LOL, I used to be a conspiracy theorist for saying that covid was leaked from a chinka lab, but now

HarveyH55 wrote:
Nobody knew to even look, until months after it was already an epidemic. Infection only lasts 5-10 days. Symptoms are the same as cold and flu. Lab leak is most likely, but China took a couple months to make sure nothing there to see. Also think lab leak is most likely, because everyone, wanted to look anywhere else more, and dismiss the possibility, specially Fauci. Couldn't have the public wanting to poke around all virus labs...

HarveyH55 wrote:
Coronavirus is the most common respiratory virus in animals. Sort of animal cold and flu. Crossing over into the human species is devastating for a few years, least to those in poor health, weak immune systems. Fauci made it worse, with his questionable advice. He had thousands of case in China, to realize it was only a deadly threat to an isolated segment of the population. Instead of promoting 'everybody is go to die', and broad-brushing the response, he should have limited his focus on those actually at risk. It was a cash-grab, bigger the response, the more government money spent, with little oversight into who got what, or what it was actually used for. Fauci and friends hit the jackpot, and he cashed in, just like many did in other countries. Fauci knew it wouldn't matter what he did, 2-3 years, and the population would achieve, or very close to, herd-immunity. All that money the governments threw around, will be used to further fund virus and genetic research. Which wasn't being as generously fund, as 'go-green' technology.

I doubt the bio-weapons theories, as most 'leaders', and head researchers are old, poor health, weak immune systems. The ones most likely to die from any sort of infection. Why release new ones to worry about? Vaccines are never 100% safe, or effective. Therapeutics usually work best, early into an infection. If you wait until you need a neck-tube in the ICU, it's a little late.

I do believe Wuhan was studying gain-of-function. Rather than waiting around, for a naturally event to happen, they removed all randomness they could. The used infected animals, to intentionally attempt to infect other species. The studied the original virus, to any successful cross-infections to see what changed. They were sloppy, and forgot humans were an animal species. There are only a handful of coronaviruses that crossed into the human species,so it should have been relatively safe. Besides, it just a mild respiratory infection in animals, rarely deadly. I think some sloppy lab worker got infected,, and spread it outside the lab. Don't think the lab was restricted to only employees either. Likely had plumbers, electricians, and others come in occasionally. Probably a few visitors, like Dr. Fauci...

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Coronavirus is the most common respiratory virus in animals. Sort of animal cold and flu. Crossing over into the human species is devastating for a few years, least to those in poor health, weak immune systems. Fauci made it worse, with his questionable advice. He had thousands of case in China, to realize it was only a deadly threat to an isolated segment of the population. Instead of promoting 'everybody is go to die', and broad-brushing the response, he should have limited his focus on those actually at risk. It was a cash-grab, bigger the response, the more government money spent, with little oversight into who got what, or what it was actually used for. Fauci and friends hit the jackpot, and he cashed in, just like many did in other countries. Fauci knew it wouldn't matter what he did, 2-3 years, and the population would achieve, or very close to, herd-immunity. All that money the governments threw around, will be used to further fund virus and genetic research. Which wasn't being as generously fund, as 'go-green' technology.

I doubt the bio-weapons theories, as most 'leaders', and head researchers are old, poor health, weak immune systems. The ones most likely to die from any sort of infection. Why release new ones to worry about? Vaccines are never 100% safe, or effective. Therapeutics usually work best, early into an infection. If you wait until you need a neck-tube in the ICU, it's a little late.

I do believe Wuhan was studying gain-of-function. Rather than waiting around, for a naturally event to happen, they removed all randomness they could. The used infected animals, to intentionally attempt to infect other species. The studied the original virus, to any successful cross-infections to see what changed. They were sloppy, and forgot humans were an animal species. There are only a handful of coronaviruses that crossed into the human species,so it should have been relatively safe. Besides, it just a mild respiratory infection in animals, rarely deadly. I think some sloppy lab worker got infected,, and spread it outside the lab. Don't think the lab was restricted to only employees either. Likely had plumbers, electricians, and others come in occasionally. Probably a few visitors, like Dr. Fauci...

