Many problems
| 25-04-2020 21:33 | |
tmiddles ★★★★★(3979) |
keepit wrote:How about bigfoot and chupacabra? Me? Lee Harvey did it alone OJ totally did it, alone and no bigfoot or chupacabra |
| 25-04-2020 21:41 | |
| keepit★★★★★ (3058) |
I haven't seen bigfoot or chucacabra so i don't know. I saw films of the Kennedy assassination. and i saw testimony in the oj trial though. I guess the film and sound of the assassination could have been doctored. I'd have to see evidence that it was doctored though. |
| 27-04-2020 16:48 | |
gfm7175 ★★★★★(3314) |
tmiddles wrote:gfm7175 wrote:...I am making fun of your useless style of responding.Oh, eh, not that funny. Didn't expect you to laugh. Liberals tend to have no sense of humor. tmiddles wrote: link to references tmiddles wrote: You're incapable of going onto the CDC website and pulling up their COVID numbers? The CDC website works just fine for me. tmiddles wrote:gfm7175 wrote:Absolutely. Your illiteracy in English is showing again... tmiddles wrote: Self-proclaimed victory mantra. tmiddles wrote: LIE. tmiddles wrote: What do you wish to blather on about? tmiddles wrote: They've already addressed the things that you have brought up. If you have no new arguments, then what is there to respond to? tmiddles wrote:gfm7175 wrote:So you consider INFOWARS to be a more credible source than Wikipedia?tmiddles wrote:They seem to be a hit or a miss, depending on the specific video/article...Wikipedia, on the other hand, Generally speaking, yes. |
| 28-04-2020 07:35 | |
| tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
gfm7175 wrote:I did and what you claimed was there is not. Sure looks like your are lying. Again. gfm7175 wrote:For over 5 years ITN/IBD and others have repeatedly made three arguments I've destroyed below. They both tucked tail and ran because I've got them dead to rights. If you'd like to debate me on them let's go:tmiddles wrote: Misuse of the 1st LTD, Plancks Law/SB Law, and glaring hypocrisy of "Valid Data" exposed: https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/venus-is-hotter-than-mercury--d6-e2710-s720.php#post_53762 43 days with no reply Here: Debating "photons of the lower temperature object are not absorbed by the higher temperature object." and that the a light bulb absorbs the radiance from an oven, IBD claims "go ahead ... I'm ready to debate it.": https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/the-radiative-greenhouse-effect-does-not-exist-d10-e3047-s40.php#post_53357 50 days with no reply And Here: 2nd Law and disproving IBD's confusion about Earth being a isolated system: https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/2nd-law-d6-e3030-s80.php#post_53063 56 days with no reply gfm7175 wrote:tmiddles wrote:So you consider INFOWARS to be a more credible source than Wikipedia? So you find these stories to be credible?: The Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax and never happened. The government is putting chemicals in the water to make frogs and people gay. Barack Obama was born in Kenya The government is controlling the weather Hillary Clinton was running a child sex ring out of a D.C.-area pizza restaurant Millions of undocumented immigrants illegally voted in the election Glenn Beck is a CIA operative link "Good tests kill flawed theories; we remain alive to guess again." - Karl Popper ITN/IBD Fraud exposed: The 2nd LTD add on claiming radiance from cooler bodies can't be absorbed Max Planck debunks, they can't explain:net-thermal-radiation-you-in-a-room-as-a-reference & Proof: no data is valid for IBD or ITN |
| 28-04-2020 17:43 | |
Into the Night ★★★★★(21596) |
tmiddles wrote:gfm7175 wrote:I did and what you claimed was there is not. Sure looks like your are lying. Again. Lie. You never examined the site or did the math. Mantra 17.; tmiddles wrote: Mantra 4b. Rolling Stone magazine is not INFOWARS. Making up shit about INFOWARS is a lie. You are repeating that lie. No argument presented. RQAA. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 28-04-2020 17:54 | |
| tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:Did the math? What math? Searched the site and it's not there. You lied. Into the Night wrote: What are you claiming I got wrong about your trusted INFOWARS? |
| 28-04-2020 18:58 | |
| Into the Night★★★★★ (21596) |
tmiddles wrote:...deleted Mantras 29...28...17...29... No argument presented. RQAA. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
Join the debate Many problems:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| You Must Understand The Root Problems Of World Wide Society Chaos | 1 | 10-07-2021 19:51 |
| You Must Seek Solutions From Outsiders To Solve The Geopolitical Problems In Your Conflict Game | 1 | 27-09-2020 03:25 |
| The Perfect Solution To Remove Conflict Problems In The South China East Asia Sea | 3 | 16-09-2020 05:00 |
| Server problems | 4 | 01-04-2019 06:52 |
| HOW CLIMATE CHANGE IS AFFECTING MY LOCAL COMMUNITY IN THE PRESENT DAY AND HOW TO COMBAT THESE PROBLEMS | 3 | 17-01-2018 22:42 |