ITN calls himself The Parrot Killer. Ha!

gfm7175 wrote:
Haha, thanks for this! It appears that ITN isn't doing all of the parrot killing after-all...

Im a BM wrote:

gfm7175 wrote:
Haha, thanks for this! It appears that ITN isn't doing all of the parrot killing after-all...

Christmas was so much fun that year!

That was back when Google still brought fresh meat to the slaughter.

GasGuzzler and gfm7175 don't come around much anymore. Sigh...

Im a BM wrote:
Those who placed their bets that Into the Night would get his first Nobel Prize for his paradigm-shifting discoveries in the field of thermodynamics might want to rethink it.

Im a BM wrote:
Do you know what Into the Night has discovered about the INTERSTITIUM?

It is NOT an organ, contains no tissue, and does not have compartments.

Im a BM wrote:
There is too much controversy about "climate change" for fast-tracking ITN's Nobel Prize in thermodynamics.

Im a BM wrote:
But this historic medical science discovery will advance Into the Night very rapidly to fame, and most certainly a Nobel Prize.

You know what all those stupid scientists THOUGHT the interstitium was?

Ask Google: "Do scientists think that the interstitium is an organ that contains tissue and has compartments?"

Im a BM wrote:
Google's AI provides its answer at the upper left:

[b]Im a BM wrote:
"Some researchers propose that the interstitium is a new organ, describing it as a widespread, fluid-filled network of compartments supported by a collagen lattice, rather than a solid structure. Located throughout the body under the skin and lining organs, it is thought to act as a shock absorber and conduit for fluids."[/b]

Im a BM wrote:
Imagine how RICH and FAMOUS Into the Night is going to be when he uses his scientific genius to teach the world the TRUTH about the interstitium.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Those who placed their bets that Into the Night would get his first Nobel Prize for his paradigm-shifting discoveries in the field of thermodynamics might want to rethink it.

I didn't create the laws of thermodynamics. You just want to ignore them.

Im a BM wrote:
Do you know what Into the Night has discovered about the INTERSTITIUM?

It is NOT an organ, contains no tissue, and does not have compartments.

Not a 'discovery'. You are simply denying anatomy.

Im a BM wrote:
There is too much controversy about "climate change" for fast-tracking ITN's Nobel Prize in thermodynamics.

Climate cannot change, Robert.
Science is not a prize.

Im a BM wrote:
But this historic medical science discovery will advance Into the Night very rapidly to fame, and most certainly a Nobel Prize.

You know what all those stupid scientists THOUGHT the interstitium was?

Ask Google: "Do scientists think that the interstitium is an organ that contains tissue and has compartments?"

Not a discovery, Robert. You just choose to ignore it. You are not Google.

Im a BM wrote:
Google's AI provides its answer at the upper left:

Google is not sentient.

[b]Im a BM wrote:
"Some researchers propose that the interstitium is a new organ, describing it as a widespread, fluid-filled network of compartments supported by a collagen lattice, rather than a solid structure. Located throughout the body under the skin and lining organs, it is thought to act as a shock absorber and conduit for fluids."[/b]

The interstitium is not an organ. It is not a network. I has no compartments. It has no collagen lattice. Liquids are not solids. It is everywhere in the body. It does not line organs. It is not a conduit.

Im a BM wrote:
Imagine how RICH and FAMOUS Into the Night is going to be when he uses his scientific genius to teach the world the TRUTH about the interstitium.

Nah. You just deny anatomy.

Im a BM wrote:
One more attempt to get Jeppe Branner to take some interest in his website.

I will detail for him how there is a new trend where hundreds of viewers who never post anything are selectively looking up old threads. I'll give him some quotes from what scientists said about his website - why they would NEVER post here - after I asked them to take a look at it.

Im a BM wrote:
Once more, I'll beg him to try the moderated sub forum experiment again.

Im a BM wrote:
ITN can contact Branner to explain how I "doxed" myself, and how I should be banned for "spamming".