LOL coronavirus did not cross over from animals as it has always been called the common cold. Furthermore the covid virus in the bats that it came from is totally harmless and as always you are a typical government disinformation POS

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Coronavirus is the most common respiratory virus in animals. Sort of animal cold and flu. Crossing over into the human species is devastating for a few years, least to those in poor health, weak immune systems. Fauci made it worse, with his questionable advice. He had thousands of case in China, to realize it was only a deadly threat to an isolated segment of the population. Instead of promoting 'everybody is go to die', and broad-brushing the response, he should have limited his focus on those actually at risk. It was a cash-grab, bigger the response, the more government money spent, with little oversight into who got what, or what it was actually used for. Fauci and friends hit the jackpot, and he cashed in, just like many did in other countries. Fauci knew it wouldn't matter what he did, 2-3 years, and the population would achieve, or very close to, herd-immunity. All that money the governments threw around, will be used to further fund virus and genetic research. Which wasn't being as generously fund, as 'go-green' technology.

I doubt the bio-weapons theories, as most 'leaders', and head researchers are old, poor health, weak immune systems. The ones most likely to die from any sort of infection. Why release new ones to worry about? Vaccines are never 100% safe, or effective. Therapeutics usually work best, early into an infection. If you wait until you need a neck-tube in the ICU, it's a little late.

I do believe Wuhan was studying gain-of-function. Rather than waiting around, for a naturally event to happen, they removed all randomness they could. The used infected animals, to intentionally attempt to infect other species. The studied the original virus, to any successful cross-infections to see what changed. They were sloppy, and forgot humans were an animal species. There are only a handful of coronaviruses that crossed into the human species,so it should have been relatively safe. Besides, it just a mild respiratory infection in animals, rarely deadly. I think some sloppy lab worker got infected,, and spread it outside the lab. Don't think the lab was restricted to only employees either. Likely had plumbers, electricians, and others come in occasionally. Probably a few visitors, like Dr. Fauci...

LOL coronavirus did not cross over from animals as it has always been called the common cold. Furthermore the covid virus in the bats that it came from is totally harmless and as always you are a typical government disinformation POS

You should at least Google, before showing what an uneducated moron you really are... All you seem to come up with copy/paste headlines, and foolish insults. Every attempt at adding something smart, fails...

Swan wrote:
the FBI (farts bimbos and idiots) director Fay Wray ADMITS that I was right.

Sure, is great being me

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-dodges-reporters-question-covid-19-origin-hold-china-accountable

Spongy Iris wrote:
Here is your lab leak



Now there is a conspiracy theory which won't be getting promoted by the FBI.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
Here is your lab leak



Now there is a conspiracy theory which won't be getting promoted by the FBI.

Enjoy your live monkey brain pudding

Swan wrote:
the FBI (farts bimbos and idiots) director Fay Wray ADMITS that I was right.

Sure, is great being me

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-dodges-reporters-question-covid-19-origin-hold-china-accountable

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
the FBI (farts bimbos and idiots) director Fay Wray ADMITS that I was right.

Sure, is great being me

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-dodges-reporters-question-covid-19-origin-hold-china-accountable

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before joining this website, the last time I was involved in a discussion where someone invoked their IQ, I was still a teenager.

But, what else can a teenager say to establish credibility?

They haven't lived long enough to accomplish much.

IQ = 130?

That would be at the high end of the 97th percentile.

That would mean that among a random group of 100 people, only two of them have IQ higher than 130.

Maybe that counts for something.

Maybe that entitles one to insult with impunity.

I'll take your word for it, I guess, about the IQ.

I wouldn't know it from the scientific knowledge displayed.

How did you pass high school biology if you didn't even know that frogs have lungs?

At least you don't claim that alligators are amphibians.

Credit where credit is due.

