Climate-Debate.com Discuss climate change
Meteorologists are getting better at forecasting "extreme weather events"
18-08-2022 15:58 |
duncan61★★★★★ (2021) |
Harvey does not believe there is past data to compare with.[/quote] Void argument fallacy. What 'data' are you referring to?
Roj475 wrote: Is it the movement Age in Genesis that believe the Earth to be 6000 years old. Genesis makes no such statement.
Roj475 wrote: There is data available for both these points, however the returning response would likely be the same.
There is no data for the age of the Earth. There is no data for the temperature of the Earth. There is no data for the global atmospheric content of CO2. There is no data for sea level. There is no data for the amount of snow on ice on Earth.
What 'data' are your referring to?[/quote]
My Engineer buddy confirmed what you stated ITN. No one knows where oil and gas come from but his geo buddies are good at finding it. Coal is a bit easier to identify but it is all speculation.There is no proof it is old flora and fauna
duncan61 |
18-08-2022 18:14 |
Roj475★☆☆☆☆ (69) |
Into the Night wrote:
Roj475 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Roj475 wrote: [quote]HarveyH55 wrote: There is no past data to compare with, just fear and speculation.
It's like telling some people dinosaurs exist and when you hold up a bone, they have an answer why it is fake. Explain.
Harvey does not believe there is past data to compare with. Void argument fallacy. What 'data' are you referring to?
I am requesting the data for the posters position... If there is no data then it is their opinion.
Into the Night wrote: Roj475 wrote: Is it the movement Age in Genesis that believe the Earth to be 6000 years old. Genesis makes no such statement.
Age in Genesis, and I am sure other groups do.
[quote]Into the Night wrote: [quote]Roj475 wrote: There is data available for both these points, however the returning response would likely be the same.
There is no data for the age of the Earth. There is no data for the temperature of the Earth. There is no data for the global atmospheric content of CO2. There is no data for sea level. There is no data for the amount of snow on ice on Earth.
What 'data' are your referring to?
I would hope that you, as a minimum, are able to experience a different level of heat when in a Summer sun as opposed to a Winter cloudy sky.
If we are unable to measure CO2, does that mean we are unable to measure O2? |
23-08-2022 20:58 |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22414) |
Roj475 wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Roj475 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote: [quote]Roj475 wrote: [quote]HarveyH55 wrote: There is no past data to compare with, just fear and speculation.
It's like telling some people dinosaurs exist and when you hold up a bone, they have an answer why it is fake. Explain.
Harvey does not believe there is past data to compare with. Void argument fallacy. What 'data' are you referring to?
I am requesting the data for the posters position... If there is no data then it is their opinion.
Into the Night wrote: Roj475 wrote: Is it the movement Age in Genesis that believe the Earth to be 6000 years old. Genesis makes no such statement.
Age in Genesis, and I am sure other groups do.
Into the Night wrote: [quote]Roj475 wrote: There is data available for both these points, however the returning response would likely be the same.
There is no data for the age of the Earth. There is no data for the temperature of the Earth. There is no data for the global atmospheric content of CO2. There is no data for sea level. There is no data for the amount of snow on ice on Earth.
What 'data' are your referring to?
I would hope that you, as a minimum, are able to experience a different level of heat when in a Summer sun as opposed to a Winter cloudy sky.
Heat has no levels.
Roj475 wrote: If we are unable to measure CO2, does that mean we are unable to measure O2?
Yes.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
Join the debate Meteorologists are getting better at forecasting "extreme weather events":
Related content
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.