Im a BM wrote:
So, before I even start the new thread here, I'll work on a draft of that first post that will be a sales pitch to Branner.

Im a BM wrote:
Maybe he has more interest in the interstitium than he does in discussion of applied biogeochemistry or climate change.

Im a BM wrote:
Don't worry, Into the Night. THIS thread also preserves your ORIGINAL assertions when you say "RQAA". UNAMIBUOUS assertions about the nature of the interstitium.

The interstitium IS almost everything that ITN says it is NOT.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
One more attempt to get Jeppe Branner to take some interest in his website.

I will detail for him how there is a new trend where hundreds of viewers who never post anything are selectively looking up old threads. I'll give him some quotes from what scientists said about his website - why they would NEVER post here - after I asked them to take a look at it.

You are describing yourself.

Im a BM wrote:
Once more, I'll beg him to try the moderated sub forum experiment again.

And it will fail for the same reason as last time.

Im a BM wrote:
ITN can contact Branner to explain how I "doxed" myself, and how I should be banned for "spamming".

You don't get banned for doxing yourself.

Im a BM wrote:
So, before I even start the new thread here, I'll work on a draft of that first post that will be a sales pitch to Branner.

Been there. Done that. Didn't work.

Im a BM wrote:
Maybe he has more interest in the interstitium than he does in discussion of applied biogeochemistry or climate change.

There is no such thing as 'biogeochemistry'. Climate cannot change.

Im a BM wrote:
Don't worry, Into the Night. THIS thread also preserves your ORIGINAL assertions when you say "RQAA". UNAMIBUOUS assertions about the nature of the interstitium.

The interstitium IS almost everything that ITN says it is NOT.

No, it isn't. Go learn anatomy.

Im a BM wrote:
Trolling at climate-debate.com was a lot more fun for you before the other trolls all ditched you, wasn't it?

Can't blame 'em. No fresh meat being delivered by Google anymore. No new members just BEGGING to get TRASHED because they believe in climate change.

Were they supposed to stick around because it's so much fun hanging out with YOU?

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:
Trolling at climate-debate.com was a lot more fun for you before the other trolls all ditched you, wasn't it?

Can't blame 'em. No fresh meat being delivered by Google anymore. No new members just BEGGING to get TRASHED because they believe in climate change.

Were they supposed to stick around because it's so much fun hanging out with YOU?

Climate cannot change.

Im a BM wrote:
This can be the new version of the "alligators are amphibians" debate.

Im a BM wrote:
You can insist that "interstitium is saltwater"

Im a BM wrote:
NOT a tissue, you will have to repeat again and again and again. Because everyone but you understands that whether or not they call it an organ, it is DEFINITELY made of connective tissue.

Im a BM wrote:
NO compartments, you will have to defiantly repeat again and again. Because everyone but you understands that whether or not they agree that this large thing is a single, integrated organ, it most certainly DOES have compartments.

Im a BM wrote:
You were pretty specific about many other things... You'll have to keep repeating "No fibers" for example. All those medical book photos show close ups up the fibers, and you'll have to keep insisting that they don't exist. "No collagen" you said in a different post about the interstitium. You'll have to keep repeating that, because all the interstitium literature says it's made mainly of collagen.

Im a BM wrote:
Perhaps you could at least be honest with yourself.

One week ago, you had never once written the word "interstitium" at climate-debate.com, and almost certainly nowhere else either. I strongly suspect that you never even HEARD of it, and mistook it to mean "interstitial".

Im a BM wrote:
And now you've dug yourself into this STUPID position of insisting you know more about the interstitium than medical doctors, Google, textbooks, etc.

Im a BM wrote:
And you WILL troll the thread relentlessly, which makes me think I need to wait at least another week before I start it.

Im a BM wrote:
I can pray for a miracle that Branner FINALLY BANS you.

Im a BM wrote:
THEN I can create a medical wing for my library without incessant trolling by someone who truly disgusts me.