It is only personal because I so deeply resent what you do on this website.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Fauci & friends doubt the lab-leak, solely on not finding any indicators that the virus was lab manipulated/engineered. Which might be correct. But, they didn't need, or really want a created virus. They were studying gain-of-function, which doesn't happen all that often in the wild. Lot of random events, and dumb luck. All they had to do is take out the randomness, by force-infecting a selection of different species, and see if any got sick from the host. Any virus that made the jump, would be the one to study closely, and use in the next round. It would still be rough, only made the minimal requirement to infect in the new species. Through the jump, it may have characteristics useful for other species. The mutant viruses, are still natural, not engineered.

No telling exactly when covid hit the streets of Wuhan. Most people, in reasonable health, only had mild symptoms. It was cold and flu season, same symptoms. Wasn't until a while later, that the hospital started to get an unusually high number of severe respiratory infections. They expected a busy ER during flu season, but this was getting bad, and treatments weren't working. This wasn't overnight, it was a month or two. Meanwhile, thousand of exposed/infected people traveled through Wuhan International Airport, and around the world, every week. There was no test, other than a large volume of severe cases in the ER. Only people getting severe symptoms, were elderly, or weakened immune system. Mos take precautions during cold and flu season, because the ran the same risk of a hospital visit, from any respiratory infection.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
the FBI (farts bimbos and idiots) director Fay Wray ADMITS that I was right.

Sure, is great being me

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-dodges-reporters-question-covid-19-origin-hold-china-accountable

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before joining this website, the last time I was involved in a discussion where someone invoked their IQ, I was still a teenager.

But, what else can a teenager say to establish credibility?

They haven't lived long enough to accomplish much.

IQ = 130?

That would be at the high end of the 97th percentile.

That would mean that among a random group of 100 people, only two of them have IQ higher than 130.

Maybe that counts for something.

Maybe that entitles one to insult with impunity.

I'll take your word for it, I guess, about the IQ.

I wouldn't know it from the scientific knowledge displayed.

How did you pass high school biology if you didn't even know that frogs have lungs?

At least you don't claim that alligators are amphibians.

Credit where credit is due.

It is only personal because I so deeply resent what you do on this website.

Apple Inc

As of March 8, 2023 * 4:00 PM EST

NASDAQ: AAPL

152.87USD+1.27(0.84%)

Shit my Apples are all worth more than my 130 IQ.

You have a good day sir.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
the FBI (farts bimbos and idiots) director Fay Wray ADMITS that I was right.

Sure, is great being me

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-dodges-reporters-question-covid-19-origin-hold-china-accountable

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before joining this website, the last time I was involved in a discussion where someone invoked their IQ, I was still a teenager.

But, what else can a teenager say to establish credibility?

They haven't lived long enough to accomplish much.

IQ = 130?

That would be at the high end of the 97th percentile.

That would mean that among a random group of 100 people, only two of them have IQ higher than 130.

Maybe that counts for something.

Maybe that entitles one to insult with impunity.

I'll take your word for it, I guess, about the IQ.

I wouldn't know it from the scientific knowledge displayed.

How did you pass high school biology if you didn't even know that frogs have lungs?

At least you don't claim that alligators are amphibians.

Credit where credit is due.

It is only personal because I so deeply resent what you do on this website.

Apple Inc

As of March 8, 2023 * 4:00 PM EST

NASDAQ: AAPL

152.87USD+1.27(0.84%)

Shit my Apples are all worth more than my 130 IQ.

You have a good day sir.

If you are so rich, why aren't you smart?

Anti vax is anti science.

Regardless of virus origin.

Anti vax is just anti science.

Anti science is just stupid.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Vaccines have never been 100% safe, or effective... For covid, the vast majority of cases were mild, similar to cold or flu. Severe cases are mainly the elderly, and weak immune system, just like cold and flu. We don't have effective vaccines for cold or flu. The annual flu shot covers only 3, or 4 strains. Better than nothing, but no replacement for caution, and not getting infected to begin with. There can never be an effect covid vaccine, because it mutates easily, like the cold viruses. There are no unique, physically identifiable symptoms for covid. The only test, involves shoving a Q-tip, deep, up into the nose. The infected, is ready to spread, even before symptoms are obvious. Home test aren't completely accurate, even when directions are followed. A lab test still takes 2-3 days minimum. Covid infection last 5-10 days, for mild cases. The 'science' would indicate that covid-19 vaccines are stupid, political. Only those at high-risk of severe symptoms, have any hope of benefit, since it's slightly better, than doing nothing at all. But, those gullible enough to trust-the-science, and truly believe they get the shot, they are perfectly safe. No longer have to worry about covid, until the next booster. Vigilance and caution is still more important, because the vaccine isn't 100% effective. New, resistant strains emerge.

