is often ignored by simple calculations that GW-skeptics/GW-deniers/GW-purple unicorns from outer space ignore. (That last part was a reference to how nobody can decide what they want to called as a group.)|
The radiation of energy from the Earth system occurs at a layer of the atmosphere that is high enough to not have too much gas above it to obstruct the radiation. An increase in greenhouses changes the "emission layer" upward. Since upward generally means cooler, this decreases the energy emitted.
"Heads on a science
Apart" - Coldplay, The Scientist
No, science doesn't insist that, ergo I don't insist that.
I am the Ninja Scientist! Beware!
Stefan-Boltzmann says that atmospheric "layers" don't matter in the body's temperature.
Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.
Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit
When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung
Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles
Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn
You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.
The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank
:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude
IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
|SB only concerns the radiation from the surface of a gray body when it is applied naively. More complicated situations require more complicated applications. You are seriously the only person who thinks that SB can be naively applied to the Earth and produce a usable result.|
|Eugh, that was written awfully. Here's a version with better grammar:|
When you naively apply SB, you are only correct in the simple gray body situation. More complex situations require more nuanced equations and models. The entire scientific branch based around modeling the climate would like to have a word.
Edited on 18-09-2016 06:27
|Into the Night★★★★★
Another condescending statement by you.
I could give a rat's ass what word they would like to have with either of us.
People who deny science are not being scientists, not even if they are 'professional' scientists.
The Parrot Killer
|But how are they denying science? Are they denying your naive use of a law? Geez, ButthurtTheNight, that must mean you're right.|
|Into the Night★★★★★
Stay out of bars. You will get damaged talking like that. You will have earned every bit of it.
The Parrot Killer
|I would love to meet you in a bar, not to give you a knuckle sandwich, just to laugh my arse at you you pompous twat.|
|I don't plan on spending much time around people as an adult unless I have to. I'm very introverted. Bars are out of the question.|
You can't hurt anything but my feelings. And even that is difficult, as I can walk away at any time. This is where I go to show what I REALLY think about people like you.
|Alpine tundra releases long-frozen CO2 to the atmosphere, exacerbating climate warming||5||22-03-2019 04:21|
|Altering the Atmosphere to Combat Climate Change Might Not Kill Us All: Study||1||14-03-2019 18:40|
|Altering the Atmosphere to Combat Climate Change Might Not Kill Us All: Study||6||14-03-2019 00:33|
|How can hippies beat CO2? CO2 is power of nature? Man is nothing compared to nature.||2||24-02-2019 22:55|
|I believe human beings are part of nature, not against nature as westerners say.||0||05-02-2019 23:02|