Is there a moral hazard in not using geoengineering to lower the global temperature?
| Is there a moral hazard in not using geoengineering to lower the global temperature?27-06-2016 23:58 | |
| pwndogmaster1☆☆☆☆☆ (1) |
Assuming that nations are unable or unwilling to meet the 2 degrees C climate goal |
| 28-06-2016 02:42 | |
Into the Night ★★★★★(20344) |
pwndogmaster1 wrote: How would they know? It's not possible to measure temperature over the globe, a single country, or even within the confines of a single city. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
Join the debate Is there a moral hazard in not using geoengineering to lower the global temperature?:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| Geoengineering to Neutralize Ocean Acidification | 191 | 11-03-2023 06:03 |
| Low temperature breaks record set over 100 years ago, proving climate change is real | 28 | 01-06-2022 06:03 |
| Gargantuan sluice gate in Gulf Stream to warm Europe, lower nat gas need | 29 | 26-04-2022 18:14 |
| gravity and temperature | 214 | 21-11-2021 09:13 |
| From ice core analysis to temperature curves | 266 | 09-09-2021 01:41 |