Masks... Fauci is such a moron. Masks are filters, but need to be changed often to be even slightly effective. When you change you HVAC filter every month, isn't dirty and nasty? Masks are tiny, and are expected to trap much smaller particles. They'll clog quicker, and the air you breath will take the path of least resistance. Which isn't through the filter material. Of course, you need to remove them to eat and drink, sometimes speak. Should be replaced with a clean mask, every time one is removed. Basically, just cover your face,is virtue signalling, not science.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
the FBI (farts bimbos and idiots) director Fay Wray ADMITS that I was right.

Sure, is great being me

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-dodges-reporters-question-covid-19-origin-hold-china-accountable

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before joining this website, the last time I was involved in a discussion where someone invoked their IQ, I was still a teenager.

But, what else can a teenager say to establish credibility?

They haven't lived long enough to accomplish much.

IQ = 130?

That would be at the high end of the 97th percentile.

That would mean that among a random group of 100 people, only two of them have IQ higher than 130.

Maybe that counts for something.

Maybe that entitles one to insult with impunity.

I'll take your word for it, I guess, about the IQ.

I wouldn't know it from the scientific knowledge displayed.

How did you pass high school biology if you didn't even know that frogs have lungs?

At least you don't claim that alligators are amphibians.

Credit where credit is due.

It is only personal because I so deeply resent what you do on this website.

Apple Inc

As of March 8, 2023 * 4:00 PM EST

NASDAQ: AAPL

152.87USD+1.27(0.84%)

Shit my Apples are all worth more than my 130 IQ.

You have a good day sir.

If you are so rich, why aren't you smart?

Anti vax is anti science.

Regardless of virus origin.

Anti vax is just anti science.

Anti science is just stupid.

Actually people vaccinated with the covid 19 vaccines have a higher mortality rate when infected with covid. Says CDC scientist. But you just do what the government tells you like the zombie that you are and you can never know as you merely crave the brains that you lack.

You are already dead, you are just too dumb to know.

Smile retard, you did what you were told, like the good toddler that you are

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
the FBI (farts bimbos and idiots) director Fay Wray ADMITS that I was right.

Sure, is great being me

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-dodges-reporters-question-covid-19-origin-hold-china-accountable

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before joining this website, the last time I was involved in a discussion where someone invoked their IQ, I was still a teenager.

But, what else can a teenager say to establish credibility?

They haven't lived long enough to accomplish much.

IQ = 130?

That would be at the high end of the 97th percentile.

That would mean that among a random group of 100 people, only two of them have IQ higher than 130.

Maybe that counts for something.

Maybe that entitles one to insult with impunity.

I'll take your word for it, I guess, about the IQ.

I wouldn't know it from the scientific knowledge displayed.

How did you pass high school biology if you didn't even know that frogs have lungs?

At least you don't claim that alligators are amphibians.

Credit where credit is due.

It is only personal because I so deeply resent what you do on this website.

Apple Inc

As of March 8, 2023 * 4:00 PM EST

NASDAQ: AAPL

152.87USD+1.27(0.84%)

Shit my Apples are all worth more than my 130 IQ.

You have a good day sir.

If you are so rich, why aren't you smart?

Anti vax is anti science.

Regardless of virus origin.

Anti vax is just anti science.

Anti science is just stupid.

Actually people vaccinated with the covid 19 vaccines have a higher mortality rate when infected with covid. Says CDC scientist. But you just do what the government tells you like the zombie that you are and you can never know as you merely crave the brains that you lack.

You are already dead, you are just too dumb to know.

Smile retard, you did what you were told, like the good toddler that you are

So many thread titles with inflammatory terms such as "Chinka".

Just to piss people off?

Use of the term "fag" so often that it makes one suspicious of the obsession.

Just to piss people off?

You know that out of any random 50 people, at least one has IQ higher than yours.

But I saw an on line test you can take to boost your IQ score to 140.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
the FBI (farts bimbos and idiots) director Fay Wray ADMITS that I was right.

Sure, is great being me

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-dodges-reporters-question-covid-19-origin-hold-china-accountable

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before joining this website, the last time I was involved in a discussion where someone invoked their IQ, I was still a teenager.

But, what else can a teenager say to establish credibility?

They haven't lived long enough to accomplish much.

IQ = 130?

That would be at the high end of the 97th percentile.

That would mean that among a random group of 100 people, only two of them have IQ higher than 130.

Maybe that counts for something.

Maybe that entitles one to insult with impunity.

I'll take your word for it, I guess, about the IQ.

I wouldn't know it from the scientific knowledge displayed.

How did you pass high school biology if you didn't even know that frogs have lungs?

At least you don't claim that alligators are amphibians.

Credit where credit is due.

It is only personal because I so deeply resent what you do on this website.

Apple Inc

As of March 8, 2023 * 4:00 PM EST

NASDAQ: AAPL

152.87USD+1.27(0.84%)

Shit my Apples are all worth more than my 130 IQ.

You have a good day sir.

If you are so rich, why aren't you smart?

Anti vax is anti science.

Regardless of virus origin.

Anti vax is just anti science.

Anti science is just stupid.

Actually people vaccinated with the covid 19 vaccines have a higher mortality rate when infected with covid. Says CDC scientist. But you just do what the government tells you like the zombie that you are and you can never know as you merely crave the brains that you lack.

You are already dead, you are just too dumb to know.

Smile retard, you did what you were told, like the good toddler that you are

So many thread titles with inflammatory terms such as "Chinka".

Just to piss people off?

Use of the term "fag" so often that it makes one suspicious of the obsession.

Just to piss people off?

You know that out of any random 50 people, at least one has IQ higher than yours.

But I saw an on line test you can take to boost your IQ score to 140.

LOL I especially get a kick out of astrophysicist with an IQ of at least 150 that believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing and that because of this they with a straight face claim that the universe is simulated like their fag/dyke/unisex/chinky blow up doll with the puffy lips.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
the FBI (farts bimbos and idiots) director Fay Wray ADMITS that I was right.

Sure, is great being me

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-dodges-reporters-question-covid-19-origin-hold-china-accountable

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before joining this website, the last time I was involved in a discussion where someone invoked their IQ, I was still a teenager.

But, what else can a teenager say to establish credibility?

They haven't lived long enough to accomplish much.

IQ = 130?

That would be at the high end of the 97th percentile.

That would mean that among a random group of 100 people, only two of them have IQ higher than 130.

Maybe that counts for something.

Maybe that entitles one to insult with impunity.

I'll take your word for it, I guess, about the IQ.

I wouldn't know it from the scientific knowledge displayed.

How did you pass high school biology if you didn't even know that frogs have lungs?

At least you don't claim that alligators are amphibians.

Credit where credit is due.

It is only personal because I so deeply resent what you do on this website.

Apple Inc

As of March 8, 2023 * 4:00 PM EST

NASDAQ: AAPL

152.87USD+1.27(0.84%)

Shit my Apples are all worth more than my 130 IQ.

You have a good day sir.

If you are so rich, why aren't you smart?

Anti vax is anti science.

Regardless of virus origin.

Anti vax is just anti science.

Anti science is just stupid.

Actually people vaccinated with the covid 19 vaccines have a higher mortality rate when infected with covid. Says CDC scientist. But you just do what the government tells you like the zombie that you are and you can never know as you merely crave the brains that you lack.

You are already dead, you are just too dumb to know.

Smile retard, you did what you were told, like the good toddler that you are

So many thread titles with inflammatory terms such as "Chinka".

Just to piss people off?

Use of the term "fag" so often that it makes one suspicious of the obsession.

Just to piss people off?

You know that out of any random 50 people, at least one has IQ higher than yours.

But I saw an on line test you can take to boost your IQ score to 140.

LOL I especially get a kick out of astrophysicist with an IQ of at least 150 that believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing and that because of this they with a straight face claim that the universe is simulated like their fag/dyke/unisex/chinky blow up doll with the puffy lips.

Take your pills?

Swan wrote:LOL I especially get a kick out of astrophysicist with an IQ of at least 150 that believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL I especially get a kick out of astrophysicist with an IQ of at least 150 that believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing

This is why I only converse with people of 423-minimum IQs. I hate wasting my time.

Swan wrote:Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa well schmuck it can be determined from your statement that you believe that my IQ is 423 at least.

Swan wrote:So as usual you are a schizzo, and as usual you continually try to better my spirits so that you can hide from your own pathetic jelly bean status in life.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa well schmuck it can be determined from your statement that you believe that my IQ is 423 at least.

It's what we know.

Swan wrote:So as usual you are a schizzo, and as usual you continually try to better my spirits so that you can hide from your own pathetic jelly bean status in life.

Jelly bean status? Surely you jest. I have a gummy bear status and you can take that to the bank.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:
the FBI (farts bimbos and idiots) director Fay Wray ADMITS that I was right.

Sure, is great being me

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-dodges-reporters-question-covid-19-origin-hold-china-accountable

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before joining this website, the last time I was involved in a discussion where someone invoked their IQ, I was still a teenager.

But, what else can a teenager say to establish credibility?

They haven't lived long enough to accomplish much.

IQ = 130?

That would be at the high end of the 97th percentile.

That would mean that among a random group of 100 people, only two of them have IQ higher than 130.

Maybe that counts for something.

Maybe that entitles one to insult with impunity.

I'll take your word for it, I guess, about the IQ.

I wouldn't know it from the scientific knowledge displayed.

How did you pass high school biology if you didn't even know that frogs have lungs?

At least you don't claim that alligators are amphibians.

Credit where credit is due.

It is only personal because I so deeply resent what you do on this website.

Apple Inc

As of March 8, 2023 * 4:00 PM EST

NASDAQ: AAPL

152.87USD+1.27(0.84%)

Shit my Apples are all worth more than my 130 IQ.

You have a good day sir.

If you are so rich, why aren't you smart?

Anti vax is anti science.

Regardless of virus origin.

Anti vax is just anti science.

Anti science is just stupid.

Actually people vaccinated with the covid 19 vaccines have a higher mortality rate when infected with covid. Says CDC scientist. But you just do what the government tells you like the zombie that you are and you can never know as you merely crave the brains that you lack.

You are already dead, you are just too dumb to know.

Smile retard, you did what you were told, like the good toddler that you are

So many thread titles with inflammatory terms such as "Chinka".

Just to piss people off?

Use of the term "fag" so often that it makes one suspicious of the obsession.

Just to piss people off?

You know that out of any random 50 people, at least one has IQ higher than yours.

But I saw an on line test you can take to boost your IQ score to 140.

LOL I especially get a kick out of astrophysicist with an IQ of at least 150 that believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing and that because of this they with a straight face claim that the universe is simulated like their fag/dyke/unisex/chinky blow up doll with the puffy lips.

Take your pills?

LOL I especially get a kick out of astrophysicist with an IQ of at least 150 that believe that 85 percent of the universe is missing and that because of this they with a straight face claim that the universe is simulated like their fag/dyke/unisex/chinky blow up doll with the puffy lips.


Perfection needs no change

Im a BM wrote:But you ARE a disgusting racist and homophobe. You publish a lot of things you should keep to yourself. And it is reflected in the disgusting titles of the many, many threads you start. Unfortunately, that is all that most people ever see of the website. Your ugly thread